What Can Utilities Expect from New Lead Fifth-Liter Sampling Based on Historic First-Draw Data?

The United States Environmental Protection Agency recently released their most sweeping overhaul to the Lead and Copper Rule in three decades. One of the most significant changes is requiring a fifth-liter (L5) sample at homes with lead service lines (LSLs) rather than the original first-liter (L1) sample for a demonstration of compliance with water lead level (WLL) limits. We analyzed sequential sampling data from three large water systems and compliance data from Michigan utilities-which base compliance on the 90th percentile of the greater of L1 and L5 samples-to evaluate whether L5 WLLs better represent water in contact with LSLs and to explore regulatory impacts of including L5 samples in compliance monitoring. The sequential sampling data demonstrated that it is impossible to use a single sample volume within a sequential profile to universally capture the volume of water in an LSL. While L5 is not always a reliable indicator of water in contact with an LSL, Michigan compliance data showed that the L5 sample is more likely to be from an LSL and can identify utilities that benefit from an improved corrosion control treatment. Michigan compliance data indicate that it is likely that L5 sampling will result in more systems having a higher 90th percentile WLL and that a high proportion of the systems likely to exceed regulatory action levels based on L5 samples can be identified through a retrospective analysis of historic L1 data. The impact of the switch to L5 sampling on the effectiveness of corrosion control treatment over time has yet to be determined.

Response and remediation actions following the detection of Naegleria fowleri in two treated drinking water distribution systems, Louisiana, 2013-2014.

Naegleria fowleri causes the usually fatal disease primary amebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), typically in people who have been swimming in warm, untreated freshwater. Recently, some cases in the United States were associated with exposure to treated drinking water. In 2013, a case of PAM was reported for the first time in association with the exposure to water from a US treated drinking water system colonized with culturable N. fowleri. This system and another were found to have multiple areas with undetectable disinfectant residual levels. In response, the water distribution systems were temporarily converted from chloramine disinfection to chlorine to inactivate N. fowleri and reduced biofilm in the distribution systems. Once >1.0 mg/L free chlorine residual was attained in all systems for 60 days, water testing was performed; N. fowleri was not detected in water samples after the chlorine conversion. This investigation highlights the importance of maintaining adequate residual disinfectant levels in drinking water distribution systems. Water distribution system managers should be knowledgeable about the ecology of their systems, understand potential water quality changes when water temperatures increase, and work to eliminate areas in which biofilm growth may be problematic and affect water quality.

A new framework for small drinking water plant sustainability support and decision-making.

Public drinking water system decisions about treatment processes are becoming more challenging, especially as regulations become more stringent and source water quality degrades. For small systems that serve <10,000 people, treatment decisions are particularly difficult due to limited resources and because they do not currently have resources to help them make informed and sustainable decisions using environmental, social, and economic criteria. Therefore, a user-friendly sustainability assessment framework, which compares treatment processes relevant to a wide variety of small drinking water systems, was constructed. In summary, the framework uses life cycle assessment and multiple-criteria decision analysis to comprehensively evaluate twelve decision criteria, developed specific to small drinking water systems; the framework then uses an aggregation approach to identify and navigate multiple trade-offs and make a final recommendation based on stakeholder values. Four hypothetical scenarios were examined to show the framework's applicability to diverse small systems, ability to help stakeholders navigate trade-offs, and engineering relevance. The framework is universal in its capacity to evaluate systems with different design parameters, source waters, treatment criteria, and stakeholder preferences.