Mammoplasty Using Modified Superomedial Pedicle Technique in Severely Macromastia and Ptotic Breasts.

Mammoplasty is a surgery commonly used for macromastia. Many mammoplasty techniques are described, all with their specific pros and cons. However, the concern to avoid serious complications sometimes takes precedence, and the ideal result cannot be. For macromastia and severely ptotic breasts, usually the free nipple-areolar complex (NAC) mammoplasty technique is implemented. The results, however, may only be completely satisfactory regarding cosmetics. Loss of NAC, poor appearance, flabbiness, flattening, and ptosis are among the disadvantages of this technique. This study aimed to present the results of mammoplasty employing the superomedial pedicle technique without interrupting a macromastia central base with a pedicle length of 8 to 18 cm. According to the literature, many plastic surgeons recommend the free NAC rather than the pedicle technique because of the high complication rates in mammoplasties planned for highly ptotic breasts and macromastia. On the other hand, many free NAC techniques and their modifications with pedicle mammoplasty are described. The general conviction is that a standard method, protocol, or technique good for all patients does not exist. Our results are more acceptable both cosmetically and physiologically. Therefore, the superomedial pedicle technique can be modified to achieve ideal results where free NAC mammoplasty is considered for severe macromastia and ptotic patients. This combined method contributes to the viability of NAC by increasing blood supply to breast tissue and providing an ideal breast appearance.

Use of De-Epithalialized Flap for Elevating the Alar Base in Patients With Cleft Lip.

Alar base asymmetry is a common problem in cleft lip patients. Caused by a lack of bone support and soft tissue deficiency, it is one of the problems that must be corrected during cleft lip repair. While it is encountered during primary lip repair, it can also be seen as a secondary cleft lip nasal deformity after repair. This study aimed to provide alar base symmetry with a de-epithelialized muscle-skin flap during the primary cleft lip repair of incomplete cleft lip patients and secondary cleft lip deformity repair. In incomplete cleft lip patients, the tissue under the incomplete part is de-epithelialized and elevated as a superiorly based flap. The flap is rotated and sutured under the alar base for the elevation. In secondary patients, scar tissue to be removed is de-epithelialized and elevated as a superiorly based flap. It is turned over and sutured under the alar base for augmentation. The effect of the surgery is monitored during the follow-up period. There were no complications related to the flap, and no volume loss was observed. Using a de-epithelialized musculocutaneous flap, the augmentation of the alar base and nasal sill can be achieved without additional incisions in patients undergoing primary incomplete cleft lip repair and in patients undergoing secondary cleft lip deformity repair. We think it is an effective and safe method, improving the esthetic outcomes of cleft lip patients.

Hybrid Chin Advancement: Combining Fat and Sliced Cartilage Grafts for Chin Augmentation During Rhinoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Facial balance significantly impacts aesthetics, particularly in the middle and lower thirds. Patients with chin retrusion often benefit from sagittal plane chin advancement in rhinoplasty, enhancing surgical outcomes and satisfaction. OBJECTIVES: This article presents a method for analyzing chin deformities and discusses a hybrid treatment approach to harmonize facial features, complementing rhinoplasty. METHODS: The chin positions of patients treated by the senior author were assessed. A retrospective analysis included 49 patients with chin retrusion of 2.5-6 mm. Among them, 22 patients initially offered chin implants declined, leading to planned chin augmentation. Fat grafting was exclusively performed for 20 patients lacking sufficient cartilage. The "Hybrid Chin Advancement" technique involved supporting tissues beneath muscles with nasal septum cartilage and fat injections and tissues above muscles with fat injection alone. RESULTS: Pre- and postoperative Legan angle measurements and chin advancements were compared across three groups. While preoperative Legan angles were statistically similar, postoperative Legan angles and advancement changes were significantly higher in the implant group (p < 0.0001). Comparing hybrid chin advancement and fat grafting groups, postoperative Legan angles and advancement changes were significantly higher in the hybrid chin group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Fat grafting suffices for mild advancements (~ 2 mm), while the hybrid chin method is effective for moderate advancements (~ 4 mm). For advancements exceeding 6 mm, implants or osseous genioplasty are optimal. Our study's hybrid approach offers an easy, safe, and reliable method for achieving facial harmony in the lower two-thirds without compromising patient expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .