Adjuvant Therapy After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Who Needs It?

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that, on average, patients do not benefit from additional adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer, although subsets of patients might. Therefore, we sought to identify profiles of patients predicted to receive the most survival benefit or greatest detriment from adding adjuvant therapy. BACKGROUND: Although neoadjuvant therapy has become the treatment of choice for locally advanced esophageal cancer, the value of adding adjuvant therapy is unknown. METHODS: From 1970 to 2014, 22,123 patients were treated for esophageal cancer at 33 centers on 6 continents (Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration), of whom 7731 with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma received neoadjuvant therapy; 1348 received additional adjuvant therapy. Random forests for survival and virtual-twin analyses were performed for all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Patients received a small survival benefit from adjuvant therapy (3.2±10 months over the subsequent 10 years for adenocarcinoma, 1.8±11 for squamous cell carcinoma). Consistent benefit occurred in ypT3-4 patients without nodal involvement and those with ypN2-3 disease. The small subset of patients receiving most benefit had high nodal burden, ypT4, and positive margins. Patients with ypT1-2N0 cancers had either no benefit or a detriment in survival. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant therapy has value primarily for patients with more advanced esophageal cancer. Because the benefit is often small, patients considering adjuvant therapy should be counseled on benefits versus morbidity. In addition, given that the overall benefit was meaningful in a small number of patients, emerging modalities such as immunotherapy may hold more promise in the adjuvant setting.

Value of Lymphadenectomy in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect on survival of extent of lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy for patients undergoing multimodality (neoadjuvant) therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction using Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration data. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Previous worldwide data demonstrated that optimum lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy alone for esophageal cancer provides accurate staging and maximum survival. However, for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma, its value is unclear, leading to wide practice variability. METHODS: A total of 3859 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction received neoadjuvant therapy. The endpoint was all-cause mortality, reported as gain or loss of lifetime within 10 years. Lifetime predicted for each regional lymph node resected used quantile survival random forest methodology. RESULTS: Across all post-neoadjuvant ypTNM cancer categories, some degree of lymphadenectomy was associated with longer lifetime, but in a nonlinear fashion. For patients with ypN0 cancers, there was a modest gain in lifetime up to 25 lymph nodes resected and an incremental loss in lifetime as >25 were resected. For patients with ypN+ cancers, there was a robust gain in lifetime up to 30 lymph nodes resected and then an incremental loss in lifetime. CONCLUSIONS: Worldwide data for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction demonstrate that lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy is a valuable component of neoadjuvant therapy. Survival is maximized when an optimum range of nodes is resected.

A cost-benefit analysis of a proposed overseas refugee latent tuberculosis infection screening and treatment program.

BACKGROUND: This study explored the effect of screening and treatment of refugees for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) before entrance to the United States as a strategy for reducing active tuberculosis (TB). The purpose of this study was to estimate the costs and benefits of LTBI screening and treatment in United States bound refugees prior to arrival. METHODS: Costs were included for foreign and domestic LTBI screening and treatment and the domestic treatment of active TB. A decision tree with multiple Markov nodes was developed to determine the total costs and number of active TB cases that occurred in refugee populations that tested 55, 35, and 20 % tuberculin skin test positive under two models: no overseas LTBI screening and overseas LTBI screening and treatment. For this analysis, refugees that tested 55, 35, and 20 % tuberculin skin test positive were divided into high, moderate, and low LTBI prevalence categories to denote their prevalence of LTBI relative to other refugee populations. RESULTS: For a hypothetical 1-year cohort of 100,000 refugees arriving in the United States from regions with high, moderate, and low LTBI prevalence, implementation of overseas screening would be expected to prevent 440, 220, and 57 active TB cases in the United States during the first 20 years after arrival. The cost savings associated with treatment of these averted cases would offset the cost of LTBI screening and treatment for refugees from countries with high (net cost-saving: $4.9 million) and moderate (net cost-saving: $1.6 million) LTBI prevalence. For low LTBI prevalence populations, LTBI screening and treatment exceed expected future TB treatment cost savings (net cost of $780,000). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing LTBI screening and treatment for United States bound refugees from countries with high or moderate LTBI prevalence would potentially save millions of dollars and contribute to United States TB elimination goals. These estimates are conservative since secondary transmission from tuberculosis cases in the United States was not considered in the model.

Durability and Performance of 2298 Trifecta Aortic Valve Prostheses: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Reports of early failure of the Trifecta externally wrapped, bovine pericardial aortic valve prosthesis (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) raise concerns about its durability. This study evaluated the hemodynamic performance and explant of Trifecta valves compared with the PERIMOUNT bovine pericardial prosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). METHODS: From October 2007 to July 2017, 2305 patients received a Trifecta bioprosthesis during aortic valve replacement at Cleveland Clinic. Trends in postoperative valve hemodynamics were assessed from 4971 transthoracic echocardiograms and valve explants by systemic follow-up. To compare outcomes, 2298 patients receiving a Trifecta valve were 1:1 propensity matched from 17,281 patients receiving a PERIMOUNT bioprosthesis. RESULTS: Mean age at implant was 69 years in both matched groups. Compared with PERIMOUNT valves, early transvalvular mean gradient of Trifecta valves was lower (11 vs 15 mm Hg at 1 year, P < .001); however, its longitudinal rate of rise was greater (P < .001), resulting in 5-year mean gradients of 17 vs 16 mm Hg, and more patients experienced severe aortic regurgitation (2.4% vs 0.81%; P < .001). At 5 years, 35 Trifecta valves had been explanted vs 14 PERIMOUNT valves; freedom from explant at 1, 3, and 5 years was 98.9%, 98.0%, and 95.9%, respectively, for the Trifecta group vs 99.3%, 99.0%, and 98.7% for the PERIMOUNT group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with an older-generation internally mounted bovine pericardial valve, the Trifecta externally wrapped bioprosthesis exhibits superior early hemodynamic performance, but has a rapid increase in transvalvular gradient and more aortic regurgitation, with lower freedom from explant at 5 years. These findings raise concern regarding long-term Trifecta durability despite favorable early hemodynamics.

Outcomes in 937 Intermediate-Risk Patients Undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in PARTNER-2A.

BACKGROUND: The Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves 2A (PARTNER-2A) randomized trial compared outcomes of transfemoral transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. The purpose of the present study was to perform an in-depth analysis of outcomes after SAVR in the PARTNER-2A trial. METHODS: From January 2012 to January 2014, 937 patients underwent SAVR at 57 centers. Mean age was 82 ± 6.7 years and 55% were men. Less-invasive operations were performed in 140 patients (15%) and concomitant procedures in 198 patients (21%). Major outcomes and echocardiograms were adjudicated by an independent events committee. Follow-up was 94% complete to 2 years. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 4.1% (n = 38, Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality: 5.2% ± 2.3%), observed to expected ratio (O/E) was 0.8, and in-hospital stroke was 5.4% (n = 51), twice expected. Aortic clamp and bypass times were 75 ± 30 minutes and 104 ± 46 minutes, respectively. Patients having severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (n = 260, 33%) had similar survival to patients without (p > 0.9), as did patients undergoing less-invasive SAVR (p = 0.3). Risk factors for death included cachexia (p = 0.004), tricuspid regurgitation (p = 0.01), coronary artery disease (p = 0.02), preoperative atrial fibrillation (p = 0.001), higher white blood cell count (p < 0.0001), and lower hemoglobin (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: In this adjudicated prospective study, SAVR in intermediate-risk patients had excellent results at 2 years. However, there were more in-hospital strokes than expected, most likely attributable to mandatory neurologic assessment after the procedure. No pronounced structural valve deterioration was found during 2-year follow-up. Continued long-term surveillance remains important.

Oregon indigenous farmworkers: results of promotor intervention on pesticide knowledge and organophosphate metabolite levels.

OBJECTIVES: To examine changes in health beliefs, pesticide safety knowledge, and biomarkers of pesticide exposure in indigenous farmworkers who received enhanced pesticide safety training compared with those receiving the standard training. METHODS: Farmworkers in Oregon were randomly assigned to either a promotors pesticide safety training program or a standard video-based training. Spot urine samples were analyzed for dialkyl phosphate urinary metabolites. Pre-/postintervention questionnaires were used to measure pesticide safety knowledge, health beliefs, and work practices. RESULTS: Baseline to follow-up improvements in total pesticide knowledge scores were higher in the promotor group than in the standard video group. Pairwise differences in mean concentrations of dialkyl phosphate metabolite levels showed declines from baseline to follow-up for both intervention groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results showed reductions in pesticide exposure in indigenous-language speaking farmworkers who received enhanced pesticide safety training.

Pesticide risk perception and biomarkers of exposure in Florida female farmworkers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare workplace characteristics, workplace behaviors, and the health beliefs of female farmworkers of childbearing age with actual biomarkers of exposure to organophosphate pesticides and to the fungicide mancozeb. METHODS: Hispanic and Haitian farmworkers between the ages of 18 and 40 years working in nursery or fernery operations were recruited to participate in a cross-sectional survey, examining demographics, work practices, work-related hygiene, and pesticide exposure beliefs. Single-void (spot) urine samples were analyzed for organophosphate and ethylenethiourea metabolites. RESULTS: Women in nurseries worried less frequently about the effects of pesticides on their health than those in fernery operations. In summary, organophosphate and ethylenethiourea levels in nursery workers were significantly higher than levels in fernery workers and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that perceived pesticide exposure did not correspond to actual metabolite levels within differing agricultural subpopulations.