Impact of stents and flow diverters on hemodynamics in idealized aneurysm models.

Cerebral aneurysms constitute a major medical challenge as treatment options are limited and often associated with high risks. Statistically, up to 3% of patients with a brain aneurysm may suffer from bleeding for each year of life. Eight percent of all strokes are caused by ruptured aneurysms. In order to prevent this rupture, endovascular stenting using so called flow diverters is increasingly being regarded as an alternative to the established coil occlusion method in minimally invasive treatment. Covering the neck of an aneurysm with a flow diverter has the potential to alter the hemodynamics in such a way as to induce thrombosis within the aneurysm sac, stopping its further growth, preventing its rupture and possibly leading to complete resorption. In the present study the influence of different flow diverters is quantified considering idealized patient configurations, with a spherical sidewall aneurysm placed on either a straight or a curved parent vessel. All important hemodynamic parameters (exchange flow rate, velocity, and wall shear stress) are determined in a quantitative and accurate manner using computational fluid dynamics when varying the key geometrical properties of the aneurysm. All simulations are carried out using an incompressible, Newtonian fluid with steady conditions. As a whole, 72 different cases have been considered in this systematic study. In this manner, it becomes possible to compare the efficiency of different stents and flow diverters as a function of wire density and thickness. The results show that the intra-aneurysmal flow velocity, wall shear stress, mean velocity, and vortex topology can be considerably modified thanks to insertion of a suitable implant. Intra-aneurysmal residence time is found to increase rapidly with decreasing stent porosity. Of the three different implants considered in this study, the one with the highest wire density shows the highest increase of intra-aneurysmal residence time for both the straight and the curved parent vessels. The best hemodynamic modifications are always obtained for a small aneurysm diameter.

Hemodynamic differences between Pipeline and coil-adjunctive intracranial stents.

INTRODUCTION: Modern coil-adjunctive intracranial stent designs have increased metal surface coverage to construct putative 'flow diverter lights.' This is rooted in the assumption that flow diversion is linearly correlated with metal surface coverage rather than being a threshold to be reached by device porosity and design. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate this assumption, by performing computational flow analysis on three aneurysm models treated with low metal surface coverage stents (ATLAS and Enterprise), a Pipeline flow diverter, and the LVIS Blue stent. METHODS: Computational flow analysis was performed on virtual deployment models entailing deployment of an ATLAS, Enterprise, LVIS Blue, or Pipeline. The impact of device deployment on velocity vectors at the neck, maximum wall shear stress, inflow rate into the aneurysm, and turnover time was determined. RESULTS: Velocity vector plots demonstrated low magnitude, localized inflow jets for Pipeline only; asymmetric, selectively high inflow jets were seen for LVIS Blue, and broader velocity vector clusters were seen for Atlas and Enterprise. Reduction in wall shear stress as compared with baseline was significant for all devices and greatest for the Pipeline. Mean peak wall shear stress was significantly lower for LVIS Blue in comparison with ATLAS or Enterprise but significantly lower for Pipeline than for LVIS Blue. Reduction of inflow rate into the aneurysm was significant for LVIS Blue and Pipeline but significantly lower for Pipeline than for LVIS Blue. Turnover time was statistically similar for ATLAS, Enterprise, and LVIS Blue, but significantly increased for Pipeline. CONCLUSION: Considerable differences in peak wall shear stress, inflow rates, and turnover time between flow diverters, moderate- and low-porosity stents reinforce the assumption that effective flow diversion represents a threshold in device design, encompassing metal surface coverage only in part.

Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH)-phase II: rupture risk assessment.

PURPOSE: Assessing the rupture probability of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) remains challenging. Therefore, hemodynamic simulations are increasingly applied toward supporting physicians during treatment planning. However, due to several assumptions, the clinical acceptance of these methods remains limited. METHODS: To provide an overview of state-of-the-art blood flow simulation capabilities, the Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH) was conducted. Seventeen research groups from all over the world performed segmentations and hemodynamic simulations to identify the ruptured aneurysm in a patient harboring five IAs. Although simulation setups revealed good similarity, clear differences exist with respect to the analysis of aneurysm shape and blood flow results. Most groups (12/71%) included morphological and hemodynamic parameters in their analysis, with aspect ratio and wall shear stress as the most popular candidates, respectively. RESULTS: The majority of groups (7/41%) selected the largest aneurysm as being the ruptured one. Four (24%) of the participating groups were able to correctly select the ruptured aneurysm, while three groups (18%) ranked the ruptured aneurysm as the second most probable. Successful selections were based on the integration of clinically relevant information such as the aneurysm site, as well as advanced rupture probability models considering multiple parameters. Additionally, flow characteristics such as the quantification of inflow jets and the identification of multiple vortices led to correct predictions. CONCLUSIONS: MATCH compares state-of-the-art image-based blood flow simulation approaches to assess the rupture risk of IAs. Furthermore, this challenge highlights the importance of multivariate analyses by combining clinically relevant metadata with advanced morphological and hemodynamic quantification.

Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH): Phase I: Segmentation.

PURPOSE: Advanced morphology analysis and image-based hemodynamic simulations are increasingly used to assess the rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, the accuracy of those results strongly depends on the quality of the vessel wall segmentation. METHODS: To evaluate state-of-the-art segmentation approaches, the Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge (MATCH) was announced. Participants carried out segmentation in three anonymized 3D DSA datasets (left and right anterior, posterior circulation) of a patient harboring five IAs. Qualitative and quantitative inter-group comparisons were carried out with respect to aneurysm volumes and ostia. Further, over- and undersegmentation were evaluated based on highly resolved 2D images. Finally, clinically relevant morphological parameters were calculated. RESULTS: Based on the contributions of 26 participating groups, the findings reveal that no consensus regarding segmentation software or underlying algorithms exists. Qualitative similarity of the aneurysm representations was obtained. However, inter-group differences occurred regarding the luminal surface quality, number of vessel branches considered, aneurysm volumes (up to 20%) and ostium surface areas (up to 30%). Further, a systematic oversegmentation of the 3D surfaces was observed with a difference of approximately 10% to the highly resolved 2D reference image. Particularly, the neck of the ruptured aneurysm was overrepresented by all groups except for one. Finally, morphology parameters (e.g., undulation and non-sphericity) varied up to 25%. CONCLUSIONS: MATCH provides an overview of segmentation methodologies for IAs and highlights the variability of surface reconstruction. Further, the study emphasizes the need for careful processing of initial segmentation results for a realistic assessment of clinically relevant morphological parameters.

Evaluation of the hemodynamic effectiveness of aortic dissection treatments via virtual stenting.

Aortic dissection treatment varies for each patient and stenting is one of a number of approaches that are utilized to Stabilize the condition. Information regarding the hemodynamic forces in the aorta in dissected and virtually stented cases could support clinicians in their choices of treatment prior to medical intervention. Computational fluid dynamics coupled with lumped parameter models have shown promise in providing detailed information that could be used in the clinic; for this, it is necessary to develop personalized workflows in order to produce patient-specific simulations. In the present study, a case of pre- and post-stenting (virtual stent-graft) of an aortic dissection is investigated with a particular focus on the role of personalized boundary conditions. For each virtual case, velocity, pressure, energy loss, and wall shear stress values are evaluated and compared. The simulated single stent-graft only marginally reduced the pulse pressure and systemic energy loss. The double stent-graft results showed a larger reduction in pulse pressure and a 40% reduction in energy loss as well as a more physiological wall shear stress distribution.Regions of potential risk were highlighted. The methodology applied in the present study revealed detailed information about two possible surgical outcome cases and shows promise as both a diagnostic and an interventional tool.

Experimental validation of numerical simulations on a cerebral aneurysm phantom model.

The treatment of cerebral aneurysms, found in roughly 5% of the population and associated in case of rupture to a high mortality rate, is a major challenge for neurosurgery and neuroradiology due to the complexity of the intervention and to the resulting, high hazard ratio. Improvements are possible but require a better understanding of the associated, unsteady blood flow patterns in complex 3D geometries. It would be very useful to carry out such studies using suitable numerical models, if it is proven that they reproduce accurately enough the real conditions. This validation step is classically based on comparisons with measured data. Since in vivo measurements are extremely difficult and therefore of limited accuracy, complementary model-based investigations considering realistic configurations are essential. In the present study, simulations based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) have been compared with in situ, laser-Doppler velocimetry (LDV) measurements in the phantom model of a cerebral aneurysm. The employed 1:1 model is made from transparent silicone. A liquid mixture composed of water, glycerin, xanthan gum and sodium chloride has been specifically adapted for the present investigation. It shows physical flow properties similar to real blood and leads to a refraction index perfectly matched to that of the silicone model, allowing accurate optical measurements of the flow velocity. For both experiments and simulations, complex pulsatile flow waveforms and flow rates were accounted for. This finally allows a direct, quantitative comparison between measurements and simulations. In this manner, the accuracy of the employed computational model can be checked.