RESUMO
Introduction: Tattooing has a rich historical presence in various human civilizations, with the earliest physical evidence dating back to around 3258 BC. While acceptance of tattoos is increasing in the Western world, negative associations remain. Short-pulsed lasers, such as Q-Switched (QS) or picosecond lasers, are the gold standard for tattoo removal. Case Presentation: This case report discusses the successful removal of 17 amateur tattoos, which were self-administered by a 19-year-old female patient using black eyeliner ink and sewing needles. The tattoos, distributed across her body, including the face and hands, were partially or completely removed over 10 sessions using the QS Neodymium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet 1,064-nm laser. Conclusion: The factors that influence the efficacy of tattoo removal are highlighted, including tattoo type, location, and coexisting fibrosis. The psychological and social importance of effective tattoo removal is emphasized, particularly for young people seeking to disassociate from past experiences or affiliations.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The first-line treatment of the localized form of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) remains surgical excision. Either conventional excision (CE) with margins or Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) may be preferred, depending on the risk factors of cSCC, the characteristics of the tumor, and the available technical facilities. METHODS: This article presents a systematic review of the current literature spanning from 1974 to 2023, comparing outcomes of cSCC treated with MMS versus cSCC treated with conventional excision. RESULTS: Out of the 6821 records identified through the database search, a total of 156 studies were screened, of which 10 were included in the review. The majority of the included studies showed that treatment of cSCC with MMS consistently exhibits a significantly lower risk of recurrence compared to treatment with CE. In addition, MMS is emerging as the preferred technique for the resection of cSCC located in aesthetically or functionally challenging anatomical areas. CONCLUSION: The studies generally demonstrate that MMS is a safer and more effective treatment of cSCC than CE. Nevertheless, outcomes such as recurrence rates and cost-effectiveness should be assessed more precisely, in order to allow for a more tailored approach in determining the appropriate indication for the use of MMS.
RESUMO
The most common type of alopecia in women is female androgenetic alopecia (FAGA), characterized by progressive hair loss in a patterned distribution. Many oral therapies, including spironolactone (an aldosterone antagonist), androgen receptor blockers (e.g., flutamide/bicalutamide), 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (e.g., finasteride/dutasteride), and oral contraceptives, target the mechanism of androgen conversion and binding to its respective receptor and therefore could be administered for the treatment of FAGA. Despite significant advances in the oral treatment of FAGA, its management in patients with a history of gynecological malignancies, the most common cancers in women worldwide, may still be a concern. In this review, we focus on the safety of antiandrogens for the treatment of FAGA patients. For this purpose, a targeted literature review was conducted on PubMed, utilizing the relevant search terms. To sum up, spironolactone seems to be safe for the systemic treatment of FAGA, even in high-risk populations. However, a general uncertainty remains regarding the safety of other medications in patients with a history of gynecologic malignancies, and further studies are needed to evaluate their long-term safety in patients with FAGA and risk factors to establish an optimal risk assessment and treatment selection protocol.
RESUMO
Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare inflammatory skin disorder characterized by hyperkeratotic follicular papules, orange-red scaling plaques with islands of sparing and palmoplantar keratoderma. While spontaneous resolution occurs in some cases, treatment can be challenging for others. The use of biologics in PRP management has gained attention in recent studies, although their high costs and potential side effects present limitations. We present a case of a 71-year-old patient with treatment-resistant PRP who showed significant improvement through optimized adalimumab treatment. Considering the emerging role of phospholipase A2 in PRP pathogenesis, montelukast was added, further enhancing the therapeutic response. By maintaining montelukast and prolonging the adalimumab interval to 3 and 4 weeks, effective dose optimization was achieved without PRP relapse. This case report highlights the potential for adalimumab dose optimization by shortening the initial treatment interval for increased effectiveness and lengthening the interval during the maintenance phase to conserve medication doses. Montelukast appears to assist in sustaining clinical outcomes during interval prolongation, necessitating further investigation through additional studies.