Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 43
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Surg Res ; 303: 22-31, 2024 Sep 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39288516

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between pursuing a research year (RY) and plastic surgery match outcomes is unclear. The present study investigated the association between a dedicated RY and the odds of matching into an integrated Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS) residency program. METHODS: Electronic Residency Application Service applications to an integrated PRS residency program from 2017 to 2021 were evaluated. Match results were determined using online public sources. Students who had taken a RY were compared with those who had not (traditional). The relationship between pursuing a RY and matching was determined with logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: In total, 974 applicants were included, of which 191 (20%) completed an RY. The RY group had significantly higher match rates (83% versus 74%, P = 0.008), more presentations (13 versus 5, P < 0.001), and more publications (11 versus 4, P < 0.001) than the traditional group. The RY group was 80% more likely to match than the traditional group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.8, P = 0.016). However, this benefit was eliminated after controlling for the number of publications. Subgroup analysis revealed that applicants who completed an RY had increased odds of matching into a top 20 PRS residency program (OR = 2.2, P < 0.001), with the strongest association observed among applicants with 15+ (OR = 2.6, P < 0.001) or 20+ publications (OR = 4.1, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An RY is associated with 80% higher odds of matching and an increased number of publications. RYs seem to be most associated with benefits for applicants aiming to increase their publication numbers or to match into a top 20 residency program.

2.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(1): 97-99, 2024 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38117050

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gender-affirming surgery (GAS) has a complicated history within US health care. As GAS procedures and reimbursement availability continue to uptrend, the present study aims to investigate whether compensation is equitable between GAS procedures and general plastic surgery procedures. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all surgeries performed by plastic surgeons from 2016 to 2020. Cases were assigned to the GAS or non-GAS cohort using ICD-10 codes. Duplicate Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were removed for analysis. Operative time, total wRVUs, wRVUs per hour (wRVU/h), reoperation/readmission rate, and number of concurrent procedures were compared between the cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 132,319 non-GAS and 3,583 GAS were identified. After duplicate CPT removal, 299 cases (21 unique CPTs) remained in the GAS cohort and 20,022 (37 unique CPTs) in the non-GAS cohort. Operative time was higher in the GAS cohort (262.9 vs 120.7 min, P < 0.001), as were total wRVUs (59.4 vs 21.6, P < 0.001). Reoperation/readmission rate (7.0% vs 6.0%) and wRVU/h (15.8 vs 15.1) were not significantly different (all P > 0.05). There was a positive correlation between total operative time and total wRVUs (P < 0.001) and a negative correlation between total operative time and wRVU/h (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Proportional wRVUs are allocated to gender affirming plastic procedures. However, the RVU scale does not allocate proportional wRVUs to longer operative times for both GAS and general plastic surgeries. Compensation for gender affirming plastic surgeries is higher than that of general plastic surgeries; however, there is no difference in wRVUs per hour on comparison.


Assuntos
Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Cirurgia de Readequação Sexual , Cirurgiões , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Reoperação , Duração da Cirurgia
3.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(4S Suppl 2): S262-S266, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38556686

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many factors influence a patient's decision to undergo autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction, including medical, social, and financial considerations. This study aims to investigate differences in out-of-pocket and total spending for patients undergoing autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction. METHODS: The IBM MarketScan Commercial Databases were queried to extract all patients who underwent inpatient autologous or implant-based breast reconstruction from 2017 to 2021. Financial variables included gross payments to the provider (facility and/or physician) and out-of-pocket costs (total of coinsurance, deductible, and copayments). Univariate regressions assessed differences between autologous and implant-based reconstruction procedures. Mixed-effects linear regression was used to analyze parametric contributions to total gross and out-of-pocket costs. RESULTS: The sample identified 2079 autologous breast reconstruction and 1475 implant-based breast reconstruction episodes. Median out-of-pocket costs were significantly higher for autologous reconstruction than implant-based reconstruction ($597 vs $250, P < 0.001) as were total payments ($63,667 vs $31,472, P < 0.001). Type of insurance plan and region contributed to variable out-of-pocket costs (P < 0.001). Regression analysis revealed that autologous reconstruction contributes significantly to increasing out-of-pocket costs (B = $597, P = 0.025) and increasing total costs (B = $74,507, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The US national data demonstrate that autologous breast reconstruction has higher out-of-pocket costs and higher gross payments than implant-based reconstruction. More study is needed to determine the extent to which these financial differences affect patient decision-making.


Assuntos
Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias da Mama , Mamoplastia , Humanos , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde , Mamoplastia/métodos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Análise de Regressão , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia
4.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(1): 120-132, 2024 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37856246

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Treatment management for congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) on the face (FCMN) is highly variable and requires a thorough assessment of multiple factors. To date, a systematic review of FCMN treatment is lacking. The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the frequency, variety, and outcomes of treatment modalities for FCMN with different levels of complexity. METHODS: A comprehensive review of Pubmed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases from 1950 to 2022 was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Articles reporting on FCMN treatment approaches, outcomes, and associated complications were screened and data were extracted according to inclusion criteria. Data were tabulated for thematic analysis of FCMN treatment types, anatomic locations, outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: Of the 561 studies retrieved, 34 met inclusion criteria including 19 surgical treatments, 14 nonsurgical treatments, and one combined surgical and nonsurgical treatment study, totaling 356 patients. The majority of treated FCMN were small-to-medium-sized (56%). Facial CMN treated conservatively were mostly located on the cheek (27%) and/or perinasal region (21%), whereas FCMN treated with surgery were primarily located in the periorbital region (44%) and/or the cheek (17%). Across all treatment cohorts, 22% of patients experienced at least one complication, with 12% of complications experienced by patients treated by surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There is a greater need for standardized FCMN nomenclature that encompasses nevi pattern, dimensions, anatomical coverage, and quantitative measurements of treatment outcome. Future studies should focus on identifying anatomic locations of FCMN that are more prone to complications and determine which treatment approach optimizes outcomes.


Assuntos
Nevo Pigmentado , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Nevo Pigmentado/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Bochecha , Bases de Dados Factuais , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/complicações
5.
J Craniofac Surg ; 2024 Apr 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38597600

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Orbital fractures frequently require operative management by a plastic and reconstructive surgeon. Due to the proximity to the globe and complexity of the reconstruction, orbital fractures, and related procedures have the potential to be a source of medical litigation. The aim of the present study was to review orbital fracture malpractice litigation, including case outcomes and compensatory damages. METHODS: The Westlaw and Lexis Nexis databases were queried for jury verdicts and settlements related to orbital fracture malpractice lawsuits. The Boolean terms included "orbit! /10 fracture," "orbit! & fracture," and "ocular & fracture" for both databases. Cases were included if they were state or federal cases related to both orbital fracture and medical malpractice involving surgical or medical mismanagement or misdiagnosis of orbital fracture. RESULTS: A total of 49 cases from 1994 to 2018 met inclusion criteria between the databases. The most common legal complaint was the defendant's failure to make a diagnosis either by not ordering the proper radiological tests or by not interpreting radiological tests correctly, seen in 35% of cases. In 57% of the cases, the defendant was a surgeon, 46% of which involved a plastic surgeon specifically. Cases were resolved in favor of the defendant 49% of the time. Most cases (57%) resulted in a monetary outcome of $0. However, cases that were decided in favor of the plaintiff had significant compensatory damages with the majority being over $100,000, and 1 case as high as $8 million. CONCLUSION: Although almost half of the orbital fracture malpractice cases resulted in an outcome favoring the defendant, significant monetary consequences against the defendant were possible in cases when the plaintiff prevailed.

6.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(5): 1402-1406, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38819145

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have sought to analyze risk factors associated with craniosynostosis and while syndromic craniosynostosis is often linked to genetic mutations, the factors impacting nonsyndromic cases are less investigated. The aim of current meta-analysis is to evaluate the relationship between ethnicity and suture type in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients. METHODS: The search term "craniosynostosis [Title/Abstract] AND (race [Title/Abstract] OR ethnicity [Title/Abstract])) NOT (syndrome [Title/Abstract])" was used to search the PubMed, Cochrane, and MEDLINE databases. Analyses were conducted separately for each racial and ethnic group for each suture type cohort. Odds ratios were conducted for each suture cohort and confounders were adjusted using linear mixed-effect models. Because of the homogeneity of the populations and categorical nature of the classification, binary logistic regression was run on aggregate data. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 165 articles. After reviewing titles, abstracts, and manuscript contents of these articles, 5 studies were ultimately included in a meta-analysis. Studies with missing data for a particular cohort or variable were excluded from the respective analysis. Hispanic children had higher odds of sagittal suture involvement (OR: 1.53, P <0.001), whereas Asian had coronal suture (OR: 2.47, P <0.001). Both Asian and African American children had significantly lower odds of sagittal suture involvement (OR: 0.50, P <0.001 and OR: 0.7, P =0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION: The relationship between ethnicity and craniosynostosis has been suggested as a risk factor, but without definitive conclusion. Present meta-analysis findings demonstrated association between ethnicity and suture type, however further research with larger scale and geographically varied data is warranted.


Assuntos
Suturas Cranianas , Craniossinostoses , Craniossinostoses/cirurgia , Craniossinostoses/etnologia , Humanos , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco
7.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 48(5): 1056-1065, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37486364

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Despite a lack of data demonstrating causation, there is growing concern over breast implants and systemic illness. This study examines the impact of rising public interest in breast implant illness (BII) and its implications on breast implant removals (BIR). METHODS: A Google Trends (GT) analysis of each year between 2010 and 2022 was performed globally, and then separately for the United States alone (US), using the search terms "capsular contracture," "breast implant illness," and "breast implant(s) removal". Linear regression was performed to determine significant correlations. Data on BII-related Facebook advocacy groups, relevant pop culture events, numbers of BIR surgeries, and number of BII-related publications were collected and analyzed alongside GT data to determine relevance. RESULTS: For global GT, there was a significant relationship between "breast implant illness" and "breast implant(s) removal" in 2016 (R2=0.62, ß =0.33, p<0.01), 2020 (R2=0.53, ß =0.23, p=0.01), and 2022 (R2=0.60, ß =0.44, p=0.01). In the US, 2016 (R2=0.53, ß =1.75, p=0.01) 2018 (R2=0.61, ß =1.93, p<0.01) and 2020 (R2=0.72, ß=0.91, p<0.01) were significant. In 2020, "capsular contracture" and "breast implant(s) removal" was significant in the US (R2=0.58, ß=0.4, p=0.01). In 2016, Facebook was the platform for the largest BII advocacy group and in 2020 YouTube was the platform for the first BII documentary and TEDx talk. From 2010 to 2020, PubMed publications containing "ASIA" and "BII" increased 24-fold and ASPS reports on BIR rose 70%. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that BII is a topic of global concern and has implications on both academic medicine and clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Assuntos
Implante Mamário , Implantes de Mama , Contratura , Mamoplastia , Humanos , Implantes de Mama/efeitos adversos , Cultura Popular , Contratura Capsular em Implantes/cirurgia , Implante Mamário/efeitos adversos , Contratura/cirurgia
8.
J Craniofac Surg ; 34(7): 2008-2011, 2023 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37590005

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Healthcare spending in the United States remains a major concern, requiring reforms to control spending and curtail costs. Medical supply is one of the largest expenses for hospitals and strategies should be utilized to reduce nonbeneficial service delivery, which increases cost without concomitant increase in value. Introduction of field sterility is one of the potential strategies that has been applied in several surgical disciplines to improve cost-efficiency by reducing overuse of resources and decreasing enormous medical waste. Of course, this must be applied without a diminution in safety. METHODS: The PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases from 1980 to 2022 were used to review literature. Key words included "cleft surgery and field sterility," "sterile gloves and oral surgery," "oral surgery and field sterility," "sterile techniques and cleft palate surgery," "sterile versus nonsterile gloves," "sterile and non-sterile gloves and minor surgery," "skin laceration repair and sterile techniques," "sterile gloves and wound suture," "surgical site infection and field sterility," "operating room versus clinical setting," "operating rooms economics and hand surgery," and "main operating room versus ambulatory." RESULTS: The literature search yielded 827 articles. Following evaluation of titles, abstracts, and manuscript contents, 23 articles were ultimately included, of which 10 discussed field sterility and cost-efficiency for cutaneous procedures, 9 hand surgery, and 4 oral surgery. There was no study evaluating field sterility application in cleft surgery. In the reviewed studies, no statistical significance was observed in surgical site infection (SSI) with substantial cost savings and medical waste reduction when hand procedures were performed in ambulatory settings with field sterility compared to the main operating room (OR). Furthermore, no difference was observed for SSI in wound closure, excision of skin lesions, or Mohs micrographic surgery when nonsterile gloves were used. CONCLUSION: The incidence of infection following most cleft-related procedures remains low. As such, the application of field sterility may be ideal for this setting. The cost and waste associated with standard operating protocols are not warranted for many cleft procedures.


Assuntos
Infertilidade , Lacerações , Resíduos de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Luvas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Infertilidade/complicações , Esterilização , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos
9.
Aesthet Surg J ; 2023 Nov 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37996070

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gluteal augmentation with autologous fat grafting, colloquially referred to as Brazilian butt lift (BBL), is an increasingly common procedure with a highly reported complication profile. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to analyze the prevalence and characteristics of complications that accompany these surgeries in ambulatory surgery facilities. METHODS: Adults patients who experienced fat grafting complications from 2019-2021 were identified in formerly QUAD A, formerly known as the American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF), database. Patients and complications were analyzed based on sociodemographic, surgery and facility-specific variables using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 436 fat grafting procedures with complications were reported to QUAD A, with an overall complication rate of 0.93%. Of these complications, 153 (37.6%) were confirmed to be from gluteal augmentation procedures. Notably, the number of gluteal augmentation with fat grafting complications decreased from the year 2019 (48) to 2020 (36), then nearly doubled from 2020 to 2021 (69). The majority of patients were female (96.7%) with a mean age of 42.0 years and a mean BMI of 28.3 kg/m2. Wound infection was the most commonly documented complication (22.3%). Of the patients who experienced complications, 35.9% presented to a hospital for their complications and 12.6% required reoperation. Four deaths were described. There was no association between sociodemographic or surgical variables and increased odds of readmission or reoperation (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Gluteal augmentation accounts for a large proportion of complications from fat grafting procedures. Increased reporting requirements may aid in future determination of incidences of complications and improve patient safety.

10.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 187(1): 1-9, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33721147

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Breast cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death in US Hispanic women. When present, lower health literacy levels potentially within this patient population require tailored materials to address health disparities. We aim to evaluate and compare Spanish and English online health care informative resources on preventive mastectomy. METHODS: A Google web search using "preventive mastectomy" and "mastectomía preventiva" was conducted. The first ten institutional/organizational websites in each language were selected. Assessment of mean reading grade level, cultural sensitivity, understandability, and actionability was carried out utilizing validated tools. RESULTS: The mean reading grade level for English materials was 14.69 compared with 11.3 for Spanish, both exceeding the recommended grade level established by the AMA and NIH. The mean cultural sensitivity score for English information was 2.20 compared with 1.88 for Spanish information, both below the acceptability benchmark of 2.5. English webpages scored 65% and 35% for understandability and actionability, respectively, while Spanish webpages scored 47% and 18%. CONCLUSIONS: Online English and Spanish preventive mastectomy materials were written at an elevated reading level and lacked cultural sensitivity. Spanish language information demonstrated inferior understandability, actionability, and cultural sensitivity. Addressing these issues provides an opportunity to help resolve health literature disparities regarding preventive mastectomy for US Hispanic women.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Letramento em Saúde , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Compreensão , Feminino , Humanos , Internet , Idioma , Mastectomia
17.
J Craniofac Surg ; 26(1): 135-40, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25569392

RESUMO

The relative rarity of skull base tumors has limited surgeons' ability to report on morbidity and mortality in a large and nationwide patient series. We aimed to assess the impact of reconstructive procedures on patients undergoing skull base surgery and to determine whether 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality varied between patients who underwent reconstruction and those who did not. We performed a retrospective analysis using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005 to 2012 databases. Chi-squared tests were used for categorical variables and t-tests were used for continuous variables. Multiple logistic regression analysis predicted the influence of preoperative and operative variables on complications. A total of 479 patients were included in our study; 199 patients received concurrent reconstruction. There was no statistically significant difference in wound complication, morbidity, length of total hospital stay, and mortality between the 2 groups. The reconstruction cohort showed significantly longer operative times (416.45 [207.585] versus 319.99 [222.813] min, P = 0.001) and higher return to the operating room rate (13.6% versus 6.1%, P = 0.005). Reconstruction using pedicled flaps was associated with increased odds of wound complications (odds ratio, 4.937; P = 0.023), and microsurgical reconstruction was associated with return to the operating room (odds ratio, 2.212; P = 0.015). According to logistic regression, dyspnea, diabetes mellitus, functional status, and tumor involving the central nervous system were associated with complications. This study is the first comprehensive analysis of reconstruction after skull base surgery. Additional measures involved in flap reconstruction are associated with an increase in operation time and return to the operating room rate but not with complications, morbidity, or mortality.


Assuntos
Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Base do Crânio/cirurgia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Microcirurgia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Radiocirurgia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Base do Crânio/cirurgia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Taxa de Sobrevida
18.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 91: 284-292, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432086

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is commonly used in plastic and reconstructive surgery. With the abundance of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting P-values for ADM outcomes, this study used the fragility index (FI), reverse fragility index (rFI), and fragility quotient (FQ) to evaluate the statistical stability of the outcomes in ADM RCTs. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, Medline, and Cochrane databases were reviewed for ADM RCTs (2003-present) reporting a dichotomous, categorical outcome. FI and rFI (event reversals influencing outcome significance) and FQ (standardized fragility) were calculated and reported as median. Subgroup analysis was performed based on intervention types. RESULTS: Among the 127 studies screened, 56 RCTs with 579 outcomes were included. The median FI stood at 4 (3-5) and FQ was 0.04 (0.03-0.07). Only 101 outcomes were statistically significant with a median FI of 3 (1-6) and FQ of 0.04 (0.02-0.08). The nonsignificant outcomes had a median FI of 4 (3-5) and FQ of 0.04 (0.03-0.07). Notably, 26% of the outcomes had several patients lost to follow up equal to or surpassing the FI. Based on the intervention type, the median FIs showed minor fluctuations but remained low. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes from ADM-related RCTs were statistically fragile. Slight outcome reversals or maintenance of patient follow-up can alter the significance of results. Therefore, future researchers are recommended to jointly report FI, FQ, and P-values to offer a comprehensive view of the robustness in ADM literature.


Assuntos
Derme Acelular , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Humanos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos
19.
Plast Aesthet Nurs (Phila) ; 44(1): 59-69, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38166309

RESUMO

There is uncertainty whether postoperative application of paper tape (PT) improves scar aesthetics and reduces wound closure complications. This study aimed to review and assess the quality of applicable findings from studies investigating PT's efficacy. We queried PubMed and SCOPUS using the search terms "(("paper tape") AND (wound OR closure OR heal* OR complication OR skin OR prevent* OR scar*))." We excluded articles that were duplicates, basic science, or not clinically relevant. We assessed the level of evidence for each article using the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) Rating Levels of Evidence and Grading Recommendations for Therapeutic Studies, ranging from I (highest) to V (lowest). Of 186 publications reviewed, we included eight studies in the literature review. Five of these studies reported statistically significant positive outcomes on scar aesthetics and wound closure associated with using PT. Using the ASPS rating system, we found that two studies were Level I, three studies were Level II, two studies were Level IV, and one study was Level V. Notably, heterogeneity in the study designs limited outcome comparison. The data from the studies included in this literature review support using PT to optimize scar and wound management. The lack of higher levels of evidence, however, suggests the need for additional randomized controlled trials to rigorously evaluate patient outcomes when using PT compared with other forms of adhesive dressings.


Assuntos
Cicatriz , Cicatrização , Humanos , Cicatriz/prevenção & controle , Bandagens , Adesivos , Estética
20.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 93: 190-192, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703709

RESUMO

The present study sought to analyze malpractice cases related to gender affirming surgery to provide information to physicians as it may serve to minimize the risk of malpractice suits. The Westlaw and Lexis Nexis databases were queried for jury verdicts and settlements related to gender affirming surgery malpractice lawsuits. A total of 26 cases were identified between 1970 and 2020, five of which were determined relevant on further review. Motives included adverse surgical and medical outcomes, and failure to treat. All cases were decided in favor of the defendant and resulted in $0 compensatory damages.


Assuntos
Imperícia , Cirurgia de Readequação Sexual , Humanos , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Cirurgia de Readequação Sexual/legislação & jurisprudência , Masculino , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA