Favorable outcomes of acute leukemias of ambiguous lineage treated with hyperCVAD: a multi-center retrospective study.

Acute leukemias of ambiguous lineage (ALAL) are rare hematologic malignancies with poor outcomes. Retrospective studies have suggested that acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) regimens are more effective than acute myeloid leukemia (AML) regimens. We retrospectively examined the effectiveness of the widely-used adult ALL regimen hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (hyperCVAD) as initial therapy in patients with ALAL at five academic institutions. Twenty-five patients were identified, including 23 with mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) and two with acute undifferentiated leukemia. Five of 8 tested (63%) had FLT3-ITD and 3 of 25 (12%) were Philadelphia chromosome-positive. The complete remission (CR) rate was 76%, with CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) in an additional 8%, for an overall response rate of 84%. Median number of cycles to CR/CRi was 1. There were no deaths in the first 30 days. Of the 21 patients achieving CR or CRi, 14 (66%) proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. With a median follow-up time of 31.6 months, median overall survival for the entire cohort was not reached, and the estimated 2-year survival was 63%. HyperCVAD can be considered an effective and tolerable front-line regimen for patients with ALAL, and warrants further prospective study.

Reliability, validity, and minimal detectable change of the push-off test scores in assessing upper extremity weight-bearing ability.

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical measurement study. INTRODUCTION: The push-off test (POT) was recently conceived and found to be reliable and valid for assessing weight bearing through injured wrist or elbow. However, further research with larger sample can lend credence to the preliminary findings supporting the use of the POT. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This study examined the interrater reliability, construct validity, and measurement error for the POT in patients with wrist conditions. METHODS: Participants with musculoskeletal (MSK) wrist conditions were recruited. The performance on the POT, grip isometric strength of wrist extensors was assessed. The shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and numeric pain rating scale were completed. The intraclass correlation coefficient assessed interrater reliability of the POT. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) examined the concurrent relationships between the POT and other measures. The standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change at 90% confidence interval were assessed as measurement error and index of true change for the POT. RESULTS: A total of 50 participants with different elbow or wrist conditions (age: 48.1 ± 16.6 years) were included in this study. The results of this study strongly supported the interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.96 and 0.93 for the affected and unaffected sides, respectively) of the POT in patients with wrist MSK conditions. The POT showed convergent relationships with the grip strength on the injured side (r = 0.89) and the wrist extensor strength (r = 0.7). The POT showed smaller standard error of measurement (1.9 kg). The minimal detectable change at 90% confidence interval for the POT was 4.4 kg for the sample. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides additional evidence to support the reliability and validity of the POT. This is the first study that provides the values for the measurement error and true change on the POT scores in patients with wrist MSK conditions. Further research should examine the responsiveness and discriminant validity of the POT in patients with wrist conditions.

Phase 1 study of belinostat and adavosertib in patients with relapsed or refractory myeloid malignancies.

PURPOSE: Belinostat is an intravenous histone deacetylase inhibitor with approval for T-cell lymphomas. Adavosertib is a first in class oral Wee1 inhibitor. Preclinical studies of the combination demonstrated synergy in various human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) lines as well as AML xenograft mouse models. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This was a phase 1 dose-escalation study of belinostat and adavosertib in patients with relapsed/refractory AML and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Patients received both drugs on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 21-day cycle. Safety and toxicity were monitored throughout the study. Plasma levels of both drugs were measured for pharmacokinetic analysis. Response was determined by standard criteria including bone marrow biopsy. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled and treated at 4 dose levels. A grade 4 cytokine release syndrome at dose level 4 (adavosertib 225 mg/day; belinostat 1000 mg/m2) qualified as a dose-limiting toxicity event. The most common non-hematologic treatment-related adverse events were nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dysgeusia, and fatigue. No responses were seen. The study was terminated prior to maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase 2 dose determination. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of belinostat and adavosertib at the tested dose levels was feasible but without efficacy signals in the relapsed/refractory MDS/AML population.

Identification of a Cryptic t(8;20;21)(q22;p13;q22) Resulting in RUNX1T1/RUNX1 Fusion in a Patient with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

The detection of recurrent genetic abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), including RUNX1T1/RUNX1 gene fusion, is critical for optimal medical management. Herein, we report a 45 year old woman with newly diagnosed AML and conventional chromosome studies that revealed an apparently balanced t(8;20)(q22;p13) in all 20 metaphases analyzed. A RUNX1T1/RUNX1 dual-color dual-fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probe set was subsequently performed and revealed a RUNX1T1/RUNX1 gene fusion. Metaphase FISH studies performed on abnormal metaphases revealed a cryptic, complex translocation resulting in RUNX1T1/RUNX1 fusion, t(8;20;21)(q22;p13;q22). This case study shows the importance of performing FISH studies or other high-resolution genetic testing concurrently with conventional chromosome studies for the detection of cryptic recurrent gene fusions in AML, particularly a focused genetic evaluation such as RUNX1T1/RUNX1 gene fusion, when specific abnormalities involving 8q22 are identified.

Remote Home Monitoring of Patients With Cancer During the COVID Pandemic: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant challenges in the care of patients with cancer, including how to manage outpatients who are COVID-positive but do not require hospitalization. We explored the use of a remote patient monitoring (RPM) program to care for such outpatients. METHODS: Consecutive patients who were tested for COVID-19 because of symptom onset but were clinically stable were offered enrollment into a pilot RPM program. Patients were provided equipment for vital sign measurements and a computer tablet to enter results three times per day. The results were monitored centrally by clinical staff. The goal was to closely monitor patients and escalate care as warranted. RESULTS: Between March and June of 2020, 29 patients were approached and 26 were enrolled. The mean age was 57 years old (range, 30-88), 14 were women, and patients remained in the program for an average of 16 days (range, 2-63). Twenty-four patients (83%) were on active anticancer therapy. During that time period, only one patient was admitted to the hospital for worsening respiratory symptoms. The percentage of days during which at least one set of data and all three sets of data were entered was 97.2% and 65.7%, respectively. There was no association between the demographic factors of age, sex, or the reason for being monitored with the level of engagement (P > .05). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, patients with cancer were readily enrolled in a remote home monitoring program. Monitoring was feasible, and there was a high rate of engagement with the program. The role of RPM should be further tested as the COVID pandemic continues.

Phase 1 study of belinostat (PXD-101) and bortezomib (Velcade, PS-341) in patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

We report the results of a phase 1 dose-escalation study of belinostat and bortezomib in adult patients with acute leukemia or MDS or CML with blast crisis. Thirty-eight patients received IV belinostat days 1-5 and 8-12 with IV bortezomib days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 21 days. QTc prolongation was the only identified DLT. The RP2Ds were 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib and 1000 mg/m2 belinostat. One patient with highly refractory MLL-ENL rearranged biphenotypic AML with multiple karyotypic aberrations had a complete pathologic and karyotypic response. One patient with post-MPN AML remained on study with stable disease (SD) for 32 cycles. Whole-exome sequencing revealed no aberrations in the first patient and a hyper-mutator genotype in the second. Eighteen patients had a best response of SD. We conclude that this treatment strategy is feasible but has limited activity in this population. Nevertheless, the factors that predict exceptional responses to this strategy warrant further investigation.

Phase I trial of dimethyl fumarate, temozolomide, and radiation therapy in glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF), an oral agent approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), has promising preclinical activity against glioblastoma (GBM). This phase I study sought to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of DMF and evaluate its safety and toxicity when combined with standard concurrent radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) followed by maintenance TMZ in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. METHODS: Using a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design with 3 dose levels, patients received daily DMF with 60 Gy RT and concurrent TMZ 75 mg/m2 daily, followed by maintenance DMF (continuously) and TMZ 150-200 mg/m2 on days 1-5 of each 28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined by evaluation of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first 6 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated at the 3 dose levels, and no DLTs were observed. There were no unexpected toxicities. The most common grade 3/4 treatment related adverse events (AEs) were lymphopenia (58%), decreased CD4 count (17%), and thrombocytopenia (17%). Four patients completed all planned treatment; seven patients had progression on treatment. One patient chose to withdraw from the study during maintenance. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 8.7 months with no difference in PFS between those with stable disease or a partial response; median overall survival was 13.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: DMF may be safely combined with RT and TMZ in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. The RP2D for DMF is 240 mg three times daily.

MDM2 antagonists as a novel treatment option for acute myeloid leukemia: perspectives on the therapeutic potential of idasanutlin (RG7388).

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clonal heterogenous malignancy of the myeloid cells with a poor prognosis lending itself to novel treatment strategies. TP53 is a critical tumor suppressor and plays an essential role in leukemogenesis. Although TP53 is relatively unusual in de novo AML, inactivation of wild-type p53 (WT-p53) is a common event. Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) is a key negative regulator of p53 and its expression; inhibition of MDM2 is postulated to reactivate WT-p53 and its tumor suppressor functions. Nutlins were the first small molecule inhibitors that bind to MDM2 and target its interaction with p53. RG7388 (idasanutlin), a second-generation nutlin, was developed to improve upon the potency and toxicity profile of earlier nutlins. Preliminary data from early phase trials and ongoing studies suggest clinical response with RG7388 (idasanutlin) both in monotherapy and combination strategies in AML. We herein briefly discuss currently approved therapies in AML and review the clinical data for RG7388 (idasanutlin) and MDM2 inhibition as novel treatment strategies in AML. We further describe efficacy and toxicity profile data from completed and ongoing trials of RG7388 (idasanutlin) and other MDM2-p53 inhibitors in development. Many targeted therapies have been approved recently in AML, with a focus on the older and unfit population for intensive induction therapy and in relapsed/refractory disease. The "nutlins", including RG7388 (idasanutlin), merit continued investigation in such settings.

Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms in lymphoma survivors: Reducing risks.

Treatment for Hodgkin (HL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) has changed dramatically in the last fifty years. While there are increasing numbers of long-term survivors, there has been increasing recognition of the long-term toxicities of treatments, particularly therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia (t-MDS/AML). The survival for t-MDS/AML is extremely poor. Multiple heterogeneous retrospective studies have reported risk factors for the development of t-MDS/AML. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy have been most closely examined as possible t-MDS/AML risk factors. In this paper, we will review the risks of t-MDS/AML for HL and NHL patients as reported in the literature and assess for any changes over time. In HL patients, the incidence of t-MDS/AML has decreased with a reduction in alkylating agents. In indolent NHL patients, we anticipate decreased incidence of t-MDS/AML as targeted therapies begin to replace cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Phase I Study of Sorafenib and Vorinostat in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Preclinical data suggest histone deacetylase inhibitors improve the therapeutic index of sorafenib. A phase I study was initiated to establish the recommended phase 2 dose of sorafenib combined with vorinostat in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients received vorinostat (200 to 400 mg by mouth once daily, 5 of 7 d) and sorafenib at standard or reduced doses (400 mg [cohort A] or 200 mg [cohort B] by mouth twice daily). Patients who received 14 days of vorinostat in cycle 1 were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). RESULTS: Sixteen patients were treated. Thirteen patients were evaluable for response. Three patients experienced DLTs, 2 in cohort A (grade [gr] 3 hypokalemia; gr 3 maculopapular rash) and 1 in cohort B (gr 3 hepatic failure; gr 3 hypophosphatemia; gr 4 thrombocytopenia). Eleven patients required dose reductions or omissions for non-DLTtoxicity. Ten patients (77%) had stable disease (SD). The median treatment duration was 4.7 months for response-evaluable patients. One patient with SD was on treatment for 29.9 months, and another patient, also with SD, was on treatment for 18.7 months. Another patient electively stopped therapy after 15 months and remains without evidence of progression 3 years later. CONCLUSIONS: Although some patients had durable disease control, the addition of vorinostat to sorafenib led to toxicities in most patients, requiring dose modifications that prevented determination of the recommended phase 2 dose. The combination is not recommended for further exploration with this vorinostat schedule in this patient population.

Cutaneous plasmablastic lymphoma.

Plasmablastic lymphoma is a variant of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma occurring in immunocompromised individuals. Multiple organ sites may be involved; however, cutaneous involvement has been rarely reported in the medical literature. To date, there have been only 7 reports of cutaneous plasmablastic lymphoma without systemic involvement. We report a case of isolated cutaneous plasmablastic lymphoma occurring in an HIV-positive man with more than 10 years of follow-up.

A Phase II Trial of Bortezomib and Vorinostat in Mantle Cell Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib has demonstrated marked preclinical activity when combined with the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in leukemia, multiple myeloma, and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cells. The present study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present multicenter, nonrandomized phase II trial used a Simon 2-stage design with 3 cohorts: cohort A, MCL with no previous bortezomib (including untreated MCL); cohort B, MCL with previous bortezomib; and cohort C, relapsed or refractory DLBCL with no previous bortezomib. Vorinostat (400 mg) was administered orally on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12 before bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2), which was administered intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each 21-day cycle. RESULTS: For the 65 treated patients (22 in cohort A, 4 in cohort B, and 39 in cohort C), the overall response rate was 31.8%, 0%, and 7.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 7.6 months for cohort A and 1.8 months for cohort C. In cohort A, 7 patients had a partial response (PRs), 5 had stable disease (SD), 7 had progressive disease (PD), 1 was not assessed, and 2 were not evaluable. In cohort B, 2 had SD and 2 had PD. In cohort C, 3 had a PR, 8 had SD, 23 had PD, and 5 were not assessed. Baseline NF-κB activation, measured as nuclear RelA by immunohistochemistry, did not correlate with clinical response. CONCLUSION: The combination of bortezomib and vorinostat is safe and has modest activity in MCL and limited activity in DLBCL.

Update on rational targeted therapy in AML.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a challenge to both patients and clinicians. Despite improvements in our understanding of the disease, treatment has changed minimally and outcomes remain poor for the majority of patients. Within the last decade, there have been an increasing number of potential targets and pathways identified for development in AML. The classes of agents described in this review include but are not limited to epigenetic modifiers such as IDH inhibitors, BET inhibitors, and HDAC inhibitors as well as cell cycle and signaling inhibitors such as Aurora kinase inhibitors and CDK inhibitors. While the developments are encouraging, it is unlikely that targeting a single pathway will result in long-term disease control. Accordingly, we will also highlight potential rational partners for the novel agents described herein.

Phase I study of pemetrexed with sorafenib in advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine if combination treatment with pemetrexed and sorafenib is safe and tolerable in patients with advanced solid tumors. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled and 36 patients were treated (24 in cohort A; 12 in cohort B). The cohort A dose schedule resulted in problematic cumulative toxicity, while the cohort B dose schedule was found to be more tolerable. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was pemetrexed 750 mg/m2 every 14 days with oral sorafenib 400 mg given twice daily on days 1-5. Because dosing delays and modifications were associated with the MTD, the recommended phase II dose was declared to be pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 14 days with oral sorafenib 400 mg given twice daily on days 1-5. Thirty-three patients were evaluated for antitumor activity. One complete response and 4 partial responses were observed (15% overall response rate). Stable disease was seen in 15 patients (45%). Four patients had a continued response at 6 months, including 2 of 5 patients with triple-negative breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A phase I trial employing a standard 3 + 3 design was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cohort A involved a novel dose escalation schema exploring doses of pemetrexed every 14 days with continuous sorafenib. Cohort B involved a modified schedule of sorafenib dosing on days 1-5 of each 14-day pemetrexed cycle. Radiographic assessments were conducted every 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed and intermittent sorafenib therapy is a safe and tolerable combination for patients, with promising activity seen in patients with breast cancer.

Low NK cell counts in peripheral blood are associated with inferior overall survival in patients with follicular lymphoma.

Host immune responses influence follicular lymphoma (FL) outcomes. To test our hypothesis that immune cells in blood reflect that response, we assessed by peripheral blood flow cytometry in 75 untreated FL patients the absolute counts of: lymphocytes (ALC), CD4(+)T (ACD4C), CD8(+)T (ACD8C) and natural killer (ANKC) cells. Low ANKC was the only parameter associated with inferior overall survival by univariate analysis (p=0.02), and trended to significance in multivariable analysis with ACD4C (p=0.08). Five (24%) patients with low initial ANKC died, while one (2%) with normal/high ANKC has died. In conclusion, evaluation of blood ANKC may be a useful indicator of outcome in previously untreated FL patients.

Ischemic stroke in the setting of chronic immune thrombocytopenia in an elderly patient--a therapeutic dilemma.

Chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) carries a poor prognosis in the elderly patients. Increasing evidence proposes that a subgroup of patients with chronic ITP may be more susceptible to ischemic stroke. An 84-year-old Caucasian man with multiple ischemic stroke risk factors presented with acute onset of slurred speech, confusion, and unsteady gait. Physical examination and neurologic imaging were consistent with a new left thalamic infarct. Platelet counts ranged between 40 000 × 10(9)/L and 65 000 × 10(9) /L. Antiplatelet therapy for his newly acquired stroke was not initiated considering his low platelet counts and for mildly symptomatic thrombocytopenia, and the patient was discharged home. Both hematologic and neurologic guidelines for the management of chronic ITP and stroke have contradictory goals. Although anticoagulation is mandated in acute stroke, ITP causes low platelet counts that increase bleeding complications.

Lung cancer outcomes in women.

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in men and women. Since the 1970s, there has been evidence for improved survival of women with lung cancer compared to men. Multiple analyses have demonstrated a survival advantage in women regardless of stage, histology, or treatment. The etiology for the improved prognosis is not yet fully elucidated, but is likely related to underlying biologic differences, including hormonal interactions. More recently, gender differences in response to newer agents such as epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and anti-angiogenesis agents have been identified. Further exploration of tumor molecular, biologic, hormonal, and pharmacogenomic interactions may provide additional insight into the observed survival benefit for women and, ultimately, permit exploitation of these differences in our treatment selection for both women and men.

Cutaneous precursor B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma in 2 adult patients: clinicopathologic and molecular cytogenetic studies with a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Precursor B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (B-LBL) is an uncommon high-grade neoplasm of immature B cells. In contrast to the more common lymphoblastic lymphoma of T-cell lineage, B-LBL can be an extranodal disease, with a propensity to involve skin and bone. Most reported cases of B-LBL in the skin, a rarity in adults, are manifestations of existing systemic disease. OBSERVATIONS: We report 2 unusual cases of primary cutaneous B-LBL in adults. Fluorescence in situ hybridization studies, not previously reported in primary cutaneous B-LBL to our knowledge, demonstrated rearrangement of the MLL gene in one patient and possible hyperdiploidy in the other, both reported in precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. CONCLUSIONS: Review of the literature identified 13 reported cases of B-LBL occurring primarily in the skin, in addition to our 2 cases. Precursor B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma is more common in children and in young adults, with a tropism for the head and neck region. Histologically, B-LBL must be differentiated from other high-grade lymphoid tumors and small "blue round cell" tumors. Because of the common absence of mature B-cell markers in immunohistochemical studies and the frequent expression of CD99, B-LBL may present a diagnostic challenge. Although there is a suggestion in a limited number of patients that abbreviated therapy may provide long-term disease control, the risk of relapse remains significant, particularly if a patient's condition is misdiagnosed and the patient is treated as having mature B-cell lymphoma. In the absence of prospective studies for this population, patients with B-LBL are treated currently with intensive acute lymphoblastic leukemia regimens.

Mixed chimerism and graft failure following conditioning with the fludarabine and cyclophosphamide nonablative regimen; conversion to full donor chimerism.

Twenty-one patients with hematologic malignancies were treated with the fludarabine (120-125 mg/m(2)) and cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen. Graft versus host disease (GVHD) and graft rejection prophylaxis was with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Thirteen of the 21 patients (62%) had mixed chimerism (< or = 90% donor cells) at day 60 and 11 (52%) of these patients had mixed chimerism which persisted until day 100. Immunosuppression was discontinued in 12 of 13 patients and two of them converted to full chimerism by day 100. Eight patients received a donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and five of them converted to full donor chimerism with DLI alone. Two patients were given GM-CSF in addition to a DLI with conversion to full donor chimerism. Three patients (14%) had graft failure requiring a second transplant using fludarabine (125 mg/m(2)) and melphalan (140 mg/m(2)). With a median followup of 2.8 years, 15 patients are alive - one with disease and 14 with no disease. Two patients died of acute GVHD, one of chronic GVHD, and three due to progressive disease. We conclude that the nonmyeloablative fludarabine/cyclophosphamide regimen results in a significant incidence of mixed chimerism and graft rejection but is well tolerated. We suggest a more intense regimen, such as fludarabine and melphalan, be used in patients with a high risk of early disease progression to establish early engraftment and graft versus tumor effect.