Long-term Outcomes Following Colectomy and Liver Transplantation for Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term outcomes of patients with combined primary sclerosing cholangitis/inflammatory bowel disease (PSC-IBD) undergoing both liver transplantation (LT) and total abdominal colectomy (TAC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The fraction of patients with PSC-IBD that require both LT and TAC is small, thereby limiting significant conclusions regarding long-term outcomes. METHODS: Adult and pediatric patients from nine centers from the US IBD Surgery Collaborative who underwent staged LT and TAC for PSC-IBD were included. Long-term outcomes, including survival, were assessed. RESULTS: Among 127 patients, 66 underwent TAC-before-LT, with a median time from TAC to LT of 7.9 yrs, while 61 underwent LT-before-TAC, with a median time from LT to TAC of 4.4 years. Median patient survival post TAC was significantly worse in those undergoing LT-before-TAC (16.0 yrs vs. 42.6 yrs, P=0.007), while post LT survival was not impacted by the order of TAC and LT (21.6 yrs vs. 22.0 yrs, P=0.81). Patients undergoing TAC for medically refractory disease had a higher incidence of recurrent PSC (rPSC) (P=0.02) and biliary complications (0.09) compared to those undergoing TAC for oncologic indications. Definitive TAC reconstruction with either end ileostomy or ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) did not impact post-LT or post-TAC outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Long term survival in PSC-IBD was contingent upon progression to LT and was not impacted by the need for TAC. PSC-IBD patients undergoing TAC for medically refractory disease had a higher incidence of rPSC and biliary complications. The use of IPAA in PSC-IBD was a viable alternative to end ileostomy.

Objective Performance Indicators During Robotic Right Colectomy Differ According to Surgeon Skill.

INTRODUCTION: Surgeon assessment tools are subjective and nonscalable. Objective performance indicators (OPIs), machine learning-enabled metrics recorded during robotic surgery, offer objective insights into surgeon movements and robotic arm kinematics. In this study, we identified OPIs that significantly differed across expert (EX), intermediate (IM), and novice (NV) surgeons during robotic right colectomy. METHODS: Endoscopic videos were annotated to delineate 461 surgical steps across 25 robotic right colectomies. OPIs were compared among two EX, two IM, and eight NV surgeons during mesenteric dissection, vascular pedicle ligation, right colon and hepatic flexure mobilization, and preparation of the proximal and distal bowel for transection. RESULTS: Compared to NV's, EX's exhibited greater velocity, acceleration and jerk for camera, dominant, nondominant, and third arms across all steps. Compared to NV's, IM's exhibited more arm swaps and master clutch use, higher camera-related metrics (movement, path length, moving time, velocity, acceleration, and jerk), greater dominant wrist pitch and nondominant wrist articulations (roll, pitch, and yaw), longer dominant and nondominant arm path length, and higher velocity, acceleration and jerk for dominant, nondominant, and third arms across all steps. Compared to NV's, EX/IM surgeons utilized more arm swaps, higher camera-related metrics (movement, path length, velocity, acceleration, and jerk), longer nondominant arm path length, and greater velocity, acceleration and jerk for dominant, nondominant, and third arms across all steps. CONCLUSIONS: We report OPIs that discriminate EX, IM, and NV surgeons during RRC. This study is the first to demonstrate feasibility of using OPIs as an objective, scalable way to classify surgeon skill during RRC steps.

Social Determinants of Health and Impact in Perioperative Space.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines the social determinants of health (SDOH) as "the conditions in the environments where people are born, live, learn, work, play, worship, and age that affect a range of health, functioning, and quality-of-life outcomes and risks," which includes economic stability, access to quality health care, and physical environment. There is increasing evidence that SDOH have an impact in shaping a patient's access and recovery from surgery. This review evaluates the role surgeons play in reducing these disparities.

The SAGES MASTERS program presents: the 10 seminal articles for the Laparoscopic Right Colectomy Pathway.

BACKGROUND: As one of the 12 clinical pathways of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Masters Program, the Colorectal Pathway intends to deliver didactic content organized along 3 levels of performance (competency, proficiency and mastery) each represented by an anchoring procedure (laparoscopic right colectomy, laparoscopic left/sigmoid colectomy, and intracorporeal anastomosis during minimally invasive (MIS) ileocecal or right colon resection). In this article, the SAGES Colorectal Task Force presents focused summaries of the top 10 seminal articles selected for laparoscopic right colectomy which surgeons should be familiar with. METHODS: Using a systematic literature search of Web of Science, the most cited articles on laparoscopic right colectomy were identified, reviewed, and ranked by the SAGES Colorectal Task Force and invited subject experts. Additional articles not identified in the literature search were included if deemed impactful by expert consensus. The top 10 ranked articles were then summarized, with emphasis on relevance and impact in the field, findings, strengths and limitations, and conclusions. RESULTS: The top 10 seminal articles selected for the laparoscopic right colectomy anchoring procedure include articles on surgical techniques for benign and malignant disease, with anatomical and video illustrations, comparative outcomes of laparoscopic vs open colectomy, variations in technique with impact on clinical outcomes, and assessment of the learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: The top 10 seminal articles selected for laparoscopic right colectomy illustrate the diversity both in content and format of the educational curriculum of the SAGES Masters Program to support practicing surgeon progression to mastery within the Colorectal Pathway.

Critical Care Management of the Patient with Clostridioides difficile.

OBJECTIVES: To review published clinical evidence on management of Clostridioides difficile infection in critically ill patients. DATA SOURCES: We obtained relevant studies from a PubMed literature review and bibliographies of reviewed articles. STUDY SELECTION: We selected English-language studies addressing aspects of C. difficile infection relevant to critical care clinicians including epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, with a focus on high-quality clinical evidence. DATA EXTRACTION: We reviewed potentially relevant studies and abstracted information on study design, methods, patient selection, and results of relevant studies. This is a synthetic (i.e., not systematic) review. DATA SYNTHESIS: C. difficile infection is the most common healthcare-associated infection in the United States. Antibiotics are the most significant C. difficile infection risk factor, and among antibiotics, cephalosporins, clindamycin, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, and piperacillin-tazobactam confer the highest risk. Age, diabetes mellitus, inflammatory bowel disease, and end-stage renal disease are risk factors for C. difficile infection development and mortality. C. difficile infection diagnosis is based on testing appropriately selected patients with diarrhea or on clinical suspicion for patients with ileus. Patients with fulminant disease (C. difficile infection with hypotension, shock, ileus, or megacolon) should be treated with oral vancomycin and IV metronidazole, as well as rectal vancomycin in case of ileus. Patients who do not respond to initial therapy should be considered for fecal microbiota transplant or surgery. Proper infection prevention practices decrease C. difficile infection risk. CONCLUSIONS: Strong clinical evidence supports limiting antibiotics when possible to decrease C. difficile infection risk. For patients with fulminant C. difficile infection, oral vancomycin reduces mortality, and adjunctive therapies (including IV metronidazole) and interventions (including fecal microbiota transplant) may benefit select patients. Several important questions remain regarding fulminant C. difficile infection management, including which patients benefit from fecal microbiota transplant or surgery.

Elderly Patients Benefit From Enhanced Recovery Protocols After Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery protocols (ERAS) aim to decrease physiological stress response to surgery and maintain postoperative physiological function. Proponents of ERAS state these protocols decrease lengths of stay (LOS) and complication rates. Our aim was to assess whether elderly patients receive the same benefit as younger patients using ERAS protocols. METHODS: We queried patients from 2015 to 2017 at our institution with Enhanced Recovery in Surgery (ERIN) variables from the targeted colectomy NSQIP database. The patients were divided into sextiles and analyzed for readmission, LOS, return of bowel function, tolerating diet, mobilization, and multimodal pain management comparing the youngest sextile to the oldest sextile. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-two patients (73% colectomies) were enrolled in ERAS. When compared with the youngest sextile (age 19-43.8), the oldest sextile (age 71.4-92.5) had similar readmission rates at 9.8% versus 9.5% (P-value = 0.87), quicker return of bowel function, average 1.9 d versus 3.7 d (P-value < 0.01), and tolerated diet quicker, average POD 2.4 d versus 5.1 d (P-value < 0.01). There was a slight decrease in the use of multimodal pain management 88% versus 100% (P-value = 0.07), but mobilization on POD1 was slightly better in the elderly at 80% versus 78% (P-value = 0.76). Elderly patients enrolled in ERAS had an average LOS of 4.9 days versus 7.8 in the younger patients (P-value = 0.08). Among elderly non-ERAS patients average LOS was 14.6 days. CONCLUSION: Overall, elderly patients fared better or the same on the ERIN variables analyzed than the younger cohort. ERAS protocols are beneficial and applicable to elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Receipt of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II Colon Cancer and Overall Survival: A National Cancer Database Study.

BACKGROUND: There are variations in the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in stage II colon cancer (CRC). We sought to determine which patients received chemotherapy, what factors were associated with receipt of AC, and how this impacted overall survival. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, patients with stage II CRC who underwent surgical resection were selected; patients who received radiation or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. High-risk features (HRFs) were defined as pathological tumor stage IV, positive surgical margins, and perineural or lymphovascular invasion. Multivariable and subgroup analysis with eight subgroups stratified in the presence of HRFs, age, and the Charlson-Deyo score was performed. RESULTS: Of 77,739 patients identified with stage II CRC, 18.3% received AC. Younger, healthier patients with HRFs had the highest chemotherapy receipt rate (46.7%), whereas patients without HRFs, ≥ 75 y, and with the Charlson-Deyo score of 2+ had the lowest rate (2.1%). Community cancer centers were more likely to initiate AC (odds ratio = 1.24 P < 0.01) especially among healthy HRF-negative patients and younger patients. No significant racial differences in AC use were observed. AC was associated with improved overall survival in subgroups with HRFs (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.81 P < 0.001; HR: 0.75 P < 0.001; HR: 0.65 P = 0.03; HR: 0.55, P < 0.001) but not in patients without HRFs. CONCLUSIONS: AC receipt rates differed depending on patient age and type of institution delivering care. AC was associated with survival benefits only in patients with HRFs regardless of age. These findings are clinically relevant to inform appropriate use of AC in stage II CRC.

The Association Between Hospital Finances and Complications After Complex Abdominal Surgery: Deficiencies in the Current Health Care Reimbursement System and Implications for the Future.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between complications after 3 common general surgery procedures and per-episode hospital finances. BACKGROUND: With impending changes in health care reimbursement, maximizing the value of care delivered is paramount. Data on the relative clinical and financial impact of postoperative complications are necessary for directing surgical quality improvement efforts. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients enrolled in the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, hepatectomy, and colectomy at a single academic institution between September 2009 and August 2012. Clinical outcomes data were subsequently linked with hospital billing data to determine hospital finances associated with each episode. We describe the association between postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and different financial metrics. Multivariable linear regression modeling tested linear association between postoperative outcomes and cost data. RESULTS: There was a positive association between the number of surgical complications, payments, length of stay, total charges, total costs, and contribution margin for the three procedures. Multivariable models indicated that complications were independently associated with total cost among the selected procedures. Payments increased with complications, offsetting increased costs. CONCLUSIONS: In the current fee-for-service environment, the financial incentives are misaligned with quality improvement efforts. As we move to a value-driven method of reimbursement, administrators and health care providers alike will need to focus on improving the quality of patient care while remaining conscious of the cost of care delivered. Reducing complications effectively improves value.

Improving Statewide Post-Operative Sepsis Performance Measurement Using Hospital Risk Adjustment Within a Surgical Collaborative.

Background: The Georgia Quality Improvement Program (GQIP) surgical collaborative participating hospitals have shown consistently poor performance in the post-operative sepsis category of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data as compared with national benchmarks. We aimed to compare crude versus risk-adjusted post-operative sepsis rankings to determine high and low performers amongst GQIP hospitals. Patients and Methods: The cohort included intra-abdominal general surgery patients across 10 collaborative hospitals from 2015 to 2020. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) sepsis definition was used among all hospitals for case abstraction and NSQIP data were utilized to train and validate a multivariable risk-adjustment model with post-operative sepsis as the outcome. This model was used to rank GQIP hospitals by risk-adjusted post-operative sepsis rates. Rankings between crude and risk-adjusted post-operative sepsis rankings were compared ordinally and for changes in tertile. Results: The study included 20,314 patients with 595 cases of post-operative sepsis. Crude 30-day post-operative sepsis risk among hospitals ranged from 0.81 to 5.11. When applying the risk-adjustment model which included: age, American Society of Anesthesiology class, case complexity, pre-operative pneumonia/urinary tract infection/surgical site infection, admission status, and wound class, nine of 10 hospitals were re-ranked and four hospitals changed performance tertiles. Conclusions: Inter-collaborative risk-adjusted post-operative sepsis rankings are important to present. These metrics benchmark collaborating hospitals, which facilitates best practice exchange from high to low performers.

Objective performance indicators differ in obese and nonobese patients during robotic proctectomy.

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery is perceived to be more complex in obese patients. Objective performance indicators, machine learning-enabled metrics, can provide objective data regarding surgeon movements and robotic arm kinematics. In this feasibility study, we identified differences in objective performance indicators during robotic proctectomy in obese and nonobese patients. METHODS: Endoscopic videos were annotated to delineate individual surgical steps across 39 robotic proctectomies (1880 total steps). Thirteen patients were obese and 26 were nonobese. Objective performance indicators during the following steps were analyzed: splenic flexure mobilization, left colon mobilization, pelvic dissection, and rectal transection. RESULTS: The following differences were noted during robotic proctectomy in obese patients: during splenic flexure mobilization, more arm swaps, longer camera path length and velocity; during left colon mobilization, longer step time, more arm swaps, higher camera-related metrics (movement, path length, velocity, acceleration, and jerk), greater dominant arm path length, moving time, and wrist articulation; during anterior pelvic dissection, longer energy activation time, camera path length, and moving time; during posterior pelvic dissection, lower nondominant arm velocity, jerk, and acceleration; during left pelvic dissection, longer energy activation time; during right pelvic dissection, greater camera-related metrics (movement, path length, moving time, and velocity); and during rectal transection, longer step time, more arm swaps, master clutch use and camera movements, greater dominant wrist articulation, and longer dominant arm path length. CONCLUSION: We report step-specific objective performance indicators that differ during robotic proctectomy for obese and nonobese patients. This is the first study to use objective performance indicators to correlate a patient attribute with surgeon movements and robotic arm kinematics during robotic colorectal surgery.

The value of national accreditation program for rectal cancer: A survey of accredited programs and programs seeking accreditation.

BACKGROUND: Significant variation in rectal cancer care has been demonstrated in the United States. The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer was established in 2017 to improve the quality of rectal cancer care through standardization and emphasis on a multidisciplinary approach. The aim of this study was to understand the perceived value and barriers to achieving the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer accreditation. METHODS: An electronic survey was developed, piloted, and distributed to rectal cancer programs that had already achieved or were interested in pursuing the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer accreditation. The survey contained 40 questions with a combination of Likert scale, multiple choice, and open-ended questions to provide comments. This was a mixed methods study; descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative data, and thematic analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data. RESULTS: A total of 85 rectal cancer programs were sent the survey (22 accredited, 63 interested). Responses were received from 14 accredited programs and 41 interested programs. Most respondents were program directors (31%) and program coordinators (40%). The highest-ranked responses regarding the value of the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer accreditation included "improved quality and culture of rectal cancer care," "enhanced program organization and coordination," and "challenges our program to provide optimal, high-quality care." The most frequently cited barriers to the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer accreditation were cost and lack of personnel. CONCLUSION: Our survey found significant perceived value in the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer accreditation. Adhering to standards and a multidisciplinary approach to rectal cancer care are critical components of a high-quality care rectal cancer program.

Impact of Mental Health on General Surgery Patients and Strategies to Improve Outcomes.

Mental Health Disorders (MHD) are a growing concern nationwide. The significant impact MHD have on surgical outcomes has only recently started to be understood. This literature review investigated how mental health impacts the outcomes of general surgery patients and what can be done to make improvements. Patients with schizophrenia had the poorest surgical outcomes. Mental health disorders increased post-surgical pain, hospital length of stay, complications, readmissions, and mortality. Mental health disorders decreased wound healing and quality of care. Optimizing outcomes will be best accomplished through integrating more effective perioperative screening tools and interventions. Screenings tools can incorporate artificial intelligence, MHD data, resilience and its biomarkers, and patient mental health questionnaires. Interventions include cognitive behavioral therapy, virtual reality, spirituality, pharmacology, and resilience training.

The Impact of Steroids and Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Colectomies in the Era of Enhanced Recovery.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols are commonly used, but their utility in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and steroid use is poorly studied. We sought to examine influence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and steroid use on hospital length of stay (LOS) and operative duration in patients undergoing colectomies in the era of ERAS. METHODS: We performed retrospective review of our institutional National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry (2016-2018) for colectomies. We performed 2 distinct analyses to examine influence of steroids and IBD on LOS and operative duration. Multivariable linear regression was used to predict outcomes after adjusting for relevant perioperative features. RESULTS: There were 366 patients in the cohort; 17.8% were on steroids and 16.4% had IBD. Patients using steroids had longer LOS (6 vs 4 days, P < .0001). IBD patients had a longer LOS (7 vs 5 days, P < .0001) and longer operative duration (383 min vs 335.5 minute, P = .01) compared to non-IBD patients. On multivariable analysis, steroid use was not associated with increased LOS or operative duration. Inflammatory bowel disease was associated with an increased hospital LOS and operative duration. DISCUSSION: Patients on steroids had longer LOS when compared to patients not on steroids. Inflammatory bowel disease regardless of steroid use was found to be a significant risk factor for both increased LOS and operative duration. A closer look at preoperative physiology may help to tailor ERAS protocols in patients with inflammatory conditions.

Georgia Quality Improvement Programs Multi-Institutional Collection of Postoperative Opioid Data Using ACS-NSQIP Abstraction.

BACKGROUND: Excessive postoperative opioid prescribing contributes to opioid misuse throughout the US. The Georgia Quality Improvement Program (GQIP) is a collaboration of ACS-NSQIP participating hospitals. GQIP aimed to develop a multi-institutional opioid data collection platform as well as understand our current opioid-sparing strategy (OSS) usage and postoperative opioid prescribing patterns. METHODS: This study was initiated 7/2019, when 4 custom NSQIP variables were developed to capture OSS usage and postoperative opioid oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). After pilot collection, our discharge opioid variable required optimization for adequate data capture and was expanded from a free text option to 4 drop-down selection variables. Data collection then continued from 2/2020-5/2021. Logistic regression was used to determine associations with OSS usage. Average OMEs were calculated for common general surgery procedures and compared to national guidelines. RESULTS: After variable optimization, the percentage where a total discharge prescription OME could be calculated increased from 26% to 70% (P < .001). The study included 820 patients over 10 operations. There was a significant variation in OSS usage between GQIP centers. Laparoscopic cases had higher odds of OSS use (1.92 (1.38-2.66)) while OSS use had lower odds in black patients on univariate analysis (.69 (.51-.94)). On average 7 out of the 10 cases had higher OMEs prescribed compared to national guidelines recommendations. CONCLUSION: Developing a multi-institutional opioid data collection platform through ACS-NSQIP is feasible. Preselected drop-down boxes outperform free text variables. GQIP future quality improvement targets include variation in OSS use and opioid overprescribing.

Modern Management of Perianal Crohn's Disease: A Review.

Perianal Crohn's disease (CD) is a complex manifestation of CD that affects approximately 10% of patients. The spectrum of disease is quite variable, ranging from relatively mild disease to severe, aggressive manifestations that result in frequent hospitalizations, multiple surgeries, and poor quality of life. Despite significant recent advances in surgical and medical management, treatment remains challenging and frequently requires a multidisciplinary medical-surgical approach. The goal of this article is to review the current literature regarding the work-up, treatment, and future directions of therapy. Crucial features of effective management include the precise identification of manifestations, control of sepsis, limiting rectal inflammation, frequently with use of antitumor necrosis factor agents, and avoidance of extensive surgery.