Breast Implants: A Historical Review With Implications for Diagnosis and Modern Surgical Planning.

ABSTRACT: Modern breast surgery was first introduced in the United States in 1962 with the use of silicone gel-filled breast implants. Over the past 6 decades, development of breast implants has been challenged by a variety of influencers including aesthetic appeal in shape, texture, and material; challenges in managing outcomes such as contracture, disease, and rupture; and public perception of risks associated with implants. In 1992, silicone breast prostheses were banned by the US Food and Drug Administration with exception for use in breast reconstruction, congenital deformities, or to replace existing implants.The ban led to heightened concerns about implants and possible disease manifestations. Knowledge of the historical evolution of breast prostheses is useful for understanding the associated risks and outcomes unique to each breast implant era. This article aimed to explore characteristics of breast implants by generation, with implications for diagnosis and assistance to modern surgical planning for novice plastic surgeons.

Hepatic gas: widening spectrum of causes detected at CT and US in the interventional era.

The spectrum of causes of hepatic gas detected at computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) is widening. There are many iatrogenic and noniatrogenic causes of hepatic parenchymal, biliary, hepatic venous, and portal venous gas. Hepatic gas may be an indicator of serious acute disease (infarct, infection, abscess, bowel inflammation, or trauma). In other clinical scenarios, it may be an expected finding related to therapeutic interventions (such as surgery; hepatic artery embolization for a tumor or for active bleeding in acute trauma cases; percutaneous tumor ablation performed with radiofrequency, cryotherapy, laser photocoagulation, or ethanol). In some cases, hepatic gas is an incidental finding of no clinical significance. Familiarity with the expanding list of newer intervention-related causes of hepatic gas detected at CT and US, knowledge of the patient's clinical history, and a careful search for associated clues on images are all factors that may allow the radiologist to better determine the clinical relevance of this finding.