Retroviral DNA methylation and epigenetic repression are mediated by the antiviral host protein Daxx.

Integrated retroviral DNA is subject to epigenetic transcriptional silencing at different frequencies. This process is mediated by repressive DNA methylation and histone modifications on viral chromatin. However, the detailed mechanisms by which retroviral silencing is initiated and maintained are not well understood. Using a model system in which avian sarcoma virus (ASV) DNA is epigenetically repressed in mammalian cells, we previously found that a cellular scaffolding protein, Daxx, acts as an antiretroviral factor that promotes epigenetic repression through recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs). Here we show that human Daxx protein levels are increased in response to retroviral infection and that Daxx acts at the time of infection to initiate epigenetic repression. Consistent with a rapid and active antiviral epigenetic response, we found that repressive histone marks and long terminal repeat (LTR) DNA methylation could be detected within 12 h to 3 days postinfection, respectively. Daxx was also found to be required for long-term ASV silencing maintenance and full viral DNA methylation, and it was physically associated with both viral DNA and DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). These findings support a model in which incoming retroviral protein-DNA complexes are detected by Daxx, and the integrated provirus is rapidly chromatinized and repressed by DNA methylation and histone modification as part of an antiviral response. These results uncover a possible direct and active antiviral mechanism by which DNMTs can be recruited to retroviral DNA.

The interferon-inducible antiviral protein Daxx is not essential for interferon-mediated protection against avian sarcoma virus.

BACKGROUND: The antiviral protein Daxx acts as a restriction factor of avian sarcoma virus (ASV; Retroviridae) in mammalian cells by promoting epigenetic silencing of integrated proviral DNA. Although Daxx is encoded by a type I (α/ß) interferon-stimulated gene, the requirement for Daxx in the interferon anti-retroviral response has not been elucidated. In this report, we describe the results of experiments designed to investigate the role of Daxx in the type I interferon-induced anti-ASV response. FINDINGS: Using an ASV reporter system, we show that type I interferons are potent inhibitors of ASV replication. We demonstrate that, while Daxx is necessary to silence ASV gene expression in the absence of interferons, type I interferons are fully-capable of inducing an antiviral state in the absence of Daxx. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence that Daxx is not essential for the anti-ASV interferon response in mammalian cells, and that interferons deploy multiple, redundant antiviral mechanisms to protect cells from ASV.

Identification of a functional network of human epigenetic silencing factors.

Epigenetic silencing is mediated by families of factors that place, remove, read, and transmit repressive histone and DNA methylation marks on chromatin. How the roles for these functionally diverse factors are specified and integrated is the subject of intense study. To address these questions, HeLa cells harboring epigenetically silent green fluorescent protein reporter genes were interrogated with a small interference RNA library targeting 200 predicted epigenetic regulators, including potential activators, silencers, chromatin remodelers, and ancillary factors. Using this approach, individual, or combinatorial requirements for specific epigenetic silencing factors could be detected by measuring green fluorescent protein reactivation after small interference RNA-based factor knockdown. In our analyses, we identified a specific subset of 15 epigenetic factors that are candidates for participation in a functional epigenetic silencing network in human cells. These factors include histone deacetylase 1, de novo DNA methyltransferase 3A, components of the polycomb PRC1 complex (RING1 and HPH2), and the histone lysine methyltransferases KMT1E and KMT5C. Roles were also detected for two TRIM protein family members, the cohesin component Rad21, and the histone chaperone CHAF1A (CAF-1 p150). Remarkably, combinatorial knockdown of factors was not required for reactivation, indicating little functional redundancy. Consistent with this interpretation, knockdown of either KMT1E or CHAF1A resulted in a loss of multiple histone-repressive marks and concomitant gain of activation marks on the promoter during reactivation. These results reveal how functionally diverse factors may cooperate to maintain gene silencing during normal development or in disease. Furthermore, the findings suggest an avenue for discovery of new targets for epigenetic therapies.

Human factors and pathways essential for mediating epigenetic gene silencing.

Cellular identity in both normal and disease processes is determined by programmed epigenetic activation or silencing of specific gene subsets. Here, we have used human cells harboring epigenetically silent GFP-reporter genes to perform a genome-wide siRNA knockdown screen for the identification of cellular factors that are required to maintain epigenetic gene silencing. This unbiased screen interrogated 21,121 genes, and we identified and validated a set of 128 protein factors. This set showed enrichment for functional categories, and protein-protein interactions. Among this set were known epigenetic silencing factors, factors with no previously identified role in epigenetic gene silencing, as well as unstudied factors. The set included non-nuclear factors, for example, components of the integrin-adhesome. A key finding was that the E1 and E2 enzymes of the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) pathway (SAE1, SAE2/UBA2, UBC9/UBE2I) are essential for maintenance of epigenetic silencing. This work provides the first genome-wide functional view of human factors that mediate epigenetic gene silencing. The screen output identifies novel epigenetic factors, networks, and mechanisms, and provides a set of candidate targets for epigenetic therapy and cellular reprogramming.