Extracellular fluid viscosity enhances cell migration and cancer dissemination.

Cells respond to physical stimuli, such as stiffness1, fluid shear stress2 and hydraulic pressure3,4. Extracellular fluid viscosity is a key physical cue that varies under physiological and pathological conditions, such as cancer5. However, its influence on cancer biology and the mechanism by which cells sense and respond to changes in viscosity are unknown. Here we demonstrate that elevated viscosity counterintuitively increases the motility of various cell types on two-dimensional surfaces and in confinement, and increases cell dissemination from three-dimensional tumour spheroids. Increased mechanical loading imposed by elevated viscosity induces an actin-related protein 2/3 (ARP2/3)-complex-dependent dense actin network, which enhances Na+/H+ exchanger 1 (NHE1) polarization through its actin-binding partner ezrin. NHE1 promotes cell swelling and increased membrane tension, which, in turn, activates transient receptor potential cation vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) and mediates calcium influx, leading to increased RHOA-dependent cell contractility. The coordinated action of actin remodelling/dynamics, NHE1-mediated swelling and RHOA-based contractility facilitates enhanced motility at elevated viscosities. Breast cancer cells pre-exposed to elevated viscosity acquire TRPV4-dependent mechanical memory through transcriptional control of the Hippo pathway, leading to increased migration in zebrafish, extravasation in chick embryos and lung colonization in mice. Cumulatively, extracellular viscosity is a physical cue that regulates both short- and long-term cellular processes with pathophysiological relevance to cancer biology.

Cytoskeletal activation of NHE1 regulates cell volume and DNA methylation.

The regulation of mammalian cell volume is crucial for maintaining key cellular processes. Cells can rapidly respond to osmotic and hydrostatic pressure imbalances during environmental challenges, generating fluxes of water and ions that alter volume within minutes. While the role of ion pump and leak in cell volume regulation has been well-established, the role of the actomyosin cytoskeleton and its substantial interplay with ion transporters are still unclear. In this work, we discover a system of cell volume regulation controlled by cytoskeletal activation of ion transporters. Under hypotonic shock, NIH-3T3 and MCF-10A display a 20% secondary volume increase (SVI) following the initial regulatory volume decrease. We show that SVI is initiated by Ca 2+ influx through stretch activated channel Piezo1 and subsequent actomyosin remodeling. Rather than contracting cells, actomyosin triggers cell swelling by activating Na + -H + exchanger 1 (NHE1) through their co-binding partner ezrin. Cytoskeletal activation of NHE1 can be similarly triggered by mechanical stretch and attenuated by soft substrates. This mechanism is absent in certain cancer cell lines such as HT1080 and MDA-MB-231, where volume regulation is dominated by intrinsic response of ion transporters. Moreover, cytoskeletal activation of NHE1 during SVI induces nuclear deformation, leading to DNA demethylation and a significant, immediate transcriptomic response in 3T3 cells, a phenomenon that is absent in HT1080 cells. Overall, our findings reveal the central role of Ca 2+ and actomyosin-mediated mechanosensation in the regulation of ion transport, cell volume, DNA methylation, and transcriptomics.

Adhesion strength and contractility enable metastatic cells to become adurotactic.

Significant changes in cell stiffness, contractility, and adhesion, i.e., mechanotype, are observed during a variety of biological processes. Whether cell mechanics merely change as a side effect of or driver for biological processes is still unclear. Here, we sort genotypically similar metastatic cancer cells into strongly adherent (SA) versus weakly adherent (WA) phenotypes to study how contractility and adhesion differences alter the ability of cells to sense and respond to gradients in material stiffness. We observe that SA cells migrate up a stiffness gradient, or durotax, while WA cells largely ignore the gradient, i.e., adurotax. Biophysical modeling and experimental validation suggest that differences in cell migration and durotaxis between weakly and strongly adherent cells are driven by differences in intra-cellular actomyosin activity. These results provide a direct relationship between cell phenotype and durotaxis and suggest how, unlike other senescent cells, metastatic cancer cells navigate against stiffness gradients.

Computational models of migration modes improve our understanding of metastasis.

Tumor cells migrate through changing microenvironments of diseased and healthy tissue, making their migration particularly challenging to describe. To better understand this process, computational models have been developed for both the ameboid and mesenchymal modes of cell migration. Here, we review various approaches that have been used to account for the physical environment's effect on cell migration in computational models, with a focus on their application to understanding cancer metastasis and the related phenomenon of durotaxis. We then discuss how mesenchymal migration models typically simulate complex cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions, while ameboid migration models use a cell-focused approach that largely ignores ECM when not acting as a physical barrier. This approach greatly simplifies or ignores the mechanosensing ability of ameboid migrating cells and should be reevaluated in future models. We conclude by describing future model elements that have not been included to date but would enhance model accuracy.