Autonomic dysreflexia during urodynamics in children and adolescents with spinal cord injury or severe neurologic disease.

INTRODUCTION: Autonomic dysreflexia (AD) is a well-established association of high spinal cord injury (SCI), particularly in those occurring above T6. When a noxious stimulus is encountered, the body responds by stimulating an increase in blood pressure, which is then countered by vasodilation. In patients with autonomic dysreflexia, the patient is unable to vasodilate below the level of spinal injury due to interruption of the autonomic innervation below the injury. This then leads to persistently elevated blood pressure causing uncoordinated autonomic responses such as headache, flushing, sweating, and even hypertensive crisis. The noxious stimulus most commonly reported is bladder or bowel distention [1]. This potential trigger is especially important since many patients with SCI require catheterization and repeated urodynamic testing, both of which predispose them to bladder distention. In response to an incident during which a patient developed severe hypertension during UDS, institutional concern was raised about the potential risk of AD in other patients with SCI ≥ T8 and other severe neurological disease undergoing urodynamic testing, and a protocol was initiated in 2007 for monitoring for AD during UDS. Although no long-term complication was encountered in this incident, the need for improvement in our understanding of the detection and treatment of AD during urodynamic testing was highlighted. However, due to the potential of UDS to trigger AD and possible subsequent severe cardiovascular crisis, a protocol was established at our institution. Because of reports documenting episodes of AD for patients with severe, non-SCI neurologic disease and the unknown risk, these patients also were historically monitored at our institution as well. OBJECTIVE: Autonomic dysreflexia (AD) is an uncoordinated autonomic response seen in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). AD is often triggered by bladder distention, which may occur during urodynamic studies (UDS), and has potentially life-threatening consequences. Our purpose is to determine the prevalence and associated factors of AD in children undergoing UDS with either SCI or other neurological disease. METHODS: We identified 13 pediatric patients with SCI at the eighth thoracic vertebrae or above (SCI ≥ T8) or other severe neurological disorder with urodynamic evaluations between 2007 and 2011 at our institution. We retrospectively reviewed these patients for age, gender, bladder volume, bladder compliance, detrusor instability, symptoms of AD, blood pressure, and urinary infection. RESULTS: There were a total of 13 patients with SCI ≥ T8 (9), transverse myelitis (2), and encephalomyelitis (2). There were a total of 41 urodynamic studies with an average of 3.2 studies per patient. One adolescent with C1/2 injury and a prepubertal child with T2/3 injury developed AD. AD was not observed in non-SCI patients. The patients who developed AD had multiple subsequent episodes with follow up UDS. No statistical associations were found for the variables evaluated. No major complications occurred, and AD was successfully managed conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate monitoring and education, AD is easily recognized and managed conservatively. We found an increased risk of patients developing subsequent AD episodes after an initial episode. Patients who did not have autonomic dysreflexia during initial UDS did not experience autonomic dysreflexia on subsequent UDS. We did not observe autonomic dysreflexia occurring in children with transverse myelitis or encephalomyelitis.

A comparative study of open, laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy in obese patients.

OBJECTIVES: Partial nephrectomy is a standard intervention for the treatment of small renal tumors. Our study compares the outcomes of three different partial nephrectomy methods (open, laparoscopic and robotic assisted) in obese (≥30 Kg/m(2)) patients with renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2005-2011, 66 obese patients had partial nephrectomy. Patients were divided into three groups according to intervention received: Open (n = 21), laparoscopic (n = 31) and robotic (n = 14). The outcome variables of blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Mean blood loss in the laparoscopic group (100 mls) was significantly less than open group (300 mls) and no difference between laparoscopic and robotic groups (150 mls). We observed a shorter median hospital stay in the laparoscopic group (two days) than open group (four days) and no difference between laparoscopic and robotic groups (three days). Three patients in the laparoscopic group had complications: Two grade II and one with grade III (based on Clavien-Dindo classification). Tumor location, pathology, grade, stage, patient gender, age, preoperative creatinine and postoperative creatinine were not different among the groups (P > 0.05). The mean tumor size in the laparoscopic group (2.70 cms) was significantly smaller than that of the open group (4.22 cm) (P < 0.05), but not statistically different from that of the robotic group (2.99 cm). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that in obese patients, both laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy are associated with less blood loss than open partial nephrectomy. Second, the length of the hospital stay was not related to the type of utilized intervention.

A pilot study of telemedicine for post-operative urological care in children.

We conducted a retrospective study of paediatric urological surgery patients over a 12-month period. We compared patients followed up by telemedicine with those who had post-operative follow-up on site at the Arkansas Children's Hospital (ACH) in Little Rock. All pre-operative patients living in northwest Arkansas were given the opportunity to use telemedicine from a satellite clinic at Lowell, 328 km from the hospital. Of 61 patients, 10 chose telemedicine and 51 chose to be evaluated at the ACH clinic. All telemedicine visits were completed successfully, but in four cases, the video clarity of the telemedicine images was not sufficient for decision-making, and a digital photograph was sent by email to the physician at the ACH. There were no post-operative surgical complications in either patient group. In the telemedicine group, the median distance to the ACH was 330 km, and the median distance to the remote clinic was 35 km. In the on-site group, the median distance to the ACH was 293 km, which was significantly less (P=0.03). In the on-site group, the median travel time to the ACH was 174 min. If the telemedicine group had driven to the hospital, the median travel time would have been 192 min. Logistic regression showed that for every 37 km increase in distance to ACH, patients had a 111% increase in the odds of receiving telemedicine compared to receiving on-site care (OR=2.1, 95% CI: 1.0, 4.4). The pilot study supports the use of telemedicine for the post-operative evaluation of paediatric urology surgery patients and suggests that substantial travel distance and time savings can be made.