RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mucosal melanoma (MM) is a rare but devastating subtype of melanoma. Our previous studies have demonstrated robust anti-tumor effects of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors in head and neck MM (HNMM) patient-derived xenograft models with CDK4 amplification. Herein, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of dalpiciclib (SHR6390), a CDK4/6 inhibitor, in HNMM patients harboring CDK4 amplification. METHODS: The anti-tumor efficacy of dalpiciclib was assessed by HNMM patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models and patient-derived tumor cells (PDC) in vivo and in vitro. Immunohistochemical analyses and western blot were then performed to assess the markers of cell proliferation and CDK4/6 signaling pathway. For the clinical trial, advanced recurrent and/or metastatic HNMM patients with CDK4 amplification were treated with dalpiciclib 125 mg once daily for 21 consecutive days in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included safety, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Dalpiciclib profoundly suppressed growth of HNMM-PDX and PDC with CDK4 amplification, whereas it showed relatively weak suppression in those with CDK4 wild type compared with vehicle. And dalpiciclib resulted in a remarkable reduction in the expression levels of Ki-67 and phosphorylated Rb compared with control group. In the clinical trial, a total of 17 patients were enrolled, and 16 patients were evaluable. The ORR was 6.3%, and the DCR was 81.3%. The estimated median PFS was 9.9 months (95% CI, 4.8-NA), and the median OS was not reached. The rate of OS at 12 months and 24 months was 68.8% (95% CI, 0.494-0.957) and 51.6% (95% CI, 0.307-0.866), respectively. The most frequent adverse events were neutrophil count decrease, white blood cell count decrease, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Dalpiciclib was well-tolerated and displayed a durable benefit for HNMM patients with CDK4 amplification in this study. Further studies on CDK4 inhibitors and its combination strategy for MM are worth further exploration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2000031608.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Quinase 4 Dependente de Ciclina , Quinase 6 Dependente de Ciclina , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Melanoma , Piperidinas , Piridinas , Pirimidinas , Adulto , Idoso , Animais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Camundongos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Quinase 4 Dependente de Ciclina/antagonistas & inibidores , Quinase 6 Dependente de Ciclina/antagonistas & inibidores , Amplificação de Genes , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/farmacologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) integration into the host genome is an important factor in HPV(+)OPSCC carcinogenesis, in conjunction with HPV oncoproteins E6/E7. However, a well-studied investigation about virus-host interaction still needs to be completed. Our objective is to characterise HPV integration to investigate potential mechanisms of tumourigenesis independent of E6/E7 oncoproteins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: High-throughput viral integration detection was performed on 109 HPV(+)OPSCC tumours with relevant clinicopathological information. Of these tumours, 38 tumours underwent targeted gene sequencing, 29 underwent whole exome sequencing and 26 underwent RNA sequencing. RESULTS: HPV integration was detected in 94% of tumours (with a mean integration count of 337). Tumours occurring at the tonsil/oropharyngeal wall that exhibit higher PD-L1 expression demonstrated increased integration sites (p = .024). HPV exhibited a propensity for integration at genomic sites located within specific fragile sites (FRA19A) or genes associated with functional roles such as cell proliferation and differentiation (PTEN, AR), immune evasion (CD274) and glycoprotein biosynthesis process (FUT8). The viral oncogenes E2, E4, E6 and E7 tended to remain intact. HPV fragments displayed enrichment within host copy number variation (CNV) regions. However, insertions into genes related to altered homologous recombination repair were infrequent. Genes with integration had distinct expression levels. Fifty-nine genes whose expression level was affected by viral integration were identified, for example, EPHB1, which was reported to be involved in cellular protein metabolic process. CONCLUSIONS: HPV can promote oncogenesis through recurrent integration into functional host genome regions, leading to subsequent genomic aberrations and gene expression disruption. This study characterises viral integrations and virus-host interactions, enhancing our understanding of HPV-related carcinogenesis mechanisms.