Admission blood cell counts are predictive of stroke-associated infection in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with endovascular therapy.

Stroke-associated infection (SAI) is a major medical complication in acute ischemic stroke patients (AIS) treated with endovascular therapy (EVT). Three hundred thirty-three consecutive patients with AIS caused by a large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation who received EVT (142 (42.6%) of them were given IV tPA as bridging therapy) and 337 AIS patients who received IV tPA only (non-EVT) were enrolled in the study and evaluated to determine the association of inflammatory factors on admission with SAI. Among the 333 AIS patients undergoing EVT, SAI occurred in 219 (65.8%) patients. Patients with SAI had higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) total scores, white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil counts, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) than those without SAI (P < 0.05). The multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that older age in addition to higher diastolic blood pressure (DBP), NIHSS score, fasting blood glucose, WBC and neutrophil counts, NLR, and PLR were significantly associated with SAI (P < 0.05). However, these associations were not revealed in 337 non-EVT AIS patients. Furthermore, based on the inflammatory markers, we developed a nomogram that provided the opportunity for more accurate predictions (compared with conventional factors) and appeared a better prognostic tool for SAI according to the decision curve analysis. In summary, if proven externally valid, our nomogram that included WBC count, NLR, and PLR may be a useful tool for SAI prediction in clinical practice.

Low triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio predicts hemorrhagic transformation in large atherosclerotic infarction of acute ischemic stroke.

The ratio of triglyceride (TG) to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is an objective approach to predicting poor outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The impact of TG/HDL-C on hemorrhagic transformation (HT) after AIS remains unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the accurate effect of TG/HDL-C on HT after AIS. We enrolled a total of 1423 patients with AIS in the training cohort from a prospective, consecutive hospital-based stroke registry. Of the 1423 patients, HT occurred in 155 (10.89%) patients. The incidence of HT after AIS was significantly increased when there were low levels of TG (P=0.016) and TG/HDL-C (P=0.006) in patients with AIS attributable to large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), but not in those who suffered from cardioembolic stroke. After adjustment for covariates, a lower TG/HDL-C (OR=0.53, 95%CI=0.20-0.93) that was more than TG alone (OR=0.61, 95%CI=0.27-0.98) independently increased the risk of HT in LAA. Furthermore, our established nomogram indicated that lower TG/HDL-C was an indicator of HT. These findings were further validated in the test cohort of 558 patients with AIS attributable to LAA. In summary, a low level of TG/HDL-C is correlated with greater risk of HT after AIS attributable to LAA.

Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting Lead to Improved Cognitive Performance in Patients with Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis.

In patients with severe carotid artery stenosis, the effects of carotid artery reopening, achieved either by carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS), on cognitive functions remain elusive. Herein, we conducted a prospective study to determine whether and to what extent CEA and CAS affected cognitive performance. Patients admitted to the Department of Neurology or Vascular Surgery in Nanjing First Hospital from December 2012 to March 2015 with a diagnosis of severe carotid artery stenosis (>70%) were included in the study. Among them, 77 patients underwent CEA, 81 patients underwent CAS, and 77 patients who refused to receive aforementioned interventions were enrolled in control group. Of note, all patients in this study received basic pharmacological treatment according to the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines. Cognitive functions were evaluated by a broad spectrum of neuropsychological tests including the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and event related potential P300 on the day prior to and at 3 months after indicated intervention. When compared with basic pharmacological treatment, both CEA and CAS significantly increased the scores of MMSE and MoCA at 3 months following procedures. Meanwhile, a significant reduction of P300 score was also observed in patients underwent CEA or CAS. In addition, the changes in MMSE, MoCA and P300 scores over time between CEA and CAS groups were not statistically significant. Taken together, our findings suggest an improvement of cognitive functions following carotid artery reopening. Meanwhile, the beneficial effects of CEA and CAS on cognitive performance seem to be equivalent.