The effect of Xiang-Sha-Liu-Jun-Zi tang (XSLJZT) on irritable bowel syndrome: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by chronic, recurrent abdominal pain or abdominal discomfort and changes in defecation habits. Xiang-Sha-Liu-Jun-Zi tang (XSLJZT) is a traditional Chinese medical formula that can modulate gastrointestinal disturbance. PURPOSE: To investigate the therapeutic effect of XSLJZT on IBS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed as a double-blind, randomized, controlled preliminary study. Eighty patients with IBS were assigned to a control group (CG, 40 patients) that received oral administration of an XSLJZT 10% comparator (3.0 g three times daily) for 28 days or to a treatment group (TG, 40 patients) that received XSLJZT. The primary outcome measure was changes in scores on the Gastrointestinal System Rating Scale-IBS. The secondary outcome measures were changes in scores on the irritable bowel syndrome-quality of life (IBS-QOL) and World Health Organization-quality of life-brief. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients completed the study (n = 31 for the CG; n = 32 for the TG). The TG were discovered to have significantly lower diarrhea scores than the CG at V2 (second assessment) compared with V1 (first assessment, baseline) (mean change ±â€¯SD: CG: 0.19 ±â€¯1.33 vs. TG: -0.38 ±â€¯0.91, p = 0.05). The scores for Item 28 on the IBS-quality of life (QOL) scale ("I feel frustrated that I cannot eat when I want because of my bowel problems") were lower in the CG at V3 (third assessment) compared with V1 but slightly higher in the TG (CG: -0.48 ±â€¯0.89 vs. TG: 0.03 ±â€¯0.65, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Oral administration of XSLJZT (3.0 g) for 28 days lowered the mean diarrhea score in patients with IBS, indicating that the patients in the TG had greater diarrhea improvement than those in the CG. The present study used 10% XSLJZT as a comparator, and the different items of the Gastrointestinal System Rating Scale-IBS, IBS-QOL, and World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief were scored separately. Therefore, the selection of an appropriate comparator or placebo and score assessment are crucial issues for future study.

Effect of wu chu yu tang on gastroesophageal reflux disease: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The main symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease GERD are heartburn and acid regurgitation. Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) are considered to be safe and effective for the treatment of GERD. In traditional Chinese medicine, wu chu yu tang (WCYT) is used to treat nausea after eating, vomiting, and diarrhea. PURPOSE: We designed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the therapeutic effect of WCYT on GERD using omeprazole as a PPI for the positive control. METHODS: Ninety patients with GERD were randomly assigned to the 1) control group (CG), who received an oral administration of omeprazole (20 mg) once per day and given WCYT placebo (3.0 g) three times per day for 4 weeks continuously; or the 2) treatment group (TG), who received oral administration of omeprazole (20 mg) placebo once per day and WCYT (3.0 g) three times per day for 4 weeks continuously. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients (37 in CG, 40 in TG) completed the trial. Both Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERDQ) scores was less in the second assessment (V2) and in the third assessment (V3) than those in V1 (first assessment; baseline) in the CG and TG groups (all p < 0.001); the score difference of both RDQ and GERDQ between V2 and V1 was similar between CG and TG (p = 1.00, p = 0.54, respectively). The score difference of both RDQ and GERD between V3 and V1 was less in the CG group than those of the TG group (both p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: WCYT has an effect similar to omeprazole for GERD treatment. Furthermore, this effect resulting from WCYT appeared to be maintained for a longer period of time than did that of omeprazole. A study with a larger sample size and longer study period is needed to corroborate our findings.