Procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department in Japan: interim analysis of multicenter prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is widely performed outside of the operating theater, often in emergency departments (EDs). The practice and safety of PSA in the ED in an aging society such as in Japan have not been well described. We aimed to characterize the practice pattern of PSA including indications, pharmacology and incidence of adverse events (AEs) in Japan. METHODS: We formed the Japanese Procedural Sedation and Analgesia Registry, a multicenter prospective observation registry of ED patients undergoing PSA. We included all patients who received PSA in the ED. PSA was defined as any systemic pharmacological intervention intended to facilitate a painful or uncomfortable procedure. The main variables in this study were patients' demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, indication of PSA, medication choices, and AEs. The primary outcome measure was overall AEs from PSA. RESULTS: We enrolled 332 patients in four EDs during the 12-month period. The median age was 67 years (IQR, 46-78). In terms of ASA physical status, 79 (23.8%), 172 (51.8%), and 81 (24.4%) patients were class 1, 2, 3 or higher, respectively. The most common indication was cardioversion (44.0%). The most common sedative used was thiopental (38.9%), followed by midazolam (34.0%) and propofol (19.6%). Among all patients, 72 (21.7%, 95% confidence interval, 17-26) patients experienced one or more AEs. The most common AE was hypoxia (9.9%), followed by apnea (7.2%) and hypotension (3.5%). All of the AEs were transient and no patient had a serious AE. CONCLUSION: In a multicenter prospective registry in Japan, PSA in the ED appears safe particularly since the patients who underwent PSA were older and had a higher risk profile compared to patients in previous studies in different countries.

[Awake intubation using Pentax-airway scope combined with surface airway anesthesia in the cases of two obese patients with cervical spondylosis and the author himself].

We report successful awake intubation using AWS combined with surface anesthesia of the upper airway via nebulizer. The two cases are suitable for awake intubation due to difficult airway. After inhaled lidocaine 4% and nebulized 4 ml, while giving fentanyl i. v, we performed awake intubation. As a preparatory step to the procedure described above, awake intubation was tested on the author himself with only surface anesthesia. The patients and author did not buck during intubation. The present case shows that it is possible to perform awake intubate safely with less stress with the combination of AWS and surface airway anesthesia via nebulizer.