Low to Intermediate Dose Atropine Administration During Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in the Pre-Liver Transplant Population.

INTRODUCTION: Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is frequently used to screen for obstructive coronary artery disease in the pre-liver transplant evaluation. Although atropine is a commonly used adjunctive medication, no study has evaluated its side effect profile in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the safety of atropine in candidates undergoing pre-liver transplant evaluation when atropine is used in stress testing? DESIGN: This multicenter, prospective study enrolled patients over a 6-month period undergoing pre-liver transplant evaluation. Each patient completed a questionnaire assessing anticholinergic-related symptoms within 24 hours of testing and 48 hours following. Comparisons were made among patients receiving any atropine dose versus those who did not and among patients receiving at least 1 mg atropine and those receiving less/none. RESULTS: Forty patients were evaluated, and 32 (80%) had adjunctive atropine administered. No differences in clinical characteristics were noted. In comparisons among patients receiving any dose of atropine with those who did not, questionnaire results indicated a higher rate of nausea prior to testing and higher overall symptom severity following testing in patients not receiving atropine. In comparisons among patients receiving less than 1 mg atropine with those receiving at least 1 mg atropine, no difference in pre- or posttesting questionnaire responses was present. No patient in the study required reversal agents or hospitalization within 7 days of testing. CONCLUSIONS: Atropine, a hepatically metabolized medication, did not predispose patients with ESLD to an increased symptom burden, and clinical outcomes related to DSE were unaffected.

Hand-Held Echocardiography by Advanced Practice Providers in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure.

OBJECTIVES: The performed hand-held echocardiography (HHE) was evaluated and interpreted by trained advanced practice providers (APPs) on hospitalized CHF patients for image quality and interpretation by comparing with expert echocardiographer and SE findings. BACKGROUND: Congestive heart failure (CHF) is associated with increased hospital admissions and mortality. While a standard echocardiogram (SE) is the gold standard for cardiac assessment, it is not readily available. Hospitalized CHF patients require rapid assessment for expedited treatment. METHODS: Over 6 months, five trained APPs performed HHE on hospitalized CHF patients and interpreted: (a) left ventricular (LV) size, (b) LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and (c) right atrial pressure (RAP). The study echocardiographer reviewed and blindly interpreted the HHE images and compared them with APPs and SE findings. Kappa statistics determined the degree of agreement between APPs and the study echocardiographer's interpretation of the HHE images and SE. RESULTS: A total of 80 CHF patients (age 73 ± 14 years, 58% males; LVEF (by SE) 45 ± 19%; 36.3% body mass indexes ≥ 30 kg/m2) were enrolled. HHE interpretation by APPs had a good agreement for LVEF (kappa 0.79) with the study echocardiographer and SE (kappa 0.74) and a good agreement for RAP (kappa 0.67) with the study echocardiographer. The correlation between the absolute LVEF interpretation by the study echocardiographer on HHE and SE was r = 0.88 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Trained APPs obtained diagnostic-quality HHE images and interpreted the LV function and RAP in CHF patients in good agreement with the study echocardiographer. LVEF by HHE correlated with LVEF by SE. Our study suggests trained APPs can use HHE to evaluate LVEF and RAP in CHF patients, leading to expedited and optimized treatment.

Patient Age at Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease and Its Impact on Cardiovascular and Limb Outcomes.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) prevalence increases with age, but the relation between age at PAD diagnosis and outcomes is unclear. We investigated the cardiovascular and limb outcomes of patients diagnosed with PAD at different ages. We studied patients with PAD aged ≥18 years who were diagnosed between 1996 and 2020 at Mayo Clinic. Patients were grouped by diagnosis age (<50, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, ≥70 years) and ankle brachial index (ABI): low ABI (<1.0) or elevated ABI (>1.4). Primary outcomes were cardiovascular events (CVEs; myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke) and limb events (LEs; critical limb ischemia or amputation). Competing risk analysis was performed to calculate adjusted hazard ratios. The cohort included 22,073 patients with PAD (low ABI: 77.1%; elevated ABI: 22.9%). CVEs were observed in 8.2% of patients and LEs in 15.6%. The highest CVE risk was observed in patients diagnosed with PAD before age 50 (compared with patients diagnosed after age 70; hazard ratio 2.33 [95% confidence interval 1.95 to 2.78]). CVE risk decreased with older age at diagnosis. Although younger groups demonstrated higher LE risk, there was no clear association with diagnosis age. These patterns of risk were seen both in low and elevated ABI subgroups but in greater magnitude with elevated ABI. Younger patients diagnosed with PAD face increased risk of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke compared with patients diagnosed at an older age. CVE risk notably exceeds LE risk. In conclusion, younger age at PAD diagnosis may be an important risk factor, which warrants more aggressive interventions focused on CVE prevention.

Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants compared to Vitamin K antagonists postpercutaneous coronary interventions in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are commonly associated. Cotreatment with multiple antithrombotic agents can increase the risk of bleeding. We sought to evaluate patient-centered outcomes in patients with AF on double therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to patients with standard triple therapy, [a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) plus dual antiplatelet therapy]. METHODS: We performed a literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes of patients receiving double therapy with DOACs compared to triple therapy with VKAs in patients with AF undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patient-centered outcomes were the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNB), all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and stroke. RESULTS: Four RCTs (9602 patients) met our inclusion criteria. Compared to VKAs, DOACs were associated with significantly lower ISTH major bleeding/ CRNB (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.67-0.82, P < .00001, I 2 = 11%). There were no statistically significant differences in the efficacy outcomes, including myocardial infarction (RR: 0.99, 95% CI :0.79-1.25, P = .96), stent thrombosis (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.6-1.55, P = .89), ischemic stroke (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.5-1.15, P = .19), all-cause mortality (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.85-1.31, P = .61), and MACE (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.91-1.22, P = .97). CONCLUSION: Compared with triple therapy with VKAS, double therapy with DOACs is associated with a reduced risk of bleeding and is as effective in patients with AF undergoing PCI.

Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension in the contemporary era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Renal denervation (RDN) is a catheter-based ablation procedure designed to treat resistant hypertension (RH). The objective of our study is to determine the effect of RDN on blood pressure and renal function in patients with RH in comparison to medical therapy alone. We performed an extensive literature search for randomized control trials (RCT) reporting office and 24 hr. blood pressure changes and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline and 6 months. We calculated a weighted standardized mean difference of blood pressure and renal outcomes between RDN and control groups using random effects models. Our search yielded 608 studies of which we included 15 studies for the final analysis. A total of 857 patients were treated with RDN and 616 patients treated with medical therapy ± sham procedure. Only 5 studies were double-blinded RCT with sham control. The adjusted standardized mean difference in the change in office based systolic and diastolic pressures (p = 0.18; p = 0.14); 24 hr. systolic and diastolic pressures (p = 0.20; p = 0.18); and eGFR (p = 0.20) from baseline to 6 months is statistically insignificant with significant heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis showed that among sham controlled trials, 24 hr. systolic blood pressure showed a modest but statistically significant benefit favoring renal denervation in patients with RH. Our meta-analysis of 15 RCTs showed no significant benefit of RDN on blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension. Subgroup analysis of sham control studies showed a modest benefit in 24 hr. systolic blood pressure at 6 months with RDN.