Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Respir Care ; 49(6): 606-8, 2004 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15165294

RESUMO

The use of humanized antibody against tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) may increase the risk of various opportunistic infections, including tuberculosis and fungal infections. We report a case of cryptococcal pneumonia in a patient who was taking infliximab for rheumatoid arthritis. A temporally related exposure history raised the possibility that our patient acquired the infection from his pet cockatiel. It seems prudent to advise patients receiving infliximab to avoid exposure to pet avian excreta.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Criptococose/imunologia , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Pneumonia/microbiologia , Idoso , Animais , Animais Domésticos/microbiologia , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Criptococose/tratamento farmacológico , Criptococose/transmissão , Fluconazol/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Infliximab , Masculino , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Pneumonia/imunologia , Pneumonia/terapia , Psittaciformes/microbiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Zoonoses/transmissão
3.
World J Transplant ; 4(2): 43-56, 2014 06 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25032095

RESUMO

Selection of the appropriate donor is essential to a successful allograft recipient outcome for solid organ transplantation. Multiple infectious diseases have been transmitted from the donor to the recipient via transplantation. Donor-transmitted infections cause increased morbidity and mortality to the recipient. In recent years, a series of high-profile transmissions of infections have occurred in organ recipients prompting increased attention on the process of improving the selection of an appropriate donor that balances the shortage of needed allografts with an approach that mitigates the risk of donor-transmitted infection to the recipient. Important advances focused on improving donor screening diagnostics, using previously excluded high-risk donors, and individualizing the selection of allografts to recipients based on their prior infection history are serving to increase the donor pool and improve outcomes after transplant. This article serves to review the relevant literature surrounding this topic and to provide a suggested approach to the selection of an appropriate solid organ transplant donor.

5.
J Clin Microbiol ; 43(11): 5536-40, 2005 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16272482

RESUMO

Active surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is among the strategies recommended by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America for control of nosocomial MRSA infections. Infection control and laboratory personnel desire rapid, sensitive, and inexpensive methods to enhance surveillance activities. A multicenter study was performed to evaluate a new selective and differential chromogenic medium, BBL CHROMagar MRSA (C-MRSA) medium (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD), which enables recovery and concomitant identification of MRSA strains directly from nasal swab specimens taken from the anterior nares. Specimens were inoculated to C-MRSA and Trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood agar (TSA II, BD Diagnostics). Mauve colonies on C-MRSA at 24 h and 48 h and suspicious colonies on TSA II were confirmed as Staphylococcus aureus by Gram stain morphology and a coagulase test. In addition, the results of C-MRSA were compared to results of susceptibility testing (five different methods) of S. aureus strains isolated on TSA II. A total of 2,015 specimens were inoculated to C-MRSA and TSA II. Three hundred fifty-four S. aureus isolates were recovered; 208 (59%) were oxacillin (methicillin) susceptible and 146 (41%) were oxacillin resistant (MRSA). On C-MRSA, 139/146 or 95.2% of MRSA isolates were recovered, whereas recovery on TSA II was 86.9% (127/146) (P = 0.0027). The overall specificity of C-MRSA was 99.7%. When C-MRSA was compared to each susceptibility testing method, the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were as follows: oxacillin MIC by broth microdilution, 94.4% and 96.7%; oxacillin screen agar, 94.3% and 96.7%; PBP2' latex agglutination, 93.7% and 98.5%; cefoxitin disk diffusion, 95.0% and 98.1%; and mecA PCR, 95.1% and 98.1%. In this study, C-MRSA was superior to TSA II for recovery of MRSA from surveillance specimens obtained from the anterior nares and was comparable to conventional, rapid, and molecular susceptibility methods for the identification of MRSA isolates.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Meticilina/farmacologia , Mucosa Nasal/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Ágar , Compostos Cromogênicos , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Meios de Cultura , Humanos , Resistência a Meticilina , Oxacilina/farmacologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA