PET/CT-Guided Tumor Ablation, From the AJR "How We Do It" Special Series.

PET/CT guidance during percutaneous tumor ablation procedures combines metabolic and anatomic imaging, providing a powerful approach that can improve intraprocedural tumor visibility and ablation margin evaluation for a variety of cancers. This article reviews key advantages of the use of PET/CT as guidance for tumor ablation and describes the authors' technique for performing such procedures, highlighting the application of PET/CT for each procedural stage, including planning, targeting, monitoring, and assessment of results. Practical considerations in establishing and operating an interventional PET/CT practice are discussed. Suggestions for overcoming logistical challenges that have historically limited procedural PET/CT adoption are proposed. Several emerging procedural approaches relating to PET/CT and other molecular or anatomic imaging technologies are briefly explored.

Risk of persistent air leaks following percutaneous cryoablation and microwave ablation of peripheral lung tumors.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of persistent air leak (PAL) following cryoablation vs MWA of lung tumors when the ablation zone includes the pleura. METHODS: This bi-institutional retrospective cohort study evaluated consecutive peripheral lung tumors treated with cryoablation or MWA from 2006 to 2021. PAL was defined as an air leak for more than 24 h after chest tube placement or an enlarging postprocedural pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement. The pleural area included by the ablation zone was quantified on CT using semi-automated segmentation. PAL incidence was compared between ablation modalities and a parsimonious multivariable model was developed to assess the odds of PAL using generalized estimating equations and purposeful selection of predefined covariates. Time-to-local tumor progression (LTP) was compared between ablation modalities using Fine-Gray models, with death as a competing risk. RESULTS: In total, 260 tumors (mean diameter, 13.1 mm ± 7.4; mean distance to pleura, 3.6 mm ± 5.2) in 116 patients (mean age, 61.1 years ± 15.3; 60 women) and 173 sessions (112 cryoablations, 61 MWA) were included. PAL occurred after 25/173 (15%) sessions. The incidence was significantly lower following cryoablation compared to MWA (10 [9%] vs 15 [25%]; p = .006). The odds of PAL adjusted for the number of treated tumors per session were 67% lower following cryoablation (odds ratio = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.14-0.82]; p = .02) vs MWA. There was no significant difference in time-to-LTP between ablation modalities (p = .36). CONCLUSIONS: Cryoablation of peripheral lung tumors bears a lower risk of PAL compared to MWA when the ablation zone includes the pleura, without adversely affecting time-to-LTP. KEY POINTS: • The incidence of persistent air leaks after percutaneous ablation of peripheral lung tumors was lower following cryoablation compared to microwave ablation (9% vs 25%; p = .006). • The mean chest tube dwell time was 54% shorter following cryoablation compared to MWA (p = .04). • Local tumor progression did not differ between lung tumors treated with percutaneous cryoablation compared to microwave ablation (p = .36).

Image-Guided Ablation of Recurrent or Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of image-guided ablation of recurrent or unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 25 patients (14 women; age, 36-84 years) underwent 37 image-guided liver tumor ablation procedures to treat 47 ICCs (May 2004 to January 2022). At initial diagnosis, 20 patients had Stage 1 or 2 disease and 5 had Stage 3 or 4 disease. Before ablation, 19 (76.0%) of the 25 patients had progressed through prior treatments, including resection (n = 11), chemotherapy (n = 11), transarterial embolization (n = 3), or radiotherapy (n = 1); 6 (24.0%) of the 25 patients were treatment naïve. Ablation modality selection was based on patient and tumor characteristics and operator preference. Primary outcomes included local progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS) after ablation. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The mean ablated tumor size was 2.0 cm ± 1.2 (range, 0.5-5.0 cm). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year LPFS rates were 84.0% (95% CI, 72.9-96.8), 73.0% (95% CI, 59.0-90.4), and 59.5% (95% CI, 41.6-85.1), respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year secondary LPFS rates were 89.5% (95% CI, 80.2-99.9), 81.9% (95% CI, 69.4-96.6), and 75.6% (95% CI, 60.2-94.9). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year LPFS rates for tumors ≤2 cm in size were all 95.8% (95% CI, 88.2-100.0). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates were 78.5% (95% CI, 63.5-97.2), 68.4% (95% CI, 51.3-91.1), and 43.5% (95% CI, 23.5-80.5). Larger tumor size was associated with decreased time to local progression (hazard ratio, 1.93; P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous ablation provided favorable intermediate to long-term disease control for patients with recurrent or inoperable cholangiocarcinoma.

PET/CT Fluoroscopy during PET/CT-Guided Interventions: Initial Experience.

This study assessed the feasibility and functionality of the use of a high-speed image fusion technology to generate and display positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopic images during PET/CT-guided tumor ablation procedures. Thirteen patients underwent 14 PET/CT-guided ablations for the treatment of 20 tumors. A Food and Drug Administration-cleared multimodal image fusion platform received images pushed from a scanner, followed by near-real-time, nonrigid image registration. The most recent intraprocedural PET dataset was fused to each single-rotation CT fluoroscopy dataset as it arrived, and the fused images were displayed on an in-room monitor. PET/CT fluoroscopic images were generated and displayed in all procedures and enabled more confident targeting in 3 procedures. The mean lag time from CT fluoroscopic image acquisition to the in-room display of the fused PET/CT fluoroscopic image was 21 seconds ± 8. The registration accuracy was visually satisfactory in 13 of 14 procedures. In conclusion, PET/CT fluoroscopy was feasible and may have the potential to facilitate PET/CT-guided procedures.

Safety and Effectiveness of Percutaneous Image-Guided Thermal Ablation of Juxtacardiac Lung Tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation (IGTA) for juxtacardiac lung tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This bi-institutional retrospective cohort study included 23 consecutive patients (13 [57%] male; mean age, 55 years ± 18) with 30 juxtacardiac lung tumors located ≤10 mm from the pericardium treated in 28 IGTA sessions (25 sessions of cryoablation and 3 sessions of microwave ablation) between April 2008 and August 2022. The primary outcome was any adverse cardiac event within 90 days after ablation. Secondary outcomes included noncardiac adverse events, local tumor progression-free survival (LT-PFS), and the cumulative incidence of local tumor progression with death as a competing risk. Two tumors treated without curative intent or follow-up imaging were considered in the safety analysis but not in the progression analysis. RESULTS: The median imaging follow-up duration was 22 months (interquartile range [IQR], 10-53 months). Primary technical success was achieved in 25 (89%) ablations. No adverse cardiac events attributable to IGTA occurred. One patient experienced a phrenic nerve injury. The median LT-PFS duration was 59 months (IQR, 32-73 months). At 1, 3, and 5 years, LT-PFS was 90% (95% CI, 78%-100%), 74% (CI, 53%-100%), and 45% (CI, 20%-97%), respectively, and the cumulative incidence of local tumor progression was 4.3% (CI, 0.29%-19%), 11% (CI, 1.6%-30%), and 26% (CI, 3.3%-58%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IGTA is safe and effective for lung tumors located ≤10 mm from the pericardium. No adverse cardiac events were not observed within 90 days after ablation.

Factors Associated with Hospital Length of Stay and Adverse Events following Percutaneous Ablation of Lung Tumors.

PURPOSE: To explore the association between risk factors established in the surgical literature and hospital length of stay (HLOS), adverse events, and hospital readmission within 30 days after percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation of lung tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This bi-institutional retrospective cohort study included 131 consecutive adult patients (67 men [51%]; median age, 65 years) with 180 primary or metastatic lung tumors treated in 131 sessions (74 cryoablation and 57 microwave ablation) from 2006 to 2019. Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, sex, performance status, smoking status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), primary lung cancer versus pulmonary metastases, number of tumors treated per session, maximum axial tumor diameter, ablation modality, number of pleural punctures, anesthesia type, pulmonary artery-to-aorta ratio, lung densitometry, sarcopenia, and adipopenia were evaluated. Associations between risk factors and outcomes were assessed using univariable and multivariable generalized linear models. RESULTS: In univariable analysis, HLOS was associated with current smoking (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 4.54 [1.23-16.8]; P = .02), COPD (IRR, 3.56 [1.40-9.04]; P = .01), cryoablations with ≥3 pleural punctures (IRR, 3.13 [1.07-9.14]; P = .04), general anesthesia (IRR, 10.8 [4.18-27.8]; P < .001), and sarcopenia (IRR, 2.66 [1.10-6.44]; P = .03). After multivariable adjustment, COPD (IRR, 3.56 [1.57-8.11]; P = .003) and general anesthesia (IRR, 12.1 [4.39-33.5]; P < .001) were the only risk factors associated with longer HLOS. No associations were observed between risk factors and adverse events in multivariable analysis. Tumors treated per session were associated with risk of hospital readmission (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Identified preprocedural risk factors from the surgical literature may aid in risk stratification for HLOS after percutaneous ablation of lung tumors, but were not associated with adverse events.

Tumor and Ablation Margin Visibility during Cryoablation of Musculoskeletal Tumors: Comparing Intraprocedural PET/CT Images with CT-Only Images.

PURPOSE: To compare tumor and ice-ball margin visibility on intraprocedural positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and CT-only images and report technical success, local tumor progression, and adverse event rates for PET/CT-guided cryoablation procedures for musculoskeletal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant and institutional review board-approved retrospective study evaluated 20 PET/CT-guided cryoablation procedures performed with palliative and/or curative intent to treat 15 musculoskeletal tumors in 15 patients from 2012 to 2021. Cryoablation was performed using general anesthesia and PET/CT guidance. Procedural images were reviewed to determine the following: (a) whether the tumor borders could be fully assessed on PET/CT or CT-only images; and (b) whether tumor ice-ball margins could be fully assessed on PET/CT or CT-only images. The ability to visualize tumor borders and ice-ball margins on PET/CT images was compared with that on CT-only images. RESULTS: Tumor borders were fully assessable for 100% (20 of 20; 95% CI, 0.83-1) of procedures on PET/CT versus 20% (4 of 20; 95 CI, 0.057-0.44) of procedures on CT only (P < .001). The tumor ice-ball margin was fully assessable in 80% (16 of 20; 95% CI, 0.56-0.94) of procedures using PET/CT versus 5% (1 of 20; 95% CI, 0.0013-0.25) of procedures using CT only (P < .001). Primary technical success was achieved in 75% (15 of 20; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91) of procedures. There was local tumor progression in 23% (3/13; 95% CI, 0.050-0.54) of the treated tumors with at least 6 months of follow-up. There were 3 adverse events (1 Grade 3, 1 Grade 2, and 1 Grade 1). CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT-guided cryoablation of musculoskeletal tumors can provide superior intraprocedural visualization of the tumor and ice-ball margins compared with that provided by CT alone. Further studies are warranted to confirm the long-term efficacy and safety of this approach.

Complications after Nephron-sparing Interventions for Renal Tumors: Imaging Findings and Management.

The two primary nephron-sparing interventions for treating renal masses such as renal cell carcinoma are surgical partial nephrectomy (PN) and image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation. Nephron-sparing surgery, such as PN, has been the standard of care for treating many localized renal masses. Although uncommon, complications resulting from PN can range from asymptomatic and mild to symptomatic and life-threatening. These complications include vascular injuries such as hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and/or renal ischemia; injury to the collecting system causing urinary leak; infection; and tumor recurrence. The incidence of complications after any nephron-sparing surgery depends on many factors, such as the proximity of the tumor to blood vessels or the collecting system, the skill or experience of the surgeon, and patient-specific factors. More recently, image-guided percutaneous renal ablation has emerged as a safe and effective treatment option for small renal tumors, with comparable oncologic outcomes to those of PN and a low incidence of major complications. Radiologists must be familiar with the imaging findings encountered after these surgical and image-guided procedures, especially those indicative of complications. The authors review cross-sectional imaging characteristics of complications after PN and image-guided thermal ablation of kidney tumors and highlight the respective management strategies, ranging from clinical observation to interventions such as angioembolization or repeat surgery. Work of the U.S. Government published under an exclusive license with the RSNA. Online supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available in the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Chung and Raman in this issue.

Comparison of expected imaging findings following percutaneous microwave and cryoablation of pulmonary tumors: ablation zones and thoracic lymph nodes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare temporal changes of ablation zones and lymph nodes following lung microwave ablation (MWA) and cryoablation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared lung ablation zones and thoracic lymph nodes following MWA and cryoablation performed 2006-2020. In the ablation zone cohort, ablation zone volumes were measured on serial CT for 12 months. In the lymph node cohort, the sum of bidimensional products of lymph node diameters was measured before (baseline) and up to 6 months following ablation. Cumulative incidence curves estimated the time to 75% ablation zone reduction and linear mixed-effects regression models compared the temporal distribution of ablation zones and lymph node sizes between modalities. RESULTS: Ablation zones of 59 tumors treated in 45 sessions (16 MWA, 29 cryoablation) in 36 patients were evaluated. Differences in the time to 75% volume reduction between modalities were not detected. Following MWA, half of the ablation zones required an estimated time of 340 days to achieve a 75% volume reduction compared to 214 days following cryoablation (p = .30). Thoracic lymph node sizes after 33 sessions (13 MWA, 20 cryoablation) differed between modalities (baseline-32 days, p = .01; 32-123 days, p = .001). Following MWA, lymph nodes increased on average by 38 mm2 (95%CI, 5.0-70.7; p = .02) from baseline to 32 days, followed by an estimated decrease of 50 mm2 (32-123 days; p = .001). Following cryoablation, changes in lymph nodes were not detected (baseline-32 days, p = .33). CONCLUSION: The rate of ablation zone volume reduction did not differ between MWA and cryoablation. Thoracic lymph nodes enlarged transiently after MWA but not after cryoablation. KEY POINTS: • Contrary to current belief, the rate of lung ablation zone volume reduction did not differ between microwave and cryoablation. • Transient enlargement of thoracic lymph nodes after microwave ablation was not associated with regional tumor spread and decreased within six months following ablation. • No significant thoracic lymph node enlargement was observed following cryoablation.

Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Contributions to Patient Dose and Personnel Exposure to Radiation during PET/CT-Guided Tumor Ablations.

This study sought to quantify the positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) components of patient radiation doses and personnel exposure to radiations during PET/CT-guided tumor ablations and assess the utility of a rolling lead shield for operator protection. Two operators performed 21 PET/CT-guided ablations behind a customized, 25-mm-thick lead shield with midchest-to-midthigh coverage. The mean patient radiation dose per procedure was 3.90 mSv ± 1.13 (11.3%) from PET and 30.51 mSv ± 19.05 (88.7%) from CT. The mean primary and secondary operator exposure outside neck-level thyroid shields was 0.05 and 0.02 mSv per procedure, respectively. The radiation exposure levels behind the rolling lead shield, inside the primary operator's thyroid shield, and on the other personnel were below the measurable threshold cumulatively over 21 procedures. The mean PET exposure level at continuous close proximity to patients was 0.02 mSv per procedure. The PET radiation doses to the patients and personnel were small. Thus, the rolling lead shield provided limited benefit.

Comparison of Percutaneous Image-Guided Microwave Ablation and Cryoablation for Sarcoma Lung Metastases: A 10-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND. To our knowledge, outcomes between percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) and cryoablation of sarcoma lung metastases have not been compared. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare technical success, complications, local tumor control, and overall survival (OS) after MWA versus cryoablation of sarcoma lung metastases. METHODS. This retrospective cohort study included 27 patients (16 women, 11 men; median age, 64 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, 0-2) who, from 2009 to 2021, underwent 39 percutaneous CT-guided ablation sessions (21 MWA and 18 cryoablation sessions; one to four sessions per patient) to treat 65 sarcoma lung metastases (median number of tumors per patient, one [range, one to 12]; median tumor diameter, 11.0 mm [range, 5-33 mm]; 25% of tumors were nonperipheral). We compared complications according to ablation modality by use of generalized estimating equations. We evaluated ablation modality, tumor size, and location (peripheral vs nonperipheral) in relation to local tumor progression by use of proportional Cox hazard models, with death as the competing risk. We estimated OS using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS. Primary technical success was 97% for both modalities. Median follow-up was 23 months (range, one to 102 months; interquartile range, 12-44 months). A total of seven of 61 tumors (11%) showed local progression. Estimated 1-year and 2-year local control rates were, for tumors 1 cm or smaller, 97% and 95% after MWA versus 99% and 98% after cryoablation, and for tumors larger than 1 cm, 74% and 62% after MWA versus 86% and 79% after cryoablation. Tumor size of 1 cm or smaller was associated with a decreased cumulative incidence of local progression (p = .048); ablation modality and tumor location were not associated with progression (p = .86 and p = .54, respectively). Complications (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] grade, ≤ 3) occurred in 17 of 39 sessions (44%), prompting chest tube placement in nine (23%). There were no CTCAE grade 4 or 5 complications. OS at 1, 2, and 3 years was 100%, 89%, and 82%, respectively. CONCLUSION. High primary technical success, local control, and OS support the use of MWA and cryoablation for treating sarcoma lung metastases. Ablation modality and tumor location did not affect local progression. The rate of local tumor progression was low, especially for small tumors. No life-threatening complications occurred. CLINICAL IMPACT. Percutaneous MWA and cryoablation are both suited for the treatment of sarcoma lung metastases, especially for tumors 1 cm or smaller, whether peripheral or nonperipheral. Complications, if they occur, are not life-threatening.

Periprocedural factors associated with overall patient survival following percutaneous image-guided liver tumor cryoablation.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of periprocedural factors, including adverse events, on overall patient survival following image-guided liver tumor cryoablation procedures. METHODS: In this retrospective single-institution study, 143 patients (73 male, 70 female, ages 29-88) underwent 169 image-guided liver tumor cryoablation procedures between October 1998 and August 2014. Patient, tumor and procedural variables were recorded. The primary outcome was overall survival post-procedure (Kaplan-Meier analysis). Secondary outcomes were the impact of 15 variables on patient survival, which were assessed with multivariate cox regression and log-rank tests. RESULTS: Mean tumor diameter was 2.5 ± 1.2 cm. 26 of 143 (18.2%) patients had primary hepatic malignancies; 117 of 143 (81.8%) had liver metastases. Survival analysis revealed survivor functions at 3, 5, 7, 10 and 12 years post-ablation of 0.54, 0.37, 0.30, 0.17 and 0.06, with mean survival time of 40.8 ± 4.9 months. Tumor size ≥4 cm (p = .018), pre-procedural platelet count <100 × 103/µL (p = .023), and prior local radiation therapy (p = .014) were associated with worse overall patient survival. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were not associated with reduced survival (p = .49). CONCLUSIONS: All variables associated with overall survival were patient-related and none were associated with the cryoablation procedure. Pre-procedural thrombocytopenia, larger tumor size and history of prior local radiation therapy were independent risk factors for reduced overall survival in patients undergoing hepatic cryoablation. Adverse events related to hepatic cryoablation were not associated with decreased survival.

Outcomes Following Percutaneous Microwave and Cryoablation of Lung Metastases from Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Bi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report outcomes following percutaneous microwave and cryoablation of lung metastases from adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the head and neck. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This bi-institutional retrospective cohort study included 10 patients (6 females, median age 59 years [range 28-81]) who underwent 32 percutaneous ablation sessions (21 cryoablation, 11 microwave) of 60 lung metastases (median 3.5 tumors per patient [range 1-16]) from 2007 to 2019. Median tumor diameter was 16 mm [range 7-40], significantly larger for cryoablation (22 mm, p = 0.002). A median of two tumors were treated per session [range 1-7]. Technical success, local control, complications, and overall survival were assessed. RESULTS: Primary technical success was achieved for 55/60 tumors (91.7%). Median follow-up was 40.6 months (clinical) and 32.5 months (imaging, per tumor). Local control at 1, 2, and 3 years was 94.7%, 80.8%, and 76.4%, respectively, and did not differ between ablation modalities. Five of fifteen recurrent tumors underwent repeat ablation, and secondary technical success was achieved in four (80%). Assisted local tumor control at 1, 2, and 3 years was 96.2%, 89.8%, and 84.9%, respectively. Complications occurred following 24/32 sessions (75.0%) and 57.2% Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) lower than grade 3. Of 13 pneumothoraces, 7 required chest tube placements. Hemoptysis occurred after 7/21 cryoablation sessions, and bronchopleural fistula developed more frequently with microwave (p = 0.037). Median length of hospital stay was 1 day [range 0-10], and median overall survival was 81.5 months (IQR 40.4-93.1). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous computed tomography-guided microwave and cryoablation can treat lung metastases from ACC of the head and neck. Complications are common but manageable, with full recovery expected.

Liver tumor F-18 FDG-PET before and immediately after microwave ablation enables imaging and quantification of tumor tissue contraction.

PURPOSE: Poor liver tumor visibility after microwave ablation (MWA) limits direct tumor ablation margin assessments using contrast-enhanced CT or ultrasound (US). Positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/CT may offer improved intraprocedural assessment of liver tumor ablation margins versus current imaging techniques, as 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)-avid tumors remain visible on PET immediately following ablation. The purpose of this study was to assess intraprocedural 18F-FDG PET scans before and immediately after PET/CT-guided MWA for visualization and quantification of metabolic liver tumor tissue contraction resulting from MWA. METHODS: This retrospective study, conducted at a large academic medical center after Institutional Review Board approval, included 36 patients (20 men; mean age 63 [range 37-85]) who underwent PET/CT-guided MWA of 42 18F-FDG-avid liver tumors from May 2013 to March 2018. Tumor metabolic diameters (short/long axes) were measured for each tumor on pre- and post-ablation PET images. Tumor metabolic volumes were calculated using tumor diameter measurements and compared with automated volumes using an SUV threshold algorithm. A two-tailed paired t test was used for the analyses. RESULTS: Comparing intraprocedural pre- and post-ablation PET images, mean metabolic tumor short- and long-axis diameters decreased from 21.4 to 14.9 mm [- 29%, p < 0.001, standard deviation (SD) 18%] and from 24.0 to 18.0 mm (- 24%, p < 0.001, SD 16%), respectively. The mean calculated tumor metabolic volume decreased from 10.5 to 4.6 mm3 (- 55%, p < 0.001, SD 26%). The mean automated tumor metabolic volume decreased from 10.6 to 5.8 mm3 (- 45%, p < 0.001, SD 30%). CONCLUSION: Intraprocedural PET images of 18F-FDG-avid liver tumors allow visualization and quantification of MWA-induced metabolic tumor tissue contraction during 18F-FDG PET/CT-guided procedures. The ability to visualize contracted tumor immediately post-MWA may facilitate emerging intraprocedural PET and PET/CT imaging techniques that address a clinical gap in directly assessing the ablation margin.

Assessing ablation margins of FDG-avid liver tumors during PET/CT-guided thermal ablation procedures: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: To retrospectively assess liver tumor ablation margins using intraprocedural PET/CT images from FDG PET/CT-guided microwave or cryoablation procedures and to correlate minimum margin measurements with local progression outcomes. METHODS: Fifty-six patients (ages 36 to 85, median 62; 32 females) with 77 FDG-avid liver tumors underwent 60 FDG PET/CT guided, percutaneous microwave, or cryoablation procedures. Single breath-hold PET/CT images were used for intraprocedural assessment of the tumor ablation margin: liver tumors remained visible on PET immediately following ablation; microwave ablation zones were visible using contrast-enhanced CT; cryoablation zones (ice balls) were visible using unenhanced CT. Two readers retrospectively determined ablation margin assessability and measured the minimum ablation margin on intraprocedural PET/CT (n = 77) and postprocedural MRI (n = 56). Local tumor progression was assessed on all available follow-up imaging (1-49 months, mean 15). Local tumor progression was correlated with PET/CT minimum margin measurements using clustered survival models for 61 tumors. RESULTS: Minimum ablation margins were more often assessable using intraprocedural PET/CT (≥ 73/77 tumors, 95%) than postprocedural MRI (≤ 35/56 tumors, 63%). In 61 tumors with PET/CT-assessable margins (excluding tumors with overlapping ablations after PET/CT), there was a 6-fold increased risk of local tumor progression [hazard ratio (HR) 6.05; P = 0.004] for minimum ablation margins < 5 mm. CONCLUSION: Breath-hold PET/CT scans, during PET/CT-guided microwave or cryoablation procedures for FDG-avid liver tumors, enable reliable intraprocedural assessment of the entire tumor ablation margin; a minimum PET/CT ablation margin threshold of 5 mm correlates well with local tumor progression outcomes.

Practice and prospects for PET/CT guided interventions.

During the past 10 years, performing real-time molecular imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) in combination with computed tomography (CT) during interventional procedures has undergone rapid development. Keeping in mind the interest of the nuclear medicine readers, an update is provided of the current workflows using real-time PET/CT in percutaneous biopsies and tumor ablations. The clinical utility of PET/CT guided biopsies in cancer patients with lung, liver, lymphoma, and bone tumors are reviewed. Several technological developments, including the introduction of new PET tracers and robotic arms as well as opportunities provided through acquiring radioactive biopsy specimens are briefly reviewed.

Rapid Quality Assessment of Nonrigid Image Registration Based on Supervised Learning.

When preprocedural images are overlaid on intraprocedural images, interventional procedures benefit in that more structures are revealed in intraprocedural imaging. However, image artifacts, respiratory motion, and challenging scenarios could limit the accuracy of multimodality image registration necessary before image overlay. Ensuring the accuracy of registration during interventional procedures is therefore critically important. The goal of this study was to develop a novel framework that has the ability to assess the quality (i.e., accuracy) of nonrigid multimodality image registration accurately in near real time. We constructed a solution using registration quality metrics that can be computed rapidly and combined to form a single binary assessment of image registration quality as either successful or poor. Based on expert-generated quality metrics as ground truth, we used a supervised learning method to train and test this system on existing clinical data. Using the trained quality classifier, the proposed framework identified successful image registration cases with an accuracy of 81.5%. The current implementation produced the classification result in 5.5 s, fast enough for typical interventional radiology procedures. Using supervised learning, we have shown that the described framework could enable a clinician to obtain confirmation or caution of registration results during clinical procedures.

Percutaneous CT- and MRI-guided Cryoablation of cT1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: Intermediate- to Long-term Outcomes in 307 Patients.

Background Percutaneous ablation for cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains underused, partially because of heterogeneous and limited long-term outcomes data assessing recent cryoablation methods. Purpose To report intermediate- to long-term outcomes of image-guided percutaneous cryoablation of cT1 RCC and to compare outcomes for CT versus MRI guidance. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant retrospective single-institution study assessed patients who underwent percutaneous cryoablation for solitary pathology-proven cT1 RCC between August 2000 and July 2017. Tumors (cT1a, n = 282; cT1b, n = 25; size range, 0.6-6.5 cm; median size, 2.5 cm) underwent cryoablation with CT (n = 155) or MRI (n = 152) guidance. Primary end points of overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), imaging-confirmed disease-free survival (DFS), and local progression-free survival (LPFS) were calculated by using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Secondary end points of technique efficacy and adverse event rate were also calculated. Primary and secondary end points for CT and MRI guidance were compared by using univariable regression analysis. Results A total of 307 patients (mean age, 68 years ± 11 [standard deviation]; 192 men) were evaluated. Median clinical follow-up lasted 95 months (range, 8-219 months), and median imaging follow-up lasted 41 months (range, 0-189 months). Survival metrics at 3, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, included OS of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88%, 94%), 86% (95% CI: 82%, 90%), 78% (95% CI: 73%, 84%), and 76% (95% CI: 69%, 83%); DSS of 99.6% (95% CI: 99%, 100%), 99% (95% CI: 98%, 100%), 99% (95% CI: 98%, 100%), and 99% (95% CI: 98%, 100%); DFS of 94% (95% CI: 92%, 97%), 91% (95% CI: 88%, 96%), 88% (95% CI: 83%, 93%), and 88% (95% CI: 83%, 93%); and LPFS of 97% (95% CI: 94%, 99%), 95% (95% CI: 93%, 98%), 95% (95% CI: 93%, 98%), and 95% (95% CI: 93%, 98%). Survival did not significantly differ between CT and MRI guidance, with univariable Cox regression analysis hazard ratios of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.67; P = .92) for OS, 0.63 (95% CI: 0.26, 1.52; P = .30) for DFS, and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.26, 2.74; P = .77) for LPFS. Primary and secondary technique efficacy were 96% and 99%, respectively. Overall adverse event rate was 14% (43 of 307), including 11 grade 3 events and three grade 4 events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Conclusion Percutaneous CT- and MRI-guided cryoablation of cT1 renal cell carcinoma had similar excellent intermediate- and long-term outcomes. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Georgiades in this issue.

Liver Tumor Ablation Procedure Duration and Estimated Patient Radiation Dose: Comparing Positron Emission Tomography/CT and CT Guidance.

PURPOSE: To compare procedure duration and patient radiation dose in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and CT-guided liver tumor ablation procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, case-control study, 275 patients underwent 368 image-guided ablation procedures to treat 537 tumors. Radiologists used PET/CT guidance for 117 procedures and CT guidance for 251 procedures. PET/CT-guided procedures were performed by one radiologist (C: P.B.S.). All 3 radiologists (A: J.G.S., B: a radiologist who is not an author on this article, and C: P.B.S.) performed CT-guided procedures. Potential confounders included patient demographics, clinical and tumor characteristics, and procedural variables. RESULTS: The mean duration and estimated patient radiation dose of PET/CT-guided procedures performed by radiologist C were 21.5 ± 4.9 minutes longer and 0.7 ± 2.8 mSv higher than CT-guided procedures performed by all radiologists in an unadjusted comparison. Adjusting for confounding, mean duration and estimated dose of PET/CT-guided procedures performed by radiologist C were 28.3 ± 3.8 minutes longer (P < .0001) and 6.2 ± 2.9 mSv higher (P = .03) than CT-guided procedures performed by the same radiologist. Comparing CT-guided procedures performed by all 3 radiologists, adjusted mean durations and estimated patient doses of procedures by the least experienced radiologist, radiologist A, and the second most experienced radiologist, radiologist B, were 24.2 ± 5.1 (P < .0001) and 18.1 ± 8.9 (P = .04) minutes longer and 13.1 ± 3.7 (P < .001) and 14.5 ± 6.4 (P = .02) mSv higher, respectively, than procedures performed by the most experienced radiologist, radiologist C. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT-guided liver ablations had a slightly longer duration with slightly higher estimated patient radiation dose than similar CT-guided liver ablations. Procedure duration and patient dose do not appear to be major impediments to the emerging field of PET/CT-guided tumor ablation.

Intraprocedural Ablation Margin Assessment by Using Ammonia Perfusion PET during FDG PET/CT-guided Liver Tumor Ablation: A Pilot Study.

Purpose To prospectively determine whether nitrogen 13 (13N) ammonia perfusion positron emission tomography (PET) during fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT)-guided liver tumor ablation can be used to intraprocedurally assess ablation margins. Materials and Methods Eight patients (five women and three men; age range, 36-74 years; mean age, 57 years) were enrolled in this pilot study and underwent FDG PET/CT-guided microwave ablation of 11 FDG-avid liver metastases (mean diameter, 22 mm; range, 11-34 mm). All procedures were performed between March 2014 and December 2016. Complete ablation margin visibility and minimum ablation margin thickness were assessed by using intraprocedural 13N-ammonia perfusion PET compared with 24-hour postprocedural MR imaging by two independent blinded radiologists. Local tumor progression for each ablated tumor was assessed at follow-up imaging for 3-38 months (median, 17.6 months). Descriptive analysis was performed. Results Eleven of 11 (100%) ablation margins were fully assessable by using intraprocedural perfusion PET by both readers; six of eleven (55%) margins were fully assessable by both readers at postprocedural 24-hour MR imaging. By using perfusion PET, one tumor that had been judged by both readers to have a minimum margin of 0 mm progressed locally. No tumors judged to have a minimum margin greater than 0 mm at perfusion PET progressed locally. Conclusion 13N-ammonia perfusion PET during FDG PET/CT-guided liver tumor ablations can potentially be used to intraprocedurally assess the entire ablation margin, including the minimum margin. © RSNA, 2018.