The value of microbiological screening in cleft lip and palate surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to investigate whether nasal and oropharyngeal microbiological swabs taken prior to cleft lip and palate surgery correlated with the oronasal flora at the time of surgery and whether specific culture results affected surgical outcome. METHODS: Prospective audit set in two designated U.K. cleft centers each with a single surgeon. Nasal and oropharyngeal microbiological swabs were taken within 2 weeks prior to surgery and again on the operating table. Adverse outcome measures included postoperative pyrexia, wound dehiscence, or fistula formation. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four cases were recruited over 12 months. Nasal swabs cultured organisms significantly more often than oropharyngeal swabs (p < .0001). No significant difference was detected in the number of cases with a positive microbiology culture preoperatively compared with perioperative sampling (48% and 50%). The specific organisms cultured from preoperative swabs were the same as those cultured at surgery in only half of cases. Preoperative microbiology swabs were poorly predictive of the oronasal flora at surgery. Antibiotic treatment of patients with positive preoperative microbiology did not significantly reduce the incidence of bacterial colonization or significantly alter clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: Preoperative microbiological investigation is not helpful in predicting the nasal and oropharyngeal flora at the time of surgery. Further, culture results did not correlate with postoperative outcome, regardless of whether pre- or perioperative antibiotic therapy was instigated. This evidence suggests that microbiology screening swabs are an unnecessary investigation.

MRI for definitive in utero diagnosis of cleft palate: a useful adjunct to antenatal care?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in obtaining a definitive prenatal diagnosis of cleft palate. DESIGN: All expectant mothers with a sonographically diagnosed fetal cleft lip or a previously affected child with cleft palate were offered antenatal MRI at around 34 weeks' gestation. Images were interpreted by a consultant radiologist who was blinded to the ultrasound diagnosis. Two MRI readings were performed: one at the time of examination and one at the end of the study to elicit the radiologist's learning curve. MRI findings were correlated with the birth diagnosis. SETTING: Tertiary referral center for facial clefts--the Spires Cleft Centre, Oxford Children's Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Study participants included 49 pregnant women between 24 and 37 weeks' gestation, four with a family history of cleft posterior palate and 45 with a facial cleft on a 20-week ultrasound. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of fetal MRI for involvement of the palate was 96%, and the negative predictive value was 80%. The accuracy in predicting palatal clefting of four different MRI signs is discussed. The radiologist's interpretation skills significantly improved between the two MRI readings. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal MRI enables us to predict accurately the extent of a cleft palate after an ultrasound diagnosis of cleft lip. With more accurate diagnosis of the severity of the cleft, we can counsel patients more precisely and plan postnatal management correctly.