Intraoperative complications and visual outcomes of cataract surgery in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To compare the rate of intraoperative complications and visual outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NvAMD) and control eyes without NvAMD undergoing phacoemulsification. SETTING: Multicenter study. DESIGN: Retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study. METHODS: Eyes were classified based on the presence or absence of an NvAMD diagnosis. The main outcomes were (1) the rate of intraoperative complications, (2) the logMAR visual acuity (VA) at 4 to 12 weeks postoperatively in both groups, and (3) the reinjection rate of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor after phacoemulsification. RESULTS: Preoperative VA was worse in the NvAMD group (0.9 ± 0.5) compared with the reference group (0.6 ± 0.5). We observed no difference in the rate of posterior capsule rupture (PCR) (2.90% vs 2.77%; P = .889), dropped lens fragments (0.46% vs 0.29%; P = .618), or zonular dialysis (0.46% vs 0.58%, P = .749) between the 2 groups. Receiving ≥10 intravitreal injections before cataract surgery predicted the likelihood of PCR with an odds ratio of 2.86 (P = .027). Proportions of eyes achieving a visual gain of ≥0.3 logMAR (∼3 Snellen lines equivalent) was lower in NvAMD eyes (39.2% vs 63.7%; P < .0001). We observed 203 eyes (73%) in the active treatment group and 139 eyes (36%) in the inactive treatment group received >1 intravitreal injection after phacoemulsification (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The risk for PCR was higher for eyes receiving ≥10 intravitreal injections before phacoemulsification. Only 39% of eyes with NvAMD had visual improvement by ≥3 Snellen lines.

Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy with Macular Star following COVID-19 Vaccination.

PURPOSE: To report a case of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAAION) with macular star after receiving the second dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. METHOD: Case report. OBSERVATION: A 51-year-old male presented with acute visual disturbances one day after the second dose of BNT162b2 mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. At presentation, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/25 right eye (OD) and counting fingers at 3 feet left eye (OS). Anterior segment examination was normal in both eyes. Dilated fundoscopy was unremarkable OD, however, it disclosed optic nerve swelling and subretinal fluid OS. Patient was treated with a gradual tapering dose of oral prednisone over 1 month. At the five-week follow-up visit, optic disc swelling and subretinal fluid resolved with minimal improvement in BCVA to 20/400 OS. CONCLUSION: It is unclear whether COVID-19 vaccination was the triggering agent to the NAAION or just a coincidence, yet ophthalmologists should be aware of such a possible association.

Analysis of Operational Efficiency and Cost Differences between Local and General Anesthesia for Vitreoretinal Surgery.

There has been a growing trend of using local anesthesia (LA) compared to general anesthesia (GA) over the last two decades in VR surgery. We aim to answer the following question: what is the institutional benefit of LA versus GA use in operation-room time, anesthesia duration, earlier discharge from an outpatient surgery facility, and the estimated cost savings? We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1476 eyes that underwent vitreoretinal surgery over a 6-year period from a single site; 61.8% of patients received GA and 38.2% received LA for VR surgery. Anesthesia, surgical, and recovery times were significantly shorter with LA (100.49, 66.47, 66.47 mins) vs. GA (145.53, 100.14, 75.08 mins). Anesthesia, surgical, and recovery costs were significantly lower for eyes that received LA, with an estimated adjusted cost reduction of USD 1516 per surgery using LA instead of GA. Use of LA for vitreoretinal surgery is associated with better operational efficiency, earlier patient discharge, and significant cost reduction.

Incidence of chorioretinitis and endophthalmitis in hospitalized patients with fungemia.

AIM/PURPOSE: Bloodstream candida infections can seed the eye via hematogenous spread and result in chorioretinitis or endophthalmitis. If undetected and untreated, this can result in permanent vision loss. Past studies evaluating incidence of ocular candidiasis among hospitalized patients with positive fungal blood cultures have demonstrated variable rates of occurrence, but recent studies have generally shown a lower incidence than was reported several decades ago. Given low rates of occurrence, the utility of screening patients with dilated fundus exams has been called into question. The primary aim of this investigation is to identify the rate of chorioretinitis and endophthalmitis based on dilated fundoscopy for patients with fungemia at a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of adult patients admitted to the medical centre of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) between May 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017, who had positive fungal blood cultures during their hospitalization. RESULTS: There were 324 positive fungal cultures in 290 patients. Of this initial group, there were 161 eye exams. Ocular examination identified 7 of 161 patients (4.3%) with chorioretinitis or endophthalmitis. DISCUSSION: These outcomes along with previous studies support the current guidelines that screening with dilated fundus examination for these patients is appropriate and necessary.

Fungal Endophthalmitis: A Comprehensive Review.

Endophthalmitis is a serious ophthalmologic condition involving purulent inflammation of the intraocular spaces. The underlying etiology of infectious endophthalmitis is typically bacterial or fungal. The mechanism of entry into the eye is either exogenous, involving seeding of an infectious source from outside the eye (e.g., trauma or surgical complications), or endogenous, involving transit of an infectious source to the eye via the bloodstream. The most common organism for fungal endophthalmitis is Candida albicans. The most common clinical manifestation of fungal endophthalmitis is vision loss, but other signs of inflammation and infection are frequently present. Fungal endophthalmitis is a clinical diagnosis, which can be supported by vitreous, aqueous, or blood cultures. Treatment involves systemic and intravitreal antifungal medications as well as possible pars plana vitrectomy. In this review, we examine these essential elements of understanding fungal endophthalmitis as a clinically relevant entity, which threatens patients' vision.

Survey of the use of laser protective eyewear among international retina specialists: a European vitreoretinal society study.

OBJECTIVE: To report the trends for the use of eye protection methods during retinal laser in clinic and operating room. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Retrospective analysis of a 14-item survey questionnaire submitted to the European Vitreoretinal Society members. RESULTS: Responses from 630 members were analysed. Most of the respondents practised in Europe (52.7%), followed by North America (21.0%). The majority of respondents had laser filters in the microscope for the operating surgeon (92.1%), or used protective goggles (6.8%). Only 38.9% of respondents indicated that auxiliary staff in the operative room used protective goggles during laser treatment. Three-dimensional retina viewing system was used by only 22.5% of respondents, of those, 34.5% reported use of laser protection goggles by the operating surgeon. Rates of laser protection by auxiliary staff were 62.9% for indirect laser and 60.8% for slit lamp laser. We found a higher rate for use of laser protection by auxiliary staff in North America-based practices for endolaser (p<0.00001), laser indirect ophthalmoscope (p<0.00001) and slit lamp laser (p=0.00033) compared with the rest of the world. CONCLUSION: The use of laser protection methods is routinely adopted by the physicians in the operating room and clinic, but less so by their assisting or auxiliary staff.

Outcome of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Use in Uveitic Eyes Undergoing Pars Plana Vitrectomy Surgery.

Purpose: To report the outcomes in eyes with noninfectious uveitis receiving dexamethasone implant at the time of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).Methods: Retrospective analysis of visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), vitreous haze score (VHS), and central subfield thickness (CST) at baseline and follow-up visits.Results: Fourteen eyes received dexamethasone implant at the time of PPV. The CST was improved from 469 ± 182 µm at baseline to 320 ± 60 at 6 months (p = .0112) and 295 ± 46 at 12 months (p = .0728). Vitritis only recurred in 2 eyes at 6 months (18.2%) and 1 eye at 12 months (14.3%). The probability of VA improvement of ≥0.3 logMAR was 57% at 6 months and 66% at 12 months. Therapy for IOP rise was initiated in 6 eyes (42.9%).Conclusions: Local delivery of dexamethasone implant with PPV is a feasible method to counteract postoperative inflammation and macular thickening.

Inflammatory choroiditis and papillitis from Crohn's disease in a child.

A 5-year-old boy had subacute painless visual loss in his left eye with disk edema, macular edema, and choroidal thickening. He was subsequently diagnosed with inflammatory papillitis and choroiditis from Crohn's disease. The disk and macular edema responded minimally to antivascular endothelial growth factor injections but significantly to intravitreal corticosteroids.

Bilateral Spontaneous Hyphemas in a Patient with Aplastic Anemia.

Bilateral spontaneous hyphemas are a rare ophthalmic event. Aplastic anemia is a hematologic condition with well-documented manifestations in the posterior segment but not the anterior segment. We present a patient with aplastic anemia without obvious risk factors for hyphema who developed bilateral spontaneous hyphemas. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of bilateral spontaneous hyphemas in a patient with aplastic anemia.