Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 76(11): 3045-3058, 2021 10 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34473285

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on health systems. The WHO Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Surveillance and Quality Assessment Collaborating Centres Network conducted a survey to assess the effects of COVID-19 on AMR surveillance, prevention and control. METHODS: From October to December 2020, WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) national focal points completed a questionnaire, including Likert scales and open-ended questions. Data were descriptively analysed, income/regional differences were assessed and free-text questions were thematically analysed. RESULTS: Seventy-three countries across income levels participated. During the COVID-19 pandemic, 67% reported limited ability to work with AMR partnerships; decreases in funding were frequently reported by low- and middle-income countries (LMICs; P < 0.01). Reduced availability of nursing, medical and public health staff for AMR was reported by 71%, 69% and 64%, respectively, whereas 67% reported stable cleaning staff availability. The majority (58%) reported reduced reagents/consumables, particularly LMICs (P < 0.01). Decreased numbers of cultures, elective procedures, chronically ill admissions and outpatients and increased ICU admissions reported could bias AMR data. Reported overall infection prevention and control (IPC) improvement could decrease AMR rates, whereas increases in selected inappropriate IPC practices and antimicrobial prescribing could increase rates. Most did not yet have complete data on changing AMR rates due to COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first survey to explore the global impact of COVID-19 on AMR among GLASS countries. Responses highlight important actions to help ensure that AMR remains a global health priority, including engaging with GLASS to facilitate reliable AMR surveillance data, seizing the opportunity to develop more sustainable IPC programmes, promoting integrated antibiotic stewardship guidance, leveraging increased laboratory capabilities and other system-strengthening efforts.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , COVID-19 , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 63(37): 812-5, 2014 Sep 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25233282

RESUMO

Annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all health care personnel (HCP). In August 2011, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) published a final rule requiring acute care hospitals that participate in its Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program to report HCP influenza vaccination data through the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) beginning January 1, 2013. Data reported by 4,254 acute care hospitals, covering the period October 1, 2013, through March 31, 2014, were analyzed to collect estimates of the proportion of HCP vaccinated nationally and by state for three groups: (1) employees, (2) licensed independent practitioners (LIPs), and (3) adult students/trainees and volunteers. Overall in the United States, 81.8% of hospital-based HCP were reported vaccinated, with the highest proportion (86.1%) among employees and the lowest (61.9%) among LIPs. The proportion reported vaccinated varied widely by state, with ranges of 69.0%-97.6% for employees, 33.8%-93.6% for LIPs, and 50.3%-96.3% for adult students/trainees and volunteers. Public reporting of vaccination data has been shown to increase HCP influenza vaccination coverage. These new NHSN data provide a baseline for measuring changes in future hospital-based reporting of HCP influenza vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , Estações do Ano , Estados Unidos
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(3): 335-342, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37877166

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether increased antimicrobial use (AU) at the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was driven by greater AU in COVID-19 patients only, or whether AU also increased in non-COVID-19 patients. DESIGN: In this retrospective observational ecological study from 2019 to 2020, we stratified inpatients by COVID-19 status and determined relative percentage differences in median monthly AU in COVID-19 patients versus non-COVID-19 patients during the COVID-19 period (March-December 2020) and the pre-COVID-19 period (March-December 2019). We also determined relative percentage differences in median monthly AU in non-COVID-19 patients during the COVID-19 period versus the pre-COVID-19 period. Statistical significance was assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. SETTING: The study was conducted in 3 acute-care hospitals in Chicago, Illinois. PATIENTS: Hospitalized patients. RESULTS: Facility-wide AU for broad-spectrum antibacterial agents predominantly used for hospital-onset infections was significantly greater in COVID-19 patients versus non-COVID-19 patients during the COVID-19 period (with relative increases of 73%, 66%, and 91% for hospitals A, B, and C, respectively), and during the pre-COVID-19 period (with relative increases of 52%, 64%, and 66% for hospitals A, B, and C, respectively). In contrast, facility-wide AU for all antibacterial agents was significantly lower in non-COVID-19 patients during the COVID-19 period versus the pre-COVID-19 period (with relative decreases of 8%, 7%, and 8% in hospitals A, B, and C, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: AU for broad-spectrum antimicrobials was greater in COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID-19 patients at the onset of the pandemic. AU for all antibacterial agents in non-COVID-19 patients decreased in the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID-19 period.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecção Hospitalar , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pacientes Internados , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico
5.
Zoonoses Public Health ; 69(3): 215-223, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35060679

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We describe the epidemiology of live poultry-associated salmonellosis (LPAS) and investigate potential risk factors associated with hospitalization among adults aged ≥65 years in the United States during 2008-2017. LPAS is a public health concern in the United States, especially among people with increased risk for hospitalization, such as older adults. SAMPLE: We analysed data from people aged ≥65 years with non-typhoidal salmonellosis who reported live poultry contact within seven days prior to illness onset. PROCEDURE: We used logistic regression to estimate the odds of hospitalization associated with several risk factors including types of live poultry contact exposures. RESULTS: LPAS among older adults in this analysis resulted in high hospitalization rates. Salmonella Hadar infection was associated with increased hospitalization. Among older adults with LPAS, 109 individuals of 127 (86%) reported contact with live poultry at their or someone else's residence, and 85 of 105 with available information (81%) reported owning poultry. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Additional infection prevention information and education targeted at poultry-owning older adults are needed to prevent illness and hospitalization.


Assuntos
Intoxicação Alimentar por Salmonella , Salmonelose Animal , Animais , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Hospitalização , Humanos , Aves Domésticas , Fatores de Risco , Salmonella , Intoxicação Alimentar por Salmonella/epidemiologia , Intoxicação Alimentar por Salmonella/veterinária , Salmonelose Animal/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
Public Health Rep ; 126(2): 176-85, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21387947

RESUMO

In September 2008, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sponsored a meeting of public health and infection-control professionals to address the implementation of surveillance for multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs)-particularly those related to health care-associated infections. The group discussed the role of health departments and defined goals for future surveillance activities. Participants identified the following main points: (1) surveillance should guide prevention and infection-control activities, (2) an MDRO surveillance system should be adaptable and not organism specific, (3) new systems should utilize and link existing systems, and (4) automated electronic laboratory reporting will be an important component of surveillance but will take time to develop. Current MDRO reporting mandates and surveillance methods vary across states and localities. Health departments that have not already done so should be proactive in determining what type of system, if any, will fit their needs.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Órgãos Estatais de Desenvolvimento e Planejamento em Saúde/organização & administração , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Notificação de Doenças/métodos , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Estados Unidos
7.
Med ; 2(4): 365-369, 2021 04 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35590159

RESUMO

Antibiotic resistance challenges public health on many fronts, and it is increasingly clear that it must be addressed in the environment to control emerging resistance and infections in humans and animals. Here, we outline how the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is addressing antibiotic resistance in the environment.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Antifúngicos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Farmacorresistência Fúngica , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Am J Public Health ; 100(9): 1777-83, 2010 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20634456

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We compared 3 methods for classifying methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections as health care associated or community associated for use in public health surveillance. METHODS: We analyzed data on MRSA infections reported to the Michigan Department of Community Health from October 1, 2004, to December 31, 2005. Patient demographics, risk factors, infection information, and susceptibility were collected for 2151 cases. We classified each case by the health care risk factor, infection-type, and susceptibility pattern methods and compared the results of the 3 methods. RESULTS: Demographic, clinical, and microbiological variables yielded similar health care-associated and community-associated distributions when classified by risk factor and infection type. When 2 methods yielded the same classifications, the overall distribution was similar to classification by 3 methods. No specific combination of 2 methods was superior. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA categorization by 2 methods is more accurate than it is by a single method. The health care risk factor and infection-type methods yield comparable classification results. Accuracy is increased by using more variables; however, further research is needed to identify the optimal combination.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/classificação , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Vigilância da População , Infecções Estafilocócicas/classificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Demografia , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Michigan/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
9.
Clin Infect Dis ; 46(5): 668-74, 2008 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18257700

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This report compares the clinical characteristics, epidemiologic investigations, infection-control evaluations, and microbiologic findings of all 7 of the cases of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) infection in the United States during the period 2002-2006. METHODS: Epidemiologic, clinical, and infection-control information was collected. VRSA isolates underwent confirmatory identification, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and typing of the resistance genes. To assess VRSA transmission, case patients and their contacts were screened for VRSA carriage. RESULTS: Seven cases were identified from 2002 through 2006; 5 were reported from Michigan, 1 was reported from Pennsylvania, and 1 was reported from New York. All VRSA isolates were vanA positive and had a median vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration of 512 microg/mL. All case patients had a history of prior methicillin-resistant S. aureus and enterococcal infection or colonization; all had several underlying conditions, including chronic skin ulcers; and most had received vancomycin therapy prior to their VRSA infection. Person-to-person transmission of VRSA was not identified beyond any of the case patients. Infection-control precautions were evaluated and were consistent with established guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Seven patients with vanA-positive VRSA have been identified in the United States. Prompt detection by microbiology laboratories and adherence to recommended infection control measures for multidrug-resistant organisms appear to have prevented transmission to other patients.


Assuntos
Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Resistência a Vancomicina/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Carbono-Oxigênio Ligases/genética , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Saúde da Família , Feminino , Genótipo , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 12(7): 1139-1146, 2017 Jul 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28663227

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Persons receiving outpatient hemodialysis are at risk for bloodstream and vascular access infections. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducts surveillance for these infections through the National Healthcare Safety Network. We summarize 2014 data submitted to National Healthcare Safety Network Dialysis Event Surveillance. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Dialysis facilities report three types of dialysis events (bloodstream infections; intravenous antimicrobial starts; and pus, redness, or increased swelling at the hemodialysis vascular access site). Denominator data consist of the number of hemodialysis outpatients treated at the facility during the first 2 working days of each month. We calculated dialysis event rates stratified by vascular access type (e.g., arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous graft, or central venous catheter) and standardized infection ratios (comparing individual facility observed with predicted numbers of infections) for bloodstream infections. We described pathogens identified among bloodstream infections. RESULTS: A total of 6005 outpatient hemodialysis facilities reported dialysis event data for 2014 to the National Healthcare Safety Network. These facilities reported 160,971 dialysis events, including 29,516 bloodstream infections, 149,722 intravenous antimicrobial starts, and 38,310 pus, redness, or increased swelling at the hemodialysis vascular access site events; 22,576 (76.5%) bloodstream infections were considered vascular access related. Most bloodstream infections (63.0%) and access-related bloodstream infections (69.8%) occurred in patients with a central venous catheter. The rate of bloodstream infections per 100 patient-months was 0.64 (0.26 for arteriovenous fistula, 0.39 for arteriovenous graft, and 2.16 for central venous catheter). Other dialysis event rates were also highest among patients with a central venous catheter. Facility bloodstream infection standardized infection ratio distribution was positively skewed with a median of 0.84. Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated bloodstream infection pathogen (30.6%), and 39.5% of S. aureus isolates tested were resistant to methicillin. CONCLUSIONS: The 2014 National Healthcare Safety Network Dialysis Event data represent nearly all United States outpatient dialysis facilities. Rates of infection and other dialysis events were highest among patients with a central venous catheter compared with other vascular access types. Surveillance data can help define the epidemiology of important infections in this patient population.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Administração Intravenosa , Assistência Ambulatorial , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/instrumentação , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Humanos , Resistência a Meticilina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Vigilância da População , Prognóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
11.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 37(11): 1288-1301, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27573805

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE To describe antimicrobial resistance patterns for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) that occurred in 2011-2014 and were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network. METHODS Data from central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, ventilator-associated pneumonias, and surgical site infections were analyzed. These HAIs were reported from acute care hospitals, long-term acute care hospitals, and inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Pooled mean proportions of pathogens that tested resistant (or nonsusceptible) to selected antimicrobials were calculated by year and HAI type. RESULTS Overall, 4,515 hospitals reported that at least 1 HAI occurred in 2011-2014. There were 408,151 pathogens from 365,490 HAIs reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network, most of which were reported from acute care hospitals with greater than 200 beds. Fifteen pathogen groups accounted for 87% of reported pathogens; the most common included Escherichia coli (15%), Staphylococcus aureus (12%), Klebsiella species (8%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (8%). In general, the proportion of isolates with common resistance phenotypes was higher among device-associated HAIs compared with surgical site infections. Although the percent resistance for most phenotypes was similar to earlier reports, an increase in the magnitude of the resistance percentages among E. coli pathogens was noted, especially related to fluoroquinolone resistance. CONCLUSION This report represents a national summary of antimicrobial resistance among select HAIs and phenotypes. The distribution of frequent pathogens and some resistance patterns appear to have changed from 2009-2010, highlighting the need for continual, careful monitoring of these data across the spectrum of HAI types. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;1-14.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Bacilos e Cocos Aeróbios Gram-Negativos/efeitos dos fármacos , Bacilos Gram-Negativos Anaeróbios Facultativos/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/efeitos dos fármacos , Hospitais , Humanos , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/microbiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia
12.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 37(2): 205-7, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26554448

RESUMO

Reports of bloodstream infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among chronic hemodialysis patients to 2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance systems (National Healthcare Safety Network Dialysis Event and Emerging Infections Program) were compared to evaluate completeness of reporting. Many methicillin-resistant S. aureus bloodstream infections identified in hospitals were not reported to National Healthcare Safety Network Dialysis Event.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Diálise Renal , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Estados Unidos
13.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 36(1): 54-64, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25627762

RESUMO

DISCLOSURE The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Agency for Toxic Substances and Diseases Registry. OBJECTIVE Describe the impact of standardizing state-specific summary measures of antibiotic resistance that inform regional interventions to reduce transmission of resistant pathogens in healthcare settings. DESIGN Analysis of public health surveillance data. METHODS Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) data from intensive care units (ICUs) of facilities reporting to the National Healthcare Safety Network in 2011 were analyzed. For CLABSI due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), extended-spectrum cephalosporin (ESC)-nonsusceptible Klebsiella species, and carbapenem-nonsusceptible Klebsiella species, we computed 3 state-level summary measures of nonsusceptibility: crude percent nonsusceptible, model-based adjusted percent nonsusceptible, and crude infection incidence rate. RESULTS Overall, 1,791 facilities reported CLABSIs from ICU patients. Of 1,618 S. aureus CLABSIs with methicillin-susceptibility test results, 791 (48.9%) were due to MRSA. Of 756 Klebsiella CLABSIs with ESC-susceptibility test results, 209 (27.7%) were due to ESC-nonsusceptible Klebsiella, and among 661 Klebsiella CLABSI with carbapenem susceptibility test results, 70 (10.6%) were due to carbapenem-nonsusceptible Klebsiella. All 3 state-specific measures demonstrated variability in magnitude by state. Adjusted measures, with few exceptions, were not appreciably different from crude values for any phenotypes. When linking values of crude and adjusted percent nonsusceptible by state, a state's absolute rank shifted slightly for MRSA in 5 instances and only once each for ESC-nonsusceptible and carbapenem-nonsusceptible Klebsiella species. Infection incidence measures correlated strongly with both percent nonsusceptibility measures. CONCLUSIONS Crude state-level summary measures, based on existing NHSN CLABSI data, may suffice to assess geographic variability in antibiotic resistance. As additional variables related to antibiotic resistance become available, risk-adjusted summary measures are preferable.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções por Klebsiella/epidemiologia , Klebsiella oxytoca , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Risco Ajustado/métodos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Notificação de Doenças , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Klebsiella/microbiologia , Klebsiella oxytoca/efeitos dos fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
14.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 34(1): 1-14, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23221186

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe antimicrobial resistance patterns for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) during 2009-2010. METHODS: Central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and surgical site infections were included. Pooled mean proportions of isolates interpreted as resistant (or, in some cases, nonsusceptible) to selected antimicrobial agents were calculated by type of HAI and compared to historical data. RESULTS: Overall, 2,039 hospitals reported 1 or more HAIs; 1,749 (86%) were general acute care hospitals, and 1,143 (56%) had fewer than 200 beds. There were 69,475 HAIs and 81,139 pathogens reported. Eight pathogen groups accounted for about 80% of reported pathogens: Staphylococcus aureus (16%), Enterococcus spp. (14%), Escherichia coli (12%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (11%), Candida spp. (9%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (and Klebsiella oxytoca; 8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8%), and Enterobacter spp. (5%). The percentage of resistance was similar to that reported in the previous 2-year period, with a slight decrease in the percentage of S. aureus resistant to oxacillins (MRSA). Nearly 20% of pathogens reported from all HAIs were the following multidrug-resistant phenotypes: MRSA (8.5%); vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (3%); extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant K. pneumoniae and K. oxytoca (2%), E. coli (2%), and Enterobacter spp. (2%); and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (2%), K. pneumoniae/oxytoca (<1%), E. coli (<1%), and Enterobacter spp. (<1%). Among facilities reporting HAIs with 1 of the above gram-negative bacteria, 20%-40% reported at least 1 with the resistant phenotype. CONCLUSION: While the proportion of resistant isolates did not substantially change from that in the previous 2 years, multidrug-resistant gram-negative phenotypes were reported from a moderate proportion of facilities.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Candida/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Resistência a Múltiplos Medicamentos , Enterococcus/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Fenótipo , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/microbiologia , Prevalência , Análise de Regressão , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia
16.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 33(10): 993-1000, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22961018

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate national data on healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), device utilization, and antimicrobial resistance in long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs). DESIGN AND SETTING: Comparison of data from LTACHs and from medical and medical-surgical intensive care units (ICUs) in short-stay acute care hospitals reporting to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) during 2010. METHODS: Rates of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) as well as device utilization ratios were calculated. For each HAI, pathogen profiles and antimicrobial resistance prevalence were evaluated. Comparisons were made using Poisson regression and the mood median and χ2 tests. RESULTS: In 2010, 104 LTACHs reported CLABSIs and 57 reported CAUTIs and VAP to the NHSN. Median CLABSI rates in LTACHs (1.25 events per 1,000 device-days reported; range, 0.0-5.96) were comparable to rates in major teaching ICUs and were higher than those in other ICUs. CAUTI rates in LTACHs (median, 2.61; range, 0.0-9.92) were higher and VAP rates (median, 0.0; range, 0.0-3.29) were generally lower than those in ICUs. Central line utilization in LTACHs was higher than that in ICUs, whereas urinary catheter and ventilator utilization was lower. Methicillin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus CLABSIs (83%) and vancomycin resistance among Enterococcus faecalis CAUTIs (44%) were higher in LTACHs than in ICUs. Multidrug resistance among Pseudomonas aeruginosa CAUTIs (25%) was higher in LTACHs than in most ICUs. CONCLUSIONS: CLABSIs and CAUTIs associated with multidrug-resistant organisms present a challenge in LTACHs. Continued HAI surveillance with pathogen-level data can guide prevention efforts in LTACHs.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Cateteres de Demora/microbiologia , Cateteres de Demora/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/efeitos dos fármacos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Assistência de Longa Duração , Distribuição de Poisson , Vigilância da População/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Ventiladores Mecânicos/efeitos adversos , Ventiladores Mecânicos/microbiologia , Ventiladores Mecânicos/estatística & dados numéricos
17.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 32(7): 649-55, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21666394

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Expanding hospitalized patients' risk stratification for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is important for improving patient safety. We applied definitions for hospital-onset (HO) and community-onset (CO) CDI to electronic data from 85 hospitals between January 2007 and June 2008 to identify factors associated with higher HO CDI rates. METHODS: Nonrecurrent CDI cases were identified among adult (≥ 18-year-old) inpatients by a positive C. difficile toxin assay result more than 8 weeks after any previous positive result. Case categories included HO, CO-hospital associated (CO-HA), CO-indeterminate hospital association (CO-IN), and CO-non-hospital associated (CO-NHA). C. difficile testing intensity (CDTI) was defined as the total number of C. difficile tests performed, normalized to the number of patients with at least 1 C. difficile toxin test recorded. We calculated both the incidence density and the prevalence of CDI where appropriate. We fitted a multivariable Poisson model to identify factors associated with higher HO CDI rates. RESULTS: Among 1,351,156 unique patients with 2,022,213 admissions, 9,803 cases of CDI were identified; of these, 50.6% were HO, 17.4% were CO-HA, 9.0% were CO-IN, and 23.0% were CO-NHA. The incidence density of HO was 6.3 per 10,000 patient-days. The prevalence of CO CDI on admission was, per 10,000 admissions, 8.4 for CO-HA, 4.4 for CO-IN, and 11.1 for CO-NHA. Factors associated (P < .0001) with higher HO CDI rates included older age, higher CO-NHA prevalence on admission, and increased CDTI. CONCLUSION: Electronic health information can be leveraged to risk-stratify HO CDI rates by patient age and CO-NHA prevalence on admission. Hospitals should optimize diagnostic testing to improve patient care and measured CDI rates.


Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Vigilância da População/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Notificação de Doenças , Hospitais , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Distribuição de Poisson , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
19.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 29(11): 996-1011, 2008 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18947320

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of selected antimicrobial resistance patterns among pathogens causing device-associated and procedure-associated healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) reported by hospitals in the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). METHODS: Data are included on HAIs (ie, central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and surgical site infections) reported to the Patient Safety Component of the NHSN between January 2006 and October 2007. The results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of up to 3 pathogenic isolates per HAI by a hospital were evaluated to define antimicrobial-resistance in the pathogenic isolates. The pooled mean proportions of pathogenic isolates interpreted as resistant to selected antimicrobial agents were calculated by type of HAI and overall. The incidence rates of specific device-associated infections were calculated for selected antimicrobial-resistant pathogens according to type of patient care area; the variability in the reported rates is described. RESULTS: Overall, 463 hospitals reported 1 or more HAIs: 412 (89%) were general acute care hospitals, and 309 (67%) had 200-1,000 beds. There were 28,502 HAIs reported among 25,384 patients. The 10 most common pathogens (accounting for 84% of any HAIs) were coagulase-negative staphylococci (15%), Staphylococcus aureus (15%), Enterococcus species (12%), Candida species (11%), Escherichia coli (10%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (6%), Enterobacter species (5%), Acinetobacter baumannii (3%), and Klebsiella oxytoca (2%). The pooled mean proportion of pathogenic isolates resistant to antimicrobial agents varied significantly across types of HAI for some pathogen-antimicrobial combinations. As many as 16% of all HAIs were associated with the following multidrug-resistant pathogens: methicillin-resistant S. aureus (8% of HAIs), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (4%), carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (2%), extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant K. pneumoniae (1%), extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant E. coli (0.5%), and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, and E. coli (0.5%). Nationwide, the majority of units reported no HAIs due to these antimicrobial-resistant pathogens.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Processamento Eletrônico de Dados/métodos , Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Fungos/efeitos dos fármacos , Fungos/fisiologia , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Micoses/epidemiologia , Micoses/microbiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/microbiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA