Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Aust Fam Physician ; 44(1-2): 10-1, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25688952

RESUMO

One of the few and largest randomised controlled trials of point-of-care testing (PoCT) in general practice was conducted in Australia. This trial showed PoCT provided the same or better clinical effectiveness than central laboratory testing for HbA1c, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, cholesterol and triglyceride measurements but not for the international normalised ratio (INR) or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. For most tests, however, testing in the central laboratory was more cost-effective than PoCT. One factor that contributed to the higher cost of PoCT was the considerable amount of resources devoted to training and monitoring the PoCT operators throughout the trial, many of whom were in remote locations.


Assuntos
Troca de Informação em Saúde/tendências , Internet , Testes Imediatos/tendências , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Austrália , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Serviços de Saúde Rural
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA