Selective visuoconstructional impairment following mild COVID-19 with inflammatory and neuroimaging correlation findings.

People recovered from COVID-19 may still present complications including respiratory and neurological sequelae. In other viral infections, cognitive impairment occurs due to brain damage or dysfunction caused by vascular lesions and inflammatory processes. Persistent cognitive impairment compromises daily activities and psychosocial adaptation. Some level of neurological and psychiatric consequences were expected and described in severe cases of COVID-19. However, it is debatable whether neuropsychiatric complications are related to COVID-19 or to unfoldings from a severe infection. Nevertheless, the majority of cases recorded worldwide were mild to moderate self-limited illness in non-hospitalized people. Thus, it is important to understand what are the implications of mild COVID-19, which is the largest and understudied pool of COVID-19 cases. We aimed to investigate adults at least four months after recovering from mild COVID-19, which were assessed by neuropsychological, ocular and neurological tests, immune markers assay, and by structural MRI and 18FDG-PET neuroimaging to shed light on putative brain changes and clinical correlations. In approximately one-quarter of mild-COVID-19 individuals, we detected a specific visuoconstructive deficit, which was associated with changes in molecular and structural brain imaging, and correlated with upregulation of peripheral immune markers. Our findings provide evidence of neuroinflammatory burden causing cognitive deficit, in an already large and growing fraction of the world population. While living with a multitude of mild COVID-19 cases, action is required for a more comprehensive assessment and follow-up of the cognitive impairment, allowing to better understand symptom persistence and the necessity of rehabilitation of the affected individuals.

Exploratory assessment of the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in aerosols in hospital facilities and public spaces of a metropolitan center in Brazil.

Although much has been discovered regarding the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2, its presence in aerosols and their implications in the context of the pandemic is still controversial. More research on this topic is needed to contribute to these discussions. Presented herein are the results of ongoing research to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in aerosol in different hospital facilities (indoor environments) and public spaces (outdoor environments) of a metropolitan center in Brazil. From May to August 2020, 62 samples were collected using active sampling method (air samplers with filters) and passive method (petri dishes) in two hospitals, with different occupancies and infrastructure for contamination control. Outdoor public spaces such as sidewalks and a bus station were also investigated. Five air samples from four facilities in a hospital tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in suspended and sedimentable particles. SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols inside the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), in the protective apparel removal room, in the room containing patient mobile toilets and used clothes (room with natural ventilation) and in an external corridor adjacent to the ICU, probably coming from infected patients and/or from aerosolization of virus-laden particles on material/equipment. Our findings reinforce the hypothesis of airborne transmission of the new coronavirus, contributing to the planning of effective practices for pandemic control.

PSMA PET/CT in the Brazilian Unified Healthcare System reduces costs with futile salvage therapies in the management of cases of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

Objective: To compare costs between treatment strategies employed prior to and after prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) via the Brazilian Unified Health Care System and their impact on the therapeutic management of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: The referring physicians were surveyed on their treatment intentions (strategies) at two different time points: prior to and after PSMA PET/CT. Cost comparison results are presented as median (IQR) for each of the two strategies. The shift in therapeutic management after PSMA PET/CT was also analyzed. Results: The study sample included 59 patients (mean age: 65.9 years). The PSMA PET/CT result was considered positive in 38 patients (64.4%) and was found to have an impact on the treatment strategy in for 36 patients (61.0%). Prior to PSMA PET/CT, salvage therapy (i.e., treatment with curative intent) was the intended treatment for most patients, and that was significantly less so after the examination (76.3% vs. 45.8%; p < 0.001). Conversely, a strategy involving systemic (i.e., palliative) therapy became more common after PSMA PET/CT (23.7% vs. 54.2%; p < 0.001). The after-PSMA PET/CT strategy presented higher overall costs than did the before-PSMA PET/CT strategy, in all scenarios evaluated. In all scenarios, nearly half of this cost difference was related to the cost of the PSMA PET/CT itself, the remainder being related to the new treatment choices that stemmed from knowledge of the PSMA PET/CT findings. Conclusion: For patients treated within the Brazilian Unified Health Care System, PSMA PET/CT presented higher costs in comparison with conventional imaging methods. Adding PSMA PET/CT to the workflow had an impact on therapeutic management, mainly representing a shift from futile curative treatments to systemic palliative ones. The amount of funds that could potentially be saved by not providing such futile treatments would suffice to evaluate roughly two patients with PSMA PET/CT scans for each futile treatment strategy avoided.

Objetivo: Comparar custos entre estratégias antes e após o exame de PET/CT-PSMA da perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde e seu impacto no manejo terapêutico para pacientes com recidiva bioquímica de câncer de próstata. Materiais e Métodos: Os médicos solicitantes informaram a intenção terapêutica em dois momentos: antes e após o exame. Os resultados de comparação de custo estão apresentados como medianas de custo (p25; p75). A mudança na intenção terapêutica também foi analisada. Resultados: O estudo envolveu 59 pacientes (idade média: 65,9 anos). A PET/CT-PSMA foi considerada positiva em 38 dos 59 pacientes (64.4%). O exame impactou a estratégia de tratamento para 36 pacientes (61%). Antes da obtenção das informações da PET/CT-PSMA, a terapia de resgate (i.e., com intenção curativa) era o tratamento sugerido para a maioria dos pacientes, e após o exame, reduziu significativamente (76,3% vs 45,8%; p < 0,001). Em contrapartida, a terapia sistêmica (i.e., paliativa) aumentou como intenção de tratamento após o exame (23,7% vs 54,2%; p < 0,001). A estratégia "após PET/CT-PSMA" apresentou maiores custos em relação à estratégia "antes da PET/CT-PSMA" nos cenários comparados. Cerca de metade da diferença de custos entre as duas estratégias foi relacionada aos custos do exame propriamente ditos, enquanto a outra metade foi relacionada às novas escolhas de tratamento a partir do exame. Conclusão: Oferecer a PET/CT-PSMA no Sistema Único de Saúde apresentou maiores custos em relação à estratégia com métodos de imagem convencionais e impactou o manejo terapêutico, pelo favorecimento de tratamentos sistêmicos paliativos no lugar de tratamentos curativos fúteis. A quantidade de recursos que poderiam ser poupados ao evitar tratamentos fúteis seria suficiente para avaliar aproximadamente dois pacientes com exames de PET/CT-PSMA para cada estratégia de tratamento fútil evitada.

PSMA PET/CT in the Brazilian Unified Healthcare System reduces costs with futile salvage therapies in the management of cases of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer / PET/CT-PSMA no Sistema Único de Saúde reduz custos com terapias de resgate fúteis no manejo de pacientes com recidiva bioquímica de câncer de próstata

Abstract Objective: To compare costs between treatment strategies employed prior to and after prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) via the Brazilian Unified Health Care System and their impact on the therapeutic management of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: The referring physicians were surveyed on their treatment intentions (strategies) at two different time points: prior to and after PSMA PET/CT. Cost comparison results are presented as median (IQR) for each of the two strategies. The shift in therapeutic management after PSMA PET/CT was also analyzed. Results: The study sample included 59 patients (mean age: 65.9 years). The PSMA PET/CT result was considered positive in 38 patients (64.4%) and was found to have an impact on the treatment strategy in for 36 patients (61.0%). Prior to PSMA PET/CT, salvage therapy (i.e., treatment with curative intent) was the intended treatment for most patients, and that was significantly less so after the examination (76.3% vs. 45.8%; p < 0.001). Conversely, a strategy involving systemic (i.e., palliative) therapy became more common after PSMA PET/CT (23.7% vs. 54.2%; p < 0.001). The after-PSMA PET/CT strategy presented higher overall costs than did the before-PSMA PET/CT strategy, in all scenarios evaluated. In all scenarios, nearly half of this cost difference was related to the cost of the PSMA PET/CT itself, the remainder being related to the new treatment choices that stemmed from knowledge of the PSMA PET/CT findings. Conclusion: For patients treated within the Brazilian Unified Health Care System, PSMA PET/CT presented higher costs in comparison with conventional imaging methods. Adding PSMA PET/CT to the workflow had an impact on therapeutic management, mainly representing a shift from futile curative treatments to systemic palliative ones. The amount of funds that could potentially be saved by not providing such futile treatments would suffice to evaluate roughly two patients with PSMA PET/CT scans for each futile treatment strategy avoided.

Resumo Objetivo: Comparar custos entre estratégias antes e após o exame de PET/CT-PSMA da perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde e seu impacto no manejo terapêutico para pacientes com recidiva bioquímica de câncer de próstata. Materiais e Métodos: Os médicos solicitantes informaram a intenção terapêutica em dois momentos: antes e após o exame. Os resultados de comparação de custo estão apresentados como medianas de custo (p25; p75). A mudança na intenção terapêutica também foi analisada. Resultados: O estudo envolveu 59 pacientes (idade média: 65,9 anos). A PET/CT-PSMA foi considerada positiva em 38 dos 59 pacientes (64.4%). O exame impactou a estratégia de tratamento para 36 pacientes (61%). Antes da obtenção das informações da PET/CT-PSMA, a terapia de resgate (i.e., com intenção curativa) era o tratamento sugerido para a maioria dos pacientes, e após o exame, reduziu significativamente (76,3% vs 45,8%; p < 0,001). Em contrapartida, a terapia sistêmica (i.e., paliativa) aumentou como intenção de tratamento após o exame (23,7% vs 54,2%; p < 0,001). A estratégia "após PET/CT-PSMA" apresentou maiores custos em relação à estratégia "antes da PET/CT-PSMA" nos cenários comparados. Cerca de metade da diferença de custos entre as duas estratégias foi relacionada aos custos do exame propriamente ditos, enquanto a outra metade foi relacionada às novas escolhas de tratamento a partir do exame. Conclusão: Oferecer a PET/CT-PSMA no Sistema Único de Saúde apresentou maiores custos em relação à estratégia com métodos de imagem convencionais e impactou o manejo terapêutico, pelo favorecimento de tratamentos sistêmicos paliativos no lugar de tratamentos curativos fúteis. A quantidade de recursos que poderiam ser poupados ao evitar tratamentos fúteis seria suficiente para avaliar aproximadamente dois pacientes com exames de PET/CT-PSMA para cada estratégia de tratamento fútil evitada.

Comparison of [18F]Fluorocholine and [18F]Fluordesoxyglucose for assessment of progression, lung metastasis detection and therapy response in murine 4T1 breast tumor model.

The [18F]Fluorocholine ([18F]FCH) tracer for PET imaging has been proven to be effective for several malignances. However, there are only a few studies related to its breast tumor applicability and they are still limited. The aim of this study was investigate the efficacy of [18F]FCH/PET compared to [18F]FDG/PET in a murine 4T1 mammary carcinoma model treated and nontreated. [18F]FCH/PET showed its applicability for primary tumor and lung metastasis detection and their use for response monitoring of breast cancer therapeutics at earlier stages.

Synthesis, quality control and dosimetry of the radiopharmaceutical 18F-sodium fluoride produced at the Center for Development of Nuclear Technology - CDTN / Síntese, controle de qualidade e dosimetria do radiofármaco 18 -F de fluoreto de sódio produzido no Centro de Desenvolvimento da Tecnologia Nuclear - CDTN

18F-Sodium fluoride (Na18F) is a radiopharmaceutical used for diagnosis in nuclear medicine by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Bone scintigraphy is normally performed using 99mTc-MDP. However, 18F PET scans promise high quality imaging with increased resolution and improved sensitivity and specificity. In order to make available a tool for more specific studies of tumors and non-oncological diseases of bone tissue, the UPPR/CDTN team undertook the production and quality control of Na18F injectable solution with the physical-chemical, microbiological and biological characteristics recommended in the U.S. Pharmacopeia. Na18F radiochemical purity was 96.7 ± 1.3 percent, with Rf= 0.026 ± 0.006. The product presented a pH of 5.3 ± 0.6, half life of 109.0 ± 0.8 minutes, endotoxin limit < 5.0 EU.mL-1 and no microbial contaminants. The biodistribution of Na18F was similar to that described in the literature, with a clearance of 0.19 mL.min-1 and distribution volume of 18.76 mL. The highest bone concentration (5.0 ± 0.5 percentID.g-1) was observed 20 minutes after injection. Na18F produced at the UPPR presented all the quality assurance requirements of the U.S. Pharmacopeia and can be safely used for clinical bone imaging.

O Fluoreto de sódio 18F (Na18F) é um radiofármaco empregado para diagnóstico através da Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons (PET). Cintilografias ósseas são normalmente obtidas utilizando-se 99mTc-MDP. Entretanto, o interesse pelo Na18F é crescente, principalmente devido à obtanção de imagens de elevada resolução. Com o objetivo de tornar disponível uma ferramenta mais específica para estudos de tumores e doenças não-oncológicas do tecido ósseo, o grupo da UPPR/CDTN implementou a produção e o controle de qualidade da solução injetável de Na18F com as características físico-química, microbiológica e biológica preconizadas pela farmacopéia. Sua pureza radioquímica foi de 96,7 ± 1,3 por cento, com Rf= 0,026 ± 0,006. O produto apresentou pH igual a 5,3 ± 0,6, tempo de meia-vida de 109,0 ± 0,8 minutos, limite de endotoxinas < 5,0 EU.mL-1 e ausência de microrganismos. O perfil de biodistribuição em camundongos foi semelhante ao disponível na literatura, com depuração igual a 0,19 mL.min-1 e volume de distribuição igual a 18,76 mL. A concentração máxima (5,0 ± 0,5 por cento DI.g-1) foi observada no osso 20 minutos após a injeção. O Na18F produzido na UPPR do CDTN apresentou os parâmetros de qualidade definidos na farmacopéia americana e pode ser usado com segurança para uso clínico em cintilografia óssea.