Medium-term outcomes of EXTra-design engineering inner-branch ENdografts for the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms from a multicenter collaboration.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to present the medium-term outcomes of Extra-Design engineering endografts with inner branches (EDE-iBEVARs, Artivion) in endovascular aortic repairs of complex aneurysms building upon promising early results. METHODS: A retrospective, international, multi-center study was conducted including consecutive patients who underwent complex endovascular aortic repairs using EDE-iBEVARs between 2018 and 2022. Patient demographics, aneurysm anatomical features, procedural details, reinterventions, complications, and endograft failures during follow-up were assessed. The primary outcome was aneurysm-related mortality. Secondary outcome measures included the freedom from all-cause mortality and reintervention, technical and clinical success, and late related complications including branch instability, endoleaks, and serious adverse events. RESULTS: Our study encompassed a total of 260 patients across 13 European centers. The cohort included patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (n = 116), suprarenal or juxta-renal aneurysms (n = 95), and those who had previous open repair or previous endovascular aortic repair with type 1A endoleak (n = 49). Of 982 possible inner branches (937 antegrade and 45 retrograde), 962 (98%) were successfully cannulated and bridged with covered stents during the index procedure. Overall, the endograft was successfully deployed in 98% of patients, and 93% were discharged from hospital following surgery. At 3 years, freedom from aneurysm-related mortality was 97%, whereas the freedom of all-cause mortality was 89%. Freedom from reinterventions was 91% and 76% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. The rate of late complications such as endoleaks or branch instability events was 12% (n = 30). The late branch occlusion rate during follow-up was 1.5% (n = 15), of which 12 were renal branches. CONCLUSIONS: EDE-iBEVARs demonstrate satisfactory medium-term outcomes with reintervention rates comparable to other endografts. Encouragingly, rates of branch patency were high, and major adverse events were low. This technology could expand the treatment options for patients with challenging complex aortic conditions.

The jailed coiling technique: An endovascular solution for saccular aneurysms with suboptimal fixation sites.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the midterm results of patients with saccular aneurysms treated with the jailed coiling technique. METHODS: A retrospective review of 17 patients treated with the jailed coiling technique over a 7 year period, between 2018 and 2024 at our institution. Treatment entails placing an endograft across the neck of the saccular aneurysm followed by coiling of the aneurysm through an extraluminal catheter. Debranching procedures of the aortic arch were performed when necessary in order to create a sealing zone of >5 mm. Data collected included demographics, anatomical features of the lesions and sealing zones, indication for intervention, method of treatment and technical success, sac expansion, and reinterventions. RESULTS: 17 patients (median age 69, 14 males) were treated for saccular aneurysms with short, suboptimal sealing zones (aortic arch 13, distal thoracic aorta 2, celiac trunk 1, brachiocephalic artery 1). Among the aortic arch aneurysms, six required preoperative debranching procedures of the aortic arch in order to create a short landing zone of 5 mm, making them eligible for the procedure. Technical success was obtained in all patients. One perioperative mortality occurred. Mean follow-up among those treated for arch aneurysms was 32 months (range 1-71 months). One patient who was treated for an aortic arch aneurysm had a persistent endoleak. No sac enlargement was observed. None of the patients required interventions and none experienced aneurysm related mortality. CONCLUSION: The jailed coiling technique is a safe and effective method to treat saccular arterial aneurysms with suboptimal, short sealing zones. It can be utilized for saccular aneurysms located within the aortic arch and for aneurysms located in other locations where coiling or stent grafting is not an option. The procedure can be performed with minimal morbidity with a high percentage of success. Long term durability of the repair needs to be determined.

Performance of BeBack Crossing Catheter in Chronic Total Occlusion in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Single-Center Experience.

PURPOSE: To describe a single-center experience in the treatment of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) with the application of BeBack catheter (Bentley InnoMed, Germany) in patients with arterial chronic total occlusion (CTO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent limb revascularizations using the BeBack catheter between 2015 and 2022. All patients had an initial failed attempt using a traditional guidewire and catheter technique. Technical success was considered whenever a successful re-entry or lesion crossing using the study device was achieved. Procedural success was defined as recanalization of the occluded artery with residual stenosis of less than 30%, and improvement in ankle-brachial index (ABI) after 24 hours. A Rutherford score was assigned to each limb and affected anatomical segments and lesion length were documented. Procedural access sites and complications were noted. RESULTS: The study included 72 patients who underwent 78 procedures using the BeBack crossing catheter. Procedural success was achieved in 91% of cases, with a technical success rate of 92.3%. The most frequently involved occluded segments were the femoral and popliteal arteries. The average ABI improved from 0.59 to 0.95 after the procedure. The most used access site was the contralateral femoral, and the BeBack catheter was employed on 85 occasions. Only 1 patient suffered a severe immediate adverse effect, and during the 30-day follow-up period, 2 patients needed reintervention. Unfortunately, 3 patients died during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The BeBack catheter offers a viable option for the treatment of patients with chronic total occlusion, with high procedural success and a low complication rate. CLINICAL IMPACT: The BeBack catheter presents a notable advancement for clinicians managing chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and arterial chronic total occlusion (CTO), showcasing over 90% procedural and technical success rates in this study. Its adept ability to navigate and recanalize occluded segments provides a robust alternative, especially when traditional techniques falter. This innovation may chane clinical strategies in vascular interventions, offering an efficient and reliable option, thereby potentially enhancing patient outcomes in limb revascularizations.

The Use of the Off-the-Shelf Inner Branch E-nside Endograft for the Treatment of Elective and Emergent Complex Aortic Aneurysms-A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this single-center study was to evaluate the early results of the off-the-shelf inner branch E-nside endograft in the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all patients treated with the E-nside endograft at our institution during the years 2021-2023. Parameters evaluated were technical success, early major adverse events, target vessel patency, and the presence of endoleaks. RESULTS: In total 16 patients underwent treatment with the E-nside endograft. Six additional patients were evaluated for the device but were excluded due to anatomical considerations. Mean age was 71 (range 59-84) and 14 (88%) were males. Mean aneurysm diameter was 66 mm (range 54-85). Aneurysms treated included thoracoabdominal in 9 (56%), juxtarenal aneurysms in 5 (31%), postdissection aneurysm in 1 (6%) and a type 1A endoleak after a failed endovascular aneurysm repair in 1 (6%). Five of the treated aneurysms were symptomatic. A total of 58 side branches were placed into target visceral arteries. Mean operative time was 190 min (range 150-360). Technical success was achieved in 15/16 of the patients (94%). At 30 days, 1 perioperative mortality and 3 major adverse events occurred, 2 of them branch related. CONCLUSIONS: The E-nside endograft is a feasible option for the treatment of a broad spectrum of aortic pathologies. As it is an off-the-shelf device, it can be used selectively in elective and emergent settings with acceptable 30-day mortality and morbidity. Further follow-up is required to determine the durability of this treatment option and patency of side branches.

Acute Limb Ischemia in Pediatric Intensive Care Units.

BACKGROUND: To determine the outcome of children treated for acute limb ischemia (ALI) in pediatric intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study including all patients diagnosed with ALI between 2005 and 2022 in 2 different pediatric ICUs: respiratory and cardiac ICU. Data collected included patients demographics and comorbidities, location and cause of arterial occlusion, and type and duration of therapy. Primary end point was freedom from amputation. Secondary end point was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients (58% male) with ALI were included in the study. Median age was 3.8 months (range 0.03-201). The lower extremity was involved in 55 (70%) patients. The limb ischemia was caused by arterial instrumentation in 94% of the patients. Anticoagulation was administered as the first-line therapy in all patients. Unfractionated heparin was administered for a median duration of 5 days (range 1-48). Low molecular weight heparin was continued for a median period of 28 days (range 4-420). Thrombolytic therapy was administered in 5 patients and 2 required surgical revascularization, all for failure of anticoagulation therapy. Mean follow-up was 21 months (range 1-188 months). None of the patients required major upper or lower extremity amputations during or after the index admission. Overall survival at 30 months was 68%. The causes of mortalities were unrelated to the limb ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: This large, single-center study demonstrates that ALI in the pediatric ICU population can be treated conservatively and is associated with a low amputation rate following nonoperative management. The favorable outcome exists regardless of the etiology of the ALI and underlying diseases.

Retrograde tibial access for revascularization of chronic total occlusions in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate tibial single access in treatment of chronic total occlusions (CTO) in patients with ipsilateral chronic-limb ischemia (CLTI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, data was collected on patients treated for ipsilateral CTO via a tibial artery access between March 2017 and March 2021. Fifty-nine limbs in 57 patients, (42 men, average age 73 years; range 47-96) were treated. Patient's symptoms were classified in accordance with the Rutherford category. The end points were freedom from major amputation and the need for reintervention up to 1 year of follow up. RESULTS: Out of the 59 treated limbs, technical success was achieved in 57 (97%). The treated multilevel segments involved 5 common and 12 external iliac arteries, 23 common and 37 superficial femoral arteries, 23 femoropopliteal segments, 14 popliteal arteries, and 4 bypasses. Mean length of occlusion was 186 mm (range 7-670). Rutherford classification of the treated limbs was category 5 and 6 in 45 patients and category 4 in 14 patients. Three procedural complications occurred and were successfully treated during the same procedure. No immediate post-procedural complication was encountered. Median follow-up was 13 months (range 1-45.3). Reintervention was required in 9 limbs, after an average of 6 months. One year free from amputation rate was 91.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Single access via the ipsilateral tibial artery can be a useful, effective, and safe approach for treating CTO in CLTI patients.

Intraoperative calf blood pressure measurements for the detection of early lower extremity ischemia following endovascular aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Access vessel complications during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) remain a concern and has been reported to occur in 3-10% of cases. The purpose of this study is to report our experience with intraoperative, non-invasive calf blood pressure (BP) measurements and ankle brachial indexes (ABIs) before and immediately following EVAR, in evaluating the perfusion of the lower extremities and detecting early lower extremity ischemia (LEI). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all consecutive patients who underwent EVAR at our institution between the years 2019 and 2021. All patients had blood pressure cuffs placed on their calves prior to the procedure. Calf BP measurements and ABIs were obtained prior to and immediately after the surgery. Based on the BP measurements, patients were categorized into two groups. Group 1: patients with unchanged ABIs at the end of the procedure. Group 2: patients who experienced a decrease in ABIs at the end of the procedure (no BP obtained or decrease of ABI >0.3 from preoperative measurement). Patients in group 2 underwent exploration of the access vessel. Based on these, the positive and negative predictive values of the study were calculated. RESULTS: During the study period we performed 113 EVAR procedures for abdominal, thoracic, and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, in which 226 femoral arteries were accessed. Mean age was 71 years and 88% were males. In 219 (97%) of the limbs, there was no change in calf BP measurements and ABIs immediately after the procedure, when compared to the preoperative measurements, and none suffered a decrease in follow up ABIs. In 7 limbs (3%), there was a decrease in the calf BP (group 2), and all underwent exploration of the femoral artery. In 5 of these, a pathology was found within the artery. The positive predictive value of the intraoperative calf BP measurement was 71%. The negative predictive value of the study was 100%. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative calf BP and ABIs is a simple method to assess the lower limb perfusion and detect LEI following EVAR. The exam is particularly accurate in ruling out LEI as it has a very high negative predictive value. However, an abnormal measurement does not necessarily confirm LEI.

Revascularization of multiple tibial arteries is not associated with improved limb salvage.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the benefit of performing multiple tibial artery revascularization compared with single vessel revascularization for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study of all patients with CLTI treated with below-the-knee endovascular intervention from 2012 to 2019. Group 1 included patients who had undergone single tibial artery revascularization. Group 2 included patients who had undergone multiple (two or more) tibial artery revascularization. More proximal disease, if present, was treated, in addition to the tibial disease. The primary endpoint was freedom from amputation. The secondary endpoints included the reintervention rates and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 527 limbs in 470 patients with CLTI (nonhealing ulcers, 62%; gangrene, 33%; and ischemic rest pain, 5%) were included in the present study. Of the 527 limbs, 245 (46%) had undergone single vessel revascularization and 282 (54%) had undergone multiple vessel revascularization. The mean follow-up was 19 ± 18 months. No difference was found in freedom from amputation between the two groups (68% vs 63%; P = .109). On multivariable analysis, the factors associated with amputation included dialysis (odds ratio [OR], 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.45), dyslipidemia (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.96-1.94), and gangrene (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.50-2.98). No differences were found in the reintervention rates between the two groups (21.2% vs 16.7%; P = .13). The overall survival rate was 73% in both study groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the present large, single-center study have demonstrated that multiple below-the-knee vessel revascularization is not associated with improved limb salvage compared with single vessel revascularization.

Short-term outcomes of inner branches for endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: To report our early experience using endografts with inner branches for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients treated in our institution for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms and TAAAs with custom-made stent grafts consisting of one or more inner branches. Data collected included patients demographics, aortic aneurysm morphology, stent grafts features, perioperative morbidity and mortality and short-term reintervention and mortality rates. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (18 males, mean age 70 ± 7.1) were included. Indications for surgery included TAAAs (12, 41%) juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (10, 37%), type 1A endoleaks (4, 15%) and paraanastamotic aneurysms (1, 4%). A total of 90 inner branches were used. Twenty-one (78%) of the stent grafts consisted only of inner branches and six (22%) had a combination of inner branches with either fenestrations or outer branches. Technical success was achieved in 26/27 (96%) of the patients. There was one perioperative mortality. Six patients suffered from major perioperative adverse events. Mean follow-up was seven months (range 1-23). During the follow-up period, four patients (15%) required reinterventions. Branch-related reinterventions were performed in two (7%) patients. No occlusions of inner branches occurred during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Inner branches in branched endovascular aneurysm repairs offer a feasible option for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms and TAAAs. The procedures can be completed with high technical success and with acceptable short-term branch-related reintervention rates. Further follow-up is required to determine the long-term durability of this technology.

Changing Paradigms in Below-the-Knee Arterial Interventions: Are We Saving Legs?

BACKGROUND: Patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) involving the below-the-knee (BTK) arteries are at increased risk of limb loss. Despite improvement in endovascular modalities, it is still unclear whether an aggressive approach results in improved limb salvage. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether an aggressive approach to BTK arterial disease results in improved limb salvage. METHODS: A comparative study of two groups was conducted. Group 1 included patients treated between 2012 and 2014, primarily with transfemoral angioplasty of the tibial arteries. Group 2 included patients treated between 2015-2019 with a wide array of endovascular modalities (stents, multiple tibial artery and pedal angioplasty, retrograde access). Primary endpoint was freedom from amputation at 4 years. RESULTS: A total of 529 BTK interventions were performed. Mean age was 71 ± 10.6 years, 382 (79%) were male. Patients in group 1 were less likely to be taking clopidogrel (66% vs. 83%, P < 0.01) and statins (72 % vs. 87%, P < 0.01). Several therapeutic modalities were used more often in group 2 than in group 1, including pedal angioplasty (24 vs. 43 %, P = 0.01), tibial and pedal retrograde access (0 vs. 10%, P = 0.01), and tibial stenting (3% vs. 25%, P = 0.01). Revascularization of two or more tibial arteries was performed at a higher rate in group 2 (54% vs. 50%, P = 0.45). Estimated freedom from amputation at 40 months follow-up was higher in group 2 (53% vs. 63%, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An aggressive, multimodality approach in treating BTK arteries results in improved limb salvage.

An Implanted Blood Vessel Support Device for Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Reducing turbulent blood flow through dialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and radial stretching of their venous wall may attenuate hyperplasia and stenosis and improve AVF outcomes in hemodialysis patients. The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the VasQ implant, which intervenes on these mechanisms by physically supporting the surgical arteriovenous anastomosis. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: 40 consecutive patients with kidney failure referred for creation of a brachiocephalic fistula in 4 vascular access centers in the United Kingdom and Israel. INTERVENTIONS: AVF surgical creation with placement of the VasQ implant (treatment) versus AVF placement without the implant (control). OUTCOMES: Safety assessed as percentage of severe device-related adverse events was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were efficacy assessments including: (1) AVF maturation at 3 months, defined as cephalic vein diameter≥5mm and flow≥500mL/min; (2) functional cumulative patency, defined as successful 2-needle cannulation for two-thirds or more of all dialysis runs for 1 month in study participants receiving dialysis; (3) cephalic vein diameter and blood flow; and (4) primary and cumulative patency at 6 months. RESULTS: No severe device-related adverse events were observed. There was no significant difference in maturation at 3 months or primary patency at 6 months between treatment and control (85% vs 80% and 80% vs 66%). Significantly larger vein luminal diameters were observed in the treatment group versus controls at 3 and 6 months (8.27±2.2 vs 6.69±1.8mm [P=0.03] and 9.6±2.5 vs 7.56±2.7mm [P=0.03]). Functional patency at 6 months was significantly greater in the treatment group (100% vs 56% [P = 0.01]). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, limited power for secondary end points. CONCLUSIONS: No safety signals were detected for the VasQ external support of brachiocephalic AVFs. Higher functional patency and vein luminal diameters were achieved with the device at 3 and 6 months. VasQ may safely intervene on mechanisms associated with the disturbed hemodynamic profile in the juxta-anastomotic region. FUNDING: Funded by Laminate Medical Technologies Ltd. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT02112669.

Secondary interventions after fenestrated and branched endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The use of fenestrated and branched endografts for the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms is increasing. Despite the low morbidity and mortality associated with these repairs, reintervention rates in the midterm and long term remain a concern. The purpose of this study was to investigate our experience with reinterventions after fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients treated with F/BEVAR at our institution during the years 2009 to 2019. Among them, we identified those who required reinterventions during the period of follow-up. Data collected included patients' demographics, type of treated aneurysm, indications for reintervention, and methods of repair. RESULTS: During the study period, 47 patients underwent F/BEVAR. A total of 160 branches were placed. Of those, 12 patients (25%) underwent 15 secondary interventions for late-occurring complications. Among those requiring reinterventions, mean age was 70 years (range, 59-80 years), and 10 (83%) were male. The majority of those requiring reinterventions were treated for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Mean time to reintervention was 14 months (range, 2-32 months). Indications for reinterventions included separation of side branches from fenestrations (nine), separation of side branches (three), type IA endoleak (one), type II endoleak (one), and limb occlusion (one). All endoleaks were detected on routine follow-up imaging. All reinterventions were performed using endovascular techniques. Mean follow-up after reinvention was 22 months (range, 1-53 months). During this period, no patient required open conversion. Follow-up imaging revealed successful obliteration of the endoleak, and none experienced continued growth of the sac. CONCLUSIONS: Reinterventions after F/BEVAR are not uncommon. The majority of reinterventions are performed for endoleaks that are due to failure at the level of the fenestrations or component separation. These endoleaks can be treated successfully with endovascular methods and do not require open conversion. Because of the possibility of development of late endoleaks, continual monitoring of these patients is required after the primary procedure.

The effect of civil and military flights on coagulation, fibrinolysis and blood flow: insight from a rat model.

BACKGROUND: Air travel thrombosis continues to be a controversial topic. Exposure to hypoxia and hypobaric conditions during air travel is assumed a risk factor. The aim of this study is to explore changes in parameters of coagulation, fibrinolysis and blood flow in a rat model of exposure to hypobaric conditions that imitate commercial and combat flights. METHODS: Sixty Sprague-Dawley male rats, aged 10 weeks, were divided into 5 groups according to the type and duration of exposure to hypobaric conditions. The exposure conditions were 609 m and 7620 m for 2 and 12 h duration. Blood count, thrombin- antithrombin complex, D-dimer, interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 were analyzed. All rats went through flight angiography MRI at day 13-post exposure. RESULTS: No effect of the various exposure conditions was observed on coagulation, fibrinolytic system, IL-1 or IL-6. MRI angiography showed blood flow reduction in lower limb to less than 30% in 50% of the rats. The reduction in blood flow was more pronounced in the left vessel than in the right vessel (p = 0.006, Wilcoxon signed rank test). The extent of occlusion differed across exposure groups in the right, but not the left vessel (p = 0.002, p = 0.150, respectively, Kruskal-Wallis test). However, these differences did not correlate with the exposure conditions. CONCLUSION: In the present rat model, no clear correlation between various hypobaric conditions and activation of coagulation was observed. The reduction in blood flow in the lower limb also occurred in the control group and was not related to the type of exposure.

Chimney Endovascular Repair of Primary Mycotic Aneurysms Involving the Paravisceral Aorta.

BACKGROUND: Primary mycotic aneurysm of the aorta (MAA) is a rare and potentially life-threatening disease. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of MAAs involving the paravisceral aorta has been rarely reported. The purpose of this study is to report our experience with chimney EVAR (CHEVAR) in patients with MAAs involving the paravisceral aorta. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients treated with EVAR at our institution during the years 2009-2019. Of those, we identified the patients who were treated with CHEVAR for MAAs. Diagnosis of MAAs was based on clinical presentation, abnormal laboratory results, and a computed tomography scan suggestive of a MAA. The data collected included patient demographics, clinical presentation, the antibiotic regimen before and after the surgery, preoperative imaging, surgical details, and perioperative and long-term morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: During the study period, we performed 54 cases of CHEVARs for aortic aneurysms. Of those, 8 (15%) were performed for mycotic aneurysms involving the visceral segment. Six (75%) were men, and the mean age was 68 years (range: 59-76). All patients were symptomatic at the time of diagnosis, presenting with either back or abdominal pain. A total of 16 visceral vessels (celiac trunk, 2; superior mesenteric artery, 7; right renal artery, 4; and left renal artery, 3) were revascularized with parallel grafts (PGs). Six patients required 2 PGs, 1 patient required 3 PGs, and 1 patient had a single PG inserted. Fifteen (94%) PGs were upward-pointing chimney stent grafts, and 1 was placed in a downward-pointing "periscope" configuration. Eight visceral arteries in 6 patients were sacrificed, either by preoperative occlusion or intentional coverage with the endograft during the procedure. The vessels sacrificed included 4 celiac trunks and 4 renal arteries (3 main branches and 1 accessory renal artery). Technical success was achieved in all patients. One patient expired in the perioperative period. One patient developed an infection-related complication. One patient experienced worsening of his renal function and eventually required dialysis. Of the 4 patients who underwent intentional sacrifice of a kidney, all experienced a moderate decrease in renal function from the baseline ( mean preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine 0.76 mg/dL and 1.2 mg/dL, respectively, increase of 43%). The mean follow-up was 8 months (range: 3-28 months). During this period, 2 patients expired, 1 from an aneurysm-related cause. No stent occlusion of the PGs occurred and no reintervention due to endoleaks was required. No patient required explanation of the stent grafts or conversion to an open repair. CONCLUSIONS: CHEVAR is a feasible and safe treatment modality for MAAs involving the visceral segment. Occasionally, intentional occlusion of the selected visceral arteries may be required to minimize the risk of gutter endoleaks in this urgent setting. Further follow-up is needed to accurately assess the durability of this repair.

Morbidity and Mortality Following Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the Elderly.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is associated with decreased perioperative morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: To report the outcomes of EVAR among patients older than 80 years of age. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we reviewed patients older than 80 years of age who underwent elective EVAR at our institution between 2007 and 2017. The demographics, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and long-term results are reported. RESULTS: During the study period, 444 patients underwent elective EVAR for AAAs. Among them 128 patients (29%) were > 80 years of age. Mean age was 84 ± 3.4 (range 80-96) years, and 110 patients (86%) were male. The EVAR was technically successful in 127 patients (99%) and there were intraoperative mortalities. Within 30 days of the surgery, nine patients (7%) died. Major and minor adverse events occurred in 26 (20%) and 59 (46%) patients, respectively. Factors associated with increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality included chronic kidney disease, peripheral artery disease, and the existence of three or more co-morbidities. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR in the elderly can be performed with a high rate of success; however, it is associated with a substantial rate of morbidity and mortality, particularly when patients present with multiple co-morbidities. When performing EVAR in this population group, the risk of rupture must be considered opposed to the life expectancy of these patients and the risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Primary Retrograde Dorsalis Pedis Artery Single Access for Revascularization of Chronic Total Occlusion in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the dorsalis pedis artery (DPA) approach as a single access site for revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) when the femoral approach is hostile or unavailable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent iliac and femoropopliteal ipsilateral revascularization via a single access site from the DPA between January 2017 and February 2018 was performed. Fifteen limbs in 15 patients (10 men and 5 women; average age 72 y; range, 49-96 y) with CLI and unavailable femoral access were included. Patients were unsuitable candidates for a surgical bypass graft. Treated limbs were classified as Rutherford category 5 and 6 in 12 patients and category 4 in 3 patients. Treated occluded segments involved 2 iliac arteries, 12 femoropopliteal arteries, 1 bypass graft, and 2 posterior tibial arteries. Technical success was defined as recanalization of the occluded artery with residual stenosis < 30% and improvement in ankle-brachial index after 24 hours. Patients were followed for up to 13 months. Endpoints were freedom from reintervention and limb salvage for 1 year. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 14 of 15 patients (93%). Stents were placed in 13 of 15 patients (86%). No complications were encountered immediately after the procedure. Median follow-up was 7.1 months (range, 1.4-13.5 mo). One patient was lost to follow-up. Reintervention was needed in 5 limbs after an average of 4.2 months. Limb salvage rate at 1 year was 83%. CONCLUSIONS: Using the DPA as a single access could be a valuable approach when traditional access sites are unavailable for treating patients with CLI.

Long-Term Outcomes of Iliofemoral Artery Stents after Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement.

PURPOSE: To report long-term results of iliofemoral stent placement after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: TAVR access-related complications treated with iliofemoral stent placement were recorded in 56 patients (mean age, 81 years; range; 53-93 years; 48% male) of 648 patients who underwent TAVR at a single center. Fifty-six patients treated with stent placement (40 patients with stent grafts and 16 patients with bare metal stents) underwent clinical and ultrasonographic follow-up after a mean of 676 days (range, 60-1840 days). RESULTS: During follow-up, none of the 56 patients who had stent placement underwent a vascular reintervention of the affected limb, and none suffered from limb claudication. No decrease was observed in ankle-brachial index (ABI) values to an abnormal value, except in 1 patient (mean preprocedural and postprocedural ABI of 1.2 ± 0.14, range, 0.97-1.4 and 1.19 ± 0.24, range, 0.65-1.54, respectively). Arterial duplex assessment showed normal stent flow velocity (mean, 168.7 ± 63.2 cm/sec; range, 80-345 cm/sec) in all but 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Iliofemoral stent implantation is a safe and efficacious treatment for vascular access site and access-related complications during transfemoral TAVR.

Parallel stent grafts for the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms: A single center study.

Background "Chimney" techniques with parallel grafts used in order to extend the landing zones in endovascular aneurysm repair (ch-EVAR) are increasingly being reported. Conflicting data has been reported regarding the success and durability of the repair. We report a single center experience using ch-EVAR in treating complex aortic pathologies. Methods We performed a retrospective review of all patients treated with ch-EVAR in our institution between 2013 and 2017. Data collected included patients demographics, indications for surgery, configuration of parallel grafts, technical success, and perioperative morbidity and mortality. Follow-up data included aortic sac size, reintervention rate, and overall mortality. Results Thirty-five patients underwent treatment of their aneurysms with parallel grafts. Sixty parallel grafts were placed. Mean age was 75 years (range 59-93) and 30 (85%) were male. Technical success was achieved in 32 (91%) patients. Mean follow up was 12 months. Sac size decreased in diameter or remained unchanged in 26 of the 30 (86.6%) patients. Four patients were found to have enlarging aneurysms due to gutter endoleaks. All were treated successfully with endovascular methods. The estimated primary patency was 95% at 12 months. Probability of freedom from intervention was 75% at 12 months. No late aneurysm related mortality occurred. Conclusion The use of ch-EVAR in treating complex aortic aneurysms is technically feasible and safe. Gutter endoleaks are encountered only in a minority of the cases, and can be treated with minimally invasive techniques. Longer term follow up is required to evaluate the patency of these parallel grafts and the durability of the aneurysm exclusion.

Acute renal artery occlusion: Presentation, treatment, and outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Acute renal artery occlusion is an uncommon disease requiring rapid diagnosis for prevention of kidney loss or permanent kidney damage. The purpose of this study was to identify patients with acute kidney infarction; to characterize their presentation, imaging, and treatment; and to compare the subgroup of patients who underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) with those who were treated without intervention. METHODS: Hospital records between 2005 and 2015 were queried for keywords suggestive of kidney infarction. Patients were divided into two groups: the CDT group and the noninterventional group. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, methods of diagnosis, and time from presentation to diagnosis. For patients treated with CDT, additional data collected included details of thrombolytic therapy and follow-up studies. The two groups were compared regarding their clinical characteristics and outcome. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were diagnosed with acute kidney infarction; 13 (31%) were treated with CDT and 29 (69%) were treated conservatively. Median time from presentation to diagnosis was 42 hours in the CDT group and 32 hours in the untreated group. Among the CDT group, complete or partial resolution of the thrombus was seen in all patients. Two required permanent dialysis, both renal transplant patients. Median follow-up was 30 months (interquartile range, 2.7-46.2) in the CDT group and 13 months (interquartile range, 0.11-16) in the noninterventional group. Mean creatinine clearance at diagnosis and at last follow-up was 74.3 and 54.6 mL/min, respectively, in the CDT group (a decrease of 27%; P = .032) and 66.1 and 60 mL/min in the conservatively treated group (a decrease of 9%; P = .04). Follow-up imaging was available in nine patients treated with CDT. Mean interval from treatment to follow-up imaging was 13 months (range, 1-35 months) and consistently showed a functional but smaller treated kidney. (Mean pole-to-pole kidney length at baseline and late follow-up: 10.4 cm and 8.5 cm, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients presenting with acute kidney infarction are managed conservatively. A subset of patients with complete occlusion of the renal artery undergo CDT with good angiographic results. The treated kidney is expected to decrease in size over time, and overall kidney function is expected to decrease compared with baseline. Deterioration in renal function appears to stabilize and does not continue over time. CDT for acute renal artery occlusion is a safe modality of therapy and should be attempted for the purpose of kidney salvage, even in the setting of prolonged ischemia.