Detection and prognostic impact of micrometastasis in colorectal cancer.

Review of literature was performed on studies with prognostic impact of micrometastasis in colorectal cancer. Among 16 studies included, micrometastasis was detected in 26.5% of patients. Most analysis revealed that micrometastasis carries a poorer prognosis compared to node negative disease (NND). The results of those studies were compared with our pilot study of 109 patients with colon cancer, showing improved prognosis of micrometastasis after being upstaged and treated with chemotherapy when compared with NND.

A prospective trial comparing 1% lymphazurin vs 1% methylene blue in sentinel lymph node mapping of gastrointestinal tumors.

BACKGROUND: Methylene blue (M), as a dye in sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM), has been introduced as an alternative to lymphazurin (L) after the recent shortage of L. M has been evaluated in breast cancer in multiple studies with favorable results. Our study compares L with M in the SLNM of gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. METHODS: Between Jan 2005 and Aug 2008, 122 consecutive patients with GI tumors were enrolled. All patients (pts) underwent SLNM with either L or M by subserosal injection of 2-5 mL of dye. Efficacy and rates of adverse reactions were compared between the two dyes. Patients were prospectively monitored for adverse reactions including anaphylaxis, development of blue hives, and tissue necrosis. RESULTS: Of 122 pts, 60 (49.2%) underwent SLNM using L and 62 (50.8%) underwent SLNM using M. Colon cancer (CrCa) was the most common site in both groups. The success rate of L and M in SLNM was 96.6% and 96.7%, respectively, with similar numbers of total number of lymph nodes per pt, SLNs per pt (<3), nodal positivity, skip metastasis, and accuracy. The only adverse reaction in the L group was oxygen desaturation >5% in 5% (3/60) of pts, compared with none in the M group. Cost per vial of L was $210 vs $7 for M. CONCLUSION: The success rate, nodal positivity, average SLNs per patient, and overall accuracy were similar between L and M. Absence of anaphylaxis and lower cost make M more desirable than L in SLNM of GI tumors.

Sentinel node biopsy for the individualization of surgical strategy for cure of early-stage colon cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The requirement for nodal analysis currently confounds the oncological propriety of focused purely endoscopic resection for early-stage colon cancer and complicates the evolution of innovative alternatives such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and its hybrids. Adjunctive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) deserves consideration as a means of addressing this shortfall. METHODS: Data from two prospectively maintained databases established for multicentric studies of SNB in colon cancer that employed similar methodologies were pooled to establish technique potency selectively in T1/T2 disease (both overall and under optimized conditions) and to project potential clinical impact. RESULTS: Of 891 patients with T1-4, M0 intraperitoneal colon cancer, 225 had T1/T2 disease. Sentinel nodes were either not found or were falsely negative in 18 patients with T1/T2 cancers (8%) as compared with 17% (112/646) in those with T3/T4 disease (P = 0.001). Negative predictive value (NPV) in the former exceeded 95%, while sensitivity [including immunohistochemistry (IHC)] was 81%. In the 193 patients with T1/T2 disease recruited from those centers contributing >22 patients, sensitivity was 89% and NPV 97%. Thus, in this cohort, SNB could have correctly prompted localized resection (obviating en bloc mesenteric dissection) in 75% (144) of patients, including 59 with T1 lesions potentially amenable to intraluminal resection alone as their definitive treatment. Forty-four patients (23.4%) would still have conventional resection, leaving three patients (1.6% overall) understaged (11% false-negative rate). CONCLUSION: These findings support the further investigation of SNB as oncological augment for localized resective techniques. Specific prospective study should pursue this goal.

Comparison of nodal positivity between SLNM vs conventional surgery in colon cancer patients with <12 and ≥12 lymph nodes harvested.

BACKGROUND: Examination of ≥12 lymph nodes (LNs) ensures accurate staging in colon cancer. The aim of this study was to compare nodal positivity between sentinel LN mapping (SLNM) and conventional surgery in patients with <12 and ≥12 LNs harvested. METHODS: From 1993 to 2008, 407 and 380 patients with colon cancer underwent SLNM and conventional surgery, respectively. Total LNs harvested and nodal positivity were analyzed. Patients were grouped according to number of LNs harvested: 2 to 11, 12 to 25, or >25. RESULTS: The average numbers of LNs harvested in the groups with 2 to 11, 12 to 25, and >25 LNs harvested for SLNM and conventional surgery, respectively, were 8.3 and 7.1 (P < .0001), 17.2 and 16.5 (P = .09), and 34.2 and 32.1 (P = .40). Nodal positivity for SLNM and conventional surgery in the groups with <12 and ≥12 LNs harvested was 42% and 29% (P = .01) and 50% and 36% (P = .003), respectively. Overall nodal positivity was 47% for SLNM and 32% for conventional surgery (P < .0001). When SLNM with 2 to 11 LNs was compared with conventional surgery with 12 to 25 LNs, nodal positivity was 42% versus 36% (P = .35). CONCLUSIONS: SLNM possessed higher nodal positivity compared with conventional surgery. SLNM is a valuable adjunct to accurate nodal staging in colon cancer.

Nodal positivity in breast cancer correlated with the number of lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging versus mammogram.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer can detect more than 15% additional lesions than mammography. We investigated lymph node metastases rates in patients with multifocal or multicentric disease detected by MRI compared with patients with a single lesion detected by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients undergoing MRI and mammography was performed. The objective was to compare lymph node metastases rates in patients with additional lesions detected by MRI versus a single lesion detected by mammography or MRI. RESULTS: Of 413 patients, 318 were included for the study. The overall nodal metastases rate was 24.8%. MRI detected multiple lesions in 83 (26.1%) patients; 67 (21.1%) patient MRI findings were not detected by mammography. The lymph node metastases rate was 37.3% when ≥ 2 lesions were detected compared with 20.2% when a single malignant lesion was detected (P = .01). The evaluation of the 67 patients with additional lesions detected by MRI revealed 32 patients with invasive lesions, 29 with benign lesions, and 6 with in situ disease. Comparing patients with single malignant lesions with patients with additional malignant lesions detected by MRI, the lymph node metastases rate increased from 20.2% to 50% (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a significant increase in the lymph node metastases rate in patients with additional malignant lesions detected by MRI. This finding suggests that MRI-detected malignant lesions are biologically significant and may predict more aggressive disease.

Ultrastaging of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) vs. non-SLNs in colorectal cancer--do we need both?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study to analyze whether ultrastaging of initially negative nonsentinel lymph nodes (non-SLNs) would increase nodal positivity in colon cancer and rectal cancer. METHODS: After SLN mapping (SLNM), SLNs were ultrastaged by 4 hematoxylin and eosin and 1 immunohistochemistry sections. A blinded pathologist reexamined initially negative non-SLNs by 3 additional hematoxylin and eosin and 1 immunohistochemistry sections. RESULTS: In 156 colon cancer and 44 rectal cancer patients, 2,755 nodes were identified (494 SLNs and 2,261 non-SLNs). Metastases were detected in 20.9% of SLNs and 8.6% of non-SLNs (P<.0001). After ultrastaging non-SLNs, only .58% became positive for metastases in 12 patients. Of these, 10 already had positive lymph nodes, hence no change of staging occurred. Ultrastaging upstaged only 2 of 200 patients (1%). CONCLUSIONS: The chance of finding additional metastases by ultrastaging of all non-SLNs is extremely low (<1%) and of little benefit.