Stable isotope-labelled intravenous microdose for absolute bioavailability and effect of grapefruit juice on ibrutinib in healthy adults.

AIMS: Ibrutinib, an inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, is used in the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Ibrutinib undergoes extensive rapid oxidative metabolism mediated by cytochrome P450 3A both at the level of first pass and clearance, which might result in low oral bioavailability. The present study was designed to investigate the absolute bioavailability (F) of ibrutinib in the fasting and fed state and assess the effect of grapefruit juice (GFJ) on the systemic exposure of ibrutinib in order to determine the fraction escaping the gut (Fg ) and the fraction escaping hepatic extraction (Fh ) in the fed state. METHODS: All participants received treatment A [560 mg oral ibrutinib, under fasting conditions], B (560 mg PO ibrutinib, fed, administered after drinking glucose drink) and C (140 mg oral ibrutinib, fed, with intake of GFJ before dosing). A single intravenous (i.v.) dose of 100 µg (13) C6 -ibrutinib was administered 2 h after each oral dose. RESULTS: The estimated 'F' for treatments A, B and C was 3.9%, 8.4% and 15.9%, respectively. Fg and Fh in the fed state were 47.0% and 15.9%, respectively. Adverse events were mild to moderate in severity (Grade 1-2) and resolved without sequelae by the end of the study. CONCLUSION: The absolute oral bioavailability of ibrutinib was low, ranging from 3.9% in the fasting state to 8.4% when administered 30 min before a standard breakfast without GFJ and 15.9% with GFJ. Ibrutinib was well tolerated following a single oral and i.v. dose, under both fasted and fed conditions and regardless of GFJ intake status.

Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of oral ¹4C radiolabeled ibrutinib: an open-label, phase I, single-dose study in healthy men.

The absorption, metabolism, and excretion of ibrutinib were investigated in healthy men after administration of a single oral dose of 140 mg of ¹4C-labeled ibrutinib. The mean (S.D.) cumulative excretion of radioactivity of the dose was 7.8% (1.4%) in urine and 80.6% (3.1%) in feces with <1% excreted as parent ibrutinib. Only oxidative metabolites and very limited parent compound were detected in feces, and this indicated that ibrutinib was completely absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. Metabolism occurred via three major pathways (hydroxylation of the phenyl (M35), opening of the piperidine (M25 and M34), and epoxidation of the ethylene on the acryloyl moiety with further hydrolysis to dihydrodiol (PCI-45227, and M37). Additional metabolites were formed by combinations of the primary metabolic pathways or by further metabolism. In blood and plasma, a rapid initial decline in radioactivity was observed along with long terminal elimination half-life for total radioactivity. The maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for total radioactivity were higher in plasma compared with blood. The main circulating entities in blood and plasma were M21 (sulfate conjugate of a monooxidized metabolite on phenoxyphenyl), M25, M34, M37 (PCI-45227), and ibrutinib. At Cmax of radioactivity, 12% of total radioactivity was accounted for by covalent binding in human plasma. More than 50% of total plasma radioactivity was attributed to covalently bound material from 8 hours onward; as a result, covalent binding accounted for 38% and 51% of total radioactivity AUC(0-24 h) and AUC(0-72 h), respectively. No effect of CYP2D6 genotype was observed on ibrutinib metabolism. Ibrutinib was well-tolerated by healthy participants.

Effect of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptives, warfarin, and digoxin in healthy participants.

OBJECTIVE: Drug-drug interactions between canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor approved for the management of type-2 diabetes mellitus, and an oral contraceptive (OC), warfarin, and digoxin were evaluated in three phase 1 studies in healthy participants. METHODS: All studies were open-label; study 1 included a fixed-sequence design, and studies 2 and 3 used a crossover design. Regimens were: study 1: OC (levonorgestrel (150 µg) + ethinyl estradiol (30 µg))/day (day 1), canagliflozin 200 mg/day (days 4 - 8), and canagliflozin with OC (day 9); study 2: canagliflozin 300 mg/day (days 1 - 12) with warfarin 30 mg/day (day 6) in period 1, and only warfarin 30 mg/day (day 1) in period 2, or vice versa; study 3: digoxin alone (0.5 mg/day (day 1) + 0.25 mg/day (days 2 - 7)) in period 1, and with canagliflozin 300 mg/day (days 1 - 7) in period 2, or vice versa. Pharmacokinetics (PK) were assessed at prespecified intervals; OC: days 1 and 9, canagliflozin: days 8 - 9 (study 1); warfarin: days 6 (period 1) and 1 (period 2) (study 2); and digoxin: days 5 - 7 (periods 1 and 2) (study 3). Warfarin's pharmacodynamics (PD; International Normalized Ratio (INR)) was assessed on days 6 (period 1) and 1 (period 2). RESULTS: Canagliflozin increased the plasma exposure of OC (maximum plasma concentration (Cmax): 22%, area under the curve (AUC): 6%) and digoxin (Cmax: 36%, AUC: 20%); but did not alter warfarin'€™s PK and PD. No clinically relevant safety findings (including hypoglycemia) were noted. CONCLUSION: Canagliflozin can be coadministered with OC, warfarin, or digoxin without dose adjustments. All treatments were well-tolerated.

Soft-tissue penetration of ceftobiprole in healthy volunteers determined by in vivo microdialysis.

Ceftobiprole is a promising new broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against several multidrug-resistant gram-positive and gram-negative species, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In order to make efficacy predications against these resistant bacteria in soft-tissue infections, i.e., skin and skin structure infections, ceftobiprole's ability to reach the site of action should be explored. Therefore, a microdialysis study was conducted in 12 healthy volunteers to determine the penetration of ceftobiprole into skeletal muscle and subcutaneous (s.c.) adipose tissue after a single intravenous dose of 500 mg. Plasma and tissue interstitial space fluid (ISF) drug concentrations were measured for 24 h from the start of the 2-h intravenous infusion. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using noncompartmental analysis. The penetration of ceftobiprole into the ISF of tissues was assessed by comparing the ratios between tissue and plasma of the free drug area under the concentration-time curve (fAUC). It was found that ceftobiprole distributes into the muscle (fAUC(muscle)/fAUC(plasma) of 0.69 +/- 0.13) and s.c. adipose tissue (fAUC(s.c.adipose)/fAUC(plasma) of 0.49 +/- 0.28). The concentrations in both skeletal muscle and s.c. adipose tissue met the efficacy breakpoint (percentage of the time that free drug concentrations remained above the MIC) for at least 40% of the 8-h dosing interval for organisms with a MIC of 2 mg/liter. Therefore, ceftobiprole qualifies as a potential agent with drug penetration capabilities to treat complicated skin and skin structure infections due to both gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens with MICs equal to or below 2 mg/liter.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a transdermal contraceptive patch and an oral contraceptive.

This open-label, randomized, 2-way crossover study characterized the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a transdermal contraceptive patch and a norgestimate-containing oral contraceptive. Healthy women (n = 34) applied a patch once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks during each of 2 cycles and received an oral contraceptive for 21 consecutive days during each of 2 cycles. Plasma concentrations of norelgestromin and ethinyl estradiol peaked and waned after daily oral contraceptive administration, whereas they rose and reached steady-state levels after first patch application. Norelgestromin exposure was similar; ethinyl estradiol exposure was higher for the patch than oral contraceptive. Hepatic estrogenic activity, assessed by hepatic globulin synthesis, was similar for corticosteroid-binding globulin and corticosteroid-binding globulin-binding capacity and higher for sex hormone-binding globulin for the patch versus oral contraceptive. The clinical significance of the differences in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles between the patch and oral contraceptive is not fully known. No serious adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events were recorded.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of ibrutinib in subjects with varying degrees of hepatic impairment.

This open-label, single-dose study was designed to characterize pharmacokinetics and safety profile of ibrutinib in hepatically impaired subjects. Each subject received single oral dose of ibrutinib (140 mg) following an overnight fast (hepatic impairment-mild [n = 6], moderate [n = 10], and severe [n = 8]; healthy control [n = 6]). Subjects with hepatic impairment showed significant increase in ibrutinib plasma exposures and fraction unbound ibrutinib. Compared to control group, mean exposure (AUClast; unbound) in mild, moderate, and severe cohorts was 4.1-, 9.8-, 13.4-fold higher, respectively. Terminal half-life trended slightly longer in moderately and severely impaired subjects, but risk of accumulation on repeated dosing appears negligible as half-life did not exceed 10 h. Based on observed effects on exposure, reduced doses are recommended for patients with mild and moderate liver impairment (Child-Pugh Class A and B), whereas 140 mg is considered too high for severely impaired patients (Class-C). A single dose of 140 mg was well tolerated in this study (NCT01767948).

UPLC-MS/MS assay for the simultaneous determination of ethinyl estradiol, norgestimate and 17-Desacetyl norgestimate at low pg/mL in human plasma.

Previously, because of the difficulty of measuring very low levels (pg/mL) of norgestimate (NGM) due to rapid metabolism to its active and major metabolite, 17-Desacetyl norgestimate (DNGM), only DNGM and the co-administered ethinyl estradiol (EE2) were required to be analyzed in bioequivalence (BE) studies for oral contraceptive NGM/EE2 tablets. Recently, with more sensitive assays available, health authorities have requested that bioequivalence of NGM be also demonstrated in addition to DNGM and EE2. Therefore, it was important to establish a 3-in-1 method for the quantitation of EE2, NGM and DNGM in human plasma. Here a UPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantitation of EE2, NGM and DNGM in human plasma at low pg/mL range is described. EE2, NGM, DNGM and their isotopic labeled internal standards (IS) EE2-d4, NGM-d6 and DNGM-d6 in 0.4mL of human plasma were extracted with hexane/ethyl acetate. The extracts were evaporated to dryness and derivatized with dansyl chloride, to enhance the mass spec response. The derivatives were reconstituted with methanol and analyzed by UPLC-MS/MS. In order to minimize the ex-vivo conversion of NGM to DNGM, sodium fluoride/potassium oxalate was used as anti-coagulant. To achieve desirable throughput for sample analysis, UPLC-MS/MS with a run time of 4.4min was utilized. The calibration curve ranges were 5-500pg/mL for EE2 and NGM, and 25-2500pg/mL for DNGM, respectively. The chromatographic separation was achieved on a Waters Acquity UPLC HSS T3 (100×2.1mm, 1.8µm) column with a gradient elution. Assay accuracy, precision, linearity, selectivity, sensitivity and analyte stability covering sample storage and analysis were established. This validated UPLC-MS/MS method has been applied to a BE study for the determination of EE2, NGM and DNGM concentrations in human plasma.

Effect of CYP3A perpetrators on ibrutinib exposure in healthy participants.

Ibrutinib (PCI-32765), a potent covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, has shown efficacy against a variety of B-cell malignancies. Given the prominent role of CYP3A in ibrutinib metabolism, effect of coadministration of CYP3A perpetrators with ibrutinib was evaluated in healthy adults. Ibrutinib (120 mg [Study 1, fasted], 560 mg [studies 2 (fasted), and 3 (nonfasted)]) was given alone and with ketoconazole [Study 1; 400 mg q.d.], rifampin [Study 2; 600 mg q.d.], and grapefruit juice [GFJ, Study 3]. Lower doses of ibrutinib were used together with CYP3A inhibitors [Study 1: 40 mg; Study 3: 140 mg], as safety precaution. Under fasted condition, ketoconazole increased ibrutinib dose-normalized (DN) exposure [DN-AUClast: 24-fold; DN-C max: 29-fold], rifampin decreased ibrutinib exposure [C max: 13-fold; AUClast: 10-fold]. Under nonfasted condition, GFJ caused a moderate increase [DN-C max: 3.5-fold; DN-AUC: 2.2-fold], most likely through inhibition of intestinal CYP3A. Half-life was not affected by CYP perpetrators indicating the interaction was mainly on first-pass extraction. All treatments were well-tolerated.

Effect of canagliflozin on the pharmacokinetics of glyburide, metformin, and simvastatin in healthy participants.

Drug-drug interactions between canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, and glyburide, metformin, and simvastatin were evaluated in three phase-1 studies in healthy participants. In these open-label, fixed sequence studies, participants received: Study 1-glyburide 1.25 mg/day (Day 1), canagliflozin 200 mg/day (Days 4-8), canagliflozin with glyburide (Day 9); Study 2-metformin 2,000 mg/day (Day 1), canagliflozin 300 mg/day (Days 4-7), metformin with canagliflozin (Day 8); Study 3-simvastatin 40 mg/day (Day 1), canagliflozin 300 mg/day (Days 2-6), simvastatin with canagliflozin (Day 7). Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed at prespecified intervals. Co-administration of canagliflozin and glyburide did not affect the overall exposure (maximum plasma concentration [Cmax ] and area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]) of glyburide and its metabolites (4-trans-hydroxy-glyburide and 3-cis-hydroxy-glyburide). Canagliflozin did not affect the peak concentration of metformin; however, AUC increased by 20%. Though Cmax and AUC were slightly increased for simvastatin (9% and 12%) and simvastatin acid (26% and 18%) following coadministration with canagliflozin, compared with simvastatin administration alone; however, no effect on active 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitory activity was observed. There were no serious adverse events or hypoglycemic episodes. No drug-drug interactions were observed between canagliflozin and glyburide, metformin, or simvastatin. All treatments were well-tolerated in healthy participants.

The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of oral ibrutinib in healthy participants and patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

PURPOSE: To assess ibrutinib pharmacokinetics under fasted and fed conditions, impact of food-intake timing, and the safety and tolerability. METHODS: Three studies were analyzed. Study 1 was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, four-way crossover study in 44 healthy participants. Study 2 was a randomized, repeat-dose crossover study in 16 patients with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ibrutinib dose was 420 mg in both studies. Study 3 was an open-label, sequential study to assess the effect of a standard breakfast on ibrutinib 560 mg in eight healthy participants. RESULTS: Administration of single-dose ibrutinib under fasting conditions (study 1) resulted in approximately 60 % of exposure compared with drug intake either 30 min before, 30 min after (fed), or 2 h after a high-fat meal. Similar food effect was observed (study 3) when ibrutinib was given 30 min before meal. In CLL patients (study 2), the C max and AUC under fasting conditions were 43 and 61 %, respectively, relative to fed conditions. When administered once-daily in uncontrolled food-intake conditions (≥30 min before or 2 h after), exposures were slightly (≈30 %) lower than in fed condition. When corrected for repeated dosing, pharmacokinetic parameters in healthy participants and patients were comparable. Ibrutinib was generally well tolerated in all settings studied. CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib administered in fasted condition reduces exposure to approximately 60 % as compared with dosing in proximity to food-intake, regardless of timing/type of meal. Because repeated drug intake in fasted condition is unlikely, no food restrictions may be needed to administer ibrutinib.

Pharmacokinetic overview of Ortho Evra/Evra.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetics of norelgestromin, the primary active metabolite of norgestimate, plus ethinyl estradiol (EE), delivered by the once-weekly contraceptive patch (Ortho Evra/Evra), have been studied in eight trials. This overview summarizes the relevant pharmacokinetic data for the contraceptive patch. DESIGN: Review article. RESULT(S): The amount of norelgestromin and EE absorbed from the patch is proportional to patch size: the 20-cm(2) patch (Ortho Evra) delivers norelgestromin, 150 microg/d, and EE, 20 microg/d, to the systemic circulation. After single and multiple applications of the contraceptive patch, daily serum concentrations (area under the serum concentration-versus-time curve) of norelgestromin and EE were within the ranges generally seen with oral norgestimate, 250 microg/EE 35 microg (Ortho-Cyclen/Cilest), but without the peaks and troughs characteristic of oral dosing. Moreover, the contraceptive patch maintains serum concentrations of norelgestromin and EE within these ranges for up to 10 days, suggesting that clinical efficacy would be maintained even if a scheduled change is missed for as long as two full days. Regardless of the location of patch application (abdomen, buttock, upper outer arm, or torso [excluding breasts]) and even under conditions of heat, humidity, exercise, and cool-water immersion, efficacious concentrations of norelgestromin and EE are achieved. Coadministration of the patch with tetracycline did not affect the pharmacokinetics of norelgestromin and EE. CONCLUSION(S): The contraceptive patch exhibits an excellent pharmacokinetic profile, maintaining efficacious serum hormone concentrations under varying conditions.

Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and covariate analysis of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) and, in the US, for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma following at least one prior therapy; the recommended dose and schedule is 1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of 21-day cycles, and the approved routes of administration in the US prescribing information are by intravenous and, following a recent update, subcutaneous injection. Findings from a phase III study demonstrated that subcutaneous administration of bortezomib, using the same dose and schedule, resulted in similar efficacy with an improved systemic safety profile (including significantly lower rates of peripheral neuropathy) versus intravenous bortezomib in patients with relapsed MM. The objectives of this report were to present a comprehensive analysis of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib, and to evaluate the impact of the subcutaneous administration site, subcutaneous injection concentration and demographic characteristics on bortezomib pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were analysed from the pharmacokinetic substudy of the randomized phase III MMY-3021 study and the phase I CAN-1004 study of subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib in patients aged ≥18 (MMY-3021) or ≤75 (CAN-1004) years with symptomatic relapsed or refractory MM after 1-3 (MMY-3021) or ≥1 (CAN-1004) prior therapies. Patients received up to eight 21-day cycles of subcutaneous or intravenous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (20S proteasome inhibition) parameters of bortezomib following subcutaneous or intravenous administration were evaluated on day 11, cycle 1. RESULTS: Bortezomib systemic exposure was equivalent with subcutaneous versus intravenous administration in MMY-3021 [mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable timepoint (AUC(last)): 155 vs. 151 ng·h/mL; geometric mean ratio 0.992 (90 % CI 80.18, 122.80)] and comparable in CAN-1004 (mean AUC(last): 195 vs. 241 ng·h/mL); maximum (peak) plasma drug concentration (C(max)) was lower with subcutaneous administration in both MMY-3021 (mean 20.4 vs. 223 ng/mL) and CAN-1004 (mean 22.5 vs. 162 ng/mL), and time to C(max) (t(max)) was longer with subcutaneous administration in both studies (median 30 vs. 2 min). Blood 20S proteasome inhibition pharmacodynamic parameters were also similar with subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib: mean maximum effect (E(max)) was 63.7 versus 69.3 % in MMY-3021 and 57.0 versus 68.8 % in CAN-1004, and mean area under the effect-time curve from time zero to 72 h was 1,714 versus 1,383 %·h in MMY-3021 and 1,619 versus 1,283 %·h in CAN-1004. Time to E(max) was longer with subcutaneous administration in MMY-3021 (median 120 vs. 5 min) and CAN-1004 (median 120 vs. 3 min). Concentration of the subcutaneous injected solution had no appreciable effect on pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic parameters. There were no apparent differences in bortezomib pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters between subcutaneous administration in the thigh or abdomen. There were also no apparent differences in bortezomib exposure related to body mass index, body surface area or age. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous administration results in equivalent bortezomib plasma exposure to intravenous administration, together with comparable blood 20S proteasome inhibition pharmacodynamic effects. These findings, together with the non-inferior efficacy of subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib demonstrated in MMY-3021, support the use of bortezomib via the subcutaneous route across the settings of clinical use in which the safety and efficacy of intravenous bortezomib has been established.

Effect of cytochrome P450 3A4 inducers on the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety profiles of bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Bortezomib, an antineoplastic agent with proteasome inhibitory activity, is extensively metabolized by the hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes CYP3A4 and CYP2C19. Drugs that affect these enzymes may therefore have an impact on the pharmacological profile of bortezomib. This study evaluated the effects of co-administration of a potent CYP3A4 inducer (rifampicin [rifampin]) and a weak CYP3A4 inducer (dexamethasone) on the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety profiles of bortezomib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma received intravenous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2, administered on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle, for 3 cycles. In stage 1, patients were randomized (1 : 1) to receive bortezomib alone or in combination with oral rifampicin 600 mg once daily on days 4-10 during cycle 3 only. If the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of bortezomib was reduced by ≥30% during rifampicin co-administration, then stage 2 was initiated, in which patients received bortezomib with dexamethasone 40 mg once daily on days 1-4 and days 9-12 during cycle 3 only. Blood samples were collected on days 11 through 14 of cycles 2 and 3 before and after bortezomib administration, at prespecified time points, for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (proteasome inhibition) assessments. RESULTS: Twelve patients in the bortezomib-alone arm, six patients in the bortezomib plus rifampicin arm and seven patients in the bortezomib plus dexamethasone arm were included in the pharmacokinetics-evaluable set. Rifampicin reduced the mean AUC from 0 to 72 hours (AUC(72h)) of bortezomib by approximately 45% (223 ng · h/mL in cycle 2 vs 123 ng · h/mL in cycle 3), while dexamethasone had no effect (mean AUC(72h): 179 ng · h/mL in cycle 2 vs 170 ng · h/mL in cycle 3). Proteasome inhibition parameters in peripheral blood were unaffected by rifampicin or dexamethasone. Safety profiles were similar across the treatment arms and consistent with previous experience of bortezomib. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, co-administration of rifampicin decreased the exposure to bortezomib but did not affect the proteasome inhibition or safety profiles; co-administration of dexamethasone did not affect the exposure to bortezomib, proteasome inhibition or safety profiles. Concomitant administration of bortezomib with strong CYP3A4 inducers such as rifampicin is not recommended, as it may result in a reduction of the clinical effect, whereas concomitant administration of weak CYP3A4 inducers such as dexamethasone does not affect the pharmacological profile of bortezomib.

Pharmacokinetic model and simulations of dose conversion from immediate- to extended-release tramadol.

OBJECTIVE: Extended-release tramadol (tramadol ER) is a once-daily formulation of tramadol approved in the United States for moderate to moderately severe chronic pain in adults. This modeling and simulation analysis was conducted to support dosing recommendations for switching patients receiving immediate-release tramadol (tramadol IR) to tramadol ER. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations based on steady-state data from three Phase 1 studies predicted minimum plasma concentration (C(min)), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), and area under the plasma-concentration-versus-time curve (AUC). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between 100-mg daily increments of tramadol ER every 24 h (Q24H) and corresponding 25-mg increments of tramadol IR every 6 h (Q6H), such as tramadol ER 200 mg Q24H versus tramadol IR 200, 225, 250, and 275 mg daily. RESULTS: Tramadol ER and IR were predicted to provide similar exposure (AUC) at a total daily dose of 100, 200, or 300 mg. Estimated exposure was comparable between tramadol IR 125-, 225-, and 325-mg and tramadol ER 100-, 200-, and 300-mg, respectively. Estimated exposure was 30-41% lower with tramadol ER 100 mg versus tramadol IR 150 and 175 mg daily, 15-26% lower with tramadol ER 200 mg versus tramadol IR 250 and 275 mg daily, and 8-19% lower with tramadol ER 300 mg versus tramadol IR 350 and 375 mg daily. CONCLUSIONS: This pharmacokinetic analysis supports switching patients from a total daily dose of tramadol IR 200 or 300 mg directly to tramadol ER 200 and 300 mg once daily, respectively. Patients who take other doses of tramadol IR may switch to the next lower 100-mg increment of tramadol ER (e.g., from tramadol IR 225, 250, or 275 mg daily in divided doses to tramadol ER 200 mg once daily). Confirmation of these findings would require clinical studies comparing the systemic exposure of tramadol upon switching from the IR to the ER formulation.

Pharmacokinetics of a contraceptive patch (Evra/Ortho Evra) containing norelgestromin and ethinyloestradiol at four application sites.

AIMS: To determine the pharmacokinetic profile of norelgestromin (NGMN) and ethinyloestradiol (EE) following application of the contraceptive patch, Evra/Ortho Evra, at each of four anatomic sites (abdomen, buttock, arm, and torso). METHODS: Thirty-seven healthy, nonpregnant women aged 20-45 years participated in this open-label, four-period crossover study. Subjects were randomized to one of four treatment (site of application) sequences. Each patch was worn for 7 days, with a 1 month washout between treatments. Blood samples were collected before and at various times up to 240 h after application of each patch. Serum samples were assayed for NGMN and EE by validated methods. RESULTS: The serum concentration reference ranges for NGMN and EE are 0.6-1.2 ng ml-1 and 25-75 pg ml-1, respectively, based on studies of the mean Cave of oral norgestimate 250 microg and EE 35 microg. For all application sites, mean concentrations of NGMN and EE remained within these ranges during the 7 day wear period. Absorption of NGMN and EE during patch application on the buttock, arm, and torso was equivalent. Absorption of NGMN and EE during patch application on the abdomen was approximately 20% less than observed for the other three sites, although mean serum concentrations were still within reference ranges. A previous study demonstrated therapeutic equivalence of patches worn on the abdomen vs other sites. CONCLUSIONS: Serum concentrations of NGMN and EE from the contraceptive patch remain within the reference ranges throughout the 7 day wear period, regardless of the site of application (abdomen, buttock, arm, or torso).