Blueprint for pandemic response: Focus on translational medicine, clinical pharmacology and pharmacometrics.

Perhaps the most important lesson learned from the COVID-19 pandemic is that of preparedness. Enhanced surveillance systems for early threat detection will be crucial to maximizing response time for implementation of public health measures and mobilization of resources in containing an emerging pandemic. Recent outbreaks have been dominated by viral pathogens, with RNA respiratory viruses being the most likely to have pandemic potential. These should therefore be a preparedness priority. Tools in the areas of virology, drug discovery, clinical pharmacology, translational medicine and pharmacometrics should be considered key components in the rapid identification and development of existing and novel interventions for a pandemic response. Prioritization of therapeutics should be based on in vitro activity, likelihood of achieving effective drug concentrations at the site of action, and safety profile at the doses that will be required for clinical efficacy. Deployment strategies must be tailored to the epidemiology of the disease, and the adequacy of the response should be re-evaluated in view of evolving epidemiological factors. An interdisciplinary framework integrating drug pharmacology, viral kinetics, epidemiology and health economics could help optimize the deployment strategy by improving decision-making around who to treat, when to treat, and with what type of intervention for optimal outcomes. Lastly, while an effective vaccine will ultimately end a pandemic, antiviral drug intervention guided by clinical pharmacology principles will continue to play a critical role in any pandemic response.

Using in silico viral kinetic models to guide therapeutic strategies during a pandemic: An example in SARS-CoV-2.

AIMS: We propose the use of in silico mathematical models to provide insights that optimize therapeutic interventions designed to effectively treat respiratory infection during a pandemic. A modelling and simulation framework is provided using SARS-CoV-2 as an example, considering applications for both treatment and prophylaxis. METHODS: A target cell-limited model was used to quantify the viral infection dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 in a pooled population of 105 infected patients. Parameter estimates from the resulting model were used to simulate and compare the impact of various interventions against meaningful viral load endpoints. RESULTS: Robust parameter estimates were obtained for the basic reproduction number, viral release rate and infected-cell mortality from the infection model. These estimates were informed by the largest dataset currently available for SARS-CoV-2 viral time course. The utility of this model was demonstrated using simulations, which hypothetically introduced inhibitory or stimulatory drug mechanisms at various target sites within the viral life-cycle. We show that early intervention is crucial to achieving therapeutic benefit when monotherapy is administered. In contrast, combination regimens of two or three drugs may provide improved outcomes if treatment is initiated late. The latter is relevant to SARS-CoV-2, where the period between infection and symptom onset is relatively long. CONCLUSIONS: The use of in silico models can provide viral load predictions that can rationalize therapeutic strategies against an emerging viral pathogen.

Pharmacologic effects of oseltamivir in immunocompromised adult patients as assessed by population PK/PD analysis and drug-disease modelling for dosing regimen optimization.

AIM: Pharmacologic effects were analysed to determine a dose recommendation for oseltamivir in immunocompromised (IC) adults with influenza. METHODS: Quantitative clinical pharmacology methods were applied to data from 160 adult IC patients (aged 18-78 years) from two studies (NV20234, 150 patients; NV25118, 10 patients) who received oseltamivir 75-200 mg twice daily for up to 10 days. An established population-pharmacokinetic (PK) model with additional effects on oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate (OC) clearance described the PK characteristics of oseltamivir in IC patients versus otherwise healthy (OwH) patients from previous clinical trials. Estimated PK parameters were used to evaluate exposure-response relationships for virologic endpoints (time to cessation of viral shedding, viral load measures and treatment-emergent resistance). A drug-disease model characterized the viral kinetics of influenza accounting for the effect of OC on viral production. RESULTS: Oseltamivir clearance was 32.5% lower (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.1-38.8) and OC clearance was 33.7% lower (95% CI, 23.2-44.1) in IC versus OwH patients. No notable exposure-response relationships were identified for exposures higher than those achieved after conventional dose oseltamivir 75 mg, which appeared to be close to the maximum effect of oseltamivir. Simulations of the drug-disease model predicted that initiating treatment within 48 hours of symptom onset had maximum impact, and a treatment duration of 10 days was favourable over 3-5 days to limit viral rebound. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the use of conventional-dose oseltamivir 75 mg twice daily for 10 days in the treatment of IC adult patients with influenza.

Respiratory syncytial virus-A dynamics and the effects of lumicitabine, a nucleoside viral replication inhibitor, in experimentally infected humans.

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes high morbidity, with mortality rates approaching or exceeding that of influenza in adult and infant patient populations, respectively. Lumicitabine (ALS-008176 or JNJ-64041575) is an oral nucleoside analogue prodrug in clinical development to treat RSV infections. This prodrug converts to plasma-circulating ALS-8112, and then to the 5'-active nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) form within host cells. We conducted an RSV-A challenge study in healthy adults to evaluate lumicitabine's activity during an active RSV infection. Objectives: To develop a semi-mechanistic mathematical model describing RSV kinetics, and the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of lumicitabine during treatment. Methods: Nasopharyngeal viral load and concentrations of ALS-8112 and ALS-8144 (uridine metabolite) were measured frequently over the study duration. Population viral kinetic and PK/PD models were developed using NONMEM. The RSV life-cycle was described using a target-cell-limited model that included a physiological delay. Results: The estimated clearances of ALS-8112 and ALS-8144 were 54.2 and 115 L/h/70 kg, respectively. A semi-physiological model was linked to predict ALS-8112 conversion to active intracellular NTP. Extensive and rapid RSV reduction occurred after lumicitabine treatment (EC50 = 1.79 µM), with >99% viral inhibition at 2 h after loading dose. Simulated NTP exposures and time to EC50 attainment suggested that rapid therapeutic effects and reduced dosing frequency are achievable in adult and paediatric patients. Conclusions: The semi-mechanistic model characterizes RSV kinetics and the antiviral effectiveness of lumicitabine in an adult challenge population. This model is applicable to guide dose selection in adult and paediatric patients.

A phase I trial of PRN1008, a novel reversible covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, in healthy volunteers.

AIM: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of PRN1008, a novel Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, in healthy volunteers, and thus determine the dose range for future clinical studies. METHODS: This was a two-part randomized, placebo controlled study in healthy volunteers using a liquid formulation. Part I was a single ascending dose design with dose levels of 50-1200 mg (n = 6 active, two placebos per cohort); Part II was a multiple ascending dose design, with dose regimens ranging from 300 to 900 mg daily, either four times or twice daily for 10 days. Plasma pharmacokinetics, adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory parameters were assessed. BTK occupancy in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was evaluated as a marker of target engagement. RESULTS: PRN1008 was rapidly absorbed following oral administration, and was safe and well tolerated in all dose regimens evaluated in both single and multiple doses. PRN1008 demonstrated a large volume of distribution, and a half-life of approximately 3-4 h. BTK occupancy of >90% was observed within 4 h after dosing in both single and multiple dose regimens, and was closely linked to maximum plasma concentration. BTK occupancy decay was slow (-1.6% h-1 ), and occupancy was sustained despite drug concentrations being undetectable. No severe or serious adverse events occurred, and the most common adverse events were gastrointestinal in nature. CONCLUSIONS: PRN1008 was safe and well-tolerated following oral administration, and achieved high, sustained levels of BTK occupancy in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Interdisciplinary pharmacometrics linking oseltamivir pharmacology, influenza epidemiology and health economics to inform antiviral use in pandemics.

AIMS: A modular interdisciplinary platform was developed to investigate the economic impact of oseltamivir treatment by dosage regimen under simulated influenza pandemic scenarios. METHODS: The pharmacology module consisted of a pharmacokinetic distribution of oseltamivir carboxylate daily area under the concentration-time curve at steady state (simulated for 75 mg and 150 mg twice daily regimens for 5 days) and a pharmacodynamic distribution of viral shedding duration obtained from phase II influenza inoculation data. The epidemiological module comprised a susceptible, exposed, infected, recovered (SEIR) model to which drug effect on the basic reproductive number (R0 ), a measure of transmissibility, was linked by reduction of viral shedding duration. The number of infected patients per population of 100 000 susceptible individuals was simulated for a series of pandemic scenarios, varying oseltamivir dose, R0 (1.9 vs. 2.7), and drug uptake (25%, 50%, and 80%). The number of infected patients for each scenario was entered into the health economics module, a decision analytic model populated with branch probabilities, disease utility, costs of hospitalized patients developing complications, and case-fatality rates. Change in quality-adjusted life years was determined relative to base case. RESULTS: Oseltamivir 75 mg relative to no treatment reduced the median number of infected patients, increased change in quality-adjusted life years by deaths averted, and was cost-saving under all scenarios; 150 mg relative to 75 mg was not cost effective in low transmissibility scenarios but was cost saving in high transmissibility scenarios. CONCLUSION: This methodological study demonstrates proof of concept that the disciplines of pharmacology, disease epidemiology and health economics can be linked in a single quantitative framework.

A drug-disease model describing the effect of oseltamivir neuraminidase inhibition on influenza virus progression.

A population drug-disease model was developed to describe the time course of influenza virus with and without oseltamivir treatment and to investigate opportunities for antiviral combination therapy. Data included viral titers from 208 subjects, across 4 studies, receiving placebo and oseltamivir at 20 to 200 mg twice daily for 5 days. A 3-compartment mathematical model, comprising target cells infected at rate ß, free virus produced at rate p and cleared at rate c, and infected cells cleared at rate δ, was implemented in NONMEM with an inhibitory Hill function on virus production (p), accounting for the oseltamivir effect. In congruence with clinical data, the model predicts that the standard 75-mg regimen initiated 2 days after infection decreased viral shedding duration by 1.5 days versus placebo; the 150-mg regimen decreased shedding by an additional average 0.25 day. The model also predicts that initiation of oseltamivir sooner postinfection, specifically at day 0.5 or 1, results in proportionally greater decreases in viral shedding duration of 5 and 3.5 days, respectively. Furthermore, the model suggests that combining oseltamivir (acting to subdue virus production rate) with an antiviral whose activity decreases viral infectivity (ß) results in a moderate additive effect dependent on therapy initiation time. In contrast, the combination of oseltamivir with an antiviral whose activity increases viral clearance (c) shows significant additive effects independent of therapy initiation time. The utility of the model for investigating the pharmacodynamic effects of novel antivirals alone or in combination on emergent influenza virus strains warrants further investigation.

Understanding the effect of the HCV polymerase inhibitor mericitabine on early viral kinetics in the phase 2 JUMP-C and PROPEL studies.

AIMS: The aim was to evaluate early viral kinetics in patients receiving mericitabine [hepatitis C virus (HCV) nucleoside polymerase inhibitor] with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) and ribavirin in two clinical trials (PROPEL and JUMP-C). METHODS: We examined rapid virological responses (RVRs; week 4 HCV RNA <15 IU ml(-1) ) and complete early virological responses (cEVR; week 12 HCV RNA <15 IU ml(-1) ) in HCV genotype 1/4-infected patients receiving mericitabine (500 or 1000 mg) or placebo twice daily plus peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin. RESULTS: Among IL28B rs12979860 CC genotype patients receiving 500 or 1000 mg mericitabine or placebo, respectively, RVR rates were 64.3% (95% confidence interval: 38.8-83.7%), 95.1% (83.9-98.7%) and 33.3% (20.2-49.7%), and cEVR rates were 100% (78.5-100%), 100% (91.4-100%) and 80.6% (65.0-90.3%). Among non-CC genotype patients, RVR rates were 26.5% (14.6-43.1%), 52.3% (43.0-61.3%) and 5.7% (2.2-13.8%), and cEVR rates were 76.5% (60.0-87.6%), 84.6% (76.6-90.1%) and 28.6% (19.3-40.1%), respectively. In multiple regression analysis, IL28B genotype (P < 0.0001), mericitabine dose (P < 0.0001) and bodyweight (P = 0.0009) were associated with first-phase (α) slope (change in log10 HCV RNA from baseline to week 1). CONCLUSIONS: Mericitabine-containing triple therapy reduces the impact of IL28B genotype on RVR and cEVR compared with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin dual therapy. The IL28B genotype, mericitabine dose and bodyweight are the most important factors associated with the α slope, and there is no evidence of a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between mericitabine and ribavirin.

Two-way interaction study between ritonavir boosted danoprevir, a potent HCV protease inhibitor, and ketoconazole in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Danoprevir is a potent, highly selective, macrocyclic, orally bioavailable inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus protease, and a substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A. It is co-administered with low-dose ritonavir, a potent CYP3A inhibitor, to enhance danoprevir pharmacokinetics. Ketoconazole is a substrate for and potent selective inhibitor of CYP3A. METHODS: In this open-label, 3-period study, the 2-way interaction potential between ritonavir-boosted danoprevir (danoprevir/r) and ketoconazole was investigated in 18 healthy subjects. Subjects initially received ketoconazole 200 mg q24h for 4 days (Period 1) followed by a 7-day washout period. Danoprevir/r 100/100 mg q12h was then given for 10 days (Period 2) followed by a further 4 days of danoprevir/r 100/100 mg q12h plus ketoconazole 200 mg q24h (Period 3). Serial blood samples were collected for the determination of danoprevir, ritonavir and/or ketoconazole plasma concentrations, and calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters. Safety and tolerability were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Co-administration of ketoconazole with danoprevir/r modestly increased the danoprevir AUCτ by 1.44-fold, with no effect on danoprevir Cmax. Co-administration of danoprevir/r with ketoconazole substantially increased ketoconazole AUCτ and Cmax by 3.71-fold and 1.73-fold, respectively. Danoprevir/r was well tolerated when administered alone or with ketoconazole. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the effect of potent CYP3A inhibitors, such as ketoconazole, on danoprevir/r pharmacokinetics is not likely to be clinically relevant.

Population pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir: pediatrics through geriatrics.

Oseltamivir is a potent inhibitor of influenza virus neuraminidase enzymes essential for viral replication. This study aimed to investigate the impact of covariates on pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of oseltamivir and its active metabolite form, oseltamivir carboxylate (OC). Dosing history, plasma drug concentrations, and demographic information were pooled from 13 clinical trials providing data for 390 healthy and infected subjects ranging in age from 1 to 78 years and given oseltamivir doses of 20 to 1,000 mg. Candidate population PK models simultaneously characterizing the time course of oseltamivir and OC in plasma were evaluated by using the NONMEM software program, and subject covariates were assessed using stepwise forward selection (α = 0.01) and backward elimination (α = 0.001). A two-compartment model with first-order absorption of oseltamivir and first-order conversion of oseltamivir to OC and a one-compartment model with first-order elimination of OC were utilized. Body weight when evaluated using a power function was a significant predictor of the apparent oseltamivir clearance and both apparent OC clearance (CL(m)/F) and central volume of distribution (Vc(m)/F). Creatinine clearance was a significant predictor of CL(m)/F, while Vc(m)/F also decreased linearly with age. A visual predictive check indicated that the final model described oseltamivir and OC concentrations in plasma adequately across dose regimens and subject covariate ranges. Concordance of population mean and individual post hoc predictions of maximum concentration of drug at steady state (C(max)) and area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state (AUC(0-24)) was high (r(2) = 0.81 and 0.71, respectively). In conclusion, a comprehensive population PK model was constructed to bridge the adult to pediatric oseltamivir PK data, allowing for reasonable estimation of the PK of OC using subject demographic data alone.

Effect of IL28B genotype on early viral kinetics during interferon-free treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although interleukin 28B (interferon, lambda 3) (IL28B) genotype affects the response of patients with chronic hepatitis C to peginterferon and ribavirin, little is known regarding its effect on response to direct-acting antivirals in interferon-free combinations. We analyzed the effects of IL28B genotype on the viral kinetic (VK) response to an interferon-free combination of the nucleoside polymerase inhibitor mericitabine (RG7128) and the hepatitis C virus (HCV) protease inhibitor danoprevir. METHODS: We performed a double-blind, dose-escalation study of patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection who were interferon treatment naive or had not responded to previous therapy with peginterferon and ribavirin. Patients were sequentially assigned to 1 of 7 cohorts then randomly assigned to groups that received up to 13 days of treatment with mericitabine (500 or 1000 mg, twice daily) plus danoprevir (100 or 200 mg, every 8 hours, or 600 or 900 mg, twice daily) or placebo. Eighty-three of 87 patients were genotyped for the IL28B single-nucleotide polymorphism rs12979860. VKs were analyzed only in patients who received 13 days of treatment, at optimal doses, using a biphasic model to describe first- and second-phase slopes of viral decay during therapy. RESULTS: At day 14 (the end of interferon-free treatment), the mean reduction in the serum level of HCV RNA was slightly greater in patients with the CC polymorphism (5.01 log(10) IU/mL) than those without (4.59 log(10) IU/mL). Modeling revealed that patients with the CC polymorphism had slightly better early VKs, most apparent in the ß-phase of viral decay. A mixed effect on the α-phase was observed, which was reduced in magnitude but prolonged in patients with CC, who also had better on-treatment response to peginterferon and ribavirin during follow up. CONCLUSIONS: IL28B genotype appears to affect early VKs in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving interferon-free treatment.

A randomised study of the effect of danoprevir/ritonavir or ritonavir on substrates of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and 2C9 in chronic hepatitis C patients using a drug cocktail.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of danoprevir in combination with low-dose ritonavir (danoprevir/r) and placebo plus low-dose ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of probe drugs for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and CYP2C9, in patients with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: A total of 54 patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 received an oral drug cocktail (2 mg midazolam, 10 mg warfarin and 10 mg vitamin K) before and after 14 days of dosing with either danoprevir/r or placebo plus low-dose ritonavir (placebo/r). Serial pharmacokinetic samples were collected up to 24 (midazolam) and 72 (S-warfarin) h post-dose. Plasma concentrations of midazolam, α-hydroxymidazolam and S-warfarin were measured using validated assays. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using non-compartmental analysis, and geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the differences between baseline and post-dosing values were calculated. RESULTS: Danoprevir/r and placebo/r significantly increased midazolam area under the time-concentration curve (AUC0-∞) and reduced the midazolam metabolic ratio while S-warfarin AUC0-∞ was modestly decreased. When danoprevir data were pooled across doses, the midazolam GMR (90 % CI) AUC0-∞ was 9.41 (8.11, 10.9) and 11.14 (9.42, 13.2) following danoprevir/r and placebo/r dosing, respectively, and the S-warfarin GMR (90 % CI) AUC0-∞ was 0.72 (0.68, 0.76) and 0.76 (0.69, 0.85), respectively. The effects of danoprevir/r and placebo/r appeared to be qualitatively similar. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial inhibition of CYP3A- and modest induction of CYP2C9- activity were observed with danoprevir/r and low-dose ritonavir.

Asia-Inclusive Clinical Research and Development Enabled by Translational Science and Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology: Toward a Culture That Challenges the Status Quo.

Access lag to innovative therapies in Asian populations continues to present a challenge to global health. Recent progressive changes in the global regulatory landscape, including newer guidelines, are enabling simultaneous global drug development and near-simultaneous global drug registration. The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E17 guideline outlines general principles for the design and analysis of multiregional clinical trials (MRCTs). We posit that translational research and quantitative clinical pharmacology tools are core enablers for Asia-inclusive global drug development aligned with ICH E17 principles. Assessment of ethnic sensitivity should be initiated early in the development lifecycle to inform the need for, and extent of, Asian phase I ethno-bridging data. Relevant ethno-bridging data may be generated as standalone Asian phase I trials, as part of Western First-In-Human trials, or under accelerated development settings as a lead-in phase in an MRCT. Quantitative understanding of human clearance mechanisms and pharmacogenetic factors is vital to forecasting ethnic sensitivity in drug exposure using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models. Stratification factors to control heterogeneity in MRCTs can be identified by reverse translational research incorporating pharmacometric disease models and model-based meta-analyses. Because epidemiological variations can extend to the molecular level, quantitative systems pharmacology models may be useful in forecasting how molecular variation in therapeutic targets or pathway proteins across populations might impact treatment outcomes. Through prospective evaluation of conservation in drug- and disease-related intrinsic and extrinsic factors, a pooled East Asian region can be implemented in Asia-inclusive MRCTs to maximize efficiency in substantiating evidence of benefit-risk for the region at-large with a Totality of Evidence approach.

Rilzabrutinib, a reversible covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor: Absorption, metabolism, excretion, and absolute bioavailability in healthy participants.

This single-center, open-label, non-randomized, two-part, phase I study was conducted (1) to evaluate the absolute oral bioavailability of rilzabrutinib 400 mg tablet following an i.v. microtracer dose of ~100 µg [14C]-rilzabrutinib (~1 µCi) and single oral dose of 400 mg rilzabrutinib tablet (part 1), and (2) to characterize the absorption, metabolism, and excretion (AME) of 14C-radiolabeled rilzabrutinib following single oral dose (300 mg) of [14C]-rilzabrutinib (~1000 µCi; administered as a liquid) in healthy male participants (part 2). A total of 18 subjects were enrolled (n = 8 in part 1; n = 10 in part 2). The absolute bioavailability of 400 mg rilzabrutinib oral tablet was low (<5%). In part 1, rilzabrutinib was absorbed rapidly after single oral dose of rilzabrutinib 400 mg tablet with a median (range) time to maximum concentration (Tmax ) value of 2.03 h (1.83-2.50 h). The geometric mean (coefficient of variation) terminal half-life following the oral dose and i.v. microtracer dose of ~100 µg [14C]-rilzabrutinib, were 3.20 (51.0%) and 1.78 (37.6%) h, respectively. In part 2, rilzabrutinib was also absorbed rapidly following single oral dose of 300 mg [14C]-rilzabrutinib solution with a median (range) Tmax value of 1.00 h (1.00-2.00 h). The majority of total radioactivity was in the feces for both non-bile collection subjects (92.9%) and bile collection subjects (87.6%), and ~5% of radioactivity was recovered in urine after oral administration. Urinary excretion of unchanged rilzabrutinib was low (3.02%). The results of this study advance the understanding of the absolute bioavailability and AME of rilzabrutinib and can help inform its further investigation.

Lumicitabine, an orally administered nucleoside analog, in infants hospitalized with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection: Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic results.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is the leading cause of infant hospitalizations and mortality. Lumicitabine, an oral nucleoside analog was studied for the treatment of RSV. The phase 1b and phase 2b studies reported here assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of lumicitabine in infants/neonates hospitalized with RSV. In the phase 1b study, infants (≥1 to ≤12 months) and neonates (<28 days) received a single-ascending or multiple-ascending doses (single loading dose [LD] then 9 maintenance doses [MD] of lumicitabine, or placebo [3:1]). In the phase 2b study, infants/children (28 days to ≤36 months old) received lumicitabine 40/20 mg/kg, 60/40 mg/kg LD/MD twice-daily or placebo (1:1:1) for 5 days. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy parameters were assessed over 28 days. Lumicitabine was associated with a dose-related increase in the incidence and severity of reversible neutropenia. Plasma levels of ALS-008112, the active nucleoside analog, were dose-proportional with comparable mean exposure levels at the highest doses in both studies. There were no significant differences between the lumicitabine groups and placebo in reducing viral load, time to viral non-detectability, and symptom resolution. No emergent resistance-associated substitutions were observed at the RSV L-gene positions of interest. In summary, lumicitabine was associated with a dose-related increase in the incidence and severity of reversible neutropenia and failed to demonstrate antiviral activity in RSV-infected hospitalized infants. This contrasts with the findings of the previous RSV-A adult challenge study where significant antiviral activity was noted, without incidence of neutropenia. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02202356 (phase 1b); NCT03333317 (phase 2b).

Antiviral activity of danoprevir (ITMN-191/RG7227) in combination with pegylated interferon α-2a and ribavirin in patients with hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Current therapy options for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection genotype 1 are effective in <50%. Danoprevir (ITMN-191/RG7227) is a potent, selective, and orally active inhibitor of the HCV NS3/4A serine protease. METHODS: The safety and antiviral efficacy of danoprevir was examined over 14 days in combination with pegylated interferon α-2a (180 µg once weekly) and ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b, multiple ascending dose study consisting of 6 dose cohorts (400 mg, 600 mg, and 900 mg twice daily and 100 mg, 200 mg, and 300 mg 3 times daily). RESULTS: Danoprevir in combination with pegylated interferon α-2a and ribavirin was safe and generally well tolerated. The median change in HCV RNA level from baseline to the end of treatment with danoprevir at 400 mg, 600 mg, and 900 mg twice daily was -4.7 log(10) IU/mL, -5.4 log(10) IU/mL, and -5.3 log(10) IU/mL, respectively, and at 100 mg, 200 mg, and 300 mg 3 times daily was -5.5 log(10) IU/mL, -5.7 log(10) IU/mL, and -5.6 log(10) IU/mL, respectively. Placebo administered in combination with standard of care resulted in median decrease in HCV RNA level of -2.6 log(10) IU/mL (with twice daily regimen) and -2.0 log(10) IU/mL (with 3 times daily regimen). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed substantial antiviral efficacy of danoprevir in combination with pegylated interferon α-2a and ribavirin. Exploration of the safety and antiviral efficacy of danoprevir in longer clinical studies is warranted.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inclisiran, a small interfering RNA therapy, in patients with hepatic impairment.

BACKGROUND: Inclisiran, a small interfering RNA molecule, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by inhibiting production of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) in the liver. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of inclisiran in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment (HI) vs participants with normal hepatic function (NHF). METHODS: In this single-center, open-label, parallel-group study, patients with mild (Child-Pugh A) or moderate (Child-Pugh B) HI and with NHF, matched by age, body mass index, sex, and race (if possible), received a single subcutaneous therapeutic dose of inclisiran (300 mg). Pharmacokinetic profiles, pharmacodynamic endpoints (PCSK9 and LDL-C), and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight participants completed the study (mild HI: n = 10; moderate HI: n = 6; NHF: n = 12). Inclisiran achieved maximum plasma concentration at 4-6 h and was undetectable in plasma at 48 h in most participants, irrespective of liver function. Inclisiran exposure was 1.24-fold higher in the mild HI vs NHF groups (90% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.53) and 2.03-fold higher in the moderate HI vs NHF groups (90% CI 1.60-2.58). LDL-C and PCSK9 plasma levels decreased from baseline up to the last assessment on Day 60 in all groups, with a similar response in NHF and mild HI groups but a less pronounced and more varied decrease in the moderate HI group. Inclisiran was generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic exposure of inclisiran increased by up to two fold in patients with moderate HI compared with those with NHF, while pharmacodynamic effects remained relatively unchanged. Inclisiran is generally safe and well tolerated in patients with mild or moderate HI, with no dose adjustment needed. However, a larger, long-term clinical trial would help to further evaluate the long-term safety profile of inclisiran in patients with liver disease.

An evaluation of a supratherapeutic dose of inclisiran on cardiac repolarization in healthy volunteers: A phase I, randomized study.

Inclisiran is a small interfering RNA molecule that has been shown to provide an effective and sustained reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. This study aimed to determine whether a supratherapeutic dose of inclisiran affects cardiac repolarization and conduction in healthy volunteers. A phase I, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and positive-controlled, three-way crossover study was performed in 48 healthy volunteers. Volunteers were assigned to three treatments in a randomized sequence: a supratherapeutic dose of inclisiran sodium (900 mg), placebo, or moxifloxacin 400 mg as a positive control, with a minimum 7-day washout period between treatments. Continuous electrocardiogram monitoring was performed from >60 min before dosing until 48 h after dosing. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety were also assessed. Inclisiran, at a supratherapeutic dose, did not show a clinically significant effect on the QT interval (Fridericia correction formula [QTcF]; maximal placebo- and baseline-corrected change: 2.5 ms [90% confidence interval: 0.6, 4.5]) near the maximal plasma concentrations at 4 h. In addition, inclisiran did not show any effects on other electrocardiogram intervals or ST- and T-wave morphology. The positive control, moxifloxacin, demonstrated the expected changes in QTcF interval, validating the adequate sensitivity of the study. A supratherapeutic dose of inclisiran sodium (900 mg) had no effect on the QTcF interval or other electrocardiogram parameters, providing additional insight and reassurance regarding the safety profile of inclisiran.

A thorough QTc study to evaluate the effects of oral rilzabrutinib administered alone and with ritonavir in healthy subjects.

This study aimed to define the clinically relevant supratherapeutic dose of rilzabrutinib, an oral Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, and evaluate potential effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic exposures on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects. This was a two-part phase I study (anzctr.org.au ACTRN12618001036202). Part A was a randomized, open-label, three-period, single-dose crossover study (n = 12) with rilzabrutinib 100 mg ± ritonavir 100 mg or rilzabrutinib 1200 mg. Part B was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way, single-dose crossover study (n = 39) with matched placebo, rilzabrutinib 400 mg ± ritonavir 100 mg, or moxifloxacin (positive control). Primary objectives: part A - pharmacokinetics (PK) of rilzabrutinib ± ritonavir, safety, and optimal dose for Part B; Part B - effect of rilzabrutinib therapeutic and supratherapeutic concentration on electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters. ECGs and PK samples were serially recorded before and post-dose. In part A, rilzabrutinib 100 mg + ritonavir led to 17-fold area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞ ) and 7-fold maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) increases over rilzabrutinib alone. Rilzabrutinib 1200 mg was discontinued due to mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal intolerance. In Part B, rilzabrutinib 400 mg + ritonavir increased rilzabrutinib mean AUC0-∞ from 454 to 3800 ng h/mL and Cmax from 144 to 712 ng/mL. The concentration-QTc relationship was slightly negative, shallow (-0.01 ms/ng/mL [90% CI -0.016 to -0.001]), and an effect >10 ms on QTcF could be excluded within the observed range of plasma concentrations, up to 2500 ng/mL. Safety was similar to other studies of rilzabrutinib. In conclusion, rilzabrutinib, even at supratherapeutic doses, had no clinically relevant effects on ECG parameters, including the QTc interval.