Regulating drivers with epilepsy in Maryland: Results of the application of a United States consensus guideline.

OBJECTIVE: Driving regulations for people with seizures vary widely throughout the United States and the world. Maryland updated their guidelines in 2003 to reflect those of a U.S. consensus guideline requiring a minimum 3-month seizure-free period as well as an individual risk assessment by a Medical Advisory Board (MAB). This retrospective study provides the first analysis of outcomes after the implementation of the consensus guidelines and an assessment of their predictive validity through longitudinal outcome data. METHODS: MAB reviews and licensing records for Maryland driver applicants with seizures between 2004 and 2005 were reviewed, during which 254 first-time applicants were processed. The initial licensing decisions were assessed and the subsequent seizure recurrence and crash rates over the following 7 years were evaluated. RESULTS: The MAB approved driving for 74.8% of initial applicants; most had been seizure-free for over 6 months. Approved drivers had a longer median seizure-free period (563 days) compared to those who were denied (104.5 days, p < 0.01), and 22.7% of approved drivers had seizures recur during monitoring over the next year, although none resulted in crashes or deaths. Of applicants initially denied (n = 50), 89.3% were eventually licensed. Treating physicians recommended driving for 84.4% of applicants rejected by the MAB. SIGNIFICANCE: Maryland's individualized system for assessing driving applicants with seizures resulted in a dynamic process of approvals and denials based on favorable and unfavorable risk factors and lengths of seizure freedom. Seizure recurrences were comparable to internationally accepted rates. Over the course of monitoring, most applicants were eventually licensed. Treating physicians recommended that nearly all their patient applicants be permitted to drive, which raises safety concerns for the 10 states that rely solely on physician recommendations. Further assessment is needed of the risk factors deemed favorable and unfavorable by the U.S. consensus guidelines.

20-year mortality after discharge in a cohort of 1,099 former trauma inpatients with and without substance use disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Psychoactive substance use disorders (SUDs) are common in trauma patients and substance use has become a leading cause of death in the United States. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of a lifetime SUD and SUD characteristics (substance used, current SUD versus in remission from dependence, etc.) on the long-term survival of trauma patients. METHODS: Cohort study of consecutive adult trauma inpatients who were discharged alive from a level-one trauma center (1994-1996). The presence of lifetime SUD was determined at the time of admission by the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual III-R. Mortality follow-up through the end of 2017 was obtained by linking patients to a national database of death certificates. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine the association of lifetime SUD and death after adjusting for age and tobacco use. RESULTS: 1,220 patients were approached, 1,118 consented to participate, and 1,099 had personal identifiers for matching. 789 (71.8%) of subjects were men, 596 (54.2%) had lifetime SUDs, and 325 (29.6%) died. Injury was the most common cause of death (24.6%, 80/325), with poisonings (40.0%, 32/80) being the most common injury-related cause of death. Compared to those without a lifetime SUD, lifetime SUD was associated with increased all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj]=1.83; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.4), injury death (HRadj=2.47; 95% CI: 1.4 to 4.2), and fatal opioid overdose (HRadj=12.96; 95% CI, 1.7 to 100.4)(p ≤ 0.01 for all HRadj). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a lifetime SUD was associated with early death, particularly from reinjury, in trauma patients. It is important to address a patient's SUD during admission to decrease their chances of dying after discharge, especially due to injury-related causes.

Suicides, homicides, and unintentional injury deaths after trauma center discharge: cocaine use as a risk factor.

BACKGROUND: : To study whether trauma center patients with positive toxicology findings for cocaine-positive (COC+) are at a higher risk for suicide, homicide, and unintentional injury death after discharge than cocaine-negative (COC+) trauma patients. METHODS: : Patients admitted between July 1983 and June 1995 and discharged alive from a level I trauma center were prospectively followed up for 1.5 years to 14.5 years. The occurrence of suicide, homicide, and unintentional injury death was explored in relation to COC+ status at admission using Cox proportional hazards methodology. Models included possible confounders. Interactions with each of the main effects were explored. RESULTS: : Of the 27,399 admissions, 21,500 had urine COC toxicology testing performed and were included in the study. COC was positive in 11.4% of the studied population. COC+ patients were significantly younger, with 72% of COC+ versus 43% of COC- in the 25 to 44 years age group. COC+ patients were more likely to be men, positive for alcohol, and intentional injury victims. COC+ status was not associated with subsequent suicide. Furthermore, the COC+ status association with subsequent homicide became nonsignificant after adjusting for confounders. Unadjusted COC+ status was associated with unintentional injury death (odds ratio = 1.65 [1.14-2.40]). Interactions were found in the association with unintentional injury death such that COC+ status tripled the odds of injury death (odds ratio = 2.75 [1.58-4.78]) among the alcohol-negative patients within the 25 to 45 years age group. CONCLUSION: : COC+ trauma patients are at an increased risk of subsequent unintentional injury death after discharge from a trauma center. Suicide and homicide occurrence seems to be unaffected.

Alcohol use and testing among older trauma victims in Maryland.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined alcohol use in the older trauma population. The purpose of the present study was to examine blood alcohol level testing and results among older trauma patients. METHODS: All patients aged 65 years or older directly admitted from the injury scene and entered into the Maryland Trauma Registry during a 6-year period were reviewed. RESULTS: The annual proportion of directly admitted patients of age 65 or older increased by 44% from 1996 to 2000. Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was measured for 66% of older patients; 9% were alcohol positive, and 81% had BAC > or = 80 mg/dL. Mean BAC was 165 mg/dL for all alcohol-positive patients. The highest mean BAC was noted in patients with fall-related injuries, followed by pedestrians struck, then by those in a motor vehicle crash. The most common cause of injury was motor vehicle crash (47%). Among all injury causes, patients with fall-related injuries had the greatest proportional increase from 28% in 1996 to 44% in 2000. Alcohol positive status was most frequent (13%) and mean BAC was highest among patients admitted because of fall-related injuries. CONCLUSION: Identifying and addressing alcohol use problems remains an important injury prevention measure for the older trauma population.

School suspensions, injury-prone behaviors, and injury history.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association of history of school suspension (HSS) to risky behaviors and injury history. METHODS: Adult patients admitted to a Level I trauma center (n = 774) were assessed for demographics, socioeconomic status, educational history, risky behaviors (infrequent seat belt use, drinking and driving, binge drinking, and speeding for a thrill), substance abuse disorders, and prior injury history. Student's t test and chi statistics were used to compare subjects with and without a HSS in relation to risky behaviors and injury history (alpha = 0.05). Logistic regression models were constructed with each risky behavior and injury history as the outcome adjusting for demographics, socioeconomic status, and substance abuse disorders. RESULTS: Patients with HSS (n = 260) were significantly younger, more likely to be male, not married, low income, Black, unemployed, smokers, and alcohol and drug dependent than patients without such history (n = 514). They had higher rates of binge drinking (66% vs. 33%), infrequent seat belt use (50% vs. 26%), drinking and driving (24% vs. 12%), and driving fast for a thrill (21% vs. 8%). Similarly, they had more frequent previous history of vehicular injuries (44% vs. 31%) and assaults (36% vs. 16%). Multivariate models revealed school suspension to be associated with infrequent seat belt use (Odds ratio [OR] = 2.02 [1.44-2.83]), binge drinking (OR = 1.95 [1.25-3.04]), speeding for a thrill (OR = 1.83 [1.15-2.92]), prior vehicular injuries (OR = 1.46 [1.06-2.02]), and assaults (OR = 1.67 [1.13-2.47]). CONCLUSION: HSS is associated with risky behaviors, and history of prior vehicular crashes and assaults.

Applying research to licensing agency screening of seniors for fitness to drive.

The aging process is associated with medical conditions that can negatively affect medical fitness to drive. Traditional licensing agency methods to identify at-risk drivers have significant limitations. These include testing of visual acuity and driving tests. Recently, methods have been developed to allow for screening for cognitive decline in older drivers. This article highlights deficiencies in traditional licensing practices to screen for at-risk senior drivers. It also addresses the possible use of newer screening techniques and procedures. Application of these new methods to overcome deficiencies in traditional license screening practices to identify at-risk drivers is discussed, along with the implications for gerontology and geriatrics education.

Test characteristics of a drug CAGE questionnaire for the detection of non-alcohol substance use disorders in trauma inpatients.

BACKGROUND: Non-alcohol substance use disorders (drug use disorders [DUDs]) are common in trauma patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the test characteristics of a 4-item drug CAGE questionnaire to detect DUDs in a cohort of adult trauma inpatients. METHODS: Observational cross-sectional cohort of 1,115 adult patients admitted directly to a level-one trauma center between September, 1994 and November, 1996. All participants underwent both a 4-item drug CAGE questionnaire and the substance use disorder section of a structured psychiatric diagnostic clinical interview (SCID) (DSM-IIIR criteria), administered by staff unaware of their clinical status. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), positive (LR+) and negative likelihood ratios (LR-), and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were calculated for each individual question and the overall questionnaire, using SCID-generated DUD diagnoses as the standard. Performance characteristics of the screen were also compared across selected sociodemographic, injury mechanism, and diagnostic sub-groups. RESULTS: Subjects with DUDs were common (n = 349, 31.3%), including cannabis (n = 203, 18.2%), cocaine (n = 199, 17.8%), and opioids (n = 156, 14.0%). The screen performed well overall (AUC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88-0.91) and across subgroups based on age, sex, race, marriage status, income, education, employment status, mechanism of injury, and current/past DUD status (AUCs 0.75-1.00). Answering any one question in the affirmative had a sensitivity = 83.4% (95% CI: 79.1-87.1), specificity = 92.3% (95% CI: 90.2-94.1), PPV = 83.1%, LR+ = 10.8. CONCLUSIONS: The 4-item drug CAGE and its individual questions had good-to-excellent ability to detect DUDs in this adult trauma inpatient population, suggesting its usefulness as a screening tool.

Social, behavioral and driving characteristics of injured pedestrians: a comparison with other unintentional trauma patients.

Pedestrian injuries represent 11% of all motor vehicle related injuries in the USA. This study attempts to define the epidemiology of the pedestrian victim. Patients admitted to a regional adult trauma center were interviewed and evaluated for substance abuse. Pedestrians were compared with the remaining unintentional trauma patients with regard to demographics, socioeconomics, possession of a driver's license, injury prone behaviors, risk taking dispositions, and BAC levels using the Student's t-test and Pearson's chi2 statistic (alpha=0.05). Multivariate logistic regression models were built with pedestrian mechanism as the outcome. When compared to the remaining unintentional trauma population (N=661), pedestrians (N=113) were significantly more likely to be black, not married, unemployed, binge drinkers, alcohol dependent, drug dependent, BAC+, to have a low income, low educational achievement, younger age, and to not have a driver license. Black race, unemployment of 1 year or more, never licensed, lapsed license, revoked license and BAC>200 mg/dl showed statistical significance in the multiple logistic regression. Pedestrians represent a sub-population with a low socioeconomic status and high incidence of substance abuse. Unemployment, not having a driver's license, black race, and a BAC>200 mg/dl were strongly linked to being an injured pedestrian.

Sociodemographic characteristics associated with substance use status in a trauma inpatient population.

Substance use is significantly associated with physical injury, yet relatively little is known about the prevalence of specific substance use disorders among trauma patients, or their associated sociodemographic characteristics. We evaluated these issues in an unselected sample of 1,118 adult inpatients at the University of Maryland Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD, who were interviewed with the psychoactive substance use disorder section of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. Among trauma inpatients, lifetime alcohol users (71.8% of subjects) were more likely male; users of illegal drugs (45.3%) were also more likely to be younger, unmarried, and poor. Patients with current drug abuse/dependence (18.8%) were more likely to be non-white, less educated, and poor; those with current alcohol abuse/dependence (32.1%) were also more likely male, unmarried, and older. These findings highlight the need for screening for substance use disorders in trauma settings and referral of patients to substance abuse treatment programs.

Risk of psychoactive substance dependence among substance users in a trauma inpatient population.

One measure of a substance's addictive risk is the proportion of users who become dependent. This study evaluates the lifetime and current risk of substance dependence among lifetime substance users' among trauma inpatients and provides a relative ranking of addictive risk among the substances. Data on use of 8 substance groups (alcohol, opiates, marijuana, cocaine, other stimulants, sedative-hypnotics, hallucinogens, other drugs) were obtained by interview (Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-III-R) from 1,118 adult trauma inpatients. Prevalence of lifetime dependence among lifetime users ranged from 80.7% for opiates and 70.9% for cocaine to 33.3% for hallucinogens and 26.6% for sedative-hypnotics. The rank order of addictive risk was similar to that found in the general population. Trauma inpatients had a higher absolute addictive risk than the general population, comparable to the risk found in patients in treatment for substance use disorders, suggesting the importance of screening trauma inpatients for substance dependence.

Crash culpability and the role of driver blood alcohol levels.

Twenty years ago the American Medical Association reported the relationship between blood alcohol concentration (BAC) and crash causation. This study addresses culpability, age, gender and BAC in a population of drivers injured in motor vehicle crashes. Five years of hospital and crash data were linked, using probabilistic techniques. Trends in culpability were analyzed by BAC category. Given BAC level, the youngest and oldest drivers were more likely to have caused their crash. Women drivers had significantly higher odds of culpability at the highest BAC levels. Seatbelt use was also associated with culpability, perhaps as a marker for risk-taking among drinkers.

Crash culpability relative to age and sex for injured drivers using alcohol, marijuana or cocaine.

While there is a great deal of data documenting the etiologic role alcohol use plays in crash culpability, there is a dearth of data for other drugs. The purpose of this study was to assess crash culpability for single drug use among injured drivers admitted to a regional trauma center. This study is the largest of its kind involving trauma center patients. Clinical toxicology results obtained for patient care were linked to police crash reports containing a field attributing crash culpability. Drugs studied were alcohol, cocaine, and marijuana. As expected crash culpability was strongly associated with pre-crash alcohol use. In contrast, for both men and women, this study did not find an association between crash culpability and marijuana use. The data documents a significant association between cocaine use and crash culpability for both sexes and for drivers 21 to 40 years of age. This is the first large study to assess for crash culpability among injured drivers relative to cocaine use. Each year approximately 42 to 43,000 people die annually as the result of vehicular crashes. (NHTSA, 2005) For the decade 1994 through 2003, alcohol was a factor in 40-43% fatal injury crashes - the fatally injured person being either a vehicular occupant or pedestrian. Specifically 25 to 29% of drivers of cars and light trucks involved in those crashes were alcohol positive. Further, it is estimated that 80% or more of those drivers had blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) of 80 mg/dl or greater. (NHTSA, 2005).

Detecting Alcohol-Related Problems in Trauma Center Patients.

Injury and alcohol are strongly associated. Trauma center clinicians have a unique opportunity to prevent future injuries by identifying patients with alcohol-related problems.

The emergency care setting for screening and intervention for alcohol use problems among injured and high-risk drivers: a review.

Each year thousands of people are treated in emergency departments and trauma centers for alcohol-related injuries, including those sustained in drinking driving crashes. Emergency departments and trauma centers provide an opportunity to screen for alcohol use problems and intervene with injured or high-risk drivers to reduce future alcohol-related traffic and injury risk. Recently physicians have expressed interest in exploring screening and intervention for alcohol use problems in these venues as a means of improving clinical care. This article reviews the literature that has examined screening and brief interventions in acute care settings to reduce future alcohol consumption and alcohol-related injury. The methodological and practical issues inherent in conducting these studies as well as in actual practice are discussed. The chaotic environment of acute care, the large numbers of patients required to be screened to obtain an adequate study sample, and high attrition rates make study in these settings difficult at best and are methodological problems that should be addressed in future research. A basic question that has not been adequately answered by research to date is whether reduction in alcohol consumption will translate to reduced alcohol-related harm, such as driving while impaired, or injurious or fatal crashes. Long-term studies that assess records-based outcomes in addition to alcohol-consumption levels are needed.

Epidemiology of alcohol and other drug use among motor vehicle crash victims admitted to a trauma center.

The objectives of this research were to (1) determine the incidence and prevalence of alcohol and other drug use among motor vehicle crash (MVC) victims admitted to a regional Level-I trauma center, and (2) to examine the utility of using a rapid point-of-collection (POC) drug-testing device to identify MVC patients with drug involvement. Blood and urine specimens were routinely collected per clinical protocol for each MVC victim at the time of admission. Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) levels were determined per standard clinical protocol. Clinical urine specimens were routinely split so that a POC drug-testing device for the detection of commonly abused drugs (Marijuana, Cocaine, Amphetamines, Methamphetamines, and Opiates) could be compared to that of the standard hospital laboratory analysis of each urine specimen (which also included Barbiturates and Benzodiazepines). In the six-month period of this study, nearly two-thirds of trauma center admissions were victims of motor vehicle crashes. During this time, blood and urine was collected from 322 MVC victims. Toxicology results indicated that 59.3% of MVC victims tested positive for either commonly abused drugs or alcohol. More patients tested positive for drug use than tested positive for alcohol, with 33.5% testing positive for drug use only, 15.8% testing positive for alcohol use only, and 9.9% testing positive for both drugs and alcohol. Less than half (45.2%) of the substance-abusing patients in this study would have been identified by an alcohol test alone. After alcohol, marijuana and benzodiazepines were the most frequently detected drugs. Point of collection (POC) test results correlated well with laboratory results and provide important information to initiate rapid intervention/treatment for substance use problems among injured patients.

Impulsive or depressive personality traits do not impede behavioral change after brief alcohol interventions.

The authors investigated whether impulsivity and depression affect the success of interventions to reduce alcohol use. Unadjusted and adjusted regression models were constructed to analyze the effect of impulsivity and depression on 12-month outcomes of participants of a trauma center based randomized trial of brief personalized motivational interventions versus information and advice. Of 497 problem drinkers enrolled in the program, 248 completed the 12-month follow-up. Impulsivity, male gender, being older than 35, and intentional mechanism of injury had a direct association with drinking. After interventions, a decrease in drinking was found that was unaffected by the presence of impulsivity or depression indicators.

Pursuit of Licensure by Senior Drivers Referred by Police to a State Licensing Agency's Medical Advisory Board.

In all fifty United States and the District of Columbia, police Requests for Re-examination (RRE) concerning fitness to driver are accepted by licensing agencies. This study assessed licensing outcomes of senior drivers, ≥75 years of age, who had RREs submitted to the Medical Advisory Board (MAB) of a Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration from March 2005 through April 2007. RRE traffic event information (including crashed, did not crash), driver demographic information, initial MAB recommendations (suspension vs no suspension), driving occupational therapists assessments, and drivers' pursuit of continued licensure were entered into a database. During the period of study, 475 RREs were referred to the MAB. The percent of referred senior drivers (n=240, 50.4%) was similar to that of younger drivers (n=235, 49.5%). A higher percentage of senior drivers retired from driving compared to younger drivers; being, 57.1% vs 23.8% (p <.01), respectively. Further analyses limited to the 240 senior drivers found: 139 (57.9%) were men, 150 (62.5%) were 75-84 years of age, 119 (49.5%) were noted to be disoriented at the traffic scene, 141 (58.8%) were involved in a crash, and 127 (52.9%) were initially suspended as the result of MAB review. The following factors were significantly related to retiring from driving, initial MAB suspension and greater age. Of the 127 drivers who were initially suspended, 82 (64.6%) retired from driving, and 45 (35.4%) pursued further licensure (p <0.01). In contrast, the percentage of non-suspended drivers who did or did not pursue further licensure was similar; being 48.7% vs 51.3%. Among drivers ≥85 years of age, 68.9% retired from driving, compared with 50% of the drivers who were 75 to 84 years of age (p <0.01) While not statisically significant, higher percentages of driving retirement were noted for the following: sex - a greater percentage of men compared to women (61.9% vs 49.5%); confusion at the traffic scene (confused, 57.1% vs non-confused, 42.9%); and crash involvement (56.7% who crashed, retired vs 43.3% of those who did not crash, retired). Overall, the most important finding of this study is that as a result of police referral, only one-fifth (20.4%) of senior drivers 75 years of age or older, continued to maintain their driving privilege. However, only 40 drivers (16.7%) retained their original driving privilege without added restrictions. The data suggest that senior drivers who are not medically fit to drive may be identified by police referrals to a licensing agency. Driving occupational therapy assessments and training, and additional driving restrictions are recommended to facilitate continuation of the driving privilege for some drivers.

Police referral of drivers to the Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration's Medical Advisory Board.

In the 50 United States and the District of Columbia law enforcement medical referrals are accepted by licensing agencies. This study assessed driving actions, medical concerns, and medical conditions in 486 police referrals to the Medical Advisory Board of the Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration during a 25-month period. Driving actions, medical concerns, and medical conditions were grouped into categories and entered into a database. These elements were analyzed relative to driver age and sex. In addition, the issuance of citations for driving violations was studied relative to age and sex. A greater percentage of drivers 60 years of age or greater (senior adults) were referred compared to the general population of licensed drivers that age, being 71.4% vs 20.6% (p <0.01). Crashing, the most common driving action, was not associated with age or sex. Among driving actions frequently mentioned relative to older drivers, only confusion of pedals was associated with senior adults drivers as compared to younger drivers (6.1% vs 0.1%, p <0.01). Of the most frequently mentioned medical concerns, confusion/disorientation was associated with being a senior adult (p <0.01), while loss of consciousness was associated with younger drivers (p <0.01). The most frequently mentioned medical conditions, diabetes and seizure, were associated with being under 60 years of age. All mentions of dementia were in senior adult drivers. Compared with younger drivers, drivers 60 years of age or older, were less often summoned for driving violations, being 33.0% vs 53.5% (p <0.01), respectively. The threshold for the issuance of fewer citations was lower for men (40 to 59 years of age) compared to women (60 years of age or greater). Studies are needed to correlate specific traffic violations and/or crashes to specific medical conditions.

Medical review of fitness to drive in older drivers: the Maryland experience.

BACKGROUND: Over the next several decades, both the number and percentage of older drivers will increase dramatically. Older age is inherently associated with medical conditions, particularly those involving cognition and vision, that can affect medical fitness to drive. Over a 60-year period, the Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA) in conjunction with its medical advisory board (MAB) has matured a comprehensive system to identify at-risk older drivers and to assess their medical fitness to drive. METHODS: This paper describes the medical review process in general, and in particular for older drivers, that has evolved in the state of Maryland. The resources, philosophy and research underpinnings of its MAB review process are examined. RESULTS: Studies of functional screening measures in older drivers indicate that older drivers at risk of being at-fault for future crashes can be identified. The feasibility of using such screening measures for drivers referred to the MVA has been confirmed by practical use for a period of seven years. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to create a medical review process with a goal of "safe mobility for life" that supports preservation of the driving privilege among many older drivers.

A controlled trial of brief intervention versus brief advice for at-risk drinking trauma center patients.

BACKGROUND: Numerous reports document that preinjury alcohol use is associated with all modes of injury requiring treatment in a trauma center, with 25% to 50% or more of patients testing positive for alcohol at the time of admission. There is evidence that in trauma patients unaddressed alcohol use problems result in recurrent injury requiring readmission to a trauma center and/or death. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted to assess the effectiveness of two types of brief interventions to reduce drinking and the consequences of drinking. Trauma patients defined as at-risk alcohol users (n=497) were randomized into two treatment options: a brief personalized motivational intervention (PMI), or brief information and advice (BIA). After a brief assessment, PMI subjects received a motivational session, feedback letter, and two postdischarge telephone contacts, whereas the BIA group received a brochure and one postdischarge telephone contact. Both groups were reassessed at 6 and 12 months postinjury. RESULTS: Both the PMI and BIA groups had statistically significant reductions in drinking, binge episodes, and consequences related to drinking that persisted from the 6- to the 12-month follow-up. However, although not statistically significant, for those classified as lower-level drinkers (