Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 13(5)2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38786144

RESUMO

Co-infection with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) is associated with poor outcomes and historically relied on combination therapy with toxic agents for management. However, several novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination agents have been developed, offering potential monotherapy options. Here, we compare the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), imipenem-relebactam (IRL), and meropenem-vaborbactam (MVB) against both CRKP and CRPA clinical isolates. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for each agent were determined using broth microdilution. Carbapenemase gene detection was performed for representative isolates of varying carbapenem resistance phenotypes. IRL demonstrated excellent activity against CRKP and CRPA with susceptibility rates at 95.8% and 91.7%, respectively. While CZA and MVB showed comparable susceptibility to IRL against CRKP (93.8%), susceptibility of CRPA to CZA was modest at 79.2%, whereas most CRPA strains were resistant to MVB. Of the 35 CRKP isolates tested, 91.4% (32/35) carried a blaKPC gene. Only 1 of 37 (2.7%) CRPA isolates tested carried a blaVIM gene, which conferred phenotypic resistance to all three agents. None of the CRKP strains were cross-resistant to all three agents. Source of infection and co-infection did not significantly influence antimicrobial activity for IRL and CZA; none of the CRPA isolates from co-infected patients were susceptible to MVB. Our results suggest that novel ß-lactam agents with antipseudomonal activity and stability against carbapenemases, such as IRL and CZA, offer potential monotherapy options for the treatment of co-infection involving both CRKP and CRPA, but not MVB.

2.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 13: 1231740, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37908764

RESUMO

Background: Nearly 30% of patients infected with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) were previously shown to be coinfected with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) or Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). Infections caused by multiple carbapenem-resistant pathogens present significant challenge to infection control and therapeutic management. The study objective was to identify risk factors for acquisition of multiple carbapenem-resistant pathogens and associated outcomes. Methods: A descriptive analysis of adults infected with either CRKP alone or coinfected with CRPA or CRAB was performed. Patient groups were compared on demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcome. Results: 86 patients with CRKP monoinfection and 60 patients with coinfections were evaluated. Respiratory tract was the predominant infection site for coinfected patients involving mostly CRPA whereas urinary tract was the primary site for CRKP-only group. More coinfected patients were severely debilitated, had prior carbapenem exposure (37% vs 13%, p<0.001) and history of pneumonia in the past year (67% vs 41%, p<0.01). More coinfected patients required direct ICU admission (45% vs 27%, p=0.02) and had prolonged length of stay (median 15 vs 10 days, p<0.01) than the CRKP-only group but mortality rates (18% vs 16%) were similar. Conclusions: CRKP coinfection with another carbapenem-resistant pathogen adds significant morbidity and healthcare burden overall. Empiric therapy with reliable activity against both CRKP and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa may be prudent for at risk patients with pneumonia.


Assuntos
Acinetobacter , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos , Coinfecção , Infecções por Klebsiella , Pneumonia , Adulto , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Coinfecção/tratamento farmacológico , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Risco , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Klebsiella/complicações , Infecções por Klebsiella/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Klebsiella/epidemiologia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico
3.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1268488, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38170135

RESUMO

Background: Among patients with nosocomial bacterial pneumonia, those who decompensated to requiring mechanical ventilation (vHABP) faced the highest mortality followed by ventilator-associated pneumonia (VABP) and non-ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia (nvHABP). The objectives of this study were to identify risk factors associated with the development and mortality of vHABP and to evaluate antibiotic management. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study of adult inpatients with nosocomial pneumonia during 2014-2019 was performed. Groups were stratified by vHABP, nvHABP, and VABP and compared on demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Multivariable models were generated via machine learning to identify risk factors for progression to vHABP as well as pneumonia-associated mortality for each cohort. Results: 457 patients (32% nvHABP, 37% vHABP, and 31% VABP) were evaluated. The vHABP and nvHABP groups were similar in age (median age 66.4 years) with 77% having multiple comorbidities but more vHABP patients had liver disease (18.2% vs. 7.7% p = 0.005), alcohol use disorder (27% vs. 7.1%, p < 0.0001), and were hospitalized within the past 30 days (30.4% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.02). An immediate need for ventilatory support occurred in 70% of vHABP patients on the day of diagnosis. Mortality was the highest in vHABP followed by VABP and nvHABP groups (44.6% vs. 36% vs. 14.3%, p < 0.0001). Nearly all (96%) vHABP patients had positive cultures, with Gram-negative pathogens accounting for 58.8% whereby 33.0% were resistant to extended-spectrum ß-lactams (ESBLs), ceftriaxone (17.5%), fluoroquinolones (20.6%), and carbapenems (12.4%). Up to half of the vHABP patients with ESBL-Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa did not receive an effective empiric regimen; over 50% increase in mortality rate was observed among patients whom effective therapy was initiated past the day of pneumonia diagnosis. Risk factors associated with vHABP development were alcohol use disorder, APACHE II score, vasopressor therapy prior to infection, and culture positive for ESBL-Enterobacterales whereas history of hospitalization in the past 30 days, active malignancy, isolation of ceftriaxone-resistant pathogens or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and vasopressor therapy were risk factors for vHABP-associated mortality. Conclusion: Patients with vHABP experienced an acute and severe decompensation upon diagnosis. The risk factors identified in this study could provide actionable data for clinicians to identify those at risk for vHABP at the onset of pneumonia and to target antimicrobial stewardship efforts to improve treatment success.

4.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 13: 21501319221119138, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35978558

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Vaccination offers significant protection against hospitalization and death due to severe COVID-19. However, a significant portion of the nonelderly U.S. adult population remains unvaccinated. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of adult patients aged under 65 years hospitalized with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 between March and November 2021 assessed the age-biased risk for severe disease and outcome in non-elderly unvaccinated adults hospitalized for COVID-19. Main measures included predisposing risk factors, disease severity and progression, and outcomes in non-elderly adults compared between (1) vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals and (2) unvaccinated individuals grouped by 10-year age increment. RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen non-elderly adults were included; of whom, 82.6% were unvaccinated. Overall, unvaccinated patients were more likely to be obese (60% vs 29%, P < .001) while vaccinated patients were more likely to have cardiovascular disease (50% vs 29%, P = .03). Unvaccinated individuals had prolonged ICU stay (11 vs 2 days, P = .002) and overall length of stay (6 vs 5 days, P < .0001), and higher proportion requiring oxygen at discharge (54% vs 29%, P < .0001). An age-stratified analysis of the unvaccinated cohort found that the time to discharge increased with age (P = .003). Compared to unvaccinated patients aged <46 years, unvaccinated patients aged ≥46 years demonstrated 1.47- and 3.49-times higher likelihood of oxygen dependency upon discharge (P = .002) and requiring higher level of care or worse at discharge (P = .004), respectively. CONCLUSION: Results from our non-elderly cohort affirm the benefit of vaccination despite a subset requiring hospitalization for breakthrough infection. In unvaccinated non-elderly adults, risk for worse outcomes and severe disease increased substantially from middle age onward and provides strong support for vaccination efforts in this population.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxigênio , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Crit Care Explor ; 4(9): e0760, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38371947

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the temporal dynamics of two viral-induced inflammatory proteins interferon gamma inducible protein-10 (IP-10) and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and examine their prognostic significance. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Multicenter, inpatient. PATIENTS: Adult patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 between March 2021 and October 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Patient sera were collected on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 of hospitalization. Levels of IP-10, TRAIL, and CRP were measured using a point-of-need diagnostic immunoassay platform (MeMed BV, MeMed, Haifa, Israel) and compared between patients grouped by disease severity (severe vs nonsevere). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar regardless of severity except for a higher prevalence of diabetes and heart failure among severe patients. The immune profile at admission was similar between groups; IP-10 and CRP levels generally decreased while TRAIL levels increased over time in all patients. However, the severe group had higher IP-10 (median 713 vs 328 pg/mL; p = 0.045) and lower TRAIL levels (median 21 vs 30 pg/mL; p = 0.003) on day 3 compared with nonsevere patients. A breakpoint IP-10 level of greater than or equal to 570 pg/mL and TRAIL level of less than 25 pg/mL on day 3 were associated with COVID-19 severity. Patients with elevated day 3 IP-10 levels (≥ 570 pg/mL) were more likely to experience prolonged recovery time (median 12 vs 3 d; p < 0.001). The severe group had prolonged use of corticosteroids (12 vs 5 d; p < 0.001) and had a higher rate of secondary infections (20% vs 6%; p = 0.04) and in-hospital mortality (20% vs 0%; p < 0.001) as compared with nonsevere patients. CONCLUSIONS: The observed patterns in host immune response revealed a turning point in COVID-19 disease on hospital day 3 and the potential utility of IP-10 and TRAIL as sensitive markers associated with disease severity and time to recovery.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA