All hands on deck: The multidisciplinary rehabilitation assessment and management of hand function in persons with neuromuscular disorders.

Hand function is important in every aspect of our lives. Across a wide range of neuromuscular disorders-inherited ataxias, motor neuron diseases, polyneuropathies, and myopathies-people can experience losses in hand strength, tone, movement, dexterity, joint range, and sensation. Such changes can adversely affect function and independence in daily activities, reducing participation and quality of life. People with neuromuscular disorders (pwNMD) known to involve the hand should be assessed at regular intervals for changes both clinically and using impairment, performance, function, and patient-reported outcome measures as appropriate. A patient-centered approach to management is recommended, with clinicians partnering with the individual, their caregivers and the interprofessional teams to create personalized solutions that can overcome barriers to participation and best meet the goals of individuals affected by neuromuscular disorders. Management strategies should be multifaceted, and may include exercise, orthoses, assistive devices, technological solutions, environmental or task adaptations, medications, and/or surgery. Exercise recommendations and orthoses should be individualized and evolve based on disease progression, impairments, and functional limitations. While medications and surgery have a small role for specific clinical situations, there is a plethora of assistive and technological solutions to assist with basic and instrumental activities of daily living, work/education, and leisure for pwNMD with reduced hand function. In addition, clinicians should advocate for appropriate accommodations for reduced hand function at work/school, and the development of and adherence to legislation supporting accessibility and inclusion.

Risk Factors for Alzheimer Disease Development After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Preliminary Study.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is increasingly recognized as a major risk factor for developing neurocognitive disorders, though this association remains controversial. Determination of risk factors for post-traumatic neurodegeneration in patients with TBI is critical given the high incidence of TBI. We hypothesized that cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities, in addition to TBI severity, are associated with the risk of post-traumatic development of Alzheimer disease dementia (ADD). A case-controlled retrospective study was conducted using medical records and medical insurance data of 5642 patients with TBI admitted to a tertiary trauma center over a 12-year period, to assess risk factors of developing ADD after TBI. Logistic regression shows that presence of post-traumatic amnesia ( P= 0.03) and chronic vascular lesions ( P= 0.04) are significantly associated with development of ADD after TBI. This innovative preliminary study is the first to explore risk factors for post-traumatic ADD. Further association studies are essential to optimize care following TBI.

Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block in the Ischial Spine and Alcock's Canal Levels: A Cadaveric Study.

BACKGROUND: Blockade of the pudendal nerve (PN) using ultrasound (US) guidance has been described at the levels of the ischial spine and Alcock's canal. However, no study has been conducted to compare anatomical accuracy between different approaches in targeting the PN. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of US-guided injection of the PN at the ischial spine and Alcock's canal levels. This study also compared the accuracy of the infiltrations by three sonographers with different levels of experience. SUBJECTS: Eight Thiel-embalmed cadavers (16 hemipelvises). METHODS: Three physiatrists trained in musculoskeletal US imaging with 12 years, five years, and one year of experience performed the injections. Each injected a 0.1-mL bolus of colored dye in both hemipelvises of each cadaver at the ischial spine and Alcock's canal levels under US guidance. Each cadaver received three injections per hemipelvis. The accuracy of the injection was determined following hemipelvis dissection by an anatomist. RESULTS: The injections were accurate 33 times out of the total 42 attempts, resulting in 78% accuracy. Sixteen out of 21 injections at the ischial spine level were on target (76% accuracy), while the approach at Alcock's canal level yielded 17 successful injections (81% accuracy). The difference between the approaches was not statistically significant. There was also no significant difference in accuracy between the operators. CONCLUSIONS: US-guided injection of the PN can be performed accurately at both the ischial spine and Alcock's canal levels. The difference between the approaches was not statistically significant.

Influence of resident involvement on fluoroscopy time and ionizing radiation exposure in fluoroscopy-guided spinal procedures.

BACKGROUND: Fluoroscopic guidance has become the standard for a variety of medical procedures. Mastering these techniques requires practice, which may entail additional radiation for patients and providers. Despite their widespread use, the literature examining factors influencing radiation exposure in fluoroscopically guided pain procedures is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of resident involvement on radiation exposure during fluoroscopy-guided spinal interventions. DESIGN: Single-center, observational study. SETTING: Outpatient physiatry clinic in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All patients who received cervical or lumbar facet block(s) (FBs), transforaminal epidural steroid injection(s) (TFESIs) without digital subtraction, or a caudal epidural (CE) during the study period were included. INTERVENTIONS: Resident involvement in the procedures: absent, observing, or participating. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Machine-indicated fluoroscopy time (seconds) and radiation dose (milligrays [mGy]). RESULTS: Two hundred ninety six procedures were included: 188 FBs (58 cervical, 130 lumbar), 48 CEs, and 60 TFESIs. For lumbar FBs, fluoroscopy time and radiation dose increased significantly when residents performed them (meantime = 24.5 s, confidence interval [CI] = 20.4-28.7; meandose = 3.53 mGy, CI = 2.57-4.49) compared to when they observed (meantime = 9.9 s, CI = 8.1-11.7; meandose = 1.28 mGy, CI = 0.98-1.59) (mean difference: time = 14.63 s, CI = 9.31-19.94; dose = 2.25 mGy, CI = 1.17-3.33) and were absent during the procedure (meantime = 12.9 s, CI = 11.1-14.6; meandose = 1.65 mGy, CI = 1.40-1.89) (mean difference: time = 11.67 s, CI = 7.35-15.98; dose = 1.88 mGy, CI = 1.01-2.76). In the case of TFESIs, time, but not dose, increased significantly when residents observed (meantime = 39.1 s, CI = 30.7-47.6; meandose = 6.73 mGy, CI = 3.39-10.07) compared to when they were absent (meantime = 27.1 s, CI = 22.4-31.8; meandose = 4.41 mGy, CI = 3.06-5.76 (mean difference: time = 11.99 s, CI = 1.37-22.61; dose = 2.32 mGy, CI = -1.20-5.84). Finally, resident involvement did not significantly affect the outcomes for CEs (ptime = .032, pdose = .74) and cervical FBs (ptime = .64, pdose = .68). CONCLUSION: Resident participation affected lumbar FBs the most, with an increase in both fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.