Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 and Its Impact on Perioperative Outcome: A Propensity Score Matched Controlled Observation Study.

BACKGROUND: Adverse effects of hydroxyethyl starches (HESs) have been verified in patients suffering from sepsis or kidney disease, but not in surgical patients at large. The investigation aimed to determine whether the use of HES 130/0.4 was associated with the incidence of acute postinterventional adverse events compared to Ringer's acetate alone in a perioperative setting. METHODS: This propensity score matched, controlled observational study was performed in a single-centre university hospital. The perioperative data of 9085 patients were analyzed. Group matching was based on 13 categories including demographic data, type of procedure, and 5 preexisting comorbidities. Duration of procedure and intraoperative transfusion requirements were integrated in the matching process to reduce selection and indication bias. The primary outcome was incidence of postoperative kidney failure. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, fluid requirements, blood loss, hemodynamic stability, and the need for postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. RESULTS: The administration of HES 130/0.4 was not associated with an increased frequency of postoperative kidney failure. In-hospital mortality (Ringer's acetate: 2.58%; HES 130/0.4: 2.68%) and the need for ICU care (Ringer's acetate: 30.5%; HES 130/0.4: 34.3%) did not differ significantly between groups. Significant intergroup differences were observed for mean blood loss (Ringer's acetate: 406 ± 821 mL; HES 130/0.4: 867 ± 1275 mL; P < .001) and median length of hospital stay (Ringer's acetate: 10.5 (5/17) days; HES 130/0.4: 12.0 (8/19) days; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: An association between intraoperative HES therapy and postoperative kidney failure was not observed in a mixed cohort of elective surgical patients. In addition, HES 130/0.4 was not associated with an increased morbidity or the need for ICU therapy in this propensity score matched study.

Effects of balanced hydroxyethyl starch 6% (130/0.4) and albumin 5% on clot formation and glycocalyx shedding: Subgroup analysis of a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous fluids can impair coagulation and affect the endothelial glycocalyx, whereas glycocalyx shedding itself can cause an impairment of clot formation and firmness. We hypothesized that hydroxyethyl starch 6% (130/0.4) has a more distinct effect on coagulation and glycocalyx shedding than albumin 5%. METHODS: Presented data derive from an exploratory subgroup analysis of a prospective randomized, single-blinded trial comparing albumin 5% versus balanced hydroxyethyl starch 6% (130/0.4). Patients between 46 and 85 years undergoing cystectomy were included. Prothrombin time, plasma fibrinogen concentration, partial thromboplastin time, thrombelastometry and platelet function were analyzed before and after surgery. Glycocalyx components were assessed before and after surgery, 2 to 4 h after surgery and at 1st and 3rd postoperative day. Primary outcome parameter was the change of thrombelastometric variables at the end of surgery. Further variables included calculated blood loss, infusion amount and transfusion rate. RESULTS: 55 patients (albumin group n = 28; hydroxyethyl starch group n = 27) were included. Thrombelastometric variables were significantly more compromised in the hydroxyethyl starch than in the albumin group whereas platelet function, glycocalyx shedding, partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time and fibrinogen were not different between groups. Mean intraoperative calculated blood loss was higher in the hydroxyethyl starch group (1557 ±â€¯825 ml versus 1245 ±â€¯709 ml; p = 0.042). Transfusion requirements did not differ. CONCLUSION: Rotational thrombelastometric variables were significantly more reduced when hydroxyethyl starch was used compared to albumin 5%. This effect was independent from a shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx. However, results presented here are from a subgroup analysis and must be considered with caution. Trial registration EudraCT number 2010-018343-34.