Altered anxiety-related and social behaviors in the Fmr1 knockout mouse model of fragile X syndrome.

The loss of fragile X mental retardation (FMR1) gene function causes fragile X syndrome (FXS), a common mental retardation syndrome. Anxiety and abnormal social behaviors are prominent features of FXS in humans. To better understand the role of FMR1 in these behaviors, we analyzed anxiety-related and social behaviors in Fmr1 knockout (KO) mice. In the mirrored chamber test, Fmr1 KO mice showed greater aversion to the central mirrored chamber than wild-type (WT) littermates, suggesting increased anxiety-like responses to reflected images of mice. Fmr1 KO mice exhibited abnormal social interactions in a tube test of social dominance, winning fewer matches than WT littermates. In a partition test, Fmr1 KO mice had normal levels of social interest and social recognition. However, during direct interaction tests, Fmr1 KO mice showed significant increases in sniffing behaviors. We further tested the influence of environmental familiarity on the social responses of Fmr1 KO mice to unfamiliar partners. In unfamiliar partitioned cages, Fmr1 KO mice did not differ from WT mice in investigation of unfamiliar partners. However, in familiar partitioned cages, Fmr1 KO mice showed less investigation of a newly introduced partner during the first 5 min and more investigation during the last 5 min of a 20-min partition test, behaviors consistent with initial social anxiety followed by enhanced social investigation. Our findings indicate that the loss of Fmr1 gene function results in altered anxiety and social behavior in mice and demonstrate that the Fmr1 KO mouse is a relevant animal model for the abnormal social responses seen in FXS.

Lymphotoxin beta receptor signaling limits mucosal damage through driving IL-23 production by epithelial cells.

The immune mechanisms regulating epithelial cell repair after injury remain poorly defined. We demonstrate here that lymphotoxin beta receptor (LTßR) signaling in intestinal epithelial cells promotes self-repair after mucosal damage. Using a conditional gene-targeted approach, we demonstrate that LTßR signaling in intestinal epithelial cells is essential for epithelial interleukin-23 (IL-23) production and protection against epithelial injury. We further show that epithelial-derived IL-23 promotes mucosal wound healing by inducing the IL-22-mediated proliferation and survival of epithelial cells and mucus production. Additionally, we identified CD4(-)CCR6(+)T-bet(-) RAR-related orphan receptor gamma t (RORγt)(+) lymphoid tissue inducer cells as the main producers of protective IL-22 after epithelial damage. Thus, our results reveal a novel role for LTßR signaling in epithelial cells in the regulation of intestinal epithelial cell homeostasis to limit mucosal damage.

Esomeprazole.

Esomeprazole, a new proton pump inhibitor, is the S-isomer of omeprazole and is the first such inhibitor to be developed as a single isomer. Esomeprazole provided better control of intragastric pH than omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole in trials conducted in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) or healthy volunteers (n = 20 to 115). In 2 large randomised, double-blind multicentre trials esomeprazole 20 and/or 40mg for 8 weeks produced higher healing rates of erosive oesophagitis and better symptom control than omeprazole 20 mg in patients with GORD. Esomeprazole 10, 20 or 40mg once daily for 6 months maintained healing versus placebo (p < 0.001) in patients with endoscopically confirmed healed erosive oesophagitis in 2 large randomised, double-blind multicentre trials. Similarly, symptom-driven on-demand use of esomeprazole effectively controlled symptoms of GORD (heartburn) for 6 months in 2 large placebo-controlled trials. Esomeprazole-based triple therapy for 7 days was as effective for eradication of Helicobacter pylori as longer omeprazole-based therapy in 2 randomised double-blind trials including about 450 patients each. Endoscopically confirmed ulcer healing 4 weeks after treatment initiation was reported in about 90% of patients with active duodenal ulcer in both treatment groups. Esomeprazole-based triple therapy for 10 days was more effective than esomeprazole plus clarithromycin for eradication of H. pylori in 233 patients.

Raloxifene: a review of its use in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

UNLABELLED: Raloxifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator that partially mimics the effects of estrogens in bone and the cardiovascular system, while functioning as an antiestrogen in endometrial and breast tissue. In randomised placebo-controlled studies involving postmenopausal women or patients with osteoporosis, raloxifene 60 to 150 mg/day was effective in increasing bone mineral density (BMD) over 12- to 36-month periods. At the 60 mg/day recommended dosage, increases of 1.6 to 3.4%, 0.9 to 2.3% and 1.0 to 1.6% were reported in lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip, respectively, versus < or =0.5% with placebo. Raloxifene 60 or 120 mg/day decreased the risk of vertebral fractures over a 36-month period in postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis. Significant reductions in radiographic fracture risk versus placebo (30 and 50%) occurred regardless of whether patients had existing fractures at baseline. Although raloxifene did not affect the overall incidence of nonvertebral fractures, a reduction in the incidence of ankle fracture was reported in comparison with placebo. In postmenopausal women, raloxifene 60 mg/day significantly reduced serum levels of total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol from baseline, compared with placebo. High density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels were unaffected. Raloxifene 60 or 120 mg/day reduced the risk of invasive breast cancer by 76% during a median of 40 months' follow-up in postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis and no history of breast cancer. A relative risk reduction of 90% was reported for estrogen-receptor positive invasive breast cancers; estrogen-receptor negative cancer risk was unaffected by raloxifene. Raloxifene was generally well tolerated in clinical trials at dosages up to 150 mg/day. Adverse events thought to be related to raloxifene treatment were hot flushes and leg cramps. Venous thromboembolism was the only serious adverse event thought to be related to raloxifene treatment and a relative risk of 3.1 compared with placebo treatment was reported in patients with osteoporosis. Vaginal bleeding occurred in < or =6.4% of raloxifene-treated women but was reported by 50 to 88% of those receiving estrogens or hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Raloxifene treatment was not associated with stimulatory effects on the endometrium. CONCLUSIONS: Raloxifene significantly increases BMD in postmenopausal women and reduces vertebral fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis. In clinical trials, raloxifene was generally well tolerated compared with placebo and HRT, although its propensity to cause hot flushes precludes use in women with vasomotor symptoms. In particular, the lack of stimulatory effects on the endometrium and the reduction in invasive breast cancer incidence indicate raloxifene as an attractive alternative to HRT for the management of postmenopausal osteonorosis.

Ropinirole: a review of its use in the management of Parkinson's disease.

UNLABELLED: Ropinirole, a non-ergoline dopamine agonist, has selective affinity for dopamine D2-like receptors and little or no affinity for non-dopaminergic brain receptors. Ropinirole is indicated as adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. It is also indicated, and recent clinical trials have focused on its use, as monotherapy in patients with early Parkinson's disease. In the symptomatic treatment of early Parkinson's disease ropinirole monotherapy was significantly more effective than placebo in 2 multicentre, randomised, double-blind trials of 3 to 12 months duration as assessed by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor scores and Clinical Global Impression/Clinical Global Evaluation Scales. In a similarly designed 3-year comparative study with bromocriptine, ropinirole recipients showed a significant improvement in UPDRS- activities of daily living (ADL) scores; however, motor scores were similar between the 2 groups. Ropinirole and levodopa treatments were similar in efficacy as measured by UPDRS ADL scores, although ropinirole recipients showed significantly less improvement on UPDRS motor scores at the 5-year study end-point in a multicentre, randomised double-blind trial. As an adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients with more advanced Parkinson's disease, ropinirole was reported to be as effective as bromocriptine and significantly more effective than placebo. In general in the comparisons with placebo ropinirole allowed a > or =20% reduction in the concomitant dose of levodopa without compromising efficacy in a significant proportion of patients and, in some trials decreased the amount of awake time spent in the 'off' state ('off' state is defined as a gradual return to parkinsonism despite adequate medication). Ropinirole was well tolerated either as monotherapy or as an adjunct to levodopa treatment. Nausea, dizziness and somnolence were the most commonly reported adverse events and were reported at a higher incidence by patients receiving ropinirole than by those receiving placebo. In patients with early Parkinson's disease, ropinirole generally showed a similar overall tolerability profile to bromocriptine although, over a 3-year period nausea was more commonly reported with ropinirole recipients. In a 5-year study, the incidence of dyskinesia was significantly lower with ropinirole than with levodopa regardless of levodopa supplementation. Prior to the addition of supplementary levodopa 5% of ropinirole recipients had experienced dyskinesia compared with 36% of those receiving levodopa. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with early Parkinson's disease, ropinirole monotherapy was more efficacious than bromocriptine with regard to improvement in activities of daily living, and need for supplemental levodopa. Ropinirole recipients had a higher requirement for levodopa supplementation than levodopa recipients in a 5-year study, but the incidence of dyskinesia was significantly lower with ropinirole than with levodopa (markedly so in the one third of ropinirole recipients who were able to remain on monotherapy with no levodopa supplementation). Thus available data suggest that ropinirole may provide a means of treating early Parkinson's disease while minimising the risk of dyskinesia and delaying the need for supplemental levodopa in some patients. In addition, ropinirole is also efficacious in the management of more advanced Parkinson's disease in patients who are experiencing motor complications after long term levodopa use.

Atovaquone. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in opportunistic infections.

Atovaquone has been investigated as an alternative agent for oral use in the treatment of both mild to moderate Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) and toxoplasmosis, opportunistic infections commonly experienced by patients with AIDS. In patients with mild to moderate PCP, a dosage of 750mg 3 times daily (administered in tablet form) has similar overall therapeutic efficacy (defined as clinical response without a treatment-limiting adverse event) to the conventional therapies oral cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) and intravenous pentamidine, respectively. Response rates to atovaquone are lower than those achieved with cotrimoxazole, but atovaquone has superior tolerability. Atovaquone recipients experienced significantly fewer treatment-limiting adverse effects than patients treated with cotrimoxazole (7 vs 20%) or pentamidine (4 vs 36%). Mortality rates were higher among atovaquone-treated patients than in cotrimoxazole recipients (7 vs 0.6%) 4 weeks after completion of therapy in a large comparative trial, although most deaths were caused by bacterial infections. However, a similar rate of mortality was reported for atovaquone- and pentamidine-treated patients (16 vs 17% 8 weeks after discontinuation of therapy) in another study. In predominantly small numbers of patients with toxoplasmosis, of whom most were unresponsive to conventional agents, atovaquone 750mg 4 times daily (administered as tablets) produced a complete or partial radiological response rate of 37 to 87.5% 52% of patients achieved a complete or partial clinical response after 6 weeks of treatment in the largest trial (n = 87), although the incidence of toxoplasmosis-related death was 24% 18 weeks after therapy was initiated. Thus, atovaquone will be a useful option for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate PCP who are intolerant or unresponsive to cotrimoxazole, especially if the increased plasma drug concentrations observed with the suspension further improve response rates. Atovaquone should also be considered a promising agent for the treatment of toxoplasmosis.

Troglitazone.

Troglitazone decreases insulin resistance (improves insulin sensitivity), which results in reduced plasma glucose and insulin levels in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Risk factors for cardiovascular disease such as elevated proinsulin and triglyceride levels are also reduced by troglitazone. In clinical trials, troglitazone 200 to 800 mg daily (alone or in combination with other oral antidiabetic agents or insulin) reduced plasma or serum glucose levels and glycosylated haemoglobin compared with both baseline and placebo in patients with NIDDM refractory to other oral antidiabetic agents (usually sulphonylureas). Troglitazone was generally well tolerated in clinical trials. In patients in the US, the incidence of adverse events in troglitazone recipients was similar to that in placebo recipients.

Amifostine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential as a radioprotector and cytotoxic chemoprotector.

Amifostine (WR-2721) was originally developed as a radioprotective agent. In animals, it protects normal tissues from the damaging effects of irradiation and, as shown in more recent studies, of several cytotoxic agents. Protection of tumours is generally reduced compared with that of normal tissues in animals, suggesting that amifostine may increase the therapeutic window of cytotoxic therapies. Clinical data concerning amifostine suggest that cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced haematological toxicity and cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity are decreased upon administration of amifostine prior to cytotoxic drugs. Similarly, amifostine reduces damage to normal tissues caused by radiotherapy. Available data show that this protection is achieved without adversely affecting tumour response or patient survival. In 1 large trial, the reduction in cyclophosphamide- and cisplatin-related toxicities manifested as a decrease in the incidence and severity of neutropenia-related fever and sepsis and in the number of patients with ovarian cancer who discontinue therapy before completion of treatment, thus improving the tolerability of this antineoplastic regimen. In addition, the incidences of cisplatin-induced nephro- and neurotoxicity were reduced. Increased doses of cytotoxic therapy have also been administered when amifostine was given prior to therapy, which may increase tumour response. The predominant adverse effect associated with amifostine are hypotension, nausea and vomiting, somnolence and sneezing. Thus, amifostine is likely to be a useful adjuvant to the treatment of patients with malignancy, particularly those receiving cyclophosphamide plus cisplatin. discontinued therapy before completion of treatment, thus improving the tolerability of this antineoplastic regimen. In addition, the incidences of cisplatin-induced.

Budesonide. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease.

Budesonide is a glucocorticoid with high topical activity, but low systemic bio-availability which results in reduced systemic effects in comparison with other glucocorticoids. To date, it has been evaluated for use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease when administered either orally as a controlled ileal release formulation or rectally as an enema. In comparative trials, daily treatment with budesonide enema 2 mg/100ml for 4 weeks produced endoscopic remission or improvement in 46 to 84% of patients with active distal ulcerative colitis and/or proctitis and histological remission or improvement in 45 to 68%. In general, this regimen was effective as regimens of hydrocortisone, methylprednisolone, prednisolone or mesalazine (5-amino-salicylic acid, mesalamine) enemas, but caused less suppression of plasma cortisol levels than the other glucocorticoids. Oral treatment with controlled release budesonide 9 mg/day for 8 weeks produces clinical remission in 42 to 67% of patients with active Crohn's disease of the ileum, ileocaecal region and/or ascending colon and significantly reduces Crohn's disease activity index scores compared with baseline and placebo. Results of a quality-of-life questionnaire reflected these clinical improvements. Budesonide has similar efficacy to prednisolone. Response to budesonide is maintained after dosage tapering at 8 weeks. Compared with placebo, maintenance treatment with oral budesonide 3 or 6 mg/day increases the duration of remission in patients with Crohn's disease, but does not appear to affect the 1-year relapse rate. Thus, budesonide, administered rectally to patients with distal ulcerative colitis or proctitis or orally to patients with Crohn's disease of the ileum, ileocaecal region and/or ascending colon, is a favourable option for the treatment of acute exacerbations of inflammatory bowel disease. Because of the low incidence of adverse glucocorticoid-related effects associated with oral budesonide, it may also be a useful agent for longer term maintenance therapy if further clinical trials confirm its efficacy in this indication.

Quinupristin-dalfopristin.

Quinupristin-dalfopristin (RP 59500) is an injectable streptogramin antibiotic. It possesses a wide spectrum of activity against Gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant staphylococci, glycopeptide-resistant. Enterococcus faecium and penicillin-resistant pneumococci. Quinupristin-dalfopristin has activity against some anaerobes and selected Gram-negative pathogens. Quinupristin-dalfopristin, by way synergism of between its 2 components, is unaffected by most forms of bacterial resistance. Rare forms of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin group B resistance may affect its activity; however, at present the incidence of strains with this type of resistance remains low. Quinupristin-dalfopristin is bactericidal against streptococci and staphylococci but has weak or no bactericidal activity against enterococci. In a compassionate use programme, 67% of 95 evaluable patients with vancomycin-resistant Gram-positive infections or intolerant of vancomycin showed improvement with eradication of infection.

Remifentanil.

Remifentanil is a new selective mu opioid receptor agonist of higher potency than alfentanil, with pharmacological effects that essentially parallel those of alfentanil and other opioids in this class. Unlike other opioids, remifentanil is rapidly hydrolysed by nonspecific plasma and tissue esterases: this imparts brevity of action, precise and rapidly titratable effects (due to rapid onset and offset), non-cumulative opioid effects and rapid recovery after cessation of administration. The onset of action of remifentanil is similar to that of alfentanil, although its offset is considerably more rapid and independent of the duration of infusion. Remifentanil also has a sparing effect on hypnotics and sedatives. Its brevity of action ensures not only a rapid resolution of adverse effects but also a rapid offset of analgesic effect. Therefore, appropriate postoperative analgesia, when necessary, should be established before discontinuation of remifentanil infusion. The unique pharmacokinetic profile of remifentanil facilitates 'real time' management of intraoperative stress, as well as provision of optimal intraoperative analgesia without compromising recovery for a variety of surgical procedures.

Iodixanol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and diagnostic use as an x-ray contrast medium.

Iodixanol is an iso-osmolal nonionic dimeric hydrophilic contrast agent. It has similar diagnostic efficacy to that of other iodinated contrast media. Because of its physical properties, iodixanol would be expected to produce a lower incidence of adverse events than other nondimeric contrast media. Indeed, pharmacodynamic studies indicate that iodixanol has fewer cardiovascular effects, causes less renal damage and is associated with similar or smaller changes to the blood-brain barrier and neurological function when compared with nondimeric nonionic contrast media. In clinical trials, iodixanol had a similar tolerability profile to other nonionic contrast media but induced fewer adverse events than ioxaglate. Iodixanol appears to have an advantage over other contrast media in that it generally causes less frequent and less intense discomfort on injection. However, in common with other newer, and usually nonionic, contrast media, iodixanol is expensive. Studies investigating other nonionic contrast media (but not iodixanol) have shown that it is not cost-effective in all patients to replace older, usually ionic, contrast media with the more costly newer alternatives. Nonetheless, in selected patients who are considered at increased risk of contrast medium-associated adverse events, nonionic agents should be used. Iodixanol, with its lower intensity (and possibly frequency) of discomfort, may be a preferred option in these patients.

Diacerein.

Rhein, the active metabolite of diacerein, inhibits interleukin-1 activity. Consequently, collagenase production in articular cartilage is reduced. Rhein dose-dependently inhibits superoxide anion production, chemotaxis and phagocytic activity of neutrophils, and macrophage migration and phagocytosis. Articular cartilage damage is reduced by diacerein in animal models of osteoarthritis. Diacerein does not alter renal or platelet cyclooxygenase activity and may therefore be tolerated by patients with prostaglandin-dependent renal function. In clinical trials of < or = 6 months' duration, oral diacerein 50mg twice daily was associated with improvement in 57 to 85% of patients with osteoarthritis. Pain scores and measures of joint function were generally reduced compared with baseline and placebo. Diacerein had similar efficacy to NSAIDs, but a slower onset of action, in comparative trials of < or = 2 months' duration conducted in patients with osteoarthritis. The predominant adverse effects of diacerein are diarrhoea and related disorders.

Miglitol: a review of its therapeutic potential in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

UNLABELLED: Miglitol, the first pseudomonosaccharide alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, smooths postprandial peak plasma glucose levels and thus improves glycaemic control, which is reflected in a reduced glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level. This oral antihyperglycaemic agent is indicated for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Miglitol is generally well tolerated and, unlike the sulphonylurea agents, is not associated with bodyweight gain or hypoglycaemia when administered as monotherapy. The drug is systemically absorbed but is not metabolised and is rapidly excreted via the kidneys. Clinical trials with miglitol (usually 50 or 100 mg 3 times daily) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus consistently demonstrated a significant improvement in glycaemic control for periods of 6 to 12 months. There were also marked reductions in postprandial serum insulin levels, although miglitol generally had no effect on fasting insulin levels. In comparative studies miglitol had similar efficacy to acarbose, but at lower therapeutic doses (50 and 100 mg 3 times daily, respectively). In addition, although sulphonylurea agents provided superior reductions in HbA1c levels, miglitol provided similar or superior reductions in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose levels. In combination with other oral antidiabetic agents or insulin, miglitol improved glycaemic control in patients in whom metabolic control was suboptimal despite dietary and pharmacological intervention. Most adverse events associated with miglitol treatment involve disturbances of the gastrointestinal tract (most common effects are flatulence, abdominal pain and diarrhoea). These symptoms are usually dose dependent, mild to moderate in severity, occur at the onset of treatment, decline with time and resolve promptly on discontinuation of the drug or with dosage adjustment. As monotherapy, miglitol is not associated with hypoglycaemia, but concomitant use with other oral antidiabetic agents may necessitate dosage adjustment of the other agents. Miglitol had no significant effects on renal, cardiovascular, respiratory or haematological parameters in long term studies. No dosage adjustments are required in elderly patients, in those with hepatic impairment or in those with mild to moderate renal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: In long term, well designed trials miglitol reduces fasting and postprandial plasma glucose levels, thus improving glycaemic control, which is reflected in a reduced HbA1c level in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Most adverse events associated with miglitol involve disturbances of the gastrointestinal tract. This agent is a useful first-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus insufficiently controlled by diet alone and as second-line or as adjuvant therapy in those insufficiently controlled with diet and sulphonylurea agents. Miglitol may prove particularly beneficial in elderly patients and those with hepatic impairment or mild to moderate renal impairment, in whom other oral antidiabetic agents are contraindicated or need to be used with caution.

Ebastine: an update of its use in allergic disorders.

UNLABELLED: Ebastine is a second-generation antihistamine which undergoes transformation to its active metabolite, carebastine. Its antihistaminic and antiallergic effects have been demonstrated in in vitro and in vivo studies, in addition to data obtained from clinical trials. Patients with allergic rhinitis or chronic idiopathic urticaria experienced significant improvement in their symptoms with ebastine 10 or 20 mg once daily. Some studies in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) have indicated trends towards greater efficacy with the 20 mg than the 10 mg dose, although only 1 study has shown statistically significant benefits. In comparative trials in patients with SAR, ebastine 10 mg was as effective as most other second-generation antihistamines, including astemizole, azelastine, cetirizine, loratadine and terfenadine. Ebastine 20 mg/day was significantly superior to loratadine 10 mg/day in patients with SAR according to effects on secondary efficacy variables in comparative studies; 1 study found significantly greater changes from baseline in mean total symptom score with ebastine 20 mg (-43 vs -36% with loratadine, p = 0.045). In patients with perennial allergic rhinitis, ebastine 10 or 20 mg daily was significantly more effective than loratadine in reducing total symptom scores from baseline 1 comparative study. There have been no reports of serious adverse cardiac effects during ebastine therapy. Increases in corrected QT interval have been observed during clinical trials; however, these have not been considered clinically significant and were generally of similar magnitude to those seen with loratadine. The normal diurnal variation in QTc interval and the problems associated in correcting for changes in heart rate also complicate assessment of this issue. The incidence of adverse events during ebastine treatment is not significantly greater than that observed with placebo or other second-generation antihistamines. CONCLUSIONS: Ebastine 10 mg daily is a well tolerated and effective treatment for allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. At this dosage, it is as effective as the other second-generation antihistamines against which it has been compared. Ebastine 20 mg has similar tolerability to the 10 mg dose, and trends towards greater efficacy with the higher dose have been shown in some studies. Ebastine does not appear to be associated with any significant cardiac adverse events. Ebastine is a useful treatment option for patients with allergic rhinitis or chronic idiopathic urticaria.

Bupropion: a review of its use in the management of smoking cessation.

UNLABELLED: Sustained release bupropion (amfebutamone) is a non-nicotine agent that is indicated as an aid to smoking cessation. In 2 large well designed clinical trials, sustained release bupropion 300 mg/day (the recommended dose) for 7 or 9 weeks was associated with considerably and significantly higher smoking abstinence rates (continuous abstinence and 7-day point prevalence rates) than placebo during treatment and at follow-up at 6 and 12 months. Point prevalence rates at 12 months in 2 studies were 23.1 and 30.3% with bupropion, whereas values for placebo were 12.4 and 15.6%. Continuous abstinence rates at 12 months, available from 1 trial, were 18.4% with bupropion and 5.6% with placebo. Furthermore, bupropion was associated with significantly higher quitting rates than nicotine patch in a comparative study. Combination therapy with bupropion and nicotine patch provided slightly higher abstinence rates than bupropion alone, although differences were not statistically significant. The combination was superior to nicotine patch alone. Data from a preliminary report of long term bupropion treatment (52 weeks) showed that the drug was associated with significantly higher continuous abstinence rates than placebo only to 6 months. However, point prevalence abstinence rates were significantly higher with bupropion than placebo to 18 months. Bupropion 300 mg/day recipients reported nicotine withdrawal symptoms during treatment; however, the symptoms were significantly less severe with bupropion than placebo. Patients receiving bupropion 300 mg/day or bupropion in combination with nicotine patch for smoking cessation generally gained less bodyweight than placebo recipients. The benefits of bupropion for preventing weight gain persisted after the completion of long term, but not short term therapy. Bupropion was well tolerated in clinical trials, and the only adverse events that were significantly more common with bupropion than placebo were insomnia and dry mouth. Data published so far suggest that sustained release bupropion has a low potential for inducing seizures (seizure rate approximately 0.1% in patients with depression). CONCLUSIONS: Bupropion is an effective and well tolerated smoking cessation intervention. Further studies with long term follow-up will be useful in determining whether abstinence rates are maintained with bupropion. In addition, clarification of its efficacy in comparison with other therapies used for smoking cessation would help to establish its clinical value. The reduced potential for weight gain with bupropion and the ability to use bupropion in combination with nicotine replacement therapy make the drug a useful treatment option for smoking cessation.

Lansoprazole. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and its therapeutic efficacy in acid-related disorders.

Lansoprazole is a benzimidazole derivative that effectively decreases gastric acid secretion, regardless of the primary stimulus, via inhibition of gastric H+,K(+)-adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase). It provides effective symptom relief and healing of peptic ulcer and reflux oesophagitis after 4 to 8 weeks of therapy and appears to prevent recurrence of lesions when administered as maintenance therapy. When administered at therapeutic dosages, lansoprazole produced higher healing rates than ranitidine or famotidine in patients with duodenal and gastric ulcers. Lansoprazole heals duodenal ulcers more rapidly than ranitidine or famotidine. Relief of ulcer symptoms in lansoprazole recipients is at least equivalent to, and tends to be more rapid than, that in patients receiving histamine H2-receptor antagonists. In comparisons with omeprazole 20 mg/day, lansoprazole 30 mg/day produced duodenal ulcer healing more rapidly and reduced ulcer pain to a greater extent at 2 weeks, but overall healing rates were similar after 4 weeks of therapy. At therapeutic dosages, lansoprazole produces superior healing and symptom relief of reflux oesophagitis in comparison with ranitidine, and it tends to relieve heartburn more effectively than omeprazole, although both agents produce equivalent healing. Healing of peptic ulcers or reflux oesophagitis refractory to histamine H2-receptor antagonists occurs after 8 weeks in the majority of patients treated with lansoprazole, and lansoprazole and omeprazole demonstrate similar efficacy in patients with refractory peptic ulcers. In patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, lansoprazole effectively controls mean basal gastric acid output. Lansoprazole is generally well tolerated in clinical trials. The incidence of adverse effects is similar to that of omeprazole, ranitidine and famotidine in comparative studies. Combination therapy with lansoprazole and antibacterial agents such as amoxicillin, tinidazole, roxithromycin and/or metronidazole appears to eradicate Helicobacter pylori in 22 to 80% of patients with this organism. Limited data also suggest that lansoprazole may have superior activity against H. pylori in comparison with omeprazole, although the clinical relevance of this preliminary finding requires further confirmation. Thus, lansoprazole may be considered as alternative to existing antisecretory agents available for the treatment of acid-related disorders, particularly because it may provide more rapid healing and relief of symptoms.

Paclitaxel. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential in the treatment of cancer.

Paclitaxel is a new anticancer agent with a novel mechanism of action. It promotes polymerisation of tubulin dimers to form microtubules and stabilises microtubules by preventing depolymerisation. In noncomparative trials, continuous infusion of paclitaxel 110 to 300 mg/m2 over 3 to 96 hours every 3 to 4 weeks produced a complete or partial response in 16 to 48% of patients with ovarian cancer and 25 to 61.5% of patients with metastatic breast cancer, many of whom were refractory to treatment with cisplatin or doxorubicin, respectively. 23 to 100% of patients with ovarian cancer achieved complete or partial responses with paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, altretamine and/or doxorubicin. Similarly, response rates of 30 to 100% were observed with paclitaxel plus doxorubicin, cisplatin, mitoxantrone and/or cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Comparative trials in patients with advanced ovarian cancer showed paclitaxel therapy to produce greater response rates than treatment with parenteral hydroxyurea (71 vs 0%) or cyclophosphamide (when both agents were combined with cisplatin) [79 vs 63%]. Paclitaxel was also more effective than mitomycin in 50 patients with previously untreated breast cancer (partial response in 20 vs 4% of patients). Paclitaxel therapy also produced promising results in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, malignant melanoma, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), germ cell cancer, urothelial cancer, oesophageal cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma, and was successfully combined with cisplatin, carboplatin and/or etoposide in patients with NSCLC, SCLC or advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Hypersensitivity reactions were initially a concern with administration of paclitaxel, although current dosage regimens have reduced the incidence of these events to less than 5%. The major dose-limiting adverse effects of paclitaxel are leucopenia (neutropenia) and peripheral neuropathy. Other haematological toxicity was generally mild. Cardiac toxicity was reported in small numbers of patients and most patients developed total alopecia. Several aspects of paclitaxel use remain to be clarified, including the optimal treatment schedule and infusion time, confirmation of the tolerability profile and efficacy of combination regimens in an expanded range of malignancies. Long term follow-up of paclitaxel recipients will also allow the effects of the drug on patient survival to be determined. Nevertheless, paclitaxel is a promising addition to the current therapies available, with significant activity reported in patients with advanced ovarian or breast cancer or other types of tumors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Anagrelide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the treatment of thrombocythaemia.

Anagrelide, an orally active quinazolin, induces thrombocytopenia in humans and has therefore been evaluated for use in conditions associated with thrombocythaemia. In patients with essential or myeloproliferative thrombocythaemia, anagrelide (usually 1 to 4 mg/day) produced sustained reductions in platelet counts for 1 to more than 28 months and also reduced the incidence of disease-related symptoms. 60 to 93% of patients responded to anagrelide therapy with clinically significant reductions in platelet count. Anagrelide has a tolerability profile different from that of most other agents used in the treatment of thrombocythaemia; most adverse effects are related to its vasodilatory or positive inotropic properties. Anagrelide has a high specificity towards megakaryocytes (and thus decreases platelet levels), although haematocrit is also reduced in some patients. If longer term trials confirm the lack of leukaemogenic and mutagenic potential with this drug, anagrelide may become the agent of choice for the treatment of thrombocythaemia, especially in younger patients in whom the risk of leukaemogenic transformation with some alternative drugs is of particular concern.

Entacapone. A review of its use in Parkinson's disease.

UNLABELLED: Entacapone is a potent and specific peripheral catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor. It has been shown to improve the clinical benefits of levodopa plus an aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase inhibitor (AADC) when given to patients with Parkinson's disease and end-of-dose deterioration in the response to levodopa (the 'wearing off' phenomenon). The efficacy of entacapone is currently being assessed in patients with stable Parkinson's disease. In 2 well conducted trials of 6 months' duration and smaller short term studies, treatment with entacapone (200 mg with each dose of levodopa/AADC inhibitor) was associated with significant increases in daily 'on' time and decreases in 'off' time. Changes in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores concurred with changes in 'on' and 'off' times: entacapone improved total, activities of daily living and motor function scores, but it had no effect on mentation scores. Entacapone also provided benefits when given with controlled release levodopa/ AADC inhibitor or with standard levodopa/AADC inhibitor and selegiline in small trials. Dopaminergic events, including dyskinesia and nausea, are among the most common events with entacapone, and are related to the drug's ability to potentiate the effects of levodopa. Diarrhoea, abdominal pain, constipation and urine discolouration are the most common nondopaminergic events, although the latter event is the only one to occur consistently more frequently with entacapone than with placebo. However, adverse events of any type infrequently led to study discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and tolerability of entacapone administered with levodopa/AADC inhibitor have not yet been compared with those of other strategies for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. However, once the decision to initiate levodopa therapy has been made, studies generally support the use of entacapone as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease and the 'wearing off' phenomenon.