A survey of practice in the anesthetic management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis spine fusion by the North American Pediatric Spine Anesthesiologists Collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) affects 2%-4% of the general pediatric population. While surgical correction remains one of the most common orthopedic procedures performed in pediatrics, limited consensus exists on the perioperative anesthetic management. AIMS: To examine the current state of anesthetic management of typical AIS spine fusions at institutions which have a dedicated pediatric orthopedic spine surgeon. METHODS: A web-based survey was sent to all members of the North American Pediatric Spine Anesthesiologists (NAPSA) Collaborative. This group included 34 anesthesiologists at 19 different institutions, each of whom has a Harms Study Group surgeon performing spine fusions at their hospital. RESULTS: Thirty-one of 34 (91.2%) anesthesiologists completed the survey, with a missing response rate from 0% to 16.1% depending on the question. Most anesthesia practices (77.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 67.7-93.4) do not have patients come for a preoperative visit prior to the day of surgery. Intravenous induction was the preferred method (74.2%; 95% CI 61.3-89.9), with the majority utilizing two peripheral IVs (93.5%; 95% CI 90.3-100) and an arterial line (100%; 95% CI 88.8-100). Paralytic administration for intubation and/or exposure was divided (51.6% rocuronium/vecuronium, 45.2% no paralytic, and 3.2% succinylcholine) amongst respondents. While tranexamic acid was consistently utilized for reducing blood loss, dosing regimens varied. When faced with neuromonitoring signal issues, 67.7% employ a formal protocol. Most anesthesiologists (93.5%; 95% CI 78.6-99.2) extubate immediately postoperatively with patients admitted to an inpatient floor bed (77.4%; 95% CI 67.7-93.3). CONCLUSION: Most anesthesiologists (87.1%; 95% CI 80.6-99.9) report the use of some form of an anesthesia-based protocol for AIS fusions, but our survey results show there is considerable variation in all aspects of perioperative care. Areas of agreement on management comprise the typical vascular access required, utilization of tranexamic acid, immediate extubation, and disposition to a floor bed. By recognizing the diversity of anesthetic care, we can develop areas of research and improve the perioperative management of AIS.

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Increased Body Mass Associated with Decreased Bracing Outcomes.

Bracing reduces the need for surgical intervention in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, bracing outcomes with variable body mass index (BMI) are understudied. The authors sought to determine the association of BMI with bracing outcomes. The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of 104 patients presenting with AIS. Initial Risser score, hours of bracing per day, BMI percentile, and curve magnitude pre- and postbracing were collected. There was no detectable difference between years of brace wear or primary curve magnitude at time of presentation between both groups. Overall, 29% (25/87) of underweight/normal weight patients and 59% (10/17) of overweight/obese patients had curves ≥ 45 degrees at the end of bracing (p = 0.016). Odds of having a curve ≥ 45 degrees after bracing were 3.5 (95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 10.3, p = 0.021) times higher for overweight/obese patients compared with underweight/normal weight patients. Increased overlying adipose tissue may reduce the corrective forces required to straighten the spine. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(1):029-032, 2024).

Elevated preoperative blood pressure and its relationship to intraoperative mean arterial pressure and blood loss in posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: The relationship between preoperative blood pressure (BP) and intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) and estimated blood loss (EBL) in pediatric spine surgery is currently unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine if elevated preoperative BP is associated with elevated intraoperative MAP, EBL, and percentage estimated blood volume (EBV) lost, and to determine if intraoperative MAP is associated with percentage of EBV lost during posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of 209 patients undergoing PSF for AIS between 2016 and 2019 by a single surgeon. Data extracted included demographic characteristics, preoperative systolic and diastolic BP, continuous intraoperative MAP measured by arterial line, EBL, radiographic, and surgical characteristics. Time points of interest for MAP included incision and exposure. Elevated BP was defined as > 1 standard deviation above the mean BP of patients included in the study, and elevated MAP was defined as > 65 mmHg. RESULTS: Elevated preoperative systolic BP was associated with elevated MAP at incision (p = 0.002). Patients with elevated preoperative diastolic BP had significantly higher MAP at exposure and throughout the procedure (p = 0.04). MAP > 65 at incision was associated with a 5% increase in EBV lost (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with elevated preoperative BP parameters have increased MAPs at incision, exposure, and throughout surgery. Elevated MAP at incision is associated with an increased percentage of EBV lost in a small number of patients undergoing PSF for AIS.

Posterior cervical spinal fusion in the pediatric population using modern adult instrumentation - clinical outcome and safety.

PURPOSE: Traditionally, less rigid fixation techniques have been applied to the pediatric cervical spine. There is a lack of long-term outcome data for rigid fixation techniques. The purpose of this study was to define the clinical outcome and safety of posterior instrumented fusion in the pediatric population using adult posterior instrumentation. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective review of pediatric patients who underwent posterior cervical fusion using a 3.5 mm posterior cervical system for any indication was performed. Outcome parameters included complications, revision and fusion rates, operative time (OR), blood loss, and postoperative neurologic status. Outcomes were compared between patient groups (posterior only versus anterior/posterior approach, short versus intermediate versus long fusion, and between different etiologies) using Mann-Whitney and chi-square test. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients with a mean age of 9.9 years and mean follow-up of 2.8 years were included. At baseline 44 (56%) had an abnormal neurologic exam. Congenital deformities and basilar invagination were the most common indications for surgery. Posterior-only surgery was performed in 71 (90%) cases; mean number of levels fused was 4 (range 1-15). Overall, 4 (5%) operative complications and 4 (5%) revisions were reported at an average postoperative time of 2.6 years. Neurologic status remained unchanged in 74%, improved in 23%, and worsened in 3%. When comparing outcome measures between the various groups, 2 significant differences were found: OR was longer in the anterior/posterior approach group and decline of neuro status was more frequent in the long fusion group. CONCLUSION: Posterior cervical fusion with an adult 3.5 mm posterior cervical system was safe in this cohort of 79 pediatric patients irrespective of surgical technique, fusion length, and etiology, resulting in a high fusion and low complication/revision rate.

Updating the Evidence: Systematic Literature Review of Risk Factors and Strategies for Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Surgical Site Infection After Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a major potential complication following pediatric spinal deformity surgery that is associated with significant morbidity and increased costs. Despite this, SSI rates remain high and variable across institutions, in part due to a lack of up-to-date, comprehensive prevention, and treatment protocols. Furthermore, few attempts have been made to review the optimal diagnostic modalities and treatment strategies for SSI following scoliosis surgery. The aim of this study was to systematically review current literature on risk factors for SSI in pediatric patients undergoing scoliosis surgery, as well as strategies for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. METHODS: On January 19, 2022, a systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting risk factors for acute, deep SSI (<90 d) or strategies for prevention, diagnosis, or treatment of SSI following pediatric scoliosis surgery were included. Each included article was assigned a level of evidence rating based on study design and quality. Extracted findings were organized into risk factors, preventive strategies, diagnostic modalities, and treatment options and each piece of evidence was graded based on quality, quantity, and consistency of underlying data. RESULTS: A total of 77 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review, of which 2 were categorized as Level I, 3 as Level II, 64 as Level III, and 8 as Level IV. From these studies, a total of 29 pieces of evidence (grade C or higher) regarding SSI risk factors, prevention, diagnosis, or treatment were synthesized. CONCLUSIONS: We present an updated review of published evidence for defining high-risk patients and preventing, diagnosing, and treating SSI after pediatric scoliosis surgery. The collated evidence presented herein may help limit variability in practice and decrease the incidence of SSI in pediatric spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-systematic review.

Outcomes of Growth-friendly Instrumentation in Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Preliminary Report.

BACKGROUND: There is limited literature on the outcomes in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) undergoing growth-friendly instrumentation (GFI). The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of GFI in patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS) and OI. We hypothesized that similar trunk elongation could be obtained in OI patients, but with higher complication rates. METHODS: A multicenter database was studied for patients with EOS and OI etiology who had GFI from 2005 to 2020, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Demographic, radiographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes data were collected and compared with an idiopathic EOS cohort matched 2:1 for age, follow-up duration, and curve magnitude. RESULTS: Fifteen OI patients underwent GFI at a mean age of 7.3±3.0 years, with an average follow-up of 7.3±3.9 years. OI patients had a mean preoperative coronal curve of 78.1±14.5 and achieved 35% correction after index surgery. There were no differences in major coronal curves and coronal percent correction between the OI and idiopathic groups at all time points. T1-S1 length (cm) was lower for the OI group at baseline (23.3±4.6 vs. 27.7±7.0; P =0.028) but both groups had similar growth (mm) per month (1.0±0.6 vs. 1.2±1.1; P =0.491). OI patients had a significantly increased risk of proximal anchor failure, which occurred in 8 OI patients (53%) versus 6 idiopathic patients (20%) ( P =0.039). OI patients who underwent preoperative halo-traction (N=4) had greater T1-S1 length gain (11.8±3.2 vs. 7.3±2.8; P =0.022) and greater percent major coronal curve correction (45±11 vs. 23±17; P =0.042) at final follow-up versus patients with no halo-traction (N=11). Staged foundation fusion was performed in 2 cases. CONCLUSION: Compared with matched idiopathic EOS patients, OI patients undergoing GFI achieved similar radiographic outcomes but sustained greater rates of anchor failures, likely due to weakened bone. Preoperative halo-traction was a useful adjunct and may improve final correction. Staged foundation fusion is an idea to consider for difficult cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic-III.

Compression Screw Fixation for Pediatric Olecranon Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric olecranon fractures can be treated with several methods of fixation. Though postoperative outcomes of various fixation techniques, including cannulated intramedullary screws, have been described in adults, functional and radiographic outcomes of screw fixation in pediatric patients are unclear. In this study, we assessed clinical, radiographic, functional, and patient-reported outcomes of pediatric olecranon fractures treated with compression screw fixation. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 37 patients aged 16 years or younger with a total of 40 olecranon fractures treated with screw fixation at our level-1 trauma center between April 2005 and April 2022. From medical records, we extracted data on demographic characteristics, time to radiographic union, range of elbow motion at final follow-up, and complications during the follow-up period. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric Upper Extremity Short Form 8a measures. RESULTS: There were no malunions or nonunions at the final mean follow-up of 140 days (range, 26 to 614 d). Four patients had implant failure (11%), of whom 3 experienced fracture union with no loss of fixation or need for revision surgery. One patient underwent a revision for fracture malreduction. Screw prominence was documented in 1 patient. Instrumentation was removed at our institution for 33 of 40 fractures. Mean time to radiographic union was 53 days (range, 20 to 168 d). Postoperative range of motion at the most recent follow-up visit showed a mean extension deficit of 6 degrees (range, 0-30 degrees) and mean flexion of 134 degrees (range, 60-150 degrees). At the final follow-up, the mean (±SD) Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 4.2±8.0, and the mean Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System score was 37±1.5, indicating good function and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: All 37 patients in our series had excellent radiographic, functional, and patient-reported outcomes after screw fixation. We observed no cases of nonunion or malunion, growth disturbance, or refracture. These results suggest that screw fixation is a safe and effective option for pediatric olecranon fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Intraoperative Antibiotic Use in Patients With Early-onset Scoliosis: Current Practices and Trends.

BACKGROUND: Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) regarding antibiotic prophylaxis in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients were published in September 2019. Recommendations included using intravenous cefazolin and topical vancomycin for all index procedures, plus gram-negative coverage for neuromuscular patients. Guideline adherence is unknown. This study aimed to characterize antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of index growth-friendly procedures and assess changes in practice patterns over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review of data collected through a multicenter study group included EOS patients undergoing index growth-friendly procedures between January 2018 and March 2021, excluding revisions, lengthenings, and tetherings. Demographics, clinical measurements, intraoperative antibiotics, and 90-day complications were recorded. Descriptive and univariate statistics were utilized. Antibiotic prophylaxis from April 2018 through September 2019 and October 2019 through March 2021 were compared with evaluate change after BPG publication. RESULTS: A total of 562 patients undergoing growth-friendly procedures were included. The most common scoliosis types included neuromuscular (167, 29.7%), syndromic (134, 23.8%), and congenital (97, 17.3%). Most index procedures involved magnetically controlled growing rods (417, 74%) followed by vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib or traditional growing rods (105, 19%). Most patients received cefazolin alone at index procedure (310, 55.2%) or cefazolin with an aminoglycoside (113, 20.1%). Topical antibiotics were used in 327 patients (58.2%), with most receiving vancomycin powder. There was increased use of cefazolin with an aminoglycoside after BPG publication (16% vs. 25%) ( P =0.01). Surgical site infections occurred in 12 patients (2.1%) within 90 days of index procedure, 10 pre-BPGs (3%), and 2 post-BPGs (0.9%), with no significant difference in surgical site infection rate by type of antibiotic administered ( P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Historical variability exists regarding antibiotic prophylaxis during index growth-friendly procedures for EOS. There continues to be variability following BPG publication; however, this study found a significant increase in antibiotic prophylaxis against gram-negative bacteria after BPG publication. Overall, greater emphasis is needed to decrease variability in practice, improve compliance with consensus guidelines, and evaluate BPG efficacy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective.

Late Infection After Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Implant Exchange Versus Removal.

BACKGROUND: Late infection after posterior spinal arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the leading cause of late revision. While implant removal and antibiotic therapy are usually curative, patients may experience deformity progression. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes after implant exchange (IE) or removal (IR) to treat late-onset (≥1 y postoperative) deep surgical site infection (SSI) after spinal arthrodesis in patients with AIS. METHODS: Using a multicenter AIS registry, patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion between 2005 and 2019 and developed late deep SSI treated with IE or IR were identified. Radiographic, surgical, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes at most recent follow-up were compared. RESULTS: Of 3,705 patients, 47 (1.3%) developed late infection 3.8±2.2 years (range 1 to 9.7 y) after index surgery. Mean follow-up after index surgery was 6.1 years, with 2.8 years (range 25 to 120 mo) of follow-up after revision surgery. Twenty-one patients were treated with IE and 26 with IR. At the latest follow-up, average major-curve loss of correction (1° vs 9°, P <0.001) and increase in kyphosis (1° vs. 8°, P =0.04) were smaller in the IE group than in the IR group. Two IR patients but no IE patients had reoperation. Patients who underwent IE had higher Scoliosis Research Society 22-Item Patient Questionnaire (SRS-22) total scores (4.38 vs. 3.81, P =0.02) as well as better subscores for self-image, function, and satisfaction at the latest follow-up than those who underwent IR only. There were no significant between-group differences in operative duration, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, or changes in SRS-22 total scores. No patient had a subsequent infection during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: When treating late-onset deep SSI after posterior spinal fusion for AIS, single-stage IE is associated with better maintenance of major curve correction, sagittal profile, and patient-reported outcomes and fewer reoperations compared with IR, with no significant differences in blood loss, operative duration, or length of stay. No time interval from index surgery to IR was observed where the corrected deformity remained stable. Both techniques were curative of infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Comparison of Distal Spine Anchors and Distal Pelvic Anchors in Children With Hypotonic Neuromuscular Scoliosis Treated With Growth-friendly Instrumentation.

BACKGROUND: Lower preoperative pelvic obliquity (PO) and L5 tilt have been associated with good radiographic outcomes when the fusion ended short of the pelvis in children with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS). Our purpose was to identify indications to exclude the pelvis in children with hypotonic NMS treated with growth-friendly instrumentation. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective review. Children with spinal muscular atrophy and muscular dystrophy treated with dual traditional growing rod, magnetically controlled growing rod, or vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib with minimum 2-year follow-up after the index surgery were identified. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-eight patients had distal spine anchors (DSAs) and 87 patients had distal pelvic anchors (DPAs) placed at the index surgery. Demographics and length of follow-up were similar between the groups but there was a greater percentage of DPA patients who were nonambulatory [79 patients (91%) vs. 18 patients (47%), P <0.0001]. Preindex radiographic measures were similar except the DSA patients had a lower PO (11 vs. 19 degrees, P =0.0001) and L5 tilt (8 vs. 12 degrees, P =0.001). Postindex and most recent radiographic data were comparable between the groups. There was no difference in the complication and unplanned returns to the operating room rates.Subanalysis of the DSA group based on ambulatory status showed similar radiographic measures except the ambulatory patients had a lower PO at all time points (preindex: 5 vs. 16 degrees, P =0.011; postindex: 6 vs. 10 degrees, P =0.045; most recent follow-up: 5 vs. 14 degrees, P =0.028). Only 1 ambulatory DSA patient had a PO ≥10 degrees at most recent follow-up compared with 6 nonambulatory DSA patients. Three (8%) DSA patients, all nonambulatory, underwent extension of their instrumentation to the pelvis. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic fixation should be strongly considered in nonambulatory children with hypotonic NMS treated with growth-friendly instrumentation. At intermediate-term follow-up, revision surgery to include the pelvis was rare but DSAs do not seem effective at maintaining control of PO in nonambulatory patients. DSA and DPA were equally effective at maintaining major curve control, and complication and unplanned returns to the operating room rates were similar. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic.

A Comparative Analysis of Revision Surgery Before or After 2 Years After Graduation From Growth-friendly Surgery for Early Onset Scoliosis.

INTRODUCTION: After discontinuation of growth-friendly (GF) surgery for early onset scoliosis, patients are termed graduates: they undergo a spinal fusion, are observed after final lengthening with GF implant maintenance, or are observed after GF implant removal. The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of and reasons for revision surgery in two cohorts of GF graduates: before or after 2 years of follow-up from graduation. METHODS: A pediatric spine registry was queried for patients who underwent GF spine surgery with a minimum of 2 years of follow-ups after graduation by clinical and/or radiographic evidence. Scoliosis etiology, graduation strategy, number of, and reasons for revision surgery were queried. RESULTS: There were 834 patients with a minimum of 2-year follow-up after graduation who were analyzed. There were 241 (29%) congenital, 271 (33%) neuromuscular, 168 (20%) syndromic, and 154 (18%) idiopathic. 803 (96%) had traditional growing rod/vertical expandable titanium rib as their GF construct and 31 (4%) had magnetically controlled growing rod. Five hundred ninety-six patients (71%) underwent spinal fusion at graduation, 208 (25%) had GF implants retained, and 30 (4%) had GF implants removed.In the entire cohort, there were 108/834 (13%) patients who underwent revision surgery. Of the revisions, 71/108 (66%) occurred as acute revisions (ARs) between 0 and 2 years from graduation (mean 0.6 y), and the most common AR indication was infection (26/71, 37%). The remaining 37/108 (34%) patients underwent delayed revision (DR) surgery >2 years (mean 3.8 y) from graduation, and the most common DR indication was implant issues (17/37, 46%).Graduation strategy affected revision rates. Of the 596 patients with spinal fusion as a graduation strategy, 98/596 (16%) underwent revision, compared with only 8/208 (4%) patients who had their GF implants retained, and 2/30 (7%) that had their GF implants removed ( P ≤ 0.001).A significantly higher percentage of the ARs had a spinal fusion as the graduation strategy (68/71, 96%) compared with 30/37 DRs, (81%, P = 0.015). In addition, the 71 patients who underwent AR undergo more revision surgeries (mean: 2, range: 1 to 7) than 37 patients who underwent DR (mean: 1, range: 1 to 2) ( P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this largest reported series of GF graduates to date, the overall risk of revision was 13%. Patients who undergo a revision at any time, as well as ARs in particular, are more likely to have a spinal fusion as their graduation strategy. Patients who underwent AR, on average, undergo more revision surgeries than patients who underwent DR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative.

Pregnancy and Childbirth After Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Little data exist on pregnancy and childbirth for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients treated with a spinal fusion. The current literature relies on data from patients treated with spinal fusion techniques and instrumentation, such as Harrington rods, that are no longer in use. The objective of our study is to understand the effects of spinal fusion in adolescence on pregnancy and childbirth. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of AIS patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion that were enrolled in a multicenter study who have had a pregnancy and childbirth were reviewed. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared with national averages using χ 2 test of independence. RESULTS: A total of 78 babies were born to 53 AIS patients. As part of their pre-natal care, 24% of patients surveyed reported meeting with an anesthesiologist before delivery. The most common types of delivery were spontaneous vaginal delivery (46%, n=36/78) and planned cesarean section (20%, n=16/78). Compared with the national average, study patients had a higher rate of cesarean delivery ( P =0.021). Of the women who had a spontaneous vaginal birth, 53% had no anesthesia (n=19/36), 19% received intravenous intermittent opioids (n=7/36), and 31% had regional spinal or epidural anesthesia (n=11/36). spontaneous vaginal delivery patients in our study cohort received epidural or spinal anesthesia less frequently than the national average ( P <0.001). Of those (n=26 pregnancies) who did not have regional anesthesia (patients who had no anesthesia or utilized IV intermittent opioids), 19% (n=5 pregnancies) were told by their perinatal providers that it was precluded by previous spine surgery. CONCLUSION: The majority of AIS patients reported not meeting with an anesthesiologist before giving birth and those who had a planned C-section did so under obstetrician recommendation. The presence of instrumentation after spinal fusion should be avoided with attempted access to the spinal canal but should not dictate a delivery plan. A multidisciplinary team consisting of obstetrician, anesthesiologist, and orthopaedic surgeon can provide the most comprehensive information to empower a patient to make her decisions regarding birth experience anesthesia based on maternal rather than provider preference. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Consensus-Based Best Practice Guidelines for the Management of Spinal Deformity and Associated Tumors in Pediatric Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Screening and Surveillance, Surgical Intervention, and Medical Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Spinal conditions, such as scoliosis and spinal tumors, are prevalent in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Despite the recognized importance of their early detection and treatment, there remain knowledge gaps in how to approach these manifestations. The purpose of this study was to utilize the experience of a multidisciplinary committee of experts to establish consensus-based best practice guidelines (BPGs) for spinal screening and surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical therapy in pediatric patients with NF1. METHODS: Using the results of a prior systematic review, 10 key questions that required further assessment were first identified. A committee of 20 experts across medical specialties was then chosen based on their clinical experience with spinal deformity and tumors in NF1. These were 9 orthopaedic surgeons, 4 neuro-oncologists/oncologists, 3 neurosurgeons, 2 neurologists, 1 pulmonologist, and 1 clinical geneticist. An initial online survey on current practices and opinions was conducted, followed by 2 additional surveys via a formal consensus-based modified Delphi method. The final survey involved voting on agreement or disagreement with 35 recommendations. Items reaching consensus (≥70% agreement or disagreement) were included in the final BPGs. RESULTS: Consensus was reached for 30 total recommendations on the management of spinal deformity and tumors in NF1. These were 11 recommendations on screening and surveillance, 16 on surgical intervention, and 3 on medical therapy. Five recommendations did not achieve consensus and were excluded from the BPGs. CONCLUSION: We present a set of consensus-based BPGs comprised of 30 recommendations for spinal screening and surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical therapy in pediatric NF1.

Is an Orthopaedic Surgery Resident's Previous Case Experience Associated with Success of Initial Treatment of Pediatric Forearm Fractures?

Redisplacement and subsequent intervention are common for pediatric forearm fractures. We investigated associations between the success of closed reduction and the treating provider's experience. We identified patients aged 4-16 years with forearm fractures treated by closed reduction and cast immobilization. Clinical data and radiographs of 130 patients treated by 30 residents were reviewed to determine the treating resident's pediatric forearm fracture reduction experience and the incidence of initial treatment failure (ITF). ITF was defined as subsequent intervention before union or malunion. ITF occurred in 32 of 130 patients (25%), comprising 12 of 23 patients (52%) treated by residents with no previous experience and 20 of 107 patients (19%) treated by residents who had logged ≥ 1 previous reduction (odds ratio, 4.7). ITF was more likely to occur in pediatric forearm fractures treated by residents with no previous forearm reduction experience compared with those performed by residents who had such experience. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(1):032-035, 2023).

A novel risk calculator predicting surgical site infection after spinal surgery in patients with cerebral palsy.

AIM: To develop and validate a risk calculator based on preoperative factors to predict the probability of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) undergoing spinal surgery. METHOD: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with CP who underwent spinal fusion. In the development stage, preoperative known factors were collected, and a risk calculator was developed by comparing multiple models and choosing the model with the highest discrimination and calibration abilities. This model was then tested with a separate population in the validation stage. RESULTS: Among the 255 patients in the development stage, risk of SSI was 11%. A final prediction model included non-ambulatory status (odds ratio [OR] 4.0), diaper dependence (OR 2.5), age younger than 12 years (OR 2.5), major coronal curve magnitude greater than 90° (OR 1.3), behavioral disorder/delay (OR 1.3), and revision surgery (OR 1.3) as risk factors. This model had a predictive ability of 73.4% for SSI, along with excellent calibration ability (p = 0.878). Among the 390 patients in the validation stage, risk of SSI was 8.2%. The discrimination of the model in the validation phase was 0.743 and calibration was p = 0.435, indicating 74.3% predictive ability and no difference between predicted and observed values. INTERPRETATION: This study provides a risk calculator to identify the risk of SSI after spine surgery for patients with CP. This will allow us to enhance decision-making and patient care while providing valid hospital comparisons, public reporting mechanisms, and reimbursement determinations.

Weighing the Risk Profile of Cervical Spine MRI in Evaluating Pediatric Cervical Spine Injuries.

OBJECTIVE: Screening for cervical spine injury after blunt trauma is common, but there remains varied practice patterns and clinical uncertainty regarding adequate radiographic evaluation. An oft-cited downside of MRI is the added risk compared to CT in the pediatric population; however, these specific risks have not yet been reported. This study examines the risks of cervical spine MRI in pediatric trauma patients in the context of what value MRI adds. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of all pediatric blunt trauma patients who were evaluated with a cervical spine MRI over a 4-year period at a level 1 pediatric trauma center. Clinical and radiographic data were abstracted, as well as anesthesia requirements and MRI-related major adverse events. CT and MRI results were compared for their ability to detect clinically unstable injuries - those requiring halo or surgery. RESULTS: There was one major adverse event related to MRI among the 269 patients who underwent cervical spine MRI - a rate of 0.37%. While 55% of children had an airway and anesthesia for MRI, only 57% of these airways were newly placed for the MRI. None of the 85 patients newly intubated for MRI developed aspiration pneumonitis or ventilator-associated pneumonia, and no patients had a significant neurologic event while at MRI. Another area of the body was imaged concurrently with the cervical spine MRI in 64% of patients and 83% of MRIs were performed within 48 h. CT and MRI were both 100% sensitive for injuries requiring halo or operative intervention. Eighty-three patients had an MRI performed after a negative CT, 11% (9/83) of these patients had a clinically stable injury detected on subsequent MRI, and none of these patients presented for delayed cervical spine complications. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the safety profile of MRI in this setting is excellent and less than one-third of patients need new airway and anesthesia solely for MRI. In this clinical scenario, MRIs can happen relatively quickly and many patients require another body part to be imaged concurrently anyway. MRI and CT were both 100% sensitive for clinically unstable injuries. In the appropriate patients, MRI remains a safe and radiation-free alternative to CT.

Tibial Tuberosity Fracture: A Highly Selective Injury.

BACKGROUND: Tibial tuberosity fracture (TTF) is an uncommon injury occurring mostly in adolescents. The association between race and TTF has not been investigated. We aimed to determine whether there is an association between race and hospital admission for pediatric TTF and to evaluate previously determined risk factors for TTF using a large sample. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project 2016 Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). We compared admissions for TTF to admissions for all other diagnoses. Because forearm fracture has not been found to be associated with race, univariate and multivariate analyses comparing admissions for TTF to admissions for forearm fracture were also performed. Sample weights were used to preserve national estimates. RESULTS: Of 692 patients admitted for TTF in 2016, 93.2% were male. Factors associated with TTF admission compared with other admission diagnoses on multivariate analysis included male sex (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 17.67, confidence interval (CI) 12.25-25.47), age 13 to15 (aOR 10.33, CI 5.67-18.82, reference: age 8-12), and black (aOR 8.04, CI 3.91-16.49) and Hispanic (aOR 2.69, 95% CI 1.30-5.55) races/ethnicities (reference: Caucasian). Compared with forearm fracture admission, black race had an aOR of 22.05 (CI 10.08-48.21) for TTF admission on multivariate analysis. The effect of race on TTF admission also varied significantly with age, with 12 years carrying the strongest association of black race with TTF admission. CONCLUSION: Black race is a previously unreported, strong independent risk factor for TTF. Male sex and age 13 to 15 are also strong risk factors for TTF, making this a highly selective fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III.

Talipes Equinovarus in Loeys-Dietz Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) commonly presents with foot deformities, such as talipes equinovarus (TEV), also known as "clubfoot." Although much is known about the treatment of idiopathic TEV, very little is known about the treatment of TEV in LDS. Here, we summarize the clinical characteristics of patients with LDS and TEV and compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment. METHODS: We identified 47 patients with TEV from a cohort of 252 patients with LDS who presented to our academic tertiary care hospital from 2010 to 2016. A questionnaire, electronic health records, clinical photos and radiographs, and telephone calls were used to collect baseline, treatment, and outcome data. The validated disease-specific instrument was used to determine patient-reported foot/ankle functional limitations after treatment. Patients were categorized into nonoperative and operative groups, with the operative group subcategorized according to whether the posteromedial release was performed. RESULTS: Within our TEV cohort, bilateral TEV was present in 40 patients (85%). Thirty-seven patients underwent surgery (14 involving posteromedial release), and 10 were treated nonoperatively. The operative group had a higher incidence of posttreatment foot/ankle functional limitation (71%) than the nonoperative group (25%) ( P =0.04). The pain was the most common functional limitation (54%). The posteromedial release was associated with a higher incidence of developing hindfoot valgus compared with surgery not involving posteromedial release (43% vs. 8.7%, P =0.04) and compared with nonoperative treatment (43% vs. 0.0%, P =0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients with LDS have a high incidence of bilateral TEV. Operative treatment was associated with posttreatment foot/ankle functional limitations, and posteromedial release was associated with hindfoot valgus overcorrection deformity. These findings could have implications for the planning of surgery for TEV in LDS patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Hip Pain in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Prevalence, Intensity, Interference, and Factors Associated With Moderate to Severe Pain.

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) develop hip pain. We analyzed (1) the characteristics of hip pain in patients with SMA (prevalence, intensity, interference with activities, and responsiveness to treatment) and (2) factors (patient, clinical, and radiographic) associated with moderate to severe pain. METHODS: We performed a retrospective record review and telephone survey of 104 patients with SMA (77% response rate; 44% female; mean age, 22±13 y) who presented for treatment between 2010 and 2020. Patient, clinical, and radiographic characteristics (when available) were recorded. Patients with current or past hip pain were asked about pain characteristics. Pain intensity and interference were assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory, modified for SMA (scale, 0 to 10 with 0 indicating no pain/interference). We used univariate analysis and ordered logistic regression to determine associations between patient factors and hip pain (α=0.05). RESULTS: Hip pain occurred in 60/104 patients (58%), with 15 (14%) indicating moderate to severe pain. Compared with patients with normal body mass index values, patients who were obese had 5.4 times the odds [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-23] of moderate to severe pain. Hip contractures [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 3.2; 95% CI, 1.2-8.8] and dislocations (aOR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1-7.9) were associated with greater odds of pain compared with hips without these presentations. Surgical correction for scoliosis (aOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1-6.5) was also associated with greater odds of moderate to severe pain. Femoral head migration percentage was the only radiographic parameter associated with pain. Mean modified Brief Pain Inventory pain intensity was 2.1±2.3. Prolonged sitting, sleep, and transfers (eg, bed to wheelchair) were the activities most affected by pain. CONCLUSIONS: Hip pain was moderate to severe in 14% of patients with SMA. Obesity, hip contractures, surgical correction of scoliosis, and hip dislocations were independently associated with pain. Although mean pain intensity was low, hip pain interfered with daily activities, including prolonged sitting, sleep, and transfers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Sacral-Alar-Iliac (SAI) Fixation in Children With Spine Deformity: Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.

INTRODUCTION: Sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) screws are utilized to achieve pelvic fixation in spine deformity patients. The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the long-term outcomes of pediatric patients with scoliosis treated with posterior spinal fusion and SAI fixation at 10-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of patients aged 18 years or below treated for scoliosis with posterior spinal fusion using SAI fixation. Pelvic obliquity and the major coronal curve were determined at the preoperative visit and 6-week, 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year postoperative visits. SAI screw-specific data collected included screw dimensions, rate of screw revision, pain at the SAI screw sites, presence of lucency >2 mm around the screw, screw loosening or breaking, and deep surgical site infections. RESULTS: Ninety-seven of 151 patients (75%) were included. The average age at index surgery was 13.5±3.1 years, and the most common diagnosis was cerebral palsy (67%). The mean duration of follow-up was 11±3 years. The mean pelvic obliquity measured 20±8.0 degrees preoperatively, and 8.7±4.0 degrees at the 10-year follow-up. There were no significant difference in pelvic obliquity when comparing the 10-year follow-up visit with the 6-week postoperative follow-up. Average screw dimensions were 8.4×68.8 mm. By the 10-year follow-up, 4 patients (4%) had at least 1 SAI screw-related complication. Of these patients, 2 (2%) had pain at 1 SAI screw, 4 (4%) had lucency around the screw, and 3 (3%) had broken or loose screws. Two (2%) required SAI screw revision because of late deep wound infection, and underwent exchange with a longer screw. There were no intrapelvic protrusions, vascular, or neurological complications. CONCLUSIONS: SAI screws are a safe and effective method for pelvic fixation in children with spinal deformity. The outcomes at ≥10 years are satisfactory, with low rates of long-term complications and excellent postoperative correction and subsequent maintenance of coronal curvature and pelvic obliquity over time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.