Human Papillomavirus-Associated Multiphenotypic Carcinoma: First Description of a Vulval Case.

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated multiphenotypic sinonasal carcinoma is a rare and recently described epithelial neoplasm exhibiting myoepithelial differentiation and morphological overlap with salivary gland neoplasms, especially adenoid cystic carcinoma; it is commonly associated with HPV, especially type 33. It has mainly been reported in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses with a single case reported in the breast. Herein, we report the first vulval example in a 47-year-old patient who presented with a large craggy mass in the region of the Bartholin gland. The histologic features were of a high-grade carcinoma composed of basaloid cells arranged in sheets and nests, with occasional ductal formations, surrounded by densely hyalinised basement membrane-type material. There was diffuse block-type immunoreactivity with p16 and HPV genotyping revealed high-risk HPV type 16. In reporting this case, we highlight the propensity for "salivary gland-type" neoplasms to arise in the vulva, especially in the Bartholin gland, and stress that pathologists should consider salivary-type neoplasms when faced with a morphologically unusual vulval tumor.

Audit of Endometrial Cancer Pathology for a Regional Gynecological Oncology Multidisciplinary Meeting.

Endometrial cancer is a common disease, and in England all cancer cases are discussed at a central multidisciplinary meeting (MDT) with pathology review. We reviewed cases discussed/reviewed at a regional Gynecology MDT comparing (i) original referral histology with review histology and (ii) final review histology with the final hysterectomy histology. Cases identified as potentially eligible for the study (n=884) were found over a 4-yr period. This was reduced to 630 due to data and other issues for the primary biopsy review, and to 488 for both biopsy and hysterectomy sample. Cases were classed by agreement by grade/type and compared by clinical management (low grade vs. high grade). Of the original biopsies, central review agreed exactly with 67% and disagreed with 33%. A total of 11.6% of low-grade cancers were upgraded to high grade on review, and 6.1% of high-grade cancers were downgraded. For the biopsy/hysterectomy comparison, this was 72.5% agreement and 27.5% disagreement, with 3.5% upgraded to high from low grade, and 7.5% downgraded from high to low grade. The main areas of significant change was the identification of high-grade serous carcinoma from low-grade endometrial cancers, as well some other high grade types (clear cell and carcinosarcoma) and the confident diagnosis of cancer as opposed to an atypical hyperplasia. Central pathology review for MDT discussion does highlight significant areas of pathologic disagreement that would affect clinical management. The audit highlights that a significant disagreement rate in reporting such material between pathologists may be inescapable, but can be reduced by review.