Predicting an Unfavorable Course of Dizziness in Older Patients.

PURPOSE: Because dizziness in older people is often chronic and can substantially affect daily functioning, it is important to identify those at risk for an unfavorable course of dizziness to optimize their care. We aimed to develop and externally validate a prediction model for an unfavorable course of dizziness in older patients in primary care, and to construct an easy-to-use risk prediction tool. METHODS: We used data from 2 prospective cohorts: a development cohort with 203 patients aged 65 years or older who consulted their primary care physician for dizziness and had substantial dizziness-related impairment (Dizziness Handicap Inventory [DHI] ≥30), and a validation cohort with 415 patients aged 65 years or older who consulted their primary care physician for dizziness of any severity. An unfavorable course was defined as presence of substantial dizziness-related impairment (DHI ≥30) after 6 months. RESULTS: Prevalence of an unfavorable course of dizziness was 73.9% in the development cohort and 43.6% in the validation cohort. Predictors in the final model were the score on the screening version of the DHI, age, history of arrhythmia, and looking up as a provoking factor. The model showed good calibration and fair discrimination (area under the curve = 0.77). On external validation, discriminative ability remained stable (area under the curve = 0.78). The constructed risk score was strongly correlated with the prediction model. Performance measures for risk score cut-off values are presented to determine the optimal cut-off point for clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an easy-to-use risk score for dizziness-related impairment in primary care. The risk score, consisting of only 4 predictors, will help primary care physicians identify patients at high risk for an unfavorable course of dizziness.

Dizziness in older people: at risk of shared therapeutic nihilism between patient and physician. A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Dizziness-related impairment is a strong predictor for an unfavourable course of dizziness in older people. In this study we explored the experiences of older patients with significant dizziness-related impairment and their wishes and expectations regarding general practitioner (GP) care. Knowing the expectations and priorities of people with dizziness may enable the GP to provide tailor-made care, which in turn may substantially increase the quality of life and decrease the use and costs of health care. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews. We selected patients from ten Dutch general practices. Patients were invited to participate in the study if they were ≥ 65 years, visited their GP because of dizziness and were significantly impaired due to dizziness (Dizziness Handicap Inventory ≥ 30). We applied content analysis to the semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Thirteen participants participated, seven were female. Analysis of the interviews resulted in the overall theme "Dizziness in older people: at risk of shared therapeutic nihilism by the patient and the GP". Firstly, this can explained by the fact that participants frequently presented dizziness as a secondary complaint when they visited the GP for another complaint. Secondly, participants reported that the GP often could not help them with any treatment. Despite a poor therapeutic outcome, the vast majority of participants was satisfied how the GP handled their dizziness. Yet, understanding the cause of dizziness seems important for dizzy older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant dizziness-related impairment, older dizzy patients may not present dizziness as main reason for encounter. Presenting dizziness as a secondary complaint may give GPs the - wrong - impression that the dizziness-related impairment is only mild. GPs need to be aware of this potential underreporting. Knowing the cause of dizziness seems important for older patients. Yet, GPs regularly did not succeed in identifying the underlying cause of dizziness. Therefore, GPs should manage the expectations of older dizzy patients regarding diagnosis and successful treatment, by informing them about the uncertainty and unpredictability of dizziness. We also recommend GPs to focus on improving functional ability; this is the key to escape from therapeutic nihilism by the GP.

Usual care and management of fall risk increasing drugs in older dizzy patients in Dutch general practice.

OBJECTIVE: For general practitioners (GPs) dizziness is a challenging condition to deal with. Data on the management of dizziness in older patients are mostly lacking. Furthermore, it is unknown whether GPs attempt to decrease Fall Risk Increasing Drugs (FRIDs) use in the management of dizziness in older patients. The aim of this study is to gain more insight into GP's management of dizziness in older patients, including FRID evaluation and adjustment. DESIGN: Data were derived from electronic medical records, obtained over a 12-month period in 2013. SETTING: Forty-six Dutch general practices. PATIENTS: The study sample comprised of 2812 older dizzy patients of 65 years and over. Patients were identified using International Classification of Primary Care codes and free text. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Usual care was categorized into wait-and-see strategy (no treatment initiated); education and advice; additional testing; medication adjustment; and referral. RESULTS: Frequently applied treatments included a wait-and-see strategy (28.4%) and education and advice (28.0%). Additional testing was performed in 26.8%; 19.0% of the patients were referred. Of the patients 87.2% had at least one FRID prescription. During the observation period, GPs adjusted the use of one or more FRIDs for 11.7% of the patients. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a wide variety in management strategies for dizziness in older adults. The referral rate for dizziness was high compared to prior research. Although many older dizzy patients use at least one FRID, FRID evaluation and adjustment is scarce. We expect that more FRID adjustments may reduce dizziness and dizziness-related impairment. Key Points It is important to know how general practitioners manage dizziness in older patients in order to assess potential cues for improvement. This study revealed a wide variety in management strategies for dizziness in older patients. There was a scarcity in Fall Risk Increasing Drug (FRID) evaluation and adjustment. The referral rate for dizziness was high compared with previous research.

Skin adnexal carcinoma of the head and neck: a retrospective study in a tertiary referral center.

The objective of this study is to give more insight in the diagnosis, clinical course and therapy of skin adnexal carcinoma of the head and neck. Forty cases of skin adnexal carcinoma of the head and neck treated from 1977 to 2011 were identified by searching the hospitals cancer registration database. After pathology review by a pathologist specialized in skin cancer, 17 cases were excluded. A retrospective chart review of the remaining 23 patients was performed. Clinical course was recorded by endpoints including survival, loco-regional control and recurrence free survival. Prognostic factors considered for analysis were differentiation of the tumor and location of the tumor. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 78 % (95 % CI 61-100 %). Five-year recurrence free survival (RFS) was 58 % (95 % CI 40-84 %). Poor differentiation of the tumor significantly reduced OS (p = 0.002) and RFS (p = 0.01). Tumor location 'face' demonstrated a significantly better survival than other tumor locations (p < 0.001). Local recurrence occurred in five cases, regional metastasis was seen in seven patients, distant metastasis in three patients. Three cases with distant metastases died of disease. Based on the findings of this small group of patients in a tertiary referral center, we conclude that skin adnexal carcinoma is a very rare skin carcinoma that can behave locally aggressive but also has the potential for regional and distant metastasis. The recognition of skin adnexal carcinoma and subsequent wide excision in an early stage of the disease is of major importance for loco-regional control and survival.

Predictors of dizziness in older persons: a 10-year prospective cohort study in the community.

BACKGROUND: The current diagnosis-oriented approach of dizziness does not suit older patients. Often, it is difficult to identify a single underlying cause, and when a diagnosis is made, therapeutic options may be limited. Identification of predictors of dizziness may provide new leads for the management of dizziness in older patients. The aim of the present study was to investigate long-term predictors of regular dizziness in older persons. METHODS: Population-based cohort study of 1,379 community-dwelling participants, aged ≥60 years, from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA). Regular dizziness was ascertained during face-to-face medical interviews during 7- and 10-year follow-up. We investigated 26 predictors at baseline from six domains: socio-demographic, medical history, medication, psychological, sensory, and balance/gait. We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses with presence of regular dizziness at 7- and 10-year follow-up as dependent variables. We assessed the performance of the models by calculating calibration and discrimination. RESULTS: Predictors of regular dizziness at 7-year follow-up were living alone, history of dizziness, history of osteo/rheumatoid arthritis, use of nitrates, presence of anxiety or depression, impaired vision, and impaired function of lower extremities. Predictors of regular dizziness at 10-year follow-up were history of dizziness and impaired function of lower extremities. Both models showed good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P value of 0.36 and 0.31, respectively) and acceptable discrimination (adjusted AUC after bootstrapping of 0.77 and 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Dizziness in older age was predicted by multiple factors. A multifactorial approach, targeting potentially modifiable predictors (e.g., physical exercise for impaired function of lower extremities), may add to the current diagnosis-oriented approach.

Increasing incidence and survival of a rare skin cancer in the Netherlands. A population-based study of 2,220 cases of skin adnexal carcinoma.

BACKGROUNDS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology and treatment of skin adnexal carcinoma (SAC) in the Netherlands and to identify prognostic factors for survival in patients with SAC. METHODS: We used population-based nationwide data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry with cases diagnosed during 1989-2010 and followed up to February 1st, 2012. RESULTS: A total of 2,220 SACs were diagnosed during 1989-2010 (age-standardized incidence rate 5.3 per million). Incidence increased by 2.7% and 1.7% annually in males and females, respectively. Fifteen different morphological types were registered. The 5-year relative survival rate increased from 80% in 1989-1994 to 91% in 2006-2010. The majority of all patients (91%) received surgery. Adjuvant radiotherapy and/or lymph node dissection was performed in only a minority of cases. The risk of death was significantly higher in patients who did not receive surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The rising incidence of SAC together with the predilection for the head and neck region suggests a role for UV radiation in the carcinogenesis of SAC. Furthermore, we found an improved survival of SAC in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2010. In view of the low proportion of patients receiving adjuvant therapy there may be further room for improving survival.

The Prevalence and Persistence of Dizziness in Older European Home Care Recipients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of different geriatric syndromes in older home care (HC) recipients is yet to be determined. Dizziness is often regarded as a geriatric syndrome. The natural course of dizziness in older people is still unknown, because of a lack of longitudinal studies. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence and persistence of dizziness in HC recipients. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Home care organizations in 6 European countries participating in the EU-funded Identifying best practices for care-dependent elderly by Benchmarking Costs and outcomes of community care (IBenC) project. PARTICIPANTS: 2616 community-dwelling long-term HC recipients aged 65 years or older. METHODS: Data were collected at baseline and 6 and 12 months by using the interRAI Home Care instrument (interRAI-HC). Dizziness status was assessed by the number of days people experienced dizziness in the last 3 days (0-3) and later dichotomized for analyses (present or not in the last 3 days). Dizziness persistence was defined as the odds for dizzy people at baseline to also report dizziness at subsequent follow-up moments, compared with people who were not dizzy at baseline. The pattern of dizziness was descriptively analyzed in recipients who completed all measurements. Generalized estimating equations analysis was used to determine the persistence of dizziness symptoms. RESULTS: The prevalence of dizziness of 2616 eligible HC recipients at baseline was 25.1%, ranging from 16.2% (Belgium) to 39.7% (Italy). The majority of dizzy recipients at baseline also experienced dizziness after 6 and 12 months (79.1%). Dizziness persistence was high at 6 months [odds ratio (OR) 57.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 43.1-77.5] and at 12 months (OR 30.2, 95% CI 22.3-41.1). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Dizziness in older HC recipients in Europe is common, and dizziness persistence is high. This warrants a more active approach in treating dizziness in older HC recipients.

Effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention for dizziness in older people in primary care: A cluster randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Dizziness is common in older people. Physicians are often unable to identify a specific cause for dizziness in older people, even after an extensive diagnostic work-up. A prognosis-oriented approach, i.e. treating modifiable risk factors for an unfavourable course of dizziness, may reduce dizziness-related impairment in older people in primary care. DESIGN: Cluster randomized controlled trial. SETTING: 45 primary care practices in The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 168 participants aged ≥65y who consulted their general practitioner for dizziness and experienced significant dizziness-related impairment (Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) ≥30). Participants were part of to the intervention group (n = 83) or control group (n = 85), depending on whether they were enlisted in an intervention practice or in a control practice. INTERVENTIONS: The multifactorial intervention consisted of: medication adjustment in case of ≥3 prescribed fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs) and/or stepped mental health care in case of anxiety disorder and/or depression and/or exercise therapy in case of impaired functional mobility. The intervention was compared to usual care. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was dizziness-related impairment. Secondary outcomes were quality of life (QoL), dizziness frequency, fall frequency, anxiety and depression, use of FRIDs. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant intervention effect on dizziness-related impairment (DHI score difference -0.69 [95% CI -5.66;4.28]; p = 0.79). The intervention proved effective in reducing the number of FRIDs (FRID difference -0.48 [95% CI -0.89;-0.06]; p = 0.02). No significant intervention effects were found on other secondary outcomes. The uptake of and adherence to the interventions was significantly lower in patients eligible for ≥2 interventions compared to patients eligible for one intervention (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The multifactorial intervention for dizziness in older patients showed no significant intervention effect on most outcomes and adherence to the multifactorial intervention was low. Although multifactorial treatment for older dizzy people seems promising in theory, we question its feasibility in daily practice. Future research could focus on a sequential treatment for dizziness, e.g. measuring effectiveness of various evidence-based therapies in a stepwise approach.

Impairment reduction in older dizzy people in primary care: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The management of dizziness in older patients is primarily diagnosis-oriented. However, in 40% of older patients with dizziness, GPs are not able to identify an underlying cause, and a number of common underlying causes of dizziness cannot (or hardly) be treated. In this study we will investigate the effectiveness of a prognosis-oriented approach in the management of dizziness in older patients. This prognosis-oriented approach comprises identification of patients at risk for chronic dizziness with persistent impairment by identifying risk factors for an unfavourable course of dizziness. Patients at risk for chronic dizziness with persistent impairment will be offered treatment addressing the identified modifiable risk factors. METHODS/DESIGN: This study will be performed in primary care. An intervention study and a validation study will be conducted in a three-arm cluster randomised design. In the intervention study we will investigate a risk factor guided multi-component intervention. The risk factor guided intervention includes: (1) medication adjustment in case of three or more prescribed fall-risk-increasing drugs, (2) stepped care in case of anxiety disorder and/or depression, and (3) exercise therapy in case of impaired functional mobility. The primary outcome measure is dizziness-related impairment, which will be assessed with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Secondary outcome measures are quality of life, anxiety disorder and depression, use of fall-risk-increasing drugs, dizziness frequency, fall frequency, and healthcare utilization. DISCUSSION: This study is, to date, the first study that will investigate the effectiveness of a prognosis-oriented approach for reducing dizziness-related impairment in older people in primary care. Offering treatment that addresses identified modifiable risk factors to patients at high risk for chronic dizziness is unique. The pragmatic design of this study will enable evaluation of the outcomes in real-life routine practice conditions. An effective intervention will not only reduce dizziness-related impairment, but may also decrease healthcare utilization and healthcare costs. The previously developed risk score that will be validated alongside the intervention study will enable GPs to identify patients at high risk for chronic dizziness with persistent impairment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (identifier: NTR4346), registration date 15 December 2013.

A Different Approach of Dizziness in Older Patients: Away from the Diagnostic Dance between Patient and Physician.

Although the etiology of dizziness in older patients differs significantly from that of younger patients, most guidelines on dizziness advocate the same diagnosis-oriented approach for all patients regardless of their age. However, this diagnosis-oriented approach may be insufficient for older patients presenting with dizziness in general practice, because (1) general practitioners are often not able to identify an underlying cause of dizziness, (2) general practitioners regularly identify causes of dizziness that cannot be treated, and (3) general practitioners may identify causes of dizziness for which treatment is available but not desirable. In this article, the authors present a simultaneous diagnosis- and prognosis-oriented approach for older dizzy patients. This approach may enable general practitioners to improve their care for a voluminous group of impaired older patients, even if a diagnosis is not available (yet).

[Chronic dizziness in older people: apply a multifactorial approach]. / Chronische duizeligheid bij ouderen: een multifactoriële benadering is gewenst.

It has been suggested that chronic dizziness in older people may constitute a multifactorial geriatric syndrome. Considering dizziness to be a geriatric syndrome with multiple contributory factors may provide additional leads for treatment. A structured history, followed by physical examination and additional tests if necessary, can yield clues to factors that may contribute to dizziness. To illustrate such a multifactorial approach, we present two patients with chronic dizziness. In both cases, the general practitioner considered multifactorial dizziness with several treatable contributory factors. By treating these contributory factors, the frequency of dizziness and dizziness-related impairment decreased temporarily in one patient and permanently in the other.

The desirability of education in didactic skills according to medical interns.

Since all doctors at some point in their career will be faced with their role as a teacher, it appears desirable that future doctors are educated in didactic skills. At present, however, there are no formal opportunities for developing didactic skills at the majority of Dutch medical faculties. The main question of this study is: How do medical interns perceive the quality and quantity of their education in didactic skills? The Dutch Association for Medical Interns (LOCA) ran a national survey among 1,008 medical interns that measured the interns' self-assessed needs for training in didactic skills during medical school. Almost 80 % of the respondents argue that the mastery of didactic skills composes an essential competency for doctors, with the skill of providing adequate feedback considered to be the most important didactic quality for doctors. Of the respondents, 41 % wish to be educated in didactic skills, both during their medical undergraduate degree and during their subsequent training to become a resident. Teaching while being observed and receiving feedback in this setting is regarded as a particularly valuable didactic method by 74 % of the medical interns. Of the respondents, 82 % would invest time to follow training for the development of didactic skills if it was offered. Medical interns stress the importance of doctors' didactic skills during their clinical internships. Compared with current levels, most interns desire increased attention to the formal development of didactic skills during medical school. Considering the importance of didactic skills and the need for more extensive training, the LOCA advises medical faculties to include more formal didactic training in the medical curriculum.