Postpartum readmission for hypertension and pre-eclampsia: development and validation of a predictive model.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a model for predicting postpartum readmission for hypertension and pre-eclampsia at delivery discharge and assess external validation or model transportability across clinical sites. DESIGN: Prediction model using data available in the electronic health record from two clinical sites. SETTING: Two tertiary care health systems from the Southern (2014-2015) and Northeastern USA (2017-2019). POPULATION: A total of 28 201 postpartum individuals: 10 100 in the South and 18 101 in the Northeast. METHODS: An internal-external cross validation (IECV) approach was used to assess external validation or model transportability across the two sites. In IECV, data from each health system were first used to develop and internally validate a prediction model; each model was then externally validated using the other health system. Models were fit using penalised logistic regression, and accuracy was estimated using discrimination (concordance index), calibration curves and decision curves. Internal validation was performed using bootstrapping with bias-corrected performance measures. Decision curve analysis was used to display potential cut points where the model provided net benefit for clinical decision-making. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome was postpartum readmission for either hypertension or pre-eclampsia <6 weeks after delivery. RESULTS: The postpartum readmission rate for hypertension and pre-eclampsia overall was 0.9% (0.3% and 1.2% by site, respectively). The final model included six variables: age, parity, maximum postpartum diastolic blood pressure, birthweight, pre-eclampsia before discharge and delivery mode (and interaction between pre-eclampsia × delivery mode). Discrimination was adequate at both health systems on internal validation (c-statistic South: 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.89; Northeast: 0.74; 95% CI 0.74-0.74). In IECV, discrimination was inconsistent across sites, with improved discrimination for the Northeastern model on the Southern cohort (c-statistic 0.61 and 0.86, respectively), but calibration was not adequate. Next, model updating was performed using the combined dataset to develop a new model. This final model had adequate discrimination (c-statistic: 0.80, 95% CI 0.80-0.80), moderate calibration (intercept -0.153, slope 0.960, Emax 0.042) and provided superior net benefit at clinical decision-making thresholds between 1% and 7% for interventions preventing readmission. An online calculator is provided here. CONCLUSIONS: Postpartum readmission for hypertension and pre-eclampsia may be accurately predicted but further model validation is needed. Model updating using data from multiple sites will be needed before use across clinical settings.

Is Group B Streptococcus Colonization Associated with Maternal Peripartum Infection in an Era of Routine Prophylaxis?

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether colonization with group B streptococcus (GBS) is associated with maternal peripartum infection in an era of routine prophylaxis. STUDY DESIGN: This study presented a secondary analysis of women delivering ≥37 weeks who underwent a trial of labor from the U.S. Consortium on Safe Labor (CSL) study. The exposure was maternal GBS colonization and the outcome was a diagnosis of chorioamnionitis, and secondarily, analyses were restricted to deliveries not admitted in labor and measures of postpartum infection (postpartum fever, endometritis, and surgical site infection). Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used accounting for within-woman correlations. Models adjusted for maternal age, parity, race, prepregnancy body mass index, pregestational diabetes, insurance status, study site/region, year of delivery, number of vaginal exams from admission to delivery, and time (in hours) from admission to delivery. RESULTS: Among 170,804 assessed women, 33,877 (19.8%) were colonized with GBS and 5,172 (3.0%) were diagnosed with chorioamnionitis. While the frequency of GBS colonization did not vary by chorioamnionitis status (3.0% in both groups), in multivariable analyses, GBS colonization was associated with slightly lower odds of chorioamnionitis (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.96). In secondary analyses, this association held regardless of spontaneous labor on admission; and the odds of postpartum infectious outcomes were not higher with GBS colonization. CONCLUSION: In contrast to historical data, GBS colonization was associated with lower odds of chorioamnionitis in an era of routine GBS screening and prophylaxis. KEY POINTS: · Data in an era prior to routine group B streptococcus (GBS) screening and prophylaxis showed that maternal GBS colonization was associated with a higher frequency of maternal peripartum infection.. · In the current study, GBS colonization was associated with lower odds of chorioamnionitis in an era of routine GBS screening and prophylaxis.. · The results highlight potential benefits of GBS screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis beyond neonatal disease prevention, including mitigating the risk of maternal infectious morbidity..

Association between early amniotomy in labour induction and severe maternal and neonatal morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Amniotomy is a commonly used, inexpensive method of labour induction; however, the optimal timing of amniotomy during labour induction is debated. AIMS: To investigate whether artificial rupture of membranes <4 cm dilation is associated with caesarean, severe maternal and neonatal morbidity, and labour induction duration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 228 438 deliveries at 19 US hospitals. Women with a viable, singleton gestation undergoing induction ≥37 weeks with cervical dilation <4 cm were included. Women were excluded if membranes spontaneously ruptured <4 cm. Women were compared by early amniotomy (<4 cm dilation) versus not early. The primary outcome was caesarean. Secondary outcomes included severe maternal and neonatal morbidity, and labour duration. Logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression estimated the association between early amniotomy and study outcomes. RESULTS: Of 15 525 eligible women, 10 421 (67%) had early amniotomy. Early amniotomy was associated with higher adjusted odds of caesarean and severe maternal morbidity, but not neonatal morbidity. After accounting for interaction, early amniotomy was associated with increasingly higher odds of caesarean as body mass index increased. Early amniotomy was associated with lower odds of severe maternal morbidity among multiparas with mechanical ripening. Median labour induction was 2.5 h shorter with early amniotomy, significant in hazard regression. CONCLUSIONS: Early amniotomy was associated with increased odds of caesarean among obese women. The association between early amniotomy and severe maternal morbidity varied by maternal characteristics, but early amniotomy was not associated with neonatal morbidity. Early amniotomy in labour induction may be advantageous in certain populations, particularly non-obese women requiring mechanical ripening.

Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: Removal of the fallopian tubes at the time of hysterectomy or interval sterilization has become routine practice to prevent ovarian cancer. While emerging as a strategy, uptake of this procedure at the time of cesarean delivery for pregnant women seeking permanent sterilization has not been widely adopted due to perceptions of increased morbidity and operative difficulty with a lack of available data in this setting. OBJECTIVE: We sought to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing strategies for long-term sterilization and ovarian cancer risk reduction at the time of cesarean delivery, including bilateral tubal ligation, opportunistic salpingectomy, and long-acting reversible contraception. STUDY DESIGN: A decision-analytic and cost-effectiveness model was constructed for pregnant women undergoing cesarean delivery who desired permanent sterilization in the US population, comparing 3 strategies: (1) bilateral tubal ligation, (2) bilateral opportunistic salpingectomy, and (3) postpartum long-acting reversible contraception. This theoretic cohort consisted of 110,000 pregnant women desiring permanent sterilization at the time of cesarean delivery and ovarian cancer prevention at an average of 35 years who were monitored for an additional 40 years based on an average US female life expectancy of 75 years. The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Effectiveness was measured as quality-adjusted life years. Secondary outcomes included: the number of ovarian cancer cases and deaths, procedure-related complications, and unintended and ectopic pregnancies. The 1-, 2-, and 3-way and Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $100,000. RESULTS: Both bilateral tubal ligation and bilateral opportunistic salpingectomy with cesarean delivery have favorable cost-effectiveness ratios. In the base case analysis, salpingectomy was more cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $23,189 per quality-adjusted life year compared to tubal ligation. Long-acting reversible contraception after cesarean was not cost-effective (ie, dominated). Although salpingectomy and tubal ligation were both cost-effective over a wide range of cost and risk estimates, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio analysis was highly sensitive to the uncertainty around the estimates of salpingectomy cancer risk reduction, risk of perioperative complications, and cost. Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis estimated that tubal ligation had a 49% chance of being the preferred strategy over salpingectomy. If the true salpingectomy risk of perioperative complications is >2% higher than tubal ligation or if the cancer risk reduction of salpingectomy is <52%, then tubal ligation is the preferred, more cost-effective strategy. CONCLUSION: Bilateral tubal ligation and bilateral opportunistic salpingectomy with cesarean delivery are both cost-effective strategies for permanent sterilization and ovarian cancer risk reduction. Although salpingectomy and tubal ligation are both reasonable strategies for cesarean patients seeking permanent sterilization and cancer risk reduction, threshold analyses indicate that the risks and benefits of salpingectomy with cesarean delivery need to be better defined before a preferred strategy can be determined.

Maternal obesity and major intraoperative complications during cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have demonstrated an association between maternal obesity and postoperative complications, but there is a dearth of information about the impact of obesity on intraoperative complications. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between maternal obesity at delivery and major intraoperative complications during cesarean delivery (CD). METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the deidentified Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Cesarean Registry of women with singleton pregnancies. Maternal body mass index (BMI) at delivery was categorized as BMI 18.5 to 29.9 kg/m2, BMI 30 to 39.9 kg/m2, BMI 40 to 49.9 kg/m2, and BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2. The primary outcome, any intraoperative complication, was defined as having at least 1 major intraoperative complication, including perioperative blood transfusion, intraoperative injury (bowel, bladder, ureteral injury; broad ligament hematoma), atony requiring surgical intervention, repeat laparotomy, and hysterectomy. Log-binomial models were used to estimate risk ratios of intraoperative complication in 2 models: model 1 adjusting for maternal race, and preterm delivery <37 weeks; and model 2 adjusting for confounders in Model 1 as well as emergency CD, and type of skin incision. RESULTS: A total of 51,218 women underwent CD; 38% had BMI 18.5 to 29.9 kg/m2, 47% BMI 30 to 39.9 kg/m2, 12% BMI 40 to 49.9 kg/m2 and 3% BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2. Having at least 1 intraoperative complication was uncommon (3.4%): 3.8% for BMI 18.5 to 29.9 kg/m2, 3.2% BMI 30 to 39.9 kg/m2, 2.6% BMI 40 to 49.9 kg/m2 and 4.3% BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 (P < .001). In the fully adjusted model 2, women with BMI 40 to 49.9 kg/m2 had a lower risk of any intraoperative complication (adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.89) compared with women with BMI 18.5 to 29.9 kg/m2. Women with BMI 30 to 39.9 kg/m2 (ARR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.03) had a similar risk of any intraoperative complication compared with nonobese women. Among super obese women, there was evidence of effect modification by emergency CD. Compared with nonobese women, neither super obese women undergoing nonemergency CD (ARR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.52) nor those undergoing emergency CD (ARR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.32 to 1.10) had an increased risk of intraoperative complication. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the risk for postcesarean complications, the risk of intraoperative complication does not appear to be increased in obese women, even among those with super obesity.

Maternal super obesity and risk for intensive care unit admission in the MFMU Cesarean Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a risk factor for intensive care unit (ICU) admission in nonpregnant populations. Less is known about maternal obesity and ICU admission risk. The objective of this study was to estimate the association between maternal obesity and ICU admission among women who delivered via cesarean section or vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of women who delivered via VBAC or cesarean section in the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit (MFMU) Cesarean Registry. We defined exposure as body mass index (BMI) at delivery stratified as non-obese (BMI 18.5-29.9 kg/m2 ), class I or II obese (BMI 30-39.9 kg/m2 ), morbidly obese (BMI 40-49.9 kg/m2 ), and super obese (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 ). The primary outcome was ICU admission. Modified Poisson regression models estimated relative risk (RR) of ICU admission by obesity strata, after adjusting for confounders. Mediation analysis was used to estimate the proportion of ICU admission risk attributable specifically to obesity. RESULTS: We included 68 455 women; 40% non-obese, 46% class I or II obese, 12% morbidly obese, and 2% super obese. Super obese women were at higher risk for ICU admission compared with non-obese women (0.7 vs. 1.3%, adjusted RR 1.61; 95% CI 1.01-2.65), after adjusting for confounders. Among super obese women, medical comorbidities mediated 58% of ICU admission risk, suggesting that a significant proportion of ICU admission is driven by maternal obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Super obese women who deliver by cesarean section or VBAC are at increased risk of peripartum ICU admission. Obstetricians and critical care specialists should consider possible ICU admission during delivery planning.

Association of Maternal Obesity with Child Cerebral Palsy or Death.

Objective The primary aim of this study was to determine if there is an association between maternal obesity and cerebral palsy or death in children. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial previously performed by the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Women in the original trial were included if at high risk for preterm delivery. The present study included singletons enrolled in the original study with complete data. Obese and nonobese women were compared. A secondary analysis comparing class 3 obese or classes 1 to 2 obese women to nonobese women was performed. The primary outcome was a composite of cerebral palsy or perinatal death. Results In this study, 1,261 nonobese, 339 obese, and 69 morbidly obese women were included. When adjusted for gestational age at delivery and magnesium exposure, there was no association between maternal obesity and child cerebral palsy or death. In the analysis using obesity severity categories, excess risk for adverse outcome appeared confined to the class 3 obese group. Conclusion In women at high risk of delivering preterm, maternal obesity was not independently associated with child cerebral palsy or death. The association in unadjusted analysis appears to be mediated by preterm birth among obese patients.

Class III Obese Women's Preferences and Concerns for Cesarean Skin Incision: A Multicenter Survey.

Objective This study aims to assess class III obese women's preferences and concerns regarding cesarean delivery (CD) skin incisions. Study Design Through the National Perinatal Research Consortium (NPRC), women with body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2 at the time of enrollment completed an anonymous survey in English or Spanish. We evaluated seven domains of preferences and concerns about the cesarean skin incision. Results We surveyed 546 women at five NPRC sites. Median age (interquartile range) was 29 (25, 35) years; 364 (66%) were parous and 161 (30%) had a prior CD. Women self-identified race/ethnicity as White (31%), non-Hispanic Black (31%), Hispanic (31%), other (6%), and not reported (1%). A total of 542 women (99%) rated both delivering the baby in the best possible condition and decreasing incision opening/infection risk as important. Women were less likely to rate other domains as important (all p < 0.001), including: having least pain possible, n = 521 (95%); decreasing the risk of complications in the next pregnancy, n = 490 (90%); decreasing interference with breastfeeding, n = 474 (87%); decreasing operative time, n = 388 (71%); and having the least visible incision, n = 369 (68%). Conclusion Women with class III obesity prioritize immediate maternal and fetal safety regarding CD skin incision over other concerns including cosmetic outcome.

The Problem of the Pannus: Physician Preference Survey and a Review of the Literature on Cesarean Skin Incision in Morbidly Obese Women.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine preferences of a nationally representative sample of obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) regarding cesarean delivery (CD) incision practices for women with morbid obesity (body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m(2)). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an online survey using the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists database. We compared physician demographics, practice characteristics, and CD incision type preference. RESULTS: After exclusion of ineligible participants, 247 OB/GYNs completed the survey (42% response rate). In nonemergency CD of morbidly obese women, 84% of physicians preferred a Pfannenstiel skin incision (67% preferring taping the pannus; 17% without taping the pannus). In emergency CD, 66% preferred a Pfannenstiel incision (46% without taping the pannus; 20% with taping the pannus) and 20% a vertical incision. For both emergency and nonemergency CD, there was no difference in incision type preferences by provider years in practice, practice scope, or number of CD performed each year. CONCLUSION: Given the preference of a Pfannenstiel incision with taping the pannus during CD of morbidly obese women, further investigation is needed to assess the risks and benefits of this incision and the practice of elevating the pannus.

Maternal Super Obesity and Neonatal Morbidity after Term Cesarean Delivery.

Objective To estimate the association between maternal super obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 50 kg/m(2)) and neonatal morbidity among neonates born via cesarean delivery (CD). Methods Retrospective cohort of singleton neonates delivered via CD ≥ 37 weeks in the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Cesarean Registry. Maternal BMI at delivery was stratified as 18.5 to 29.9 kg/m(2), 30 to 39.9 kg/m(2), 40 to 49.9 kg/m(2), and ≥ 50 kg/m(2). Primary outcomes included acute (5-minute Apgar score < 5, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and ventilator support < 24 hours, neonatal injury, and/or transient tachypnea of the newborn) and severe (grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, seizure, respiratory distress syndrome, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, meconium aspiration, ventilator support ≥ 2 days, sepsis and/or neonatal death) neonatal morbidity. Odds of neonatal morbidity were estimated for each BMI category adjusting for clinical and operative characteristics. Results Of 41,262 maternal-neonatal dyads, 36% of women were nonobese, 49% had BMI of 30 to 39.9 kg/m(2), 12% had BMI of 40 to 49.9 kg/m(2), and 3% were super obese. Compared with nonobese women, super obese women had twofold odds of acute (5 vs. 10%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.59-2.73) and severe (3 vs. 6%; aOR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.59-2.73) neonatal morbidity. Conclusion Among term infants delivered via CD, maternal super obesity is associated with increased risk of neonatal morbidity.

Extreme Obesity and Postcesarean Wound Complications in the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Cesarean Registry.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the association between obesity and wound complications after cesarean delivery. METHODS: A secondary cohort analysis of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Cesarean Registry. We stratified the exposure, maternal body mass index (BMI) at delivery, as not obese (BMI < 30), obese (BMI 30-45), and extremely obese (BMI > 45). Our primary outcome was wound complication composite of wound infection, endometritis, wound opening, seroma/hematoma, and hospital readmission. Our secondary outcomes included infection composite (wound infection and endometritis) and each individual outcome included in the primary composite. We performed unadjusted and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: We included 38,229 women who underwent cesarean; 39% were not obese, 55% were obese, and 6% were extremely obese. In our cohort, 40% of women underwent repeat cesarean and 57% underwent cesarean after labor. Extremely obese women had increased risk for any wound complication (14%, adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-1.89), endometritis (8.3%, AOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07-1.49), wound infection (2.0%, AOR, 3.77; 95% CI, 2.60-5.46), wound opening (0.8%, AOR, 5.47; 95% CI, 2.79-10.71), and wound infection-related hospital readmission (3.6%, AOR, 2.97; 95% CI, 2.26-3.91) compared with nonobese women. Obese women had increased risk for any wound complication (9.6%, AOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.06-1.23) and postcesarean infection (7.7%, AOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22) but not other outcomes. CONCLUSION: In a large multicenter cohort study, we found that extreme obesity was associated with substantial increase in maternal postcesarean complications, and the association between obesity and postcesarean complications appears dose related. These findings validate associations found in single-center studies.

Association between Cerebral Palsy or Death and Umbilical Cord Blood Magnesium Concentration.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate whether magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) infusion at the time of delivery or magnesium cord blood concentration is associated with cerebral palsy (CP) or death diagnosed by the age of 2 years. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from a randomized trial of MgSO4 versus placebo for prevention of CP or death among offspring of women with anticipated preterm delivery. This study cohort included singleton, nonanomalous fetuses, whose mothers received MgSO4 as neuroprophylaxis. The primary outcomes were CP or death diagnosed by the age of 2 years. RESULTS: A total of 936 neonates (93 with CP or death, 843 controls) were included in the analysis. Infants in the group with CP or death had MgSO4 infusing at delivery at a similar frequency to that of controls (49 [52.7%] vs. 463 [54.9%], p = 0.68). Mean concentrations of cord blood magnesium, available for 596 neonates, also were not different between the two groups (2.7 ± 0.9 vs. 2.6 ± 0.9 mEq/L, p = 0.66, respectively). Multivariable analyses did not alter these findings. CONCLUSION: Among the offspring of women exposed to MgSO4, in utero, neither MgSO4 infusion at the time of delivery nor magnesium cord blood concentration is associated with CP or death.

Nonreassuring fetal status during trial of labor after cesarean.

OBJECTIVE: Concern for uterine rupture has led to the decline in vaginal births after cesarean. Nonreassuring fetal status (NRFS) may precede uterine rupture. The objective of this study was to estimate the risks of uterine rupture, uterine dehiscence, and adverse fetal outcomes associated with NRFS during trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). STUDY DESIGN: In a retrospective cohort study of the previously reported Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network prospective cohort cesarean registry, we compared women undergoing repeat cesarean for NRFS after TOLAC to those requiring repeat cesarean for other intrapartum indications. Exclusion criteria included women with a prior cesarean who underwent elective or indicated repeat cesarean or women with a multiple gestation. Primary outcomes included uterine rupture or dehiscence. Secondary outcomes included 5-minute Apgar score <7 and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Planned subanalyses for term and preterm deliveries were performed. Stratified and logistic regression analyses were used. RESULTS: Of 17,740 women undergoing TOLAC, 4754 (26.8%) had a failed vaginal birth after cesarean. Of those, NRFS was the primary indication for cesarean in 1516 (31.9%). Women with NRFS as the primary indication for repeat cesarean were at increased risk of uterine rupture (adjusted odds ratio, 3.32; 95% confidence interval, 2.21-5.00), uterine dehiscence (adjusted odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.65), 5-minute Apgar score <7, and neonatal intensive care unit admission compared to women with other primary indications. CONCLUSION: Women attempting TOLAC who require repeat cesarean for NRFS are at increased risk of uterine rupture and uterine dehiscence.

Radiographic measures of the mid pelvis to predict cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether x-ray measures of the mid pelvis can be used to predict cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Women were enrolled prospectively; x-ray pelvimetry was performed after delivery; the readers were blinded to the outcome. Groups were determined by mid pelvis measures (transverse diameter, anteroposterior diameter, and circumference ≤ 10th percentile. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. Univariable, stratified, and multivariable analyses were performed to estimate the effect of mid pelvis measures on cesarean delivery. Receiver operator characteristics curves were created to estimate the predictive value of mid pelvis measures of cesarean delivery. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-six women were included. Subjects with anteroposterior diameter or circumference ≤ 10th percentile were at greater risk of cesarean delivery (risk ratio for anteroposterior diameter, 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 3.9-5.8; risk ratio for circumference ≤ 10th percentile, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-4.8). Transverse diameter ≤ 10th percentile was not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. The area under the receiver operator characteristics curves for anteroposterior diameter, circumference ≤ 10th percentile, and transverse diameter were 0.88, 0.85, and 0.69, respectively (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Simple radiographic measures of the mid pelvis on x-ray can provide a useful adjunct to clinical information in the determination of who should attempt a vaginal delivery.

Prediction of cesarean delivery using the fetal-pelvic index.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the usefulness of the fetal-pelvic index (FPI) in the prediction of cesarean delivery among nulliparous and women who undergo a trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC). STUDY DESIGN: This prospective cohort study included subjects at 2 hospitals from the University of Pennsylvania Health system. The study sample included nulliparous women and women who attempted TOLAC, with nonanomalous pregnancies at ≥37 weeks of gestation in vertex presentation (n = 221 and 207, respectively). FPI score was calculated with the ultrasound-based fetal biometric measures that were performed within 2 weeks of delivery and x-ray pelvimetry that was performed within 48 hours of delivery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop a clinical predictive index for cesarean delivery, which included FPI and clinical factors, in nulliparous women or women who attempted TOLAC. The prediction models were tested for accuracy with the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. RESULTS: Higher FPI scores were associated with greater odds of cesarean delivery. A unit increase in FPI score increased the odds of cesarean delivery by 15% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.21) for nulliparous women and 15% for women who attempted TOLAC (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.20) after adjustment for maternal age, race, medical risk factors, and labor method. Among nulliparous women, the receiver operating characteristics analysis estimated an area under the curve of 0.88, with positive and negative predictive values of 76% and 87%, respectively. Similar findings were observed in the subgroup of women who attempted TOLAC. CONCLUSION: The FPI when combined with clinical risk factors can identify accurately women who are at a high risk for cesarean delivery.

Major trauma in pregnancy: prediction of maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Trauma, largely the consequence of motor vehicle crashes, is the leading cause of pregnancy-associated maternal mortality. Prediction of adverse outcomes has been difficult in pregnancy given the infrequent occurrence of traumatic events and anatomic considerations unique to pregnancy. The injury severity score, an anatomic scoring system with weighting dependent on severity and anatomic region of injury, is used in the prediction of adverse outcomes in the nonpregnant population but has yet to be validated in pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the associations between risk factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes after major trauma in pregnancy and to develop a clinical prediction model for adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of a cohort of pregnant patients who sustained major trauma and who were admitted to 1 of 2 level 1 trauma centers. Three composite adverse pregnancy outcomes were evaluated, namely adverse maternal outcomes and short- and long-term adverse perinatal outcomes, defined as outcomes occurring within the first 72 hours of the traumatic event or encompassing the entire pregnancy. Bivariate analyses were performed to estimate the associations between clinical or trauma-related variables and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to predict each adverse pregnancy outcome. The predictive performance of each model was estimated using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. RESULTS: A total of 119 pregnant trauma patients were included, 26.1% of whom met the severe adverse maternal pregnancy outcome criteria, 29.4% of whom met the severe short-term adverse perinatal pregnancy outcome definition, and 51.3% of whom met the severe long-term adverse perinatal pregnancy outcome definition. Injury severity score and gestational age were associated with the composite short-term adverse perinatal pregnancy outcome with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.20 (95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.30). The injury severity score was solely predictive of the adverse maternal and long-term adverse perinatal pregnancy outcomes with odds ratios of 1.65 (95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.09) and 1.14 (95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.23), respectively. An injury severity score ≥8 was the best cutoff for predicting adverse maternal outcomes with 96.8% sensitivity and 92.0% specificity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.990±0.006). An injury severity score ≥3 was the best cutoff for the short-term adverse perinatal outcomes, which correlates with a 68.6% sensitivity and 65.1% specificity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.755±0.055). An injury severity score ≥2 was the best cutoff for the long-term adverse perinatal outcomes, yielding a 68.3% sensitivity and 72.4% specificity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.763±0.042). CONCLUSION: For pregnant trauma patients, an injury severity score of ≥8 was predictive of severe adverse maternal outcomes. Minor trauma in pregnancy, defined in this study as an injury severity score <2, was not associated with maternal or perinatal morbidity or mortality. These data can guide management decisions for pregnant patients who present after trauma.

Accuracy and utilization patterns of intraabdominal imaging for major trauma in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Imaging protocols for major maternal trauma during pregnancy are not standardized, and it is uncertain whether focused assessment with sonography for trauma or computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis is preferred for detecting intraabdominal hemorrhage. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the accuracy of focused assessment with sonography for trauma compared with computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis, validate imaging accuracy with clinical outcomes, and describe clinical factors associated with each imaging mode. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients evaluated for major trauma at one of two Level 1 trauma centers between 2003 and 2019. We identified 4 imaging groups: no intraabdominal imaging, focused assessment with sonography for trauma only, computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis only, and both focused assessment with sonography for trauma and computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis. The primary outcome was a composite maternal severe adverse pregnancy outcome, including death and intensive care unit admission. We estimated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of focused assessment with sonography for trauma for hemorrhage with computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis as the reference standard. We performed analysis of variance and chi-square tests to compare clinical factors and outcomes across imaging groups. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate associations between selected imaging mode and clinical factors. RESULTS: Of 119 pregnant trauma patients, 31 (26.1%) experienced a maternal severe adverse pregnancy outcome. Intraabdominal imaging modes included none in 37.0%, focused assessment with sonography for trauma only in 21.0%, computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis only in 25.2%, and both modes in 16.8%. With computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis as the reference, focused assessment with sonography for trauma had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 11%, 91%, 50%, and 55%, respectively. One patient had a maternal severe adverse pregnancy outcome with a positive focused assessment with sonography for trauma and negative computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis, and 2 patients with a positive computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis did not have an adverse outcome. Use of computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis with or without focused assessment with sonography for trauma was associated with a higher injury severity score, lower systolic blood pressure nadir, higher motor vehicle collision speed, and higher rates of hypotension, tachycardia, bone fracture, maternal severe adverse pregnancy outcome, and fetal demise. The association of computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis use with higher injury severity score, tachycardia, and lower systolic blood pressure nadir persisted in multivariable analysis. With each 1-point increase in the injury severity score, there was an 11% higher likelihood of using computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis over focused assessment with sonography for trauma for intraabdominal imaging. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of focused assessment with sonography for trauma in detecting intraabdominal hemorrhage in pregnant trauma patients is poor, and computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis has a low false-negative rate. Providers seem to prefer computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis to focused assessment with sonography for trauma in patients with the most severe trauma. Computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis with or without focused assessment with sonography for trauma is more accurate than focused assessment with sonography for trauma alone.

Maternal influenza vaccination preferentially boosts hemagglutinin stem-specific antibody resulting in efficient transplacental transfer of stem-specific IgG.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate hemagglutinin stem-specific antibody response to the influenza vaccine during pregnancy and its transfer to the infant. METHODS: The authors assessed antibody titers among maternal participants and their paired neonate's cord blood (CB) using enzyme-linked immunoassay. Fifteen pregnant participants pre-2019 and post-2019 seasonal influenza vaccine were compared with 18 prenatally vaccinated participants with paired neonatal CB samples. Total IgG and IgG subclass titers specific for whole vaccine antigens versus recombinant hemagglutinin stem-specific antigen were compared using Wilcoxon exact test. RESULTS: Hemagglutinin stem-specific IgG was boosted more robustly than whole vaccine titers when comparing postvaccine versus prevaccine log2 IgG ratios (P = 0.04). Hemagglutinin stem-specific IgG titers were boosted postvaccination (prevaccine: 14.5 [95% confidence interval, 13.8-15.2] vs. postvaccine: 16 [95% confidence interval, 15.2-16.8], P = 0.004). While IgG to whole vaccine was similar in neonatal CB and maternal plasma (P = 0.09), hemagglutinin stem-specific IgG concentrated in CB (P = 0.002), which was dominated by IgG1 subclass (analysis of variance P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the ability of pregnant women to generate a more robust antibody response to the stem region compared with the head region of hemagglutinin with transplacental transfer of IgG.