Therapeutic drug monitoring of vedolizumab therapy in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring is effective for optimizing anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies in inflammatory bowel disease, but for vedolizumab, a gut-selective leucocyte migration inhibitor, data are scarce. METHODS: Observational cohort study including 116 bio-experienced inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with vedolizumab for active luminal disease. Biobanked trough blood samples (n = 676) covering 96% of patients were analyzed using a drug-binding immunofluorometric assay. Steroid-free treatment outcomes were classified by clinical disease activity indices and objective findings, primarily endoscopy. RESULTS: Patients with clinical remission to vedolizumab induction therapy (37%) had significantly higher trough levels than those without at weeks 6 (mean 34.1 vs 28.0 µg/mL, P = 0.03) and 10 (34.8 vs 27.5 µg/mL, P = 0.01). Optimal thresholds for discrimination were 32.4 µg/mL (AUCROC 0.66, P = 0.04) and 23.5 (AUCROC 0.67, P = 0.01), respectively. This positive association persisted during maintenance phase with 11.9 µg/mL (AUCROC 0.69, P < 0.01) associated with clinical remission (37%) and 15.3 (AUCROC 0.74, P < 0.001) for objective remission (46%). Stratification by temporal evolution of treatment effects revealed higher induction and maintenance vedolizumab levels in persistent and slow responders as compared to secondary or persistent failures. Pharmacokinetics was influenced by rare formation of anti-vedolizumab antibodies (2%), and to a lesser extent gender and albumin during induction, but not disease severity, concomitant steroids, or thiopurine metabolites. Switching to subcutaneous administrations resulted in 2.3-fold increase in steady-state trough levels. CONCLUSION: Our study supports maintaining adequate drug exposure being essential for sustained positive outcomes of vedolizumab and emphasizes individualized, therapeutic drug monitoring-based treatment regimens. Controlled trials and pharmacokinetic modeling are, however, needed.

Protocol for scoping review: Patient-controlled sedation.

BACKGROUND: In settings where general anaesthesia is unnecessary, effective sedation, analgesia and local anaesthesia are crucial for optimal outcomes. Traditionally, sedation have been managed and controlled by healthcare professionals, but advancements in pharmacology and technology have renewed the way we are able to sedate. Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) offers a promising approach, allowing patients to adjust their sedation levels during procedures. This shift aims to enhance sedation quality, improve patient satisfaction and involvement and expedite discharge. METHODS: The search strategy will be crafted in partnership with the Librarian well-versed in scoping reviews. 'Patient controlled sedation' is a wide search. The search will include databases, as MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL and Google Scholar. All literature findings will be entered into a web-based screening and data extraction tool. Two independent reviewers will assess the eligibility and inclusion of all studies. The variables to be extracted will encompass trial characteristics, participant characteristics, assessment of PCS, identified risk factors for PCS, and the evaluation of patient satisfaction as assessed in the included studies. RESULTS: Following PRISMA-P and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, this scoping review includes studies of any design. Data synthesis involves descriptive statistics and narrative presentations to explore the relationship between results and objectives. The outcome will be which procedures/surgeries PCS is used for and which patients are eligible for PCS. Additionally, aspects such as patient and operator satisfaction, economical pros and cons adverse effects will be considered. CONCLUSION: The scoping review will aim to give a better understanding of in which settings PCS is used. This scoping review provides a comprehensive understanding of PCS and identifies gaps in the literature to shape future research, so we can ensure the best possible sedation for patients in the future.

Molecular Manipulations and Intestinal Stem Cell-Derived Organoids in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

The pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) involves genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and a broadly dysregulated intestinal immune response to the commensal intestinal microflora. The interface between genetic predisposition and environmental factors is reflected in the epigenetic regulation at the transcriptional level. Treatment targets now involve mucosal and histological healing, but the future might additionally include normalization of intestinal cellular functions also at the molecular level, for example comprising complete restoration of phenotypic, genotypic, and epigenetic states. Recent developments in patient-derived epithelial intestinal stem cell (ISC) organoid technologies have opened exciting new therapeutic opportunities to potentially attain molecular healing by combining stem cell therapy with molecular manipulations using (epi)drugs and/or CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Here, we are the first to discuss the possibility for phenotypic, genotypic, and epigenetic restoration via molecular manipulations and stem cell therapy in IBD from a clinical perspective.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: implementation, utilization, and barriers in clinical practice in Scandinavia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may optimize biologic and thiopurine therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The study aimed to investigate implementation and utilization of TDM in Scandinavia. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire on the use of TDM was distributed to Scandinavian gastroenterologists via the national societies. RESULTS: In total, 297 IBD physicians prescribing biologic therapies, equally distributed between community and university hospitals, were included (response rate 42%) (Norway 118 (40%), Denmark 86 (29%), Sweden 50 (17%), Finland 33 (11%), Iceland 10 (3%)). Overall, TDM was applied during biologic therapies by 87%, and for TNF-inhibitors >90%. Among the users, reactive and proactive TDM were utilized by 90% and 63%, respectively. Danish physicians were significantly less inclined to use TDM compared to other Scandinavian countries; (58% vs 98%); OR 0.03 [0.01-0.09], p < 0.001). Reactive TDM was commonly applied at primary (74%) and secondary (99%) treatment failure. Proactive TDM was used by 80% during maintenance therapy and 56% during induction and more commonly utilized in Norway (p < 0.001), and by physicians managing >10 IBD patients/week (p = 0.005). TDM scenarios were interpreted in accord with available evidence but with discrepancies for proactive TDM. The main barriers to TDM were lack of guidelines (51%) and time lag between sampling and results (49%). TDM of thiopurines was routinely used by 87%. CONCLUSION: TDM of biologic and thiopurine therapies has been broadly implemented into clinical practice in Scandinavia. However, physicians call for TDM guidelines detailing indications and interpretations of test results along with improved test response times.

Trajectories of health-related quality of life and fatigue during vedolizumab therapy in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Normalizing health-related quality of life (QoL) and fatigue are important long-term treatment targets in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We examined their evolution in relation to changes in disease activity during vedolizumab therapy. METHODS: Cohort study of biologically refractory IBD patients treated with vedolizumab. Patients were prospectively evaluated at all infusions by Short Health Scale (SHS) (QoL questionnaire covering four health dimensions) (n = 79), visual analogous scale for fatigue (VAS-F) (n = 30), and clinical disease activity. Objective disease assessment was carried out after 1 year or at treatment failure. RESULTS: Patients in steroid-free clinical remission at end of induction improved significantly in all SHS items already from week 2 with full implementation by week 14 ("Symptoms" 59% improvement, P < 0.001; "Function" 63%, P < 0.001; "Worries" 59%, P < 0.001; "Well-being" 40%, P < 0.01). Then, SHS remained stable at background levels (< 20) for 1 year (improvements 67%; 65%; 62%; 57%; P < 0.001). Combined clinical-objective remission at 1 year was associated with highest SHS improvements (64-72%; P < 0.001). Of note, early SHS improvements preceded manifestation of clinical remission in most patients (22 of 33; 67%). Clinical response materialized into late (week 6 or later) and minor SHS improvements (31-46%, P < 0.001). Fatigue improved steadily over 6 months to background levels (VAS-F < 4) among patients in clinical remission (45% decrease) or clinical-objective remission (41%). SHS and VAS-F impairment remained elevated in patients without effect of therapy. CONCLUSION: QoL rapidly improves and predicts later significant clinical-objective efficacies of vedolizumab at end of induction and 1 year. Fatigue improves slowly after remission is attained.

Patient Satisfaction of Propofol Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl Sedation During Colonoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colonoscopy is essential for optimal management of inflammatory bowel disease. However, many patients opt out due to unpleasantness related to this procedure. We investigated if Nurse Administered Propofol Sedation (NAPS) would improve patient satisfaction and attitude towards future colonoscopies. METHODS: Randomized clinical trial of deep sedation with NAPS (n = 63) versus moderate midazolam and fentanyl sedation (n = 67). To assess the primary end point of patient satisfaction at discharge, we developed a Satisfaction Questionnaire comprising 13 items each rated by a 5-point Likert scale and with higher scores reflecting more positive outcomes (13-65 points). RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (43%) with ulcerative colitis, 48 (37%) with Crohn's disease, and 26 (20%) with high suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease were included. Most (88%) had previously had a colonoscopy and pre-procedure expectations were similar between groups. Patients receiving deep sedation had significantly higher satisfaction score (mean 60.1, SD 3.4) than those receiving moderate sedation (51.2, 8.4; P < .001). This was driven especially by less pain, more amnesia, sedation more to their liking, and better experience with the current than previous sedations. Importantly, these patients significantly more often preferred the same sedation for a future colonoscopy and were also inclined to accept more frequent colonoscopies. Assistance from another colonoscopist and disruption of the procedure due to pain occurred significantly more frequent in the moderate sedation group. There were no safety signals associated with NAPS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease favor deep propofol sedation over moderate midazolam and fentanyl sedation. Availability of NAPS may facilitate patient adherence to endoscopy-based monitoring programs. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01934088.

Drug Levels Associated With Optimal Discrimination Between Remission and Nonremission and Comparison of Antibody Assays During First Year of Stable Infliximab Maintenance Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: To implement therapeutic drug monitoring-based strategies for infliximab (IFX) in inflammatory bowel disease, the authors assessed IFX levels for optimal discrimination between remission and nonremission and compared assays for anti-IFX antibodies (Abs). METHODS: The retrospective cohort comprised 163 bionaive patients with inflammatory bowel disease who received stable IFX maintenance therapy (5 mg/kg every 8 weeks [q8w]) for 1 year. The clinical and biochemical remission status was assessed at all infusions (weeks 14-22-30-38-46-54), and IFX and anti-IFX Abs were estimated using a time-resolved fluorometric assay (n = 690; 88% of infusions). Samples positive for anti-IFX Abs or IFX levels < limit of detection (n = 102) were analyzed by 2 binding assays [enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)] and functional reporter gene assay/drug-tolerant enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: At all assessed time points, IFX levels were more than double in patients presenting clinical or biochemical remission. An IFX concentration of 4.5 mcg/mL was associated with clinical remission during the entire first year of therapy [sensitivity 54% (49-59), specificity 73% (67-78), AUCROC 0.65 (0.60-0.69), P < 0.0001]; these values were comparable with biochemical remission. Exploratory assessments for endoscopic remission (n = 131) were performed at the discretion of the treating physician. Anti-IFX Abs were associated with undetectable IFX and treatment failure [OR 2.9 (1.4-6.0), P < 0.01], irrespective of persistency or transiency. All performed assays detected anti-IFX Abs were picked up by all assays in ∼2/3 of samples. Binding assays demonstrated a higher sensitivity to anti-IFX Abs. CONCLUSIONS: IFX at ∼5 mcg/mL was associated with clinical and biochemical remission during the first year of maintenance therapy. During this phase of therapy, standard binding assays are appropriate for therapeutic drug monitoring.

A systematic monitoring approach to biologic therapies in inflammatory bowel disease: patients' and physicians' preferences and adherence.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) should aim at achieving mucosal healing. However, monitoring schedules to support this goal remain undefined. We aimed to identify patients' and physicians' preferences regarding monitoring strategy and investigated the feasibility of such a strategy. METHODS: Elements considered relevant for monitoring were identified in questionnaire surveys among 1) patients with IBD receiving biologic agents (n = 172) and 2) their physicians (n = 87). Adherence to a monitoring strategy incorporating these elements was investigated in a retrospective cohort of patients with IBD treated with biologic agents (n = 139). RESULTS: Patients considered blood and stool samples, endoscopies, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to be relevant aspects of monitoring their disease. However, patients also considered stool samples and endoscopies unpleasant. Physicians considered blood samples (99%), medical consultations (99%), fecal calprotectin (85%), endoscopy (78%), and MRI (71%) to be important aspects of IBD monitoring but considered endoscopies and MRI relevant only at clinical signs of relapse. A review of the clinical use of monitoring strategies including the elements identified above revealed high adherence for blood samples and disease activity indices (92%), but low adherence for fecal calprotectin (38%), therapeutic drug monitoring (38%), and endoscopies (32%). CONCLUSION: Important tools for evaluating mucosal healing (e.g., endoscopy) were rated highly unpleasant by patients, and physicians found endoscopies/MRI relevant only in case of relapse. These findings were reflected by low rates of adherence to use of these monitoring tools. In defining monitoring schedules to help achieve treatment goals, these important barriers must be addressed.

Fatigue is a systemic extraintestinal disease manifestation largely independent of disease activity, chronicity, and nutritional deficiencies in inflammatory bowel disease on biologics.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a common symptom reported by patients with chronic immunoinflammatory diseases and with profound negative implications on health-related quality of life. This study aimed to delineate underlying components contributing to fatigue in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving biologic therapy. METHODS: Cross-sectional questionnaire study of all patients with IBD receiving any biologic therapy at a tertiary IBD center. Fatigue was assessed by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F). Disease activity and quality of life were evaluated by generic questionnaires. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to identify components of variables explaining fatigue. RESULTS: Three hundred patients with IBD were included. Moderate-to-severe fatigue defined as FACIT-F ≤ 39 was present in half of the included patients. PCA condensed variables associated with fatigue into three main components contributing to 49% of observed fatigue. The first component, explaining 21% of fatigue, included factors related to disease chronicity, e.g., long disease duration, high number of previously used biologic therapies, presence of previous intestinal surgery, and increasing age. The second component explained 14% of fatigue and comprised disease activity-related aspects, e.g., disease activity indices and C-reactive protein. The third explained 14% of fatigue and comprised various nutritional deficiencies. CONCLUSION: Fatigue can partly be explained by chronicity, disease activity, and nutritional deficits. However, the cause of fatigue is unexplained in approximately half of the patients with IBD supporting that fatigue can be an independent, systemic extraintestinal disease manifestation in IBD.

Therapeutic thresholds and mechanisms for primary non-response to infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Primary non-response to infliximab (IFX) inherits a poor prognosis in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We explored underlying mechanisms and therapeutic thresholds in an effort to provide basis for optimizing therapy. METHODS: A prospectively followed cohort of 166 IBD patients having received standard IFX induction therapy (5 mg/kg at weeks 2, 6, and 14) had trough IFX and anti-IFX antibodies (Abs) retrospectively assessed at weeks 2 (n = 148) and 6 (n = 108). Circulating TNFα was measured in matched primary non-responders (n = 29) and responders (n = 21) at baseline and weeks 6 and 14. Clinical outcome at week 14 was supported by disease activity scores in half of patients. RESULTS: In all, 18 patients (11%) had primary non-response. Infliximab was consistently lower throughout the induction phase in non-responders as compared to responders (Week 2: IFX median 18.9 µg/mL vs. 23.3, p < .05. Week 6: 8.4 vs. 17.0, p < .05). Optimal IFX thresholds associated with response was 22.9 µg/mL at week 2 (sensitivity 51%, specificity 80%, AUCROC 0.67, p < .05) and 11.8 at week 6 (72%, 77%, 0.71, p < .05). Anti-IFX Abs occurred in 28% of primary non-responders and associated with low IFX and treatment failure (OR 13.7 [2.8-67.5], p < .01). Markers of disease activity (disease activity scores, albumin, CRP) also associated with low IFX. Circulating TNFα was higher throughout induction in non-responders with ulcerative colitis but not Crohn's disease. CONCLUSION: IBD patients with primary IFX failure generally have lower IFX trough than responders during early induction phase. Pharmacokinetic failure seems common in ulcerative colits, whereas pharmacodynamic failure appears common in Crohn's disease.

Absence of Relationship Between Crohn's Disease Activity Index or C-Reactive Protein and Infliximab Exposure Calls for Objective Crohn's Disease Activity Measures for the Evaluation of Treatment Effects at Treatment Failure.

BACKGROUND: Circulating infliximab (IFX) concentrations correlate with clinical outcomes, forming the basis of the IFX concentration monitoring in patients with Crohn's disease. This study aims to investigate and refine the exposure-response relationship by linking the disease activity markers "Crohn's disease activity index" (CDAI) and C-reactive protein (CRP) to IFX exposure. In addition, we aim to explore the correlations between different disease markers and exposure metrics. METHODS: Data from 47 Crohn's disease patients of a randomized controlled trial were analyzed post hoc. All patients had secondary treatment failure at inclusion and had received intensified IFX of 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks for up to 20 weeks. Graphical analyses were performed to explore exposure-response relationships. Metrics of exposure included area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and trough concentrations (Cmin). Disease activity was measured by CDAI and CRP values, their change from baseline/last visit, and response/remission outcomes at week 12. RESULTS: Although trends toward lower Cmin and lower AUC in nonresponders were observed, neither CDAI nor CRP showed consistent trends of lower disease activity with higher IFX exposure across the 30 evaluated relationships. As can be expected, Cmin and AUC were strongly correlated with each other. Contrarily, the disease activity markers were only weakly correlated with each other. CONCLUSIONS: No significant relationship between disease activity, as evaluated by CDAI or CRP, and IFX exposure was identified. AUC did not add benefit compared with Cmin. These findings support the continued use of Cmin and call for stringent objective disease activity (bio-)markers (eg, endoscopy) to form the basis of personalized IFX therapy for Crohn's disease patients with IFX treatment failure.

Outcome of continued infliximab therapy in Crohn's disease patients with response but without remission after one year of infliximab - a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of Crohn's disease patients having responded to infliximab but without achieving remission is not well defined. The present study examined if these patients benefit from continued long-term infliximab maintenance therapy. METHOD: Retrospective cohort study including all patients treated with infliximab for 1 year until the end of 2017 who have had a response but not reached remission on infliximab. Clinical outcomes were defined by the physicians' global evaluation, supported by clinical indices and objective markers of disease activity. RESULTS: In total, 376 Crohn's disease patients received infliximab. Among these, 76 (20%) were classified as having response but non-remission (RNR) after 1 year of therapy. A great majority (n = 54; 71%) experienced no additional therapeutic benefit after a further year of infliximab maintenance therapy, thus still having RNR. Nineteen patients (25%) obtained remission during continued infliximab, whereas only 4% (n = 3) experienced treatment failure. Although infliximab therapy beyond 2 years (follow-up median 35 months, IQR: 23-55) was accompanied by a higher proportion attaining remission (40%), nearly half (46%) still failed to improve. Among patients who had discontinued infliximab while having RNR (n = 21), half (n = 11) experienced disease flare within five months (median 22 weeks, IQR: 12-31). CONCLUSION: Most patients (71%) had no additional therapeutic benefit after an additional year of infliximab therapy, and after a median maintenance infliximab treatment period of 3 years, half still failed to improve further. Considering the importance of achieving complete remission, these patients appear to have an unmet medical need.

Interactions Between Thiopurine Metabolites, Adalimumab, and Antibodies Against Adalimumab in Previously Infliximab-Treated Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Interactions between thiopurines and infliximab presumably contribute to superior effect of infliximab-thiopurine combination therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We examined whether principal cytotoxic thiopurine metabolites influence adalimumab (ADL) and anti-ADL antibodies (Abs). METHODS: Ninety-eight IBD patients previously treated with infliximab (96%) in whom trough ADL and anti-ADL Abs had been assessed as part of their clinical care were included. Thiopurine metabolites [6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) and methylated mercaptopurine metabolites (6-MeMP)] were determined at similar time points. RESULTS: ADL-thiopurine combination therapy was not associated with reduced anti-ADL Ab positivity compared to ADL monotherapy: 8/31 (26%) versus 19/67 (28%), p = 1.00. Concentrations of thiopurine metabolites were similar in anti-ADL Ab-positive and negative patients (6-TGN median 109 pmol/8 × 108 RBC vs. 112, p = 0.80; 6-MeMP 448 RBC vs. 720, p = 0.94). ADL trough levels did not differ between anti-ADL Ab-negative patients on ADL-thiopurine combination therapy and those on monotherapy (9.5 µg/mL vs. 7.6, p = 0.31). ADL levels were also comparable between patients on ADL mono- and combination therapy after stratification for 6-TGN/6-MeMP quartiles. There were no correlations between levels of 6-TGN and ADL (rP = - 0.17, p = 0.45; rS = - 0.38, p = 0.08), or 6-MeMP and ADL (rP = - 0.23, p = 0.31; rS = - 0.35, p = 0.11). Anti-ADL Ab positivity was associated with ADL treatment failure (OR 6 [2-20], p < 0.01). Higher trough ADL (9.6 µg/mL vs. 7.3, p < 0.05), but not concomitant thiopurine treatment, metabolite levels, or dosage, was associated with clinical remission. CONCLUSION: Effectiveness of ADL therapy associated with circulating ADL levels and anti-ADL Ab formation. In this study, there appeared no direct interactions between thiopurine metabolites and ADL or anti-ADL Abs.

Metabonomics uncovers a reversible proatherogenic lipid profile during infliximab therapy of inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: One-third of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients show no response to infliximab (IFX) induction therapy, and approximately half of patients responding become unresponsive over time. Thus, identification of potential treatment response biomarkers are of great clinical significance. This study employs spectroscopy-based metabolic profiling of serum from patients with IBD treated with IFX and healthy subjects (1) to substantiate the use of spectroscopy as a semi-invasive diagnostic tool, (2) to identify potential biomarkers of treatment response and (3) to characterise the metabolic changes during management of patients with tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors. METHODS: Successive serum samples collected during IFX induction treatment (weeks 0, 2, 6 and 14) from 87 IBD patients and 37 controls were analysed by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Data were analysed with principal components analysis and orthogonal projection to latent structures discriminant analysis using SIMCA-P+ v12 and MATLAB. RESULTS: Metabolic profiles were significantly different between active ulcerative colitis and controls, active Crohn's disease and controls, and quiescent Crohn's disease and controls. Metabolites holding differential power belonged primarily to lipids and phospholipids with proatherogenic characteristics and metabolites in the pyruvate metabolism, suggestive of an intense inflammation-driven energy demand. IBD patients not responding to IFX were identified as a potentially distinct group based on their metabolic profile, although no applicable response biomarkers could be singled out in the current setting. CONCLUSION: 1H NMR spectroscopy of serum samples is a powerful semi-invasive diagnostic tool in flaring IBD. With its use, we provide unique insights into the metabolic changes taking place during induction treatment with IFX. Of distinct clinical relevance is the identification of a reversible proatherogenic lipid profile in IBD patients with active disease, which partially explains the increased risk of cardiovascular disease associated with IBD.