RESUMO
PURPOSE: Evidence of the influence of family physicians on health care is required to assist managers and policy makers with human resource planning in Africa. The international argument for family physicians derives mainly from research in high-income countries, so this study aimed to evaluate the influence of family physicians on the South African district health system. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study in 7 South African provinces, comparing 15 district hospitals and 15 community health centers (primary care facilities) with family physicians and the same numbers without family physicians. Facilities with and without family physicians were matched on factors such as province, setting, and size. RESULTS: Among district hospitals, those with family physicians generally scored better on indicators of health system performance and clinical processes, and they had significantly fewer modifiable factors associated with pediatric mortality (mean, 2.2 vs 4.7, P =.049). In contrast, among community health centers, those with family physicians generally scored more poorly on indicators of health system performance and clinical processes, with significantly poorer mean scores for continuity of care (2.79 vs 3.03; P =.03) and coordination of care (3.05 vs 3.51; P =.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, having family physicians on staff was associated with better indicators of performance and processes in district hospitals but not in community health centers. The latter was surprising and is inconsistent with the global literature, suggesting that further research is needed on the influence of family physicians at the primary care level.
Assuntos
Centros Comunitários de Saúde , Hospitais , Médicos de Família/estatística & dados numéricos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Análise de Regressão , África do Sul , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Evidence from first world contexts support the notion that strong primary health care teams contain family physicians (FPs). African leaders are looking for evidence from their own context. The roles and scope of practice of FPs are also contextually defined. The South African family medicine discipline has agreed on six roles. These roles were incorporated into a family physician impact assessment tool, previously validated in the Western Cape Province. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was used to assess the perceived impact of family physicians across seven South African provinces. All FPs working in the district health system (DHS) of these seven provinces were invited to participate. Sixteen respondents (including the FP) per enrolled FP were asked to complete the validated 360-degree assessment tool. RESULTS: A total number of 52 FPs enrolled for the survey (a response rate of 56.5%) with a total number of 542 respondents. The mean number of respondents per FP was 10.4 (SD = 3.9). The perceived impact made by FPs was high for five of the six roles. Co-workers rated their FP's impact across all six roles as higher, compared to the other doctors at the same facility. The perceived beneficial impact was experienced equally across the whole study setting, with no significant differences when comparing location (rural vs. metropolitan), facility type or training model (graduation before and ≥ 2011). CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the need to increase the deployment of family physicians in the DHS and to increase the number being trained as per the national position paper.
Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Mão de Obra em Saúde , Médicos de Família/provisão & distribuição , Estudos Transversais , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , África do SulRESUMO
Background: Epilepsy is a debilitating chronic medical condition affecting many patients globally. A seizure diary is used in monitoring and managing patients with epilepsy. In South Africa, no standardized diary is currently being used. Objective: This study intended to develop a consensus among experts managing patients with epilepsy on the content of a seizure diary. Methods: The modified Delphi method consisted of three survey rounds spanning six months. Using a three-point Likert scale questionnaire, in round one, the panelists were required to choose an option (definitely required, optional, and not required) for 50 items and comment on the contents of the diary. In round two, three items were added based on comments from the panelists. In round three, panelists were allowed to deliberate further on unresolved items and change their responses in view of the group responses. The consensus was determined as an a priori threshold of >70% on items definitely required, optional, or not required. Results: Eleven local and two international panelists were enrolled in this study. Twelve completed all three rounds. The consensus was achieved in 21 of 50 items in round 1, three of seven items in round 2, and one of two items in round 3, of which 18 were definitely required as contents of a seizure diary. Conclusions: Based on expert opinions, the modified Delphi study determined the essential contents of a seizure diary for use by patients with epilepsy in South Africa.
RESUMO
Background: The incidence and mortality rates of prostate cancer (PCa) are disproportionately on the increase among South African black men. Recent studies show a greater net benefit of prostate-specific antigen screening of black men compared with the general population. There are, however, knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) gaps among primary healthcare providers (HCPs) and users (black men) on PCa screening. Likewise, there is a scarcity of research on strategies to address these gaps. Objective: This study sought to determine complementing strategies to enhance the approach to PCa screening of African men in the Free State, South Africa, from the perspectives of primary HCPs and users. Methods: This study utilized a three-round modified Delphi survey to achieve its aim. Consensus was determined by an a priori threshold of ≥70% of agreement. Results: The survey involved a multidisciplinary panel of 19 experts. The consensus was reached on 34 items (strategies) to enhance the approach to PCa screening in the study setting. Community health education strategies were proffered, relating to relevant topics, methods, venues of delivery, and persons to deliver the education. Continuing education topics and methods of instruction were suggested for primary HCPs. Conclusions: In view of the existing KAP gaps in PCa screening among primary HCPs and users (black men), an expert consensus was determined, on complementing strategies to enhance the approach to PCa screening of South African black men in the study setting.
RESUMO
Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is performed to manually keep brain function intact until the patient's spontaneous blood circulation and breathing are restored. In South Africa, registrars, who are qualified doctors training to specialise in a medical field, are usually the team leaders and oversee junior doctors and nurses during resuscitation. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the accuracy of the execution of two-rescuer adult CPR on a Resusci-Anne® manikin performed by registrars from the University of the Free State, South Africa. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. From a target population of 142 registrars, 47 participated, of whom 44 were included in the analysis. During five cycles of CPR, compression quality was assessed. During a subsequent five cycles, airway management was assessed. Participants were evaluated executing CPR on the Resusci-Anne® manikin, with a recently Basic Life Support trained student researcher as second rescuer. A modified version of the American Heart Association's tick sheet for two-rescuer adult CPR was completed by two student researchers. Department, gender and the date of the most recent CPR training attended were recorded. Results: The median total percentage score was 82.2% (range 33.3% to 100.0%). Results showed that 88.6% of registrars consistently demonstrated correct hand placement, 25.0% correct compression rate, 93.2% correct compression depth, and 61.4% allowed complete chest recoil during compressions. Consistently correct E-C technique was found in 77.3%, and correct ventilation rate in 93.2%. Only 63.6% correctly managed an open airway, and 61.4% achieved visible chest rise. A consistently correct compression-to-ventilation ratio was performed by 59.1% of registrars. Conclusion: The study found that registrars were not consistently performing high-quality CPR on a Resusci-Anne® manikin and identified areas needing attention. The results of this study highlight the need for compulsory CPR training and regular fire drills for registrars.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: health professionals are involved in research as researchers themselves and as supervisors to undergraduate and postgraduate students. Authors may have unrealistic expectations regarding journal submission and review processes. The study aimed to describe journal response types and times for manuscripts finalised for submission by the University of the Free State School of Medicine medical editor. METHODS: this descriptive cohort study with an analytical component included all manuscripts finalised for submission to accredited journals by the medical editor, 2014-2017. Excel spreadsheets capturing all stages of the manuscript process were used to confidentially note information regarding submission and subsequent journal responses. RESULTS: ninety-five manuscripts were submitted to 72 peer-reviewed accredited journals. The total number of submissions was 163. Only 46 (48.4%) manuscripts were accepted by the first journals submitted to. Rejected submissions (n=82) had a median journal response time of 15.5 days (range 0-381 days), with a third being sent for review. Nine manuscripts were accepted with no revisions needed. Accepted submissions (n=72) had a median of one round of revision (range 0-4 rounds), and a median time of 119.5 days (range 0-674 days) from submission to final acceptance. CONCLUSION: within our setting, half of first submissions were unsuccessful, but rejection usually occurred rapidly. Acceptance for publication occurred at a median time of 4 months after one round of revision. If health professionals were made aware of expected outcomes and response times, it may prevent authors from falling victim to the publication practices of predatory journals.