Patient Confidence and Information Preferences During the Treatment Decision-making Process: Results From a Large Multiple Myeloma Patient Survey Across 12 Countries in Europe and Israel.

BACKGROUND: The relapsing nature of multiple myeloma (MM) means that patients typically receive different and multiple lines of therapy, requiring many treatment decisions over the disease course. The aim of this study was to explore patient confidence and information preferences during the treatment decision-making process. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multinational, cross-sectional survey enrolled patients with MM. It was co-developed and distributed by Myeloma Patients Europe across 12 countries in Europe and Israel from May 2019 to March 2020. Eligibility criteria included a self-reported diagnosis of MM and being able to recall the decision-making process at the start of their latest treatment line. RESULTS: A total of 1559 patients were included, with complete responses received from 1081 (69%) patients. The median age range was 54 to 64 years; there was an equal gender split and 57% had their latest treatment decision made within the past year. Overall, 54% of patients felt "very confident" in the latest treatment decision. Patients deemed the most important information to be safety/tolerability and treatment effectiveness, but the latter was among the least frequently received. Most patients reported that their primary physician treating MM was their main source for all types of information (range, 62%-94%), with 87% of patients reporting a "very good" or "good" relationship with them. CONCLUSION: Over half of patients felt very confident in their latest treatment decision; however, patients reported not routinely receiving important treatment effectiveness information. Addressing the discrepancies between information that patients receive and consider important may enhance confidence in decision-making.

Management of Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated with Novel Combination Therapies in Routine Clinical Practice in Germany.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple myeloma remains an incurable plasma cell malignancy which, despite improvements in overall survival over the last decade, is characterized by recurrent relapse and is associated with a poor prognosis. This study investigates the use of novel agents in current real-world clinical practice in the management of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in Germany over different lines of therapy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients with RRMM treated at multiple centers across Germany between May 2017 and June 2018. Variables included patient demographics and clinical characteristics, current and prior treatment regimens, treatment response, cytogenetic abnormalities, testing methodology, and resource utilization. RESULTS: Data were analyzed from 484 patients from 47 centers across Germany (60% male; average age over 70 years; majority at International Staging System stage 2 or 3). Bone pain and anemia were the most common symptoms at diagnosis, with 63% of patients receiving osteoprotective drugs. Approximately one-third (32%) of patients had received autologous stem cell transplantation and approximately 70% underwent cytogenetic testing. After failure to respond to first-line treatment, most patients received regimens containing second-generation proteasome inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, with overall response rates greater than 90% in second line (95% and 90% for daratumumab-based and carfilzomib-based therapies, respectively). The incidence of unplanned hospitalization ranged from 11% to 16% across all treatment lines, with longer hospital stays required for treatment administration than for treatment-related toxicity. CONCLUSION: Although treatment patterns for RRMM in Germany differ by line of therapy and are adapted as disease progresses, patients mostly receive combination regimens with carfilzomib or daratumumab in second and third lines, with high overall response rates achieved in all lines.

A new concept for the differential diagnosis and therapy of anaemia in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to prove the usefulness of the diagnostic plot, using the haemoglobin content of reticulocytes as a measure of functional iron deficiency (FID) and the ferritin index as a measure of iron availability, to customise anaemia treatment in cancer patients. METHODS: Based on results of this plot, cancer patients fulfilling practice guideline criteria to receive erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were allocated to treatment with ESAs alone, iron alone or the combination of both. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients identified to require iron in addition or as an alternative to ESA therapy. RESULTS: Out of 303 patients screened, 286 were allocated to treatment: 204 patients were normochromic and iron replete and treated with ESAs alone, 22 had both FID and anaemia of chronic disease and were treated with ESAs and parenteral iron, and 60 were iron-depleted and treated with iron only. After 8 weeks, a haemoglobin increase >1 g/dL from baseline was shown by 56% of patients treated with ESAs alone, by 100% of patients receiving the combination, by 50% of normochromic and by 73% of hypochromic iron-depleted patients receiving iron only. Acute phase reaction did not diminish the response rate to ESAs. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic plot was superior to transferrin saturation and ferritin in predicting iron availability in hypochromic patients treated with ESAs and proved useful to select treatment for anaemia in cancer patients.

Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Patients Treated with Proteasome Inhibitors in Germany.

INTRODUCTION: Real-world data reflects treatments and outcomes in clinical practice in contrast with controlled clinical trials. This study evaluates real-life multiple myeloma (MM) patients receiving proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based treatments in the second or third therapy line in 2017 in Germany. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review on adult relapsed/refractory MM patients treated with ≥1 dose of a PI-based regimen in either the second or the third line of therapy. Participating physicians had ≥3 years of clinical experience in treating symptomatic MM patients and used PI according to the label. RESULTS: Distinct patient profiles for each PI-based regimen emerged. Younger, fitter, transplant-eligible patients received novel PI triplets such as carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd) or IRd. Patients receiving lenalidomide in first-line therapy mostly received lenalidomide-free regimens in second-line therapy. In high-risk patients, no clear treatment patterns could be ascertained. The complete response rates were highest with KRd (13.0%), followed by carfilzomib in combination with dexamethasone (Kd) (5.7%) and bortezomib (4.8%). The very good partial response rates were highest with IRd (76.9%), followed by KRd (53.7%), Kd (25.7%), and bortezomib (20.5%). None of the KRd- or IRd-treated patients responded below a partial response. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Clear patient profiles for each PI type were observed. In second-line therapy, younger, fitter, transplant-eligible patients received novel-PI-based triplets, e.g., KRd or IRd. Patients treated with lenalidomide in first-line therapy mostly received lenalidomide-sparing regimens in second-line therapy. In high-risk patients no clear treatment patterns could be ascertained due to the limited sample size.

The role of intravenous iron in the treatment of anemia in cancer patients.

Anemia is a major cause of morbidity in cancer patients resulting in poor physical performance, prognosis and therapy outcome. Initially, erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) were supposed to be the treatment of choice but about one third of patients turned out to be nonresponders and meta-analyses provided evidence of an increased risk of mortality if used excessively. This along with the successful use of intravenous iron for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease prompted seven clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of intravenous iron as an adjunct to ESAs and four additional studies using intravenous iron only for anemia in cancer patients. These studies confirmed a superior response if ESAs are combined with intravenous iron and revealed iron only to be a useful option in patients with mild and absolute iron deficiency (AID). Currently, best treatment decisions for anemia in cancer might be based on measurements of serum ferritin (SF), transferrin saturation (TSAT), soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), ferritin index (FI = sTfR/log SF), hypochromic reticulocytes (CHR) and C-reactive protein (CRP). However, there is still an urgent need for trials investigating diagnostic approaches to optimize therapy of anemia in cancer patients with iron and/or ESAs.