Symptomatic carotid webs require aggressive intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid web (CaWeb) is a rare form of fibromuscular dysplasia that can produce embolic stroke. Misdiagnosis of symptomatic CaWeb as "cryptogenic stroke" or "embolic stroke of unknown source" is common and can lead to recurrent, catastrophic neurologic events. Reports of CaWeb in the literature are scarce, and their natural history is poorly understood. Appropriate management remains controversial. METHODS: CaWeb was defined as a single, shelf-like, linear projection in the posterolateral carotid bulb causing a filling defect on computed tomography angiography (CTA) or cerebral angiography. Cases of symptomatic CaWeb at a single institution with a high-volume stroke center were identified through collaborative evaluation by vascular neurologists and vascular surgeons. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with symptomatic CaWeb were identified during a 6-year period (2016-2022). Average age was 49 years (range, 29-73 years), 35 of 52 (67%) were African American, and 18 of 52 (35%) were African American women under age 50. Patients initially presented with stroke (47/52; 90%) or transient ischemic attack (5/52; 10%). Stenosis was <50% in 49 of 52 patients (94%) based on NASCET criteria, and 0 of 52 (0%) CaWebs were identified with carotid duplex. Definitive diagnosis was made by CTA examined in multiple planes or cerebral angiography examined in a lateral projection to adequately assess the posterolateral carotid bulb, where 52 of 52 (100%) of CaWebs were seen. Early in our institutional experience, 10 of 52 patients (19%) with symptomatic CaWeb were managed initially with dual antiplatelet and statin therapy or systemic anticoagulation; all suffered ipsilateral recurrent stroke at an average interval of 43 months (range, 1-89 months), and five were left with permanent deficits. Definitive treatment included carotid endarterectomy in 27 of 50 (56%) or carotid stenting in 23 of 50 (46%). Two strokes were irrecoverable, and intervention was deferred. Web-associated thrombus was observed in 20 of 50 (40%) on angiography or grossly upon carotid exploration. Average interval from initial stroke to intervention was 39 days. After an average follow-up of 38 months, there was no reported postintervention stroke or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest single-institution analysis of symptomatic CaWeb yet reported. Our series demonstrates that carotid duplex is inadequate for diagnosis, and that medical management is unacceptable for symptomatic CaWeb. Recurrent stroke occurred in all patients managed early in our experience with medical therapy alone. We have since adopted an aggressive interventional approach in cases of symptomatic CaWeb, with no postoperative stroke reported over an average follow-up of 38 months. In younger patients presenting with cryptogenic stroke, especially African American women, detailed review of lateral cerebral angiography or multi-planar, fine-cut CTA images is required to accurately rule out or diagnose CaWeb and avoid recurrent neurologic events.

Drastic increase in hospital labor costs led to a sustained financial loss for an academic vascular surgery division during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: The financial effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have fundamentally changed the healthcare environment, with hospitals expected to have lost billions in 2021. A preexisting nationwide nursing shortage became drastically worse during the pandemic amid dramatically increasing labor costs. We examined the evolution and financial effects of these changes during repeated pandemic surges within a vascular surgery division at a tertiary medical center. METHODS: Operating room, inpatient unit, and outpatient clinic financial data were examined retrospectively. The monthly averages for a 14-month control cohort before COVID-19 (January 2019 to February 2020) were compared to the averages for seven interval groups of sequential, 3-month cohorts from March 2020 through November 2021 (groups 1-7). RESULTS: The monthly relative value unit (RVU) generation had returned to the mean before the COVID-19 pandemic (2520 RVUs) after an isolated decrease early in the pandemic (group 1; 1734 RVUs). The RVUs ranged from 2540 to 2863 per month for groups 2 to 5, with a slight decline in groups 6 and 7. The average monthly RVUs in the COVID-19 period (2437 RVUs) were nearly equivalent (P = .93) to those for the pre-COVID-19 cohort. An analysis of payor mix demonstrated an increase in commercial and Medicaid payors, with a respective decrease in Medicare payors, during COVID-19. The contribution to indirect, or profit, from inpatient hospital and outpatient clinical revenue showed a drastic decrease in group 1, followed by a swift rebound when the government restrictions were eased (group 2). The total monthly vascular nursing unit expense demonstrated a marked increase with each sequential group during COVID-19, with an average monthly upsurge of +$82,171 (+47%; P < .001). An increase in the nursing labor expenses of +$884 per vascular case (from $1630 to $2514; +54%; P < .001) was observed in the COVID-19 era. The nursing labor costs per patient day had increased from $580 to $852 (+$272; +53%; P < .001). The nursing labor cost per RVU had increased from $69.5 to $107.7 (+$38.2; +55%; P < .001). On a system-wide level, the agency-related nursing costs had increased from $4.9 million to $13.6 million per month (+178%; P < .001) in 2021 compared with 2020. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has had severe, nationwide effects on healthcare delivery, exacerbating the deleterious effects of an existing, critical nursing shortage. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first detailed analysis of this phenomenon and its effects on a surgical division. Our results have demonstrated a progressive, drastic increase in nursing labor costs during the pandemic, with a resultant sustained erosion of financial margins despite a level of clinical productivity, as measured in RVUs, equal to the prepandemic standards. This precarious trend is not sustainable and will require increased, targeted government funding.

Financial viability of endovascular aortic repair in the modern era.

BACKGROUND: In the current era of cost containment, the financial impact of high-cost procedures such as endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) remains an area of intensive interest. Previous reports suggested slim to negative operating margins with EVAR, prompting widespread initiatives to reduce cost and to improve reimbursement. In 2015, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced the reclassification of EVAR to more specific diagnosis-related group (DRG) coding and predicted an overall increase in hospital reimbursement. The potential impact of this change has not been described. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective EVAR at a single institution between January 2014 and December 2018 were identified retrospectively, then stratified by date. Group 1 patients underwent EVAR before DRG change in 2015 and were classified with DRG 237/238, major cardiovascular procedure. Group 2 patients underwent EVAR after the change and were classified as DRG 268/269, aortic/heart assist procedures. The total direct cost included implant cost, operating room (OR) labor, room and board, and other supply costs. Net revenue reflected real payer mix values without extrapolation based on standard Medicare rates. Hospital profit was defined as the contribution to indirect (CTI), subtracting total direct cost from net revenue. RESULTS: A total of 188 encounters were included, 67 (36%) in group 1 and 121 (64%) in group 2. Medicare patients composed 84% of group 1 and 81% of group 2. CTI (profit) increased by $4447 (+123%) from $3615 in group 1 to $8062 in group 2. Net revenue per encounter increased by $2054 (+7.1%). In group 1, the higher reimbursement DRG code 237 was applied in 5 of 67 (7.5%) patients, whereas DRG code 268 was assigned in 19 of 121 (15.1%) patients in group 2. Total direct cost per encounter decreased by $2012 (-7.9%). This decrease in cost was driven by a reduction in implant cost, from a mean $16,914 per encounter in group 1 to a mean $15,655 in group 2 (-$1259 or -7.4% per encounter) and by a decrease in OR labor cost, $2838 in group 1 to $2361 in group 2 (-$477 or -17.0% per encounter). CONCLUSIONS: A significant improvement in hospital CTI was observed for elective EVAR during the course of the study. The increased DRG reimbursement after the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services coding changes in 2015 was a major driver of this salutary change. Notably, efforts to reduce implant and OR cost as well as to improve coding and documentation accuracy over time had an equally important impact on financial return.

Patients with moderate to severe strokes (NIHSS score >10) undergoing urgent carotid interventions within 48 hours have worse functional outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Increasing evidence suggests that urgent carotid intervention after a nondisabling stroke is safe. However, the functional outcome of such patients has not been quantified for various degrees of stroke. We aimed to determine whether increased presenting stroke severity and timing to intervention are associated with poor functional outcomes in patients undergoing urgent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) after an acute transient ischemic attack or stroke. METHODS: We reviewed all urgent carotid interventions from January 2013 through April 2017 at a single tertiary referral center. Preoperative variables analyzed included admission stroke severity, calculated by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The primary end point was the patient's neurologic functional independence at discharge, quantified by the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score (≤2, functionally independent; ≥3, dependent). Primary complications were defined as new or worsened stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and death. RESULTS: A total of 120 urgent carotid interventions (CEA, n = 96; CAS, n = 22; 1 CEA with middle cerebral artery aspiration thrombectomy and 1 carotid embolectomy) were performed. Bivariate analysis demonstrated a correlation between admission NIHSS score and mRS score when patients were divided into groups with an admission NIHSS score ≤10 and >10 (P = .0029). Patients presenting with larger strokes (NIHSS score >10) were 3.4 times more likely (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-9.6; P = .024) to have functional dependence (mRS score ≥3) at discharge than patients presenting with minor to moderate strokes (NIHSS score ≤10). Patients undergoing CEA or CAS before 48 hours were also associated with a worse discharge mRS score compared with those undergoing carotid interventions after 48 hours (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.4-8.7; P = .007). Even when emergent carotid interventions were excluded from the subgroup of patients undergoing CEA or CAS within 48 hours, discharge mRS correlated with time to procedure (days 1- 2 compared with >2 days). The odds of having discharge functional dependence (mRS score ≥3) were 3.4 times more likely for patients with the procedure performed at 1 to 2 days compared with >2 days (95% CI, 1.3-9.1; P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: Urgent carotid intervention performed in patients with moderate or severe strokes (NIHSS score >10) and before 48 hours is associated with functional dependence (mRS score ≥3) on hospital discharge. By demonstrating a clear correlation between admission NIHSS score and interval time to procedure with independent neurologic functional outcomes, these data aid in clinical decision-making for this high-risk subpopulation of patients who present with acute symptomatic carotid lesions.

Complications after endovascular treatment of hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery stenosis (HAS) after liver transplantation can progress to hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and a subsequent 30% to 50% risk of graft loss. Although endovascular treatment of severe HAS after liver transplantation has emerged as the dominant method of treatment, the potential risks of these interventions are poorly described. METHODS: A retrospective review of all endovascular interventions for HAS after liver transplantation between August 2009 and March 2016 was performed at a single institution, which has the largest volume of liver transplants in the United States. Severe HAS was identified by routine surveillance duplex ultrasound imaging (peak systolic velocity >400 cm/s, resistive index <0.5, and presence of tardus parvus waveforms). RESULTS: In 1129 liver transplant recipients during the study period, 106 angiograms were performed in 79 patients (6.9%) for severe de novo or recurrent HAS. Interventions were performed in 99 of 106 cases (93.4%) with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty alone (34 of 99) or with stent placement (65 of 99). Immediate technical success was 91%. Major complications occurred in eight of 106 cases (7.5%), consisting of target vessel dissection (5 of 8) and rupture (3 of 8). Successful endovascular treatment was possible in six of the eight patients (75%). Ruptures were treated with the use of a covered coronary balloon-expandable stent graft or balloon tamponade. Dissections were treated with placement of bare-metal or drug-eluting stents. No open surgical intervention was required to manage any of these complications. With a median of follow-up of 22 months, four of eight patients (50%) with a major complication progressed to HAT compared with one of 71 patients (1.4%) undergoing a hepatic intervention without a major complication (P < .001). One patient required retransplantation. Severe vessel tortuosity was present in 75% (6 of 8) of interventions with a major complication compared with 34.6% (34 of 98) in those without (P = .05). In the complication cohort, 37.5% (3 of 8) of the patients had received a second liver transplant before intervention compared with 12.6% (9 of 71) of the patients in the noncomplication cohort (P = .097). CONCLUSIONS: Although endovascular treatment of HAS is safe and effective in most patients, target vessel injury is possible. Severe tortuosity of the hepatic artery and prior retransplantation were associated with a twofold to threefold increased risk of a major complication. Acute vessel injury can be managed successfully using endovascular techniques, but these patients have a significant risk of subsequent HAT and need close surveillance.

Doppler Characteristics of Recurrent Hepatic Artery Stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess midterm sonographic findings in patients after stenting for hepatic artery stenosis. METHODS: Thirty-nine hepatic artery stent procedures were performed for hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation between September 2009 and December 2013. Thirty cases were technically successful and met the minimum follow-up time (76 days, defined by earliest diagnosed stenosis). Routine ultrasound surveillance was obtained on all patients, and statistical analysis of the findings in the patency and restenosis groups was performed. RESULTS: Of the 30 cases, restenosis occurred 9 times in 6 patients. Mean follow-up was 677 days. Mean time to restenosis was 267 days. Five cases (56%) were identified within the first 6 months after stent placement. Four cases (44%) were recognized in the second year after stent placement. Prior to the sonographic diagnosis of restenosis, the mean resistive indices of the main (.64 versus .57, P < .0001), left (.63 versus .54, P < .0001), right anterior (.60 versus .52, P < .0001), and right posterior (.60 versus .53, P = .001) hepatic artery branches differed among patency and restenosis groups, respectively. The mean peak systolic velocity also differed significantly between the 2 groups: 254 cm/sec in patients with eventual restenosis versus 220 cm/sec in patients without restenosis (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The sonographic evaluation of hepatic artery stenosis remains critical during the first 2 years after stent placement. While the vast majority of patients do not restenose, resistive index and peak systolic velocity differed significantly between the 2 groups and may be prognostic surveillance markers for the development of restenosis.

Heparin-Bonded Polytetrafluorethylene Does Not Improve Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Graft Function.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-bonded polytetrafluorethylene (hep PTFE), when compared with standard PTFE, has been shown to have a modest improvement in distal extremity bypass grafts. The data supporting its usage for dialysis access are less clear. We compared the patency rates, number of interventions, and complications between hep PTFE grafts and nonheparin-bonded PTFE (nonhep PTFE) grafts placed for dialysis access. METHODS: A retrospective review of all dialysis access procedures between January 2013 and March 2014 entered into a prospectively maintained vascular surgery database was performed. Our primary end point was functional graft patency. Secondary end points were primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency, as well as time to graft abandonment, and number of procedures required to maintain or restore graft patency. The number of interventions required to maintain graft patency and graft-related complications were also reviewed. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the 2 groups. RESULTS: Between January 2013 and March 2014, 301-dialysis access procedures were performed, which included 70 arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) comprised 32 hep PTFE (32, 6-mm straight grafts) and 38 nonhep PTFE (35, 4-7-mm taper and 3, 6-mm straight). Mean follow-up was 7.35 ± 5.15 months. At 1 year, Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that functional patency between hep PTFE and nonhep PTFE AVG were 60% and 75%, respectively (P = 0.37). Primary and secondary patencies were not significantly different between groups; however, primary-assisted patency was significantly improved at 1 year (hep PTFE versus nonhep PTFE: 50% vs. 80%; P = 0.02). The number of hep PTFE grafts undergoing percutaneous thrombectomy was significantly higher than the nonhep PTFE grafts (11 vs. 2; P = 0.009). The incidence and time to graft abandonment were not statistically different. The same was true for the number of complications between the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis showed nonhep PTFE AVG to be advantageous for primary and primary-assisted patency. CONCLUSIONS: We did not demonstrate a benefit to the routine use of hep PTFE for AVG creation especially given the higher cost of these grafts. Functional patency rates were not improved, and the rates of reintervention and thrombectomy were higher with hep PTFE AVGs.

Urgent carotid intervention is safe after thrombolysis for minor to moderate acute ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid intervention shortly after an acute neurologic ischemic event is being performed more frequently in stroke centers to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke. Thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is offered to select patients with ischemic stroke symptoms who present within 4.5 hours. However, there is a paucity of data as to whether tPA followed by urgent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) has an increased risk of complications, particularly intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We sought to determine the periprocedural complications of urgently performed CEA or CAS following tPA. METHODS: From January 2009 to January 2015, 762 patients underwent carotid interventions (CEA, n = 440; CAS, n = 322) at a tertiary referral center and 165 patients (21.6%) underwent an urgent CEA or CAS during the index hospitalization for an acute transient ischemic attack or stroke. We compared the effect of intravenous tPA on 30-day complications, including ICH. The χ(2) and Fisher exact tests were used to determine significance between groups. RESULTS: During the 6-year period, 165 patients underwent urgent carotid interventions (CEA, n = 135; CAS, n = 30) for acute neurologic symptoms. Of these, 19% (31 patients [CEA, n = 25; CAS, n = 6]) had tPA for an acute stroke; the remaining (134 patients [CEA, n = 110; CAS, n = 24]) fell outside of the tPA time window. Most strokes were minor or moderate with a mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 6.6 (range, 0-19). The mean time to intervention for both groups was 2.4 days (0-15 days). The 30-day stroke, death, and myocardial infarction rates were 9.7% (3 of 31) for the tPA group compared with 4.5% (6 of 134) for the no-tPA group (P = .37). Including bleeding complications in these 30-day outcomes, there was no difference between the tPA (3 of 31) and the no-tPA cohorts (8 of 134; P = .43). In the tPA group, there were one ICH, one neck hematoma/death, and an additional death; in the no-tPA group, there were one ICH, two neck hematomas, one stroke, two myocardial infarctions, one ICH/death, and one additional death. No significant increased rates of bleeding were noted within the tPA group (2 of 31) compared with the no-tPA group (4 of 134; P = .32). Moreover, in the tPA cohort, more than half of the patients (17 of 31) underwent revascularization within 72 hours (CEA = 13; CAS = 4) with outcomes similar to those who underwent revascularization after 72 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolysis followed by urgent CEA or CAS is not associated with an increased risk of complications in select patients who present with acute neurologic symptoms. Selection of patients is important; there was no ICH and only one death in each group for patients with minor to moderate ischemic stroke (NIHSS score <10).

Transradial approach for percutaneous intervention of malfunctioning arteriovenous accesses.

OBJECTIVE: Interventions on arteriovenous (AV) access are typically performed with a direct puncture into the fistula. An alternative is the transradial approach (TRA), which offers the advantage of visualizing both the arterial and venous limbs as well as any juxta-anastomotic stenosis, all through one access. METHODS: From September 2010 to 2013, 511 fistulograms were performed on 322 patients, 55 of which were TRA procedures in 40 patients (50% male; mean age, 60.4 ± 16.5 years). Of these, 37 of 40 accesses (92.5%) were AV fistulas, and 54 of 55 interventions (98%) were performed for stenotic lesion(s). There were 37 initial interventions, 13 secondary inventions, and five diagnostic fistulograms through the TRA. Stenotic lesions were juxta-anastomotic in 28, venous in 11, or both in 11. Mean follow-up was 14.3 months in 37 of 40 patients. Outcomes included technical and clinical success, complications, functional patency, and flow rate changes. RESULTS: All TRA punctures were successful, with no radial artery thromboses or hand ischemia. Technical success was 88% (44 of 50). Functional patency rates were 88.5% (23 of 26), 84.2% (16 of 19), and 83% (10 of 12) at 1, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The complication rate was 1.8% (one of 55), consisting of AV fistula rupture after angioplasty. The average flow rate in the 20 juxta-anastomotic stenosis increased from 637 mL/min to 1094 mL/min (P = .01) after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The TRA is a practical option with functional patency rates that are comparable to traditional approaches when intervening on a malfunctioning dialysis access in the appropriately selected patient. No hand ischemia was noted. This approach may be particularly attractive for treatment of juxta-anastomotic stenoses in a variety of AV accesses and offers unique practical advantages for the maintenance of AV accesses.

A multicenter experience with the surgical treatment of infected abdominal aortic endografts.

OBJECTIVE: Single-center experiences with the treatment of infected endografts after endovascular aortic repair (I-EVAR) have been reported. We performed a multicenter review of the surgical care of these patients to elucidate short-term and long-term outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all EVAR explants from 1997 to 2014 at four institutions was performed. Patients with I-EVAR undergoing surgical treatment were reviewed. Data were obtained detailing preoperative demographics, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (30 male) were treated with endovascular graft excision and revascularization for I-EVAR with a median age of 69 years (range, 54-80 years). Average time from the initial EVAR to presentation was 589 days (range, 43-2466 days). Preoperative comorbidities included hypertension, 32 (89%); tobacco use, 31(86%); coronary artery disease, 26 (72%); hyperlipidemia, 25 (69%), peripheral artery disease, 13 (36%); cerebrovascular disease, 10 (28%); diabetes, 10 (28%); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 9 (25%); and chronic kidney disease, 9 (25%). The most common presenting patient characteristics were leukocytosis, 23 (63%); pain, 21 (58%); and fever, 20 (56%), which were present an average of 65 days (range, 0-514 days) before explantation. Nine different types of endograft were removed. Three patients (8%) underwent emergency explantation. Thirty-four patients (89%) underwent total graft excision, and two patients (6%) underwent partial excision. Methods of reconstruction were in situ in 27 (75%) and extra-anatomic in nine (28%). Conduits used were Dacron (DuPont, Wilmington, Del), with or without rifampin, polytetrafluoroethylene, cryopreserved allograft, and femoral vein. Forty-nine organisms grew from operative cultures. Gram-positive organisms were the most common, found in 24 (67%), including Staphylococcus in 13 (36%) and Streptococcus in six (17%). Anaerobes were cultured in 6 patients (17%), gram-negative organisms in 6 (17%), and fungus in 5 (14%). Thirty-one patients (86%) received long-term antibiotics. Early complications included acute renal failure requiring dialysis, 12 (33%); respiratory failure, 3 (8%); bleeding, 4 (11%); and sepsis, 2 (6%). Six patients required re-exploration due to hematoma, infected hematoma, lymphatic leak, bowel perforation, open abdomen at initial operation, and anastomotic bleeding. Perioperative mortality was 8% (3 of 36), and long-term mortality was 25% (9 of 36) at a mean follow-up of 569 days (range, 0-3079 days). Type of reconstruction (in situ vs extra-anatomic) or conduit type did not affect perioperative or overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS: I-EVAR is a rare but potentially devastating clinical problem. Although perioperative mortality is acceptable, long-term mortality is high. The most common postoperative complication was acute renal failure requiring dialysis. Although this is the largest series of I-EVAR, further studies are needed to understand the risk factors and preventive measures.

Primary stent placement for hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Significant hepatic artery stenosis (HAS) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) can lead to thrombosis, with subsequent liver failure in 30% of patients. Although operative intervention or retransplantation has been the traditional solution, endovascular therapy has emerged as a less invasive treatment strategy. Prior smaller studies have been conflicting in the relative efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) vs primary stent placement for HAS. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective review of all endovascular interventions for HAS after OLT during a 54-month period (August 2009-December 2013). Patients with ultrasound imaging with evidence of severe HAS (peak systolic velocity >400-450 cm/s, resistive index <0.5) underwent endovascular treatment with primary stent placement or PTA. Outcomes calculated were technical success, primary and primary assisted patency rates, reinterventions, and complications. RESULTS: Sixty-two interventions for HAS were performed in 42 patients with a mean follow-up of 19.1 ± 15.2 months. During the study period, 654 OLTs were performed. Of 61 patients diagnosed with HAS, 42 underwent an endovascular intervention. The rate of endovascularly treated HAS was 6.4% (42 of 654). Primary technical success was achieved in 95% (59 of 62) of the interventions. Initial treatment was with PTA alone in 17 or primary stent in 25. Primary patency rates after initial stent placement were 87%, 76.5%, 78%, and 78% at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, compared with initial PTA rates of 64.7%, 53.3%, 40%, and 0% (P = .19). There were 20 reinterventions in 14 patients (eight stents, six PTAs). The time to the initial reintervention was 51 days in patients with PTA alone vs 105.8 days for those with an initial stent (P = .16). Overall primary assisted patency was 93% at 24 months. Major complications were one arterial rupture and two hepatic artery dissections. The long-term risk of hepatic artery thrombosis in the entire patient cohort was 3.2%. CONCLUSIONS: HAS after OLT can be treated endovascularly with high technical success and excellent primary assisted patency. This series represents the largest reported cohort of endovascular interventions for HAS to date. Initial use of a stent showed a strong trend toward decreasing the need for reintervention. Avoidance of hepatic artery thrombosis is possible in >95% of patients with endovascular treatment and close follow-up.

Retrograde pedal access for patients with critical limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Retrograde pedal access may allow the treatment of tibial occlusive lesions when standard endovascular techniques fail. We aimed to analyze the outcomes in patients with chronic limb ischemia (Rutherford class IV and V) who were not surgical candidates for a tibial bypass and had undergone an unsuccessful attempt at revascularization through an antegrade access. METHODS: During a 3-year period, a retrograde pedal access was selectively chosen when a popliteal or tibial lesion could not be crossed through an antegrade approach. Retrograde pedal access was performed under ultrasound guidance using a 4F micropuncture coaxial sheath. All interventions were performed in a sheathless fashion using a 0.014- or 0.018-inch "bareback" wire as support for a 2- or 2.5-mm balloon angioplasty catheter to cross and treat tibial chronic total occlusions that could not be treated through an antegrade approach. Routine anticoagulation and dual-antiplatelet therapy were used periprocedurally. Antegrade access was used to treat any lesion that required a stent placement after the retrograde wire was snared and brought through the antegrade guidecatheter. Patient indications and comorbidities were recorded. Outcomes analyzed were limb salvage rate, periprocedural complications, and mortality. Mean and standard deviations were calculated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate limb salvage rates. RESULTS: A review of the 681 lower extremity angiograms in which a patient had an intervention from July 2010 through December 2013 identified 13 patients (nine men) in whom a retrograde pedal access was performed (mean age, 71.4 ± 12.4 years). Among these, diabetes was present in 10 of 13 (77%) and chronic renal insufficiency (stages II-V) in nine (69%). Five (38%) had undergone contralateral amputation. Indications for a retrograde pedal revascularization were Rutherford chronic limb ischemia class IV in two (15%) and class V in 11 (85%). Technical success rate was 69% (nine of 13). A variety of popliteal (two of 13) and tibial (13 of 13) vessels were treated with angioplasty alone (10 of 13) or angioplasty/stent placement (three of 13) through a retrograde approach. The technical failures were due to inability to cross the occlusion(s). Periprocedurally, there was one myocardial infarction but no local complications, worsening renal insufficiency, or deaths. At a mean follow-up of 17.1 ± 10.3 months, the limb salvage rate was 77% (10 of 13). There was a high mortality rate of 23% (three of 13) on follow-up in this cohort, occurring at median 6 ± 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Retrograde pedal access for limb salvage in high-risk patients is feasible and safe, with acceptable limb salvage rates at intermediate follow-up. Appropriate candidates are those who have failed an antegrade intervention and are poor candidates for a tibial bypass. Future studies should test whether this mode of revascularization has favorable limb salvage rates in larger patient populations and seek to identify specific patient populations who will benefit from this technique.

Hospital reimbursement for carotid stenting and endarterectomy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) vs. carotid artery stenting (CAS) in terms of hospital reimbursement. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of hospital reimbursement for patients undergoing CEA and CAS from 1 January 2008 through 30 September 2010 at a single tertiary referral institution. Hospital cost and reimbursement were assessed using patient-specific data gathered by the institution's cost accounting system. Professional fees were excluded. RESULTS: Hospital reimbursement data were extracted for a total of 301 cases (169 CEA and 132 CAS). Mean hospital reimbursement was 16% higher for CAS ($12,000±$7372) vs. CEA ($10,160±$6840, p=0.02). However, because of the significantly higher cost of materials necessary to perform CAS, the net revenue for the hospital was 29% greater in patients undergoing CEA ($3487) vs. CAS ($2603). The differences in hospital reimbursement and net revenue were consistent in asymptomatic (n=183), symptomatic (n=123), and urgent (n=36) subgroups. When focusing on cases by diagnosis-related group (DRG) codes vs. current procedural terminology (CPT) codes, the data shifted. Several patients were coded as an outpatient procedure (DRG 0): 28 (21%) of the 132 CAS patients and 7 (4%) of the 169 CEA patients, reducing their mean reimbursement to $4046 and $2513, respectively. If these patients were excluded, the mean hospital reimbursement differential widened between and CEA ($10,515) and CAS ($13,825). CONCLUSION: Hospital reimbursement for CAS is significantly higher than that for CEA. While both procedures created net positive income for the hospital, CEA was associated with a 29% higher net revenue due to the 40% cost premium of CAS when looking at all carotid procedures. However, proper DRG coding of CAS cases would have likely resulted in similar net revenue. Asymptomatic patients had the lowest cost and highest net revenue of all the subgroups. Per capita, significantly more healthcare resources were expended with CAS when compared to CEA. Given the lack of improved clinical outcome in most cases, CAS cannot be considered cost-effective for most patients.

A stroke/vascular neurology service increases the volume of urgent carotid endarterectomies performed in a tertiary referral center.

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence supports that urgent carotid endarterectomy (CEA), defined as CEA during the index hospitalization, may be undertaken in select patients with acute carotid-related neurologic symptoms to prevent recurrent ischemic events. We aimed to determine the effect of a stroke/vascular neurology service on the volume of urgent CEAs performed and assess perioperative outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review from a single tertiary referral center between June 2005 through December 2011 revealed 393 patients who underwent CEA. We identified the number of urgent CEAs before (June 2005-August 2008) and after (September 2008-December 2011) a stroke/vascular neurology service was implemented, as well as asymptomatic CEAs and symptomatic but electively performed CEAs. Demographic data as well as 30-day adverse outcomes (transient ischemic attack [TIA], stroke, myocardial infarction, and mortality) were analyzed for each group. In patients undergoing urgent CEA, TIA and stroke severity were assessed by a stroke neurologist using the ABCD2 TIA score and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), respectively. The χ2 test was used to compare differences between the urgent CEA volume before and after a stroke/vascular neurology service. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: Demographics and comorbidities were similar between the 2 groups. The proportion of urgent CEAs performed increased significantly after initiation of a vascular neurology service (4.1% [7 of 172] vs. 22.2% [49 of 221], P<0.0001). Per annum, urgent CEAs increased from 5.3% (4/75) in 2005 to 39.6% (25/63) in 2011. A vascular neurology service did not increase the number of nonurgent referrals. Urgent CEA indications were ocular ischemic events 4% (2/49), cerebral ischemic/infarction events 35% (17/49), crescendo TIAs 6% (3/49), acute stroke 45% (22/49), and stroke-in-evolution 10% (5/49). Mean NIHSS was 3.5 (range 0-24); mean TIA score was 5 (range 1-8). Although there were no statistical differences in 30-day outcomes, there was a trend toward a higher combined complication rate (stroke, death, myocardial infarction) in the urgent compared with the symptomatic but electively performed CEA group (7.1 % [3/49] vs. 2% [1/49]; P=.36). However, patients undergoing urgent CEA with an NIHSS<10 had no perioperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration with a vascular neurology team increased the volume of urgent CEAs over a 3-year period. In patients with mild-to-moderate strokes (NIHSS<10), urgent CEA perioperative outcomes approximate those for electively performed CEAs, suggesting improved care through a multidisciplinary approach.

Emergent decommissioning of HeartMate 3 for life-threatening hemorrhage.

Left ventricular assist devices are known for the treatment of heart failure. We present a patient who underwent emergent decommissioning of his left ventricular assist device after experiencing life-threatening hemorrhage. In this case, the patient's outflow graft was avulsed from his left subclavian artery. We used a covered stent to first exclude the outflow graft and an Amplatzer II plug (Abbott Cardiovascular) to then occlude the inflow cannula. Accessing the inflow cannula of the left ventricular assist device was challenging. In hindsight, we could have accessed and occluded the outflow graft via the left subclavian artery before deploying the covered stent.

A case of successful revascularization and renal recovery after 6 days of renal artery occlusion.

A 72-year-old man with peripheral arterial disease, an atrophic left kidney, and prior right renal chimney stent as part of a complex endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair presented to our emergency department with right flank pain and anuria resulting from right artery occlusion. His serum creatinine on admission was 7.5 mg/dL. Computed tomography angiography 6 days after the onset of his symptoms revealed complete occlusion of the right renal artery stent. Percutaneous thrombectomy was performed restored renal blood flow. The urine flow started the following day, and his serum creatinine decreased to 3.5 mg/dL 7 days after discharge.

Endovascular treatment of hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery stenosis (HAS) after orthotopic liver transplantation is a significant risk factor for subsequent hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT). HAT is associated with a 30%-50% risk of liver failure culminating in retransplantation or death. Traditional treatment of hepatic artery complications has been surgical, with hepatic artery revision or retransplantation. Endovascular therapy of HAS, described primarily in the interventional radiology literature, may provide a less-invasive treatment option. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all endovascular interventions performed for HAS after orthotopic liver transplantation over a 31-month period (August 2009 to January 2012). Patients with duplex ultrasound imaging evidence of severe main HAS (peak systolic velocity of >400 cm/s, resistive index of <.5) underwent endovascular treatment with either primary stent placement or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) alone. Patients were followed with serial ultrasound imaging to assess for treatment success and late restenosis. Reintervention was performed if significant restenosis occurred. RESULTS: Thirty-five hepatic artery interventions were performed in 23 patients. Over the 31-month study period, 318 orthotopic liver transplantations were performed, yielding a 7.4% (23/318) rate of hepatic artery intervention. Primary technical success was achieved in 97% (34/35) of cases. Initial treatment was with PTA alone (n = 10) or primary stent placement (n = 13). The initial postintervention ultrasound images revealed improvements in hepatic artery peak systolic velocity (267 ± 118 [posttreatment] vs 489.9 ± 155 cm/s [pretreatment]; P < .0001) and main hepatic artery resistive index (0.61 ± 0.08 [posttreatment] vs 0.41 ± 0.07 [pretreatment]; P < .0001). At a mean follow-up of 8.2 ± 1.8 months (range, 0-29), there were 12 reinterventions in 10 patients for recurrent HAS. Thirty-one percent (n = 4/13) of patients undergoing initial stent placement required reintervention (at 236 ± 124 days of follow-up) compared with 60% (n = 6/10) of patients undergoing initial PTA (at 62.5 ± 44 days of follow-up). Primary patency rates (Kaplan-Meier) after primary stent placement were 92%, 85%, and 69% at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively, compared with 70%, 60%, and 50% after PTA (P = .17). Primary-assisted patency for the entire cohort was 97% at 6 and 12 months. Major complications were one arterial rupture managed endovascularly and one artery dissection that precipitated HAT and required retransplantation. The overall rate of HAT in the entire cohort was 4.3% (1/23). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of HAS can be performed with high technical success, excellent primary-assisted patency, and acceptable morbidity. Initial use of a stent may improve primary patency when compared with PTA. The need for reintervention is common, placing particular importance on aggressive surveillance. Longer follow-up and a larger cohort are needed to confirm these encouraging early results.

Costs and cost-effectiveness of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy for patients at standard surgical risk: results from the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) demonstrated similar rates of the primary composite end point between carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA), although the risk of stroke was higher with CAS, and the risk of myocardial infarction was higher with CEA. Given the large number of patients who are candidates for these procedures, an understanding of their relative cost and cost-effectiveness may have important implications for health care policy and treatment guidelines. METHODS: We performed a formal economic evaluation alongside the CREST trial. Costs were estimated from all trial participants over the first year of follow-up using a combination of resource use data and hospital billing data. Patient-level health use scores were obtained using data from the SF-36. We then used a Markov disease-simulation model calibrated to the CREST results to project 10-year costs and quality-adjusted life expectancy for the 2 treatment groups. RESULTS: Although initial procedural costs were $1025/patient higher with CAS, postprocedure costs and physician costs were lower such that total costs for the index hospitalization were similar for the CAS and CEA groups ($15 055 versus $14 816; mean difference, $239/patient; 95% CI for difference, -$297 to $775). Neither follow-up costs after discharge nor total 1-year costs differed significantly. For the CREST population, model-based projections over a 10-year time horizon demonstrated that CAS would result in a mean incremental cost of $524/patient and a reduction in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.008 years compared with CEA. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that CEA was economically attractive at an incremental cost-effectiveness threshold of $50 000/quality-adjusted life-year gained in 54% of samples, whereas CAS was economically attractive in 46%. CONCLUSIONS: Despite slightly lower in-trial costs and lower rates of stroke with CEA compared with CAS, projected 10-year outcomes from this controlled clinical trial demonstrate only trivial differences in overall healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life expectancy between the 2 strategies. If the CREST results can be replicated in clinical practice, these findings suggest that factors other than cost-effectiveness should be considered when deciding between treatment options for carotid artery stenosis in patients at standard risk for surgical complications. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00004732.