Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 67(10): 1487-1492, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28955061

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a multidisciplinary approach on the outcome of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at the gastroenterology division by primary care providers at Phoenix VA Healthcare system in Phoenix, Arizona, United States, and comprised clinical and laboratory data of all hepatitis C patients treated between November 2002 and December 2006. The patients were clinically evaluated to determine whether they were candidates for treatment with pegylated interferon a-2a or a-2b plus ribavirin. Patients were given detailed orientation prior to the therapy, and were closely monitored during the treatment. RESULTS: Of the 295 patients, 179(60.7%) received pegylated interferon a-2b and ribavirin and 116(39.3%) received pegylated interferon a-2a and ribavirin. Overall, 202(68.47%) had genotype 1 and 93 (31.52%) had non-genotype 1. Age range was 35 to 66 years (mean 51±8.51 and Mean BMI was 28.2±4.22), and the majority was Caucasian males who served in the Vietnam era. The overall sustained virological response was 120(40.7%). CONCLUSIONS: High sustained virological response was achieved among the participants.


Assuntos
Hepatite C Crônica , Adulto , Idoso , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Hepatite C Crônica/sangue , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/epidemiologia , Hepatite C Crônica/virologia , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Profissionais de Enfermagem , Assistentes Médicos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Carga Viral
2.
Med Teach ; 30(6): e145-51, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18608964

RESUMO

AIMS: Disaster and bioterrorism preparedness is poorly integrated into the curricula of internal medicine residency programs. Given that victims may present to a variety of healthcare venues, including primary care practices, inpatient hospital wards, and intensive care units, we developed a curriculum to address this need. METHODS: The curriculum consisted of four didactic sessions with supplemental readings covering biologic, chemical, and radiologic agents, as well as public health infrastructure. All 30 internal medicine resident participants also underwent a four hour training seminar at a high fidelity human simulation center. Instruction included the use of personal protective equipment (PPE)and participation in simulated scenarios utilizing technologically sophisticated mannequins with monitoring and interactive capability. Sessions were videotaped, reviewed with participants, and followed by self-evaluation and constructive feedback. RESULTS: Compared to a control group of residents who did not undergo training, the participants' level of knowledge was significantly better, with mean objective test scores of 66.8%+/-11.8% SD vs. 50%+/-13.1% SD, p < 0.0001. Although there was a trend toward increasing knowledge with increasing level of training in the control group, this difference was not significant. Subjective preparedness was also significantly better in the intervention group (p < 0.0001). Objective improvements were not maintained after one year. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, a disaster-preparedness curriculum including simulation-based training had a positive effect on residents' knowledge base and ability to respond to disaster. However, this effect had diminished after one year, indicating the need for reinforcement at regular intervals.


Assuntos
Medicina de Desastres/educação , Planejamento em Desastres/métodos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Medicina Interna/educação , Bioterrorismo , Educação Baseada em Competências , Humanos , Internato e Residência , Simulação de Paciente , Projetos Piloto , Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas
3.
World J Gastrointest Endosc ; 7(5): 555-62, 2015 May 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25992195

RESUMO

AIM: To compare the yield of adenomas between narrow band imaging and white light when using high definition/magnification. METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized comparative study was performed at the endoscopy unit of veteran affairs medical center in Phoenix, Arizona. Consecutive patients undergoing first average risk colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy were selected. Two experienced gastroenterologists performed all the procedures that were blinded to each other's findings. Demographic details were recorded. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Proportional data were compared using the χ(2) test and means were compared using the Student's t test. Tandem colonoscopy was performed in a sequential and segmental fashion using one of 3 strategies: white light followed by narrow band imaging [Group A: white light (WL) → narrow band imaging (NBI)]; narrow band imaging followed by white light (Group B: NBI → WL) and, white light followed by white light (Group C: WL → WL). Detection rate of missed polyps and adenomas were evaluated in all three groups. RESULTS: Three hundred patients were studied (100 in each Group). Although the total time for the colonoscopy was similar in the 3 groups (23.8 ± 0.7, 22.2 ± 0.5 and 24.1 ± 0.7 min for Groups A, B and C, respectively), it reached statistical significance between Groups B and C (P < 0.05). The cecal intubation time in Groups B and C was longer than for Group A (6.5 ± 0.4 min and 6.5 ± 0.4 min vs 4.9 ± 0.3 min; P < 0.05). The withdrawal time for Groups A and C was longer than Group B (18.9 ± 0.7 min and 17.6 ± 0.6 min vs 15.7 ± 0.4 min; P < 0.05). Overall miss rate for polyps and adenomas detected in three groups during the second look was 18% and 17%, respectively (P = NS). Detection rate for polyps and adenomas after first look with white light was similar irrespective of the light used during the second look (WL → WL: 13.7% for polyps, 12.6% for adenomas; WL → NBI: 14.2% for polyps, 11.3% for adenomas). Miss rate of polyps and adenomas however was significantly higher when NBI was used first (29.3% and 30.3%, respectively; P < 0.05). Most missed adenomas were ≤ 5 mm in size. There was only one advanced neoplasia (defined by size only) missed during the first look. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the tandem nature of the procedure rather than the optical techniques was associated with the detection of additional polyps' and adenomas.

4.
J Interv Gastroenterol ; 2(2): 54-60, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23687586

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: EGD is the gold standard for the screening and surveillance of esophageal varices. A less invasive, safer and sedationless alternative procedure is needed. OBJECTIVE: To assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) as well as the beyond the chance agreement (kappa index), of string capsule endoscopy (SCE) in the diagnosis of esophageal varices. METHODS: Cirrhotic patients underwent string capsule endoscopy (SCE) and EGD for screening and surveillance purposes. Varices were graded at EGD and SCE as small, medium and large. Descriptors at SCE were added as follows: PLUS, for the presence of red wale signs or, MINUS for their absence, irrespective of the estimated variceal size. Clinically significant varices were defined by their size (medium/large at either EGD or SCE) and/or, the PLUS descriptor irrespective of the estimated size at SCE. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy and kappa index were calculated. Procedure time, procedure-related discomfort and patient's preference were documented. RESULTS: 100 patients (33 for screening and 67 for surveillance) were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity of SCE for clinically significant varices when using the PLUS/MINUS descriptors were 82% and 90%, respectively with a PPV of 84% and NPV of 89% and a kappa of 0.73. CONCLUSION: String capsule endoscopy had an acceptable sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of clinically significant esophageal varices but the lack of air insufflation still hampers its correlation with the grading used with EGD.

6.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 66(6): 1091-5, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18028926

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is a contraindication for the use of conventional capsule endoscopy (CE). Because string CE (SCE) allows for the immediate retrieval of the device, it eliminates the risk of capsule retention. OBJECTIVE: To assess the yield and safety of SCE in patients with dysphagia. DESIGN: Comparative study of SCE and EGD. SETTING: Phoenix Veteran Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Patients with dysphagia underwent SCE and EGD. RESULTS: In 40 patients with dysphagia, the EGD findings were normal in 13 (32.5%); Schatzki's ring in 10 (25%); esophageal tumors in 9 (22.5%), with 1 of these having 2 separate and distinct malignancies; erosive esophagitis in 4 (10%); strictures in 2 (5%); and a web and large esophageal varices in 1 patient each (2.5%). The sensitivity of SCE for diagnosing anatomic pathology as the likely cause of dysphagia was 92.9%, with a specificity of 92.3%, a positive predictive value of 96.3%, and negative predictive value of 85.7%. The overall agreement between SCE and EGD was 92.7% and the kappa index was 0.83. There were no complications with either procedure. There was no case of capsule retention. The SCE recording time was 385.8 seconds; 77.5% patients preferred SCE to EGD. CONCLUSIONS: (1) SCE was safe, well tolerated, and accurate for the diagnosis of pathology responsible for dysphagia; (2) SCE was preferred to EGD by more than three fourths of patients; (3) SCE can be safely performed in patients with dysphagia.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Deglutição/diagnóstico , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/diagnóstico , Esofagoscopia/métodos , Cápsulas , Desenho de Equipamento , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/classificação , Esôfago/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segurança , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA