Bladder preserving robotic pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer-technique and short-term outcomes.

AIM: In selected patients with advanced rectal cancers involving the prostate or seminal vesicles, the bladder can be preserved to avoid the complications associated with an ileal conduit. The study was aimed at reviewing the technique and short-term outcomes of patients that underwent bladder sparing robotic pelvic exenteration with suprapubic cystostomy (SPC). METHODS: Case series of bladder preserving exenteration from a single tertiary care center. Technique for en-bloc prostatectomy with abdominoperineal resection is described. RESULTS: Five patients underwent bladder sparing robotic pelvic exenteration with SPC, all had R0 resections. Four patients had prostatic invasion and one patient had prostatic adenocarcinoma. Postoperative complications were seen in three patients of which two were re-explored. At a median follow-up of 10 months, two patients developed systemic relapses. There were no local recurrences. CONCLUSION: Robotic bladder sparing exenteration is technically feasible, provides acceptable short-term outcomes, and avoids complications of ileal conduit.

Learning curves for minimally invasive total mesorectal excision beyond the competency phase - a risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis of 1000 rectal resections.

AIM: The learning curve of total mesorectal excision (TME) by minimally invasive surgery (MIS) beyond the competency phase has not been adequately reported with large numbers or using a statistical control limit. The aim of this work was to study the learning curve of MIS TME in the proficiency phase. METHOD: Risk-adjusted (RA) cumulative sum (CUSUM) and RA Bernoulli CUSUM charts were plotted for sequential MIS TME performed by a surgical team over 1000 cases. Surgical failure, a composite endpoint of conversions, complications of grade IIIA or above, R1 resections and inadequate nodal yield were used to monitor the performance. RESULTS: The RA CUSUM detected an inflection point around the 600th operation. Two peaks were identified that could be traced back to probable causes of surgical failure. Similar inflection points were detected at the 450th case for laparoscopic TME and the 367th case for sphincter preservation. No single definite threshold point was noticed for robotic or abdominoperineal operations. At no point did the curves cross the safety threshold. The probability of surgical failure reduced with increasing experience in the multivariate regression (OR 0.899, p = 0.000). This association persisted irrespective of the surgical approach (laparoscopic versus robotic) or the type of operation (sphincter preservation versus abdominoperineal resection). CONCLUSION: The learning curves for MIS TME did not cross the safety threshold beyond the competency phase. However, a 10% reduction of relative risk in surgical failure was observed for every 100 cases operated on.

Outcomes of rectal cancer patients with a positive pathological circumferential resection margin.

PURPOSE: Evidence-based management of positive pathological circumferential resection margin (pCRM) following preoperative radiation and an adequate rectal resection for rectal cancers is lacking. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained single-centre institutional database was done to study the patterns of failure and management strategies after a rectal cancer surgery with a positive pCRM. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma with a positive pCRM were identified over 8 years (2011-2018). Majority had low-lying rectal cancers (90.7%) and were operated after preoperative radiotherapy (95.3%). Operative procedures included abdomino-perineal resections, inter-sphincteric resections, low anterior resections and pelvic exenteration in 61 (70.9%), 9 (10.5%), 11(12.8%) and 5 (5.8%) patients respectively. A total of 83 (96.5%) received chemotherapy as the sole adjuvant treatment modality while 2 patients (2.3%) were given post-operative radiotherapy and 1 patient underwent revision surgery. A total of 53 patients (61.6%) had recurrence, with 16 (18.6%), 20 (23.2%), 8(9.3%) and 9 (10.5%) patients having locoregional, systemic, peritoneal and simultaneous local-systemic relapse. Systemic recurrences were more often detected either by surveillance in an asymptomatic patient (20.1%) while local (13.1%) and peritoneal (13.2%) recurrences were more often symptomatic (p = 0.000). The 2-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of the cohort was 82.4% and 74.0%. Median local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 10.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a positive pCRM have high local and distal relapse rates. Systemic relapses are more often asymptomatic as compared to peritoneal or locoregional relapse and detected on follow-up surveillance. Hence, identification of such recurrences while still salvageable via an intensive surveillance protocol is desirable.

Long-term oncological outcomes of the sphincter preserving total mesorectal excision with varying distal resection margins.

INTRODUCTION: A subcentimeter distal resection margin (DRM) appears to be acceptable for most patients, however, long-term follow up and specific subsets where DRM would influence recurrences have not been adequately investigated. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all sphincter-preserving resections for mid and low rectal cancers between July 2011 and May 2015 was performed. Extended total mesorectal excisions (TME) and patients with positive pathologic circumferential margins (CRM) were excluded. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-six patients fit the inclusion criteria. DRM > 20 mm was obtained in 117 patients (49.6%), between 10 and 20 mm in 78 (33%) and <10 mm in 41 (17.4%) patients. Pathological DRM was positive in 4 patients (1.7%). Sixty-five recurrences occurred at a median follow up of 78.5 months. DRM did not influence any of the oncological outcomes. In a subset analysis of patients with poor pathological response to neoadjuvant radiation, that is, tumor regression grade > 3, DRM influenced disease-free survival (DFS) but not overall survival with a hazard ratio of 4.4 (p = 0.02). This was confirmed on multivariate regression analysis in this subgroup as well where pathological nodal status and DRM < 10 mm were independent predictors of DFS. CONCLUSIONS: A subcentimeter DRM may be acceptable in most patients except those who have an inadequate response to neoadjuvant radiation.

Optimal neoadjuvant strategy for signet ring cell carcinoma of the rectum-Is TNT the solution?

INTRODUCTION: The results of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancers (LARC) cannot be extrapolated to signet-ring cell cancers (SRCC) that have an extremely aggressive biology. METHODS: A retrospective study comparing long course chemoradiation (CTRT) against short course radiation (SCRT) and 12 weeks of chemotherapy for high-risk LARC. Primary endpoints were treatment failure and disease-free survival (DFS) RESULTS: CTRT was given to 74 (59.7%) and SCRT/Chemotherapy to 50 patients (40.3%). Additional chemotherapy was required in 54.1% and 28%, respectively. Except for nodal staging, no other MRI parameter down-staged. Treatment failures were seen in 33.9% and 25.8% had progression. The peritoneum was the commonest site of progression (59.4%). Of the patients that were surgically explored, 63.7% had R0 resections and pathological complete response was seen in 9.7%. At a median follow-up of 35 months, 56.5% had DFS events with a 3-year DFS of 39.5%. Recurrences were noted in 45.1% after curative resections and the 3-year OS/DFS of these patients were 67.2%/56.4%. On multivariate regression, the type of preoperative therapy did not influence treatment failures or DFS. CONCLUSIONS: SRCC is a very aggressive disease and none of the treatment strategies could show superiority over the other with very high peritoneal progression rates and relapses.

State-of-the-art surgery for recurrent and locally advanced rectal cancers.

Extended and beyond total mesorectal excisions (TME) for advanced and recurrent rectal cancers are increasingly performed with acceptable oncological and functional outcomes. These are undoubtedly due to better understanding of tumor biology and improved patient selection rather than surgical valor and technical refinements alone. In the present review, we attempt to present the current surgical standards for advanced and recurrent cancers requiring surgery outside the TME planes based on involved pelvic compartments. The available procedures, their indications, and extent of resection and reconstruction are highlighted. Emphasis is on formation of dedicated exenteration teams, structured training, and referral systems that increase hospital and surgeon volume to improve patient outcomes and reduce morbidity. Areas of deficiencies in literature were recognized with regards to factors influencing recurrences, patient selection, and quality of life. Finally, the most appropriate preoperative therapy for these tumors is unclear in both the primary and recurrent settings.

Emergency Department Visits by Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients.

AIM: This study was conducted to assess the disease status of head-and-neck cancer patients visiting the emergency department (ED) and their reason for presentation. We wanted to analyze if these visits could be avoided by incorporating any changes in our clinical practice. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of head-and-neck cancer patients attending the ED at a tertiary care cancer center in 2017. Clinical details were noted from the electronic medical records, and descriptive statistics was calculated. The analysis was performed using SPSS version 21 software. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-nine head-and-neck cancer patients attended the ED. Of these, 80.2% were males and 48.1% of patients had oral cavity cancers. About 37.2% required palliative care treatment. Nearly, 47.2% of patients presented during their initial evaluation period. About 22.7% required hospital admission and only 14.7% required any sort of emergency intervention. CONCLUSION: Majority of visits to ED could have been avoided with better counseling of the patients and their attendants.