Evaluation of the Dementia Apraxia Test in Parkinson's Disease Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Ideomotor apraxia, a disorder of skilled movements affecting limbs and/or face, can be seen in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), yet tests of apraxia in PD are rare. The aim of this project was to evaluate the psychometric properties and validity of the Dementia Apraxia Test (DATE) in a PD sample. METHODS: 118 PD patients were included. Besides DATE performance, motor and non-motor burden, cognition, and activity of daily living (ADL) function were assessed. Patients were classified as cognitively impaired (n = 41) or non-cognitively impaired (n = 77). RESULTS: Interrater reliability of the DATE (sub-)scores between video ratings and on-site ratings by the investigator was good (0.81 ≤ rk ≤ 0.87). Items were mostly easy to perform, especially the buccofacial apraxia items, which had also low discriminatory power. DATE scores were associated with cognition and ADL function. DATE performance was confounded by motor impairment and patients' age; however, when analysed for both cognitive groups separately, the correlation between DATE and motor performance was not significant. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The DATE seems to be an objective and predominantly valid apraxia screening tool for PD patients, with a few items needing revision. Due to the potential effect of motor impairment and age, standardized scores adjusting for these confounders are needed.

Quantifying activities of daily living impairment in Parkinson's disease using the Functional Activities Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive-driven activity of daily living (ADL) impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD) is increasingly discussed as prodromal marker for dementia. Diagnostic properties of assessments for this specific ADL impairment are sparsely investigated in PD. The ability of the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) for differentiating between PD patients with normal cognition and with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI), according to informant and self-reports, was examined. Global cognitive function in groups with and without mild ADL impairment was compared according to different cut-offs. METHODS: Multicenter data of 589 patients of an international cohort (CENTRE-PD) were analyzed. Analyses were run separately for informant-rated and self-rated FAQ. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to define the optimal FAQ cut-off for PD-MCI (≥ 1), and groups were additionally split according to reported FAQ cut-offs for PD-MCI in the literature (≥ 3, ≥ 5). Binary logistic regressions examined the effect of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score in PD patients with and without mild ADL impairment. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-five (38.2%) patients were classified as PD-MCI. For all three cut-off values, sensitivity was moderate to low (< 0.55), but specificity was moderately high (> 0.54) with a tendency of higher values for self-reported deficits. For the self-report, the cut-off ≥ 3 showed a significant effect of the MoCA (B = - 0.31, p = 0.003), where FAQ ≥ 3 patients had worse cognition. No effect for group differences based on informant ratings was detected. CONCLUSION: Our data argue that self-reported ADL impairments assessed by the FAQ show a relation to the severity of cognitive impairment in PD.

Assessment of Cognitive-Driven Performance-Based Activities of Daily Living Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease.

OBJECTIVES: Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) have an increased risk of developing dementia (PDD). As activities of daily living (ADL) impairment is mandatory for the diagnosis of PDD, assessing early signs of instrumental ADL (iADL) dysfunction, especially in PD-MCI, is essential. In PD, self- and caregiver-reported iADL performance is often confounded by motor dysfunction and mood. Objective and time-efficient performance-based measurements are needed to screen for cognitive-related iADL dysfunction. We evaluated the Erlangen Test of Activities of Daily Living in Mild Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment (ETAM) in PD and determined its value for characterizing a subgroup of PD-MCI patients with mild performance-based iADL impairment. METHODS: Twenty-one cognitively normal PD patients (PD-NC), 24 PD-MCI patients, and 18 healthy controls (HC) were analyzed. Assessments included the ETAM, a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery, iADL, mood, and motor measurements. RESULTS: PD-MCI patients scored significantly lower on the ETAM total score compared to PD-NC patients (p = .002), whereas HC and PD-NC patients did not statistically differ. No HC scored lower than 27 points (diagnostic cutoff for mild iADL impairment); only PD-MCI patients scored below this cutoff (29.2%) suggesting the ETAM is able to characterize a PD-MCI subgroup with early iADL impairment. PD-MCI patients below the cutoff were more impaired in the attention domain (p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The ETAM is a potentially valuable clinical assessment, able to detect first signs of iADL dysfunction in PD-MCI. Further studies in larger cohorts are needed to evaluate the prognostic ability for predicting PDD.

Home-Based Physical Behavior in Late Stage Parkinson Disease Dementia: Differences between Cognitive Subtypes.

BACKGROUND: For the early diagnosis of Parkinson disease dementia (PDD), objective home-based tools are needed to quantify even mild stages of dysfunction of the activities of daily living (ADL). OBJECTIVES: In this pilot study, home-based physical behavior was assessed to examine whether it is possible to distinguish mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) from PDD. METHODS: Fifty-five patients with mild to severe Parkinson disease (PD) participated in this cross-sectional study. Based on comprehensive neuropsychological testing, PD patients were classified as cognitively nonimpaired (PD-NC), PD-MCI or PDD. For physical behavior assessments, patients wore the accelerometer DynaPort® (McRoberts) for 3 days. Ordinal logistic regression models with continuous Y were applied to correct results for motor impairment and depressive symptoms. RESULTS: After excluding 7 patients due to insufficient wearing time, 48 patients with a mean of 2 recorded days were analyzed (17 PD-NC, 22 PD-MCI, 9 PDD). ADL-impaired PDD patients showed fewer sedentary bouts than non-ADL-impaired PD-MCI (p = 0.01, odds ratio [OR] = 8.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.8-45.2) and PD-NC (p = 0.01, OR = 10.3, CI = 1.6-67.3) patients, as well as a longer sedentary bout length (PD-NC: p = 0.02, OR = 0.1, CI = 0.02-0.65; PD-MCI: p = 0.02, OR = 0.14, CI = 0.03-0.69). These differences were mainly caused by fewer (PD-NC: p = 0.02, OR = 9.6, CI = 1.5-62.4; PD-MCI: p = 0.01, OR = 8.5, CI = 1.5-37.3) but longer sitting bouts (PD-NC: p = 0.03, OR = 0.12, CI = 0.02-0.80; PD-MCI: p = 0.04, OR = 0.19, CI = 0.04-0.93). Tests assessing executive function, visuoconstruction and attention correlated significantly with specific activity parameters (ρ ≥ 0.3; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Objective assessment of physical behavior, in particular the detection of sedentary bouts, is a promising contributor to the discrimination between PD-MCI and PDD.

Multidomain cognitive training increases physical activity in people with Parkinson's disease with mild cognitive impairment.

INTRODUCTION: Cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD), especially in patients with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI), coincides with less physical activity. Cognitive trainings (CT) have been found to promote laboratory environment-based movement. Knowledge about their effect in natural home-based environment, reflecting everyday function, is sparse. This explorative study investigated short-term effects of CT on physical activity assessed by home-based accelerometry, and its relation to change of cognitive function over time and non-cognitive outcomes in patients with PD-MCI. Cognitive and non-cognitive correlates of movement parameters at pretest were evaluated as well. METHODS: Eighteen patients with PD-MCI of the TrainParC study were analyzed. Those patients received either a 6-week multidomain group CT or physical training (PT). Physical activity and sedentary behavior were assessed with wearable accelerometers worn up to seven days pre- and post-training. RESULTS: Patients in the CT group displayed significantly greater increases in active periods after training than patients assigned to PT. In the CT group, increases in executive functioning were associated with increases in active periods and decreases in active mean bout length after training. At pretest, reduced working memory correlated with longer sedentary mean bout length, and impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) correlated with a higher number of sedentary periods. CONCLUSION: Study data revealed that CT can increase physical activity in patients with PD-MCI, possibly due to effects on executive functions, which needs further investigation in larger sample sizes. Lower working memory performance and ADL impairment might be associated with a more inactive lifestyle in patients with PD-MCI.

Exploration of whether socioeconomic factors affect the results of priority setting partnerships: updating the top 10 research priorities for the management of Parkinson's in an international setting.

OBJECTIVES: Explore whether socioeconomic differences of patients affect the prioritisation of pre-existing research questions and explore the agreement between healthcare professionals (HCP) and patients in priority setting partnerships (PSPs). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, three centre survey across UK (400 participants), Tuebingen (176 participants) and Luxembourg (303 participants). People with Parkinson's (PwP), research participants, relatives and HCP associated with three Parkinson's cohort studies were invited to participate, along with linked centres (clinical care settings, research groups, charities). Responders were encouraged to pass on the survey to friends/families/carers. METHODS: The survey involved rating the importance of research questions on a Likert scale, allowing for the generation of one new question participants felt was particularly important. Collection of demographic information allowed for comparisons of priorities across a range of socioeconomic variables; the top 10 research priorities for each group were then compared. Questions added by participants were subject to a thematic analysis. RESULTS: 879 participants completed the survey (58% PwP, 22% family/friends, 13% HCP, 4% carers). Finding the best form of physiotherapy for PwP was the number one priority across the majority of analyses. HCP were the only subgroup not to place physiotherapy in the top 10. Factors most likely to affect prioritisation in PwP included educational level, presence of carer support and disease duration. There was little difference between other socioeconomic categories. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic factors modestly influenced some research priority ratings but did not significantly affect the top priority in most comparisons. Future studies must ensure patients from a range of socioeconomic backgrounds are recruited, ensuring results generalisable to the public while also identifying any key disparities in prioritisation. PSP should also take care that HCP do not skew results during prioritisation of questions, as in this study the most important priority to patients was not identified by professionals.

The CCAS-scale in hereditary ataxias: helpful on the group level, particularly in SCA3, but limited in individual patients.

BACKGROUND: A brief bedside test has recently been introduced by Hoche et al. (Brain, 2018) to screen for the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome (CCAS) in patients with cerebellar disease. OBJECTIVE: This multicenter study tested the ability of the CCAS-Scale to diagnose CCAS in individual patients with common forms of hereditary ataxia. METHODS: A German version of the CCAS-Scale was applied in 30 SCA3, 14 SCA6 and 20 FRDA patients, and 64 healthy participants matched for age, sex, and level of education. Based on original cut-off values, the number of failed test items was assessed, and CCAS was considered possible (one failed item), probable (two failed items) or definite (three failed items). In addition a total sum raw score was calculated. RESULTS: On a group level, failed items were significantly higher and total sum scores were significantly lower in SCA3 patients compared to matched controls. SCA6 and FRDA patients performed numerically below controls, but respective group differences failed to reach significance. The ability of the CCAS-Scale to diagnose CCAS in individual patients was limited to severe cases failing three or more items. Milder cases failing one or two items showed a great overlap with the performance of controls exhibiting a substantial number of false-positive test results. The word fluency test items differentiated best between patients and controls. CONCLUSIONS: As a group, SCA3 patients performed below the level of SCA6 and FRDA patients, possibly reflecting additional cerebral involvement. Moreover, the application of the CCAS-Scale in its present form results in a high number of false-positive test results, that is identifying controls as patients, reducing its usefulness as a screening tool for CCAS in individual patients.

Everyday Function in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

BACKGROUND: Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) impairment can begin in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and is the core criteria for diagnosing dementia in both Alzheimer's (AD) and Parkinson's (PD) diseases. The Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) has high discriminative power for dementia and MCI in older age populations, but is influenced by demographic factors. It is currently unclear whether the FAQ is suitable for assessing cognitive-associated IADL in non-demented PD patients, as motor disorders may affect ratings. OBJECTIVE: To compare IADL profiles in MCI patients with PD (PD-MCI) and AD (AD-MCI) and to verify the discriminative ability of the FAQ for MCI in patients with (PD-MCI) and without (AD-MCI) additional motor impairment. METHODS: Data of 42 patients each of PD-MCI, AD-MCI, PD cognitively normal (PD-CN), and healthy controls (HC), matched according to age, gender, education, and global cognitive impairment were analyzed. ANCOVA and binary regressions were used to examine the relationship between the FAQ scores and groups. FAQ cut-offs for PD-MCI (versus PD-NC) and AD-MCI (versus HC) were separately identified using receiver operating characteristic analyses. RESULTS: FAQ total score did not differentiate between MCI groups. PD-MCI subjects had greater difficulties with tax records and traveling while AD-MCI individuals were more impaired in managing finances and remembering appointments. Classification accuracy of the FAQ was good for diagnosing AD-MCI (69%, cut-off ≥1) compared to HC, and sufficient for differentiating PD-MCI (38.1%, cut-off ≥3) from PD-CN. CONCLUSION: The FAQ task profiles and classification accuracy differed between MCI related to PD and AD.

Cognitive impairment and sedentary behavior predict health-related attrition in a prospective longitudinal Parkinson's disease study.

INTRODUCTION: In Parkinson's disease (PD), the high burden of motor and non-motor symptoms, such as cognitive impairment or falls, is associated with rapid disease progression and mortality. This is often reflected by an increased drop-out rate of PD patients in longitudinal studies. Active physical behavior can impact the disease course beneficially and has an overall positive effect on health. Contrarily, sedentary behavior is associated with cognitive impairment in PD. The aim of this study was to investigate whether sedentary physical behavior assessed in the home environment and cognitive impairment can predict health-related study attrition due to sickness and death in PD. METHODS: Data of 45 PD patients, longitudinally assessed, were analyzed. Of those, 20 patients completed six yearly visits, 16 dropped out due to sickness or death, and nine for other reasons. All patients wore a mobile device to assess physical behavior and completed cognitive testing. RESULTS: Logistic regression revealed global cognition was the primary predictor for health-related drop-out in varying models (p ≤ .04). In the survival analysis, cognitive impairment (p = .005) and longer sedentary mean bout length (p = .02) were associated with drop-out due to sickness and death. The occurrence of health-related study drop-out or death was highest in patients with both impaired cognition and longer sedentary bouts. CONCLUSIONS: Cognition was the primary predictor for study drop-out due to sickness and death. However, it seems that sedentary behavior might have a potential negative influence on PD patients' health, especially those with cognitive impairment.

Motor cortical excitability and paired-associative stimulation-induced plasticity in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

OBJECTIVE: Synaptopathy including alterations of synaptic plasticity (long-term potentiation, LTP) may precede neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease (AD). We studied LTP-like corticospinal plasticity induced by paired-associative stimulation (PASLTP) in AD and its prodromal stage, amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). METHODS: 15 AD and 15 aMCI patients, and 23 demographically matched healthy controls (HC) were included. Resting motor threshold (RMT) and stimulus intensity needed to evoke motor evoked potentials (MEP) of 1 mV (SI1mV) were obtained as single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures of corticospinal excitability in a hand muscle at baseline, followed by PASLTP using standard methodology. MEP amplitude change after PASLTP normalized to baseline was defined as plasticity effect. All measures were repeated in two visits for examining test-retest reliability. RESULTS: SI1mV were lower in aMCI compared to HC, while there was no difference between AD and HC. RMT and SI1mV showed excellent test-retest reliability in all groups. PASLTP indiscriminately did not induce LTP-like plasticity in any of the groups, and expressed poor test-retest reliability. CONCLUSIONS: aMCI shows corticospinal hyperexcitability, consistent with glutamatergic excitotoxicity in early-stage AD. Possible abnormalities of LTP-like plasticity could not be reliably tested with the standard PASLTP protocol due to massive inter-subject variability even in HC, and poor test-retest reliability. SIGNIFICANCE: Findings indicate corticospinal hyperexcitability in prodromal AD, and reliability of single-pulse TMS measures for identifying such abnormality. In contrast, the standard PASLTP protocol may not be suitable for assessing LTP-like motor cortical plasticity, given its overall nil effect and poor test-retest reliability.

Screen Fast, Screen Faster: A Pilot Study to Screen for Depressive Symptoms Using the Beck Depression Inventory Fast Screen in Parkinson's Disease With Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Objective: Depressive symptoms have a high prevalence in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and are associated with cognitive dysfunction. Especially in PD with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a time-efficient and valid instrument for the assessment of depression primarily focusing on psychological symptoms and disregarding confounding somatic symptoms is needed. We performed an examination of the psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) and the Beck Depression Inventory Fast Screen (BDI-FS). Methods: The sample consisted of 64 patients [22 females and 42 males, mean age: 67.27 years (SD = 7.32)]. Depressive symptoms were measured in a cohort of PD patients with MCI. For the BDI-II and BDI-FS the psychometric concepts of internal consistency, convergent validity and diagnostic agreement were assessed. Results: Patients gave higher ratings on test items addressing somatic symptoms than those addressing non-somatic ones. The correlation between the absolute total scores of the BDI-II and the BDI-FS was significant (r = 0.91, p < 0.001), which indicated convergent validity. The Cronbach's alpha values indicated adequate internal consistencies for both measures (BDI-II: 0.84; BDI-FS: 0.78). There was a higher than chance level agreement of diagnoses of the two questionnaires, measured by Cohen's kappa (0.58, p < 0.001). The agreements between previous diagnosis of depression and the diagnoses of the BDI-II/BDI-FS were also significantly higher than chance level (BDI-II: 0.34, p = 0.007, BDI-FS: 0.39, p = 0.002). Additional AUC analysis across different cutoffs showed that performance of BDI-FS was better than BDI-II, supporting the observation of an equivalent or better performance of BDI-FS than BDI-II. Importantly, AUC analysis confirmed that a cutoff = 4 for BDI-FS was suitable in the considered sample of patients with PD-MCI. Discussion: In a cohort of PD-MCI, the BDI-FS demonstrates adequate psychometric properties in comparison to the BDI-II and can be used as a screening measure for assessing depression in cognitively impaired PD patients, focusing solely on psychological symptoms. Still, further research is needed to validate this instrument.

Memory enhancement by multidomain group cognitive training in patients with Parkinson's disease and mild cognitive impairment: long-term effects of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses indicate positive effects of cognitive training (CT) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), however, most previous studies had small sample sizes and did not evaluate long-term follow-up. Therefore, a multicenter randomized controlled, single-blinded trial (Train-ParC study) was conducted to examine CT effects in PD patients with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI). Immediately after CT, an enhancement of executive functions was demonstrated. Here, we present the long-term results 6 and 12 months after CT. METHODS: At baseline, 64 PD-MCI patients were randomized to a multidomain CT group (n = 33) or to a low-intensity physical activity training control group (PT) (n = 31). Both interventions included 90 min training sessions twice a week for 6 weeks. 54 patients completed the 6 months (CT: n = 28, PT: n = 26) and 49 patients the 12 months follow-up assessment (CT: n = 25, PT: n = 24). Primary study outcomes were memory and executive functioning composite scores. Mixed repeated measures ANOVAs, post-hoc t tests and multiple regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: We found a significant time x group interaction effect for the memory composite score (p = 0.006, η2 = 0.214), but not for the executive composite score (p = 0.967, η2 = 0.002). Post-hoc t tests revealed significant verbal and nonverbal memory improvements from pre-intervention to 6 months, but not to 12 months follow-up assessment in the CT group. No significant predictors were found for predicting memory improvement after CT. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides Class 1 evidence that multidomain CT enhances memory functioning in PD-MCI after 6 months but not after 12 months, whereas executive functioning did not change in the long-term. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (ID: DRKS00010186), 21.3.2016 (The study registration is outlined as retrospective due to an administrative delay. The first patient was enrolled three months after the registration process was started. A formal confirmation of this process from the German Clinical Trials Register can be obtained from the authors.).

A time-efficient screening tool for activities of daily living functions in Parkinson's disease dementia.

INSTRUCTION: In Parkinson's disease (PD), activities of daily living (ADL) impairments are crucial for diagnosis of dementia (PDD). Performance-based tests are promising tools to discriminate between different levels of cognitive impairment in PD; however, the value of those tests for diagnosis of PDD is only sparsely investigated. Therefore, we evaluated the Erlangen Test of Activities of Daily Living (E-ADL), a time-efficient performance-based ADL test, in PD. METHOD: In this cross-sectional study, 40 PD patients with normal cognition (PD-NC), 45 patients with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) and 21 patients with PDD were assessed with a comprehensive ADL and cognitive test battery. RESULTS: Interrater reliability (rs =.86) indicated high consistency of the standardized E-ADL scoring system between raters. The E-ADL correlated significantly with other tests of ADL functions (p <.01), highest with an alternative performance-based ADL test (rs = -.52), and lowest with self-ratings and a physician-rated scale. The E-ADL was also associated with cognitive impairment (p <.01), but also with motor impairment. A binary logistic regression model verified that the E-ADL (p =.04) was an independent predictor of PDD, in addition to motor impairment explaining 53.3% of variance. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the E-ADL revealed an area under the curve of 0.78, a specificity of 77%, and a sensitivity of 67% for diagnosis PDD. CONCLUSIONS: The standardized, easy, and quick to administer E-ADL showed acceptable levels of reliability, and validity in PD and measures cognitive-driven ADL functions. Therefore, it might be a suitable test to support diagnosis of PDD in the clinical daily routine.

Enhancement of Executive Functions but Not Memory by Multidomain Group Cognitive Training in Patients with Parkinson's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses have demonstrated cognitive training (CT) benefits in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. However, the patients' cognitive status has only rarely been based on established criteria. Also, prediction analyses of CT success have only sparsely been conducted. OBJECTIVE: To determine CT effects in PD patients with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) on cognitive and noncognitive outcomes compared to an active control group (CG) and to analyze CT success predictors. METHODS: Sixty-four PD-MCI patients (age: 67.61 ± 7.70; UPDRS-III: 26.58 ± 13.54; MoCA: 24.47 ± 2.78) were randomized to either a CT group or a low-intensity physical activity CG for six weeks (twice weekly, 90 minutes). Outcomes were assessed before and after training. MANOVAs with follow-up ANOVAs and multiple regression analyses were computed. RESULTS: Both interventions were highly feasible (participation, motivation, and evaluation); the overall dropout rate was 4.7%. Time × group interaction effects favoring CT were observed for phonemic fluency as a specific executive test (p=0.018, η p 2=0.092) and a statistical trend for overall executive functions (p=0.095, η p 2=0.132). A statistical trend for a time × group interaction effect favoring CG was shown for the digit span backward as a working memory test (p=0.098, η p 2=0.043). Regression analyses revealed cognitive baseline levels, education, levodopa equivalent daily dose, motor scores, and ApoE status as significant predictors for CT success. CONCLUSIONS: CT is a safe and feasible therapy option in PD-MCI, yielding executive functions improvement. Data indicate that vulnerable individuals may show the largest cognitive gains. Longitudinal studies are required to determine whether CT may also attenuate cognitive decline in the long term. This trial is registered with DRKS00010186.

Executive Function Is Related to the Urinary Urgency in Non-demented Patients With Parkinson's Disease.

Introduction: Evidence suggests urinary urgency is associated with cognitive impairment in a subtype of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. This study investigates if cognitive impairment independently predicts the presence of urinary dysfunction. Methods: We report data of 189 idiopathic PD patients, excluding those with concomitant diseases or medication interacting with bladder function. A standardized questionnaire was used to define the presence of urinary urgency. All patients underwent a comprehensive motor, cognitive non-motor and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent variables characterizing urinary urgency in PD (PD-UU), which were assigned as discriminant features to estimate their individual contribution to the phenotype of the PD-UU group. Results: Of 189 PD patients, 115 (60.8%) reported PD-UU. The linear regression analysis showed that among cognitive domains, executive function (EF; p = 0.04) had a significant negative association with PD-UU. In a second model, scores of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) significantly differentiated between study groups (p = 0.007) and also non-motor symptom (NMS) burden (p < 0.001). The third model consisted of reports of HRQoL, of which stigma was the only subscale of the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) differentiating between patients with and without PD-UU (p = 0.02). The linear discriminant analysis provided evidence that the combination of EF, NMS burden, nocturia, and stigma discriminated between groups with 72.4% accuracy. Conclusion: In our large, non-demented PD cohort, urinary urgency was associated with executive dysfunction (EF), supporting a possible causative link between both symptoms. A combination of neuropsychological and non-motor aspects identified patients with PD-UU with high discriminative accuracy.

Association of cognitive activities of daily living (ADL) function and nonmotor burden in nondemented Parkinson's disease patients.

OBJECTIVE: In Parkinson's disease (PD), nonmotor symptoms (NMS) considerably influence disease progression and cognitive decline. Depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances, and hallucinations (DASH), may indicate a risk for dementia (PDD). Mild impairments in activities of daily living (ADL) caused by cognitive dysfunction are also present in the prodromal stage of PDD. The association of both factors has been sparsely investigated. Aim was to evaluate these specific NMS in a large nondemented PD cohort and their co-occurrence with cognitive dysfunction and ADL impairments. METHOD: Data of 226 PD patients was analyzed. Using corresponding items, two DASH scores were constructed from the NMS-Scale and Parkinson's disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39). Correlations between DASH scores and PDD risk factors were examined. PD patients with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) were additionally split into patients with low and high DASH burden, the latter group additionally stratified by presence of cognitive-driven ADL impairment. RESULTS: DASH-NMS scores differed significantly between PD-MCI and cognitively normal (PD-CN) patients (p = .04), while the DASH-PDQ did not (p = .73). The only significant predictor of the DASH-NMS score was cognitive-driven ADL (p = .01). PD-MCI patients with a high DASH burden and more cognitive ADL impairment presented with worse global cognition than patients with a low burden (p = .045). CONCLUSION: Our results show that the DASH-NMS is superior to the DASH-PDQ score, related to the severity of cognitive impairment, and strongly influenced by cognitive-driven ADL impairment. Presence of DASH symptoms and cognitive-ADL in PD-MCI patients may define a risk group for PDD conversion. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Validation of a German version of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/ Schmahmann Syndrome Scale: preliminary version and study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, cerebellar disorders including ataxias have been associated with deficits in motor control and motor learning. Since the 1980's growing evidence has emerged that cerebellar diseases also impede cognitive and affective processes such as executive and linguistic functions, visuospatial abilities and regulation of emotion and affect. This combination of non-motor symptoms has been named Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/ Schmahmann Syndrome (CCAS). To date, diagnosis relies on non-standardized bedside cognitive examination and, if available, detailed neuropsychological test batteries. Recently, a short and easy applicable bedside test (CCAS Scale) has been developed to screen for CCAS. It has been validated in an US-American cohort of adults with cerebellar disorders and healthy controls. As yet, the CCAS Scale has only been available in American English. We present a German version of the scale and the study protocol of its ongoing validation in a German-speaking patient cohort. METHODS: A preliminary German version has been created from the original CCAS Scale using a standardized translation procedure. This version has been pre-tested in cerebellar patients and healthy controls including medical experts and laypersons to ensure that instructions are well understandable, and that no information has been lost or added during translation. This preliminary German version will be validated in a minimum of 65 patients with cerebellar disease and 65 matched healthy controls. We test whether selectivity and sensitivity of the German CCAS Scale is comparable to the original CCAS Scale using the same cut-off values for each of the test items, and the same pass/ fail criteria to determine the presence of CCAS. Furthermore, internal consistency, test-retest and interrater reliability will be evaluated. In addition, construct validity will be tested in a subset of patients and controls in whom detailed neuropsychological testing will be available. Secondary aims will be examination of possible correlations between clinical features (e.g. disease duration, clinical ataxia scores) and CCAS scores. PERSPECTIVE: The overall aim is to deliver a validated bedside test to screen for CCAS in German-speaking patients which can also be used in future natural history and therapeutic trials. STUDY REGISTRATION: The study is registered at the German Clinical Study Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00016854).

Validation of a novel Montreal Cognitive Assessment scoring algorithm in non-demented Parkinson's disease patients.

INTRODUCTION: The early diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is essential as it increases the future risk for PD dementia (PDD). Recently, a novel weighting algorithm for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) subtests has been reported, to best discriminate between those with and without cognitive impairment in PD. The aim of our study was to validate this scoring algorithm in a large sample of non-demented PD patients, hypothesizing that the weighted MoCA would have a higher diagnostic accuracy for PD-MCI than the original MoCA. METHODS: In 202 non-demented PD patients, we evaluated cognitive status, clinical and demographic data, as well as the MoCA with a weighted and unweighted score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate discriminative ability of the MoCA. Group comparisons and ROC analysis were performed for PD-MCI classifications with a cut-off ≤ 1, 1.5, and 2 standard deviation (SD) below appropriate norms. RESULTS: PD-MCI patients scored lower on the weighted than the original MoCA version (p < 0.001) compared to PD patients with normal cognitive function. Areas under the curve only differed significantly for the 2 SD cut-off, leading to an increased sensitivity of the weighted MoCA score (72.9% vs. 70.5%) and specificity compared to the original version (79.0% vs. 65.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate better discriminant power for the weighted MoCA compared to the original for more advanced stages of PD-MCI (2 SD cut-off). Future studies are needed to evaluate the predictive value of the weighted MoCA for PDD.