[Survival benefits of chemotherapy for unresectable biliary tract cancer--a multicenter retrospective analysis].

There is no agreement on the standard chemotherapeutic regimen for biliary tract cancer(BTC), although multi-drug regimens such as gemcitabine and/or S-1 have been tested in clinical trials. This study retrospectively reviewed data from patients with BTC who were seen at hospitals in the Kitakyushu and Fukuoka areas between 2005 and 2006, and examined the effect of systemic chemotherapy regimen on survival benefits in patients with unresectable BTC. Chemotherapy may benefit patients with BTC any age group, regardless of the primary site.

[A case of advanced pancreatic cancer responding to combination chemotherapy with the individual maximum repeatable dose of gemcitabine and oral S-1].

The patient was a 70-year-old man with metastatic pancreatic cancer. After he received combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oral S-1 on day 1, he experienced severe general fatigue, anorexia and nausea. Then we changed the dose of gemcitabine from 1,000 mg/m(2) 2 to 500 mg/m(2) according to the criteria for an individual maximum repeatable dose (iMRD) determination method on day 8. His general condition recovered, and treatment schedule of gemcitabine with S-1 was continued sequentially at an outpatient clinic. His tumor marker levels, and the sizes of primary pancreatic tumor and liver metastatic lesions remarkably decreased. Partial response has been obtained for 7 months.

[Phase I/II study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and UFT for advanced pancreatic cancer in a multi-center trial].

The aim of this phase I/II study was to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine (GEM) and UFT for advanced pancreatic cancer. In phase I study UFT was given orally every day for 14 days and GEM was infused on day 1 and 8 at three dose levels (800, 900, 1,000 mg/m(2)/week) every 21 days. GEM 1,000 mg/m(2) and UFT 400 mg/m(2) did not reach the maximum tolerated dose. We decided that the recommended dose (RD) was GEM 1,000 mg/m(2)and UFT 400 mg/m(2). In phase II study 27 patients were enrolled and received GEM and UFT at RD. The tumor response rate was 17.6%, and the median survival was 221 days, which was very similar to that of GEM monotherapy. Due to adverse events, especially liver dysfunction, protocol therapy was discontinued in 12 patients. This study could not revealed the superiority of the GEM monotherapy.

[Present and future home therapy in advanced stage of pancreatic cancer].

We describe the present and future directions of home therapy in pancreatic cancer patients according to the chemotherapy and best supportive care. Chemotherapy in an outpatient clinic is widely supported by the use of gemcitabine, and useful because of mild adverse effect, good clinical benefit response and survival benefit. Since there is no secondary chemotherapy agent after gemcitabine treatment failure, best supportive care is essential. Control of blood glucose level, ascites and pain are also important. Now pain control and home therapy are easy to perform because of the development of various useful opioid agents.

[Two cases of advanced pancreatic cancer with cervical lymph node or liver metastasis responding well to S-1 monotherapy].

In two patients with advanced pancreatic cancer with cervical lymph node or liver metastasis and no indication of pancreatic resection and radiotherapy, oral treatment with S-1 (an anti-cancer agent of fluoropyrimidine derivative) exerted high anti-tumor activity on the metastatic lesions. Both cases responded well to this therapy in the late phase II study of S-1 in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer designed to evaluate efficacy and safety. In Case 1 (with cervical lymph node metastasis), the anti-tumor efficacy of this therapy was evaluated as a partial response (PR) after the first four courses of treatment. In Case 2 (with liver metastasis), the efficacy was evaluated as PR for overall response. Thus, the therapy indicated excellent efficacy in both cases. No grade 3 or severe adverse event was noted in either of the two cases. In Case 1, grade 2 anemia, stomatitis, vomiting and fatigue, and some other mild events were noted. When used as a systemic chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer, oral treatment of S-1 is highly effective, tolerable and convenient in an outpatient clinic. This drug is a promising way to improve and preserve the QOL essential to long-term home care.

[Tailored-dose chemotherapy using gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer].

Eighteen patients with metastatic or post-surgery recurrent pancreatic cancer were given weekly gemcitabine therapy. Almost all of these patients were aged or had other complications. We determined the individualized maximum repeatable dose (iMRD)as follows. We started at 500 mg/m(2) gemcitabine and repeated the treatment with an increase or a decrease of 100mg/m(2) each week, if the hematological toxicity was 0 or more than grade 1. If toxicity was grade 1, the same dose was given. And the third-week dose was an iMRD. Dose intensity was 286 mg/m(2)/week. The median survival time was 262 days. Of these 18 patients, 2 (11.1%), 11(61.1%) and 5 (27.8%) patients showed partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. The therapeutic effects of iMRD equaled those of standard administration of gemcitabine.

[A case of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with rapid progress in a young man].

A 17-year-old man was admitted to hospital because of epigastric pain. Various imaging studies showed a solid tumor (4cm in diameter) in the tail of the pancreas, multiple hypovascular tumors in liver. Serum levels of DUPAN2, SPAN1 and NSE were elevated slightly. Biopsy of hepatic tumor demonstrated that tumor cells had eosinophilic cytoplasm generally and unevenly distributed polymorphic nucleus. These data suggested that this tumor is poorly differentiated pancreatic carcinoma originated from the epithelium. Therefore, we administered 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin, combined with gemcitabine. The clinical status improved temporarily by the treatment, however, worsened rapidly. He died 81days after the treatment. Final diagnosis of autopsy was pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the young patients is rare, and we reported this case in addition to consideration on literature.

Laminin gamma2-chain fragment circulating level increases in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal cell adenocarcinomas.

Laminin-5 (LN5) is expressed solely by epithelial cells and considered to enhance cell migration after being cleaved by proteases, leading to the shedding of the N-terminal fragment of the LN5 gamma2-chain (G2F). We estimated circulating G2F level in 181 patients with various digestive diseases and 15 healthy subjects. The G2F level in pancreatic ductal cell adenocarcinoma patients with liver metastases was markedly elevated, but that in patients without liver metastases was not significantly elevated. The G2F levels in patients with benign pancreatic tumours (pancreatic cysts and intraductal papillary mucinous tumours) were similar to that in healthy volunteers. On the other hand, the level of the gamma1-chain is a common constituent of several laminin heterotrimers. The N-terminal fragment of gamma1-chain (G1F) in the circulation of these patients was also determined, and a slight increase in G1F levels was observed only in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Interestingly, a significant increase in circulating G2F/G1F ratio was observed in patients with bile duct and gallbladder carcinoma, as well as in those with metastatic pancreatic ductal cell adenocarcinoma. The increase in the circulating G2F level, particularly compared with circulating G1F level, should correlated with LN5 overexpression in invasive carcinomas, independently of basement membrane metabolism in the entire body.

The time course of gap-junctional protein connexin 32 expression in the pancreas after the induction of acute pancreatitis by caerulein in rats.

BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that the immunostaining of the gap-junction protein, connexin 32 (Cx 32), in the pancreas was markedly reduced in caerulein (Cn)-induced acute pancreatitis. The expression of Cx 32 in the pancreas during the course of acute pancreatitis is unclear. To address this, we examined Cx 32 mRNA and protein expression in the pancreas. METHODS: Cx 32 mRNA and protein expression in the pancreas was examined by Northern blot analysis and Western blot analysis, respectively, 1, 4, 7, and 14 days after the induction of acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: Cx 32 mRNA was identified in normal rat pancreas, and the value for the relative intensity against 18S rRNA was 0.57 +/- 0.15 (mean +/- SD). After the induction of acute pancreatitis by caerulein, the Cx 32 mRNA expression levels were increased on day 1, day 4, day 7, and day 14 compared with levels in the normal pancreas (1.63-fold, 1.61-fold, 1.49-fold, and 1.35-fold, respectively). A significant increase in Cx 32 protein expression was detected on day 1 and day 4 (1.67 +/- 0.15-fold and 1.72 +/- 0.2-fold, respectively), while Cx 32-positive spots, determined by immunohistochemical analysis, were markedly decreased on day 1 and had returned to normal by day 14. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the expression of Cx 32 increases early on after the induction of pancreatitis by Cn, and that the normalization of Cx 32-immunostained spots in Cn-induced acute pancreatitis occurs after the increase in Cx 32 mRNA and protein expression.

[A case of recurrent early gastric cancer with peritonitis carcinomatosa successfully treated with TS-1].

A 62-year-old man with carcinomatous ascites more than 5 years after early gastric cancer operation was admitted to our hospital because of suspected pancreatic cancer, and was diagnosed with a relapse of the gastric cancer. TS-1 was administered at a dose of 120 mg/day. At the end of 1 course a partial response of a decrease of tumor markers and ascites and improvement of QOL was achieved, and the patient was followed in the outpatient clinic. The current case suggests that TS-1 may have a potent therapeutic efficacy in cases of gastric cancer relapse with carcinomatous ascites.

[A case of advanced gastric cancer successfully treated with TS-1].

A patient with advanced gastric cancer complicated with liver and lymph node metastases was successfully treated with a novel oral anticancer drug, TS-1, TS-1 was administered at a dose of 100 mg/day. One course consisted of consecutive administration of TS-1 for 28 days and withdrawal for 14 days. At the end of 3 courses a partial response of the liver metastases was achieved. Although the patient has had complications with ascites collection due to hypoalbuminemia, he has been well without regrowth of any metastases for over 8 months.

[Multi-center trial of gemcitabine for 49 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer].

Forty-nine patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (stage IV disease) received gemcitabine in a multi-center trial in the Fukuoka pancreatic cancer chemotherapy group, Japan. No complete remissions, 5 partial remissions (10%) and 25 no changes (51%) were obtained. Gemcitabine could maintain QOL. Main toxicities were hematologic, especially neutropenia. Neutropenia tended to appear in early administration. Non-hematologic toxicities were anorexia, nausea/vomiting, and skin rash. The mean overall survival period was 7.5 months. Carcinomatous ascites and/or pleural effusion resulted in a poor prognosis (average survival 3.1 months). Gemcitabine could be given without severe toxicities in outpatient clinics. These results suggested that gemcitabine is currently a first-line therapeutic agent for advanced pancreatic cancer.

[Clinical features and management of pancreatic cancer with bone metastases].

Prognosis of pancreatic cancer is one of the worst among various cancers, however, incidence of bone metastasis has been increased even in pancreatic cancer in recent years. Therefore, we examined clinical features of pancreatic cancer presenting bone metastases who were treated in our cancer center, and propose how to manage these patients. We experienced 13 patients (7.3%) with pancreatic cancer with bone metastases during 2000-2003. Among these patients, pancreatic cancer was located at pancreatic body to tail in 10 cases, while it was located at pancreatic head in 3 cases. Liver metastasis was noted in 7 of 13 cases with bone metastases. Radiographical imagings of bone lesions revealed osteolytic bone destruction, and serum levels of bone resorption marker, 1CTP, were elevated in these patients. Stimulation of osteoclastic bone resorption is a critical step for bone metastasis, thus, serum levels of cytokines (PTHrP, IL-6, VEGF), which exert a promotive effect on bone resorption, were measured. Serum levels of IL-6 and VEGF were elevated in most of these patients, while elevation of serum PTHrP levels was found in 3 of 13 patients with bone metastases. Survival periods of pancreatic cancer patients with bone metastases was not long, however, treatment for bone metastases is important in terms of quality of life (QOL). An earlier diagnosis is essential to prevent deterioration in the QOL of pancreatic cancer patients presenting bone metastases. Periodical measurement of serum 1CTP in addition to bone scintigraphy is helpful for the earlier diagnosis for bone metastases.

Evaluation of pancreatic endocrine and exocrine function in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVES: Up to now, the characteristics of pancreatic endocrine and exocrine functions in autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) are still unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate pancreatic functions in AIP compared with those of chronic pancreatitis (CP). METHODS: Twelve patients with AIP and 25 patients with CP were examined for exocrine and endocrine pancreas. Exocrine function was evaluated by a secretin test. Concerning endocrine function, insulin secretion (C-peptide response) was examined with the glucagon tolerance test and glucagon secretion was examined with the arginine tolerance test. Pathological examination of pancreatic tissues was done on the operative specimens of AIP and CP that could not be clinically excluded from pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: For the secretin test, 8.3% of patients with AIP showed 1-factor abnormality, which was a reduction in volume, and 41.7% showed 2-factor abnormalities, which were a reduction in volume and amylase output. On the other hand, 44.0% of patients with CP showed only 1-factor abnormality, which was the reduction in the maximum bicarbonate concentration. Autoimmune pancreatitis accompanied with diabetes mellitus showed a reduction both in DeltaC-peptide response (beta-cell response) and Deltaglucagon (alpha-cell response). Histologically, AIP showed lymphoplasmatic cells infiltration surrounding the pancreatic ducts, but basement membranes were intact. Moreover, basement membranes of the duct were injured in CP. Furthermore, islet cells in AIP were revealed as almost intact even though they were surrounded by fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that exocrine dysfunction with AIP is different from CP because AIP induces stenosis of the pancreatic ducts, but ductal cells that possess the function of bicarbonate secretion are intact, and that endocrine dysfunction with AIP was secondary pancreatic diabetes.

A phase I/II study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil for advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to improve efficacy of single-agent gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer, several studies have examined the effects of 5-FU combined with gemcitabine. However, no studies to date have been performed in Japanese patients. We thus conducted a phase I/II study of gemcitabine and infusional 5-FU in Japanese patients to determine a recommended dosage for this combination and clarify efficacy and toxicity. METHODS: Phase I evaluated the frequency of dose limiting toxicity of two 5-FU dosages (400 and 500 mg/m(2)/day) infused continuously over 5 days combined with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) x 3 every 4 weeks. Results from phase I determined the recommended dosage to be examined in phase II for effect on survival period, clinical benefit response (CBR), tumor response and safety. RESULTS: A total of 34 chemo-naive patients were entered into the study. All had a Karnofsky performance of > or =50 points and distant metastases. Dose limiting toxicities in phase I determined the recommended 5-FU dosage at 400 mg/m(2)/day. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities (neutropenia, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia) were the most common severe toxicities. For the 28 patients administered the recommended dosage, 1-year survival rate was 14.3%, median survival time 7.1 months and progression free survival 3.2 months. Seven patients achieved a 25% overall response rate and three showed 27.3% improvement in CBR. CONCLUSION: Although a meaningful survival benefit over single-agent gemcitabine was not demonstrated, 5-FU 400 mg/m(2)/day infused continuously over 5 days in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) x 3 every 4 weeks appeared to be a moderately effective palliative treatment with low toxicity in Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Expression and diagnostic evaluation of the human tumor-associated antigen RCAS1 in pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Receptor-binding cancer antigen expressed on SiSo cells (RCAS1) is one of the membrane molecules expressed on human cancer cells and is presumed to play a protective role for tumor cells against immune surveillance by inhibition of clonal expansion and induction of cell death in immunocytes. AIMS: To address whether RCAS1 is expressed in pancreatic cancer and whether serologic diagnostic evaluation is useful compared with that of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and soluble Fas ligand. METHODOLOGY: Immunohistochemical expression of RCAS1 was examined by staining with a 22-1-1 monoclonal antibody, and serum RCAS1 concentrations were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 20 cases of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and other pancreatic diseases. RESULTS: Immunohistochemically, RCAS1 detection occurred in 100% (20/20) of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas cases, 100% (6/6) of intraductal papillary-mucinous adenoma of the pancreas cases, and 40% (2/5) of chronic pancreatitis cases. RCAS1 was found in the cytoplasm of cancer cells and ductal cells. Serum RCAS1 concentrations in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were significantly higher than those in patients with chronic pancreatitis (p < 0.0001), acute pancreatitis (p < 0.005), and autoimmune pancreatitis (p < 0.001). RCAS1 concentrations in patients with intraductal papillary-mucinous adenoma of the pancreas were also significantly higher than those in patients with chronic pancreatitis (p < 0.05) and autoimmune pancreatitis (p < 0.05). Positive serum RCAS1 samples (concentration, > or = 10 U/mL) were found most often in cases of pancreatic neoplasm (80% [16/20], ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas; and 60% [3/5], intraductal papillary-mucinous adenoma of the pancreas). By contrast, in cases of pancreatic inflammatory diseases, raised concentrations occurred in 9.4% (3/32) of chronic pancreatitis cases, none (0/6) of acute pancreatitis cases, and none (0/8) of autoimmune pancreatitis cases. The sensitivity of CA19-9 for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas was 75% and the specificity was 73.1% compared with chronic pancreatitis. On the other hand, the sensitivity of RCAS1 for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas was 80% and the specificity was 96.2% compared with chronic pancreatitis. The specificity of RCAS1 for chronic pancreatitis was higher than that of CA19-9. Serum soluble Fas ligand concentrations were not considerably different among these patients. CONCLUSIONS: RCAS1 was highly expressed in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, and serum RCAS1 concentrations in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were significantly higher than those in patients with other inflammatory pancreatic diseases. Our results indicate that serum RCAS1 concentrations could be a new marker in screening procedures for pancreatic cancer.