Longitudinal association between personality traits and homebound status in older adults: results from the National Health and Aging Trends Study.

BACKGROUND: Personality is associated with predictors of homebound status like frailty, incident falls, mobility, and depression. However, the relationship between personality traits and homebound status is unclear. This study aims to examine the longitudinal association between personality traits and homebound status among older adults. METHODS: Using data of non-homebound community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older in the 2013 and 2014 waves (baseline) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (N = 1538), this study examined the association between personality traits and homebound status. Homebound status (non-homebound, semi-homebound, and homebound) was determined by the frequency of going outside, difficulty in going outside, and whether there was help when going outside. Personality traits, including conscientiousness, extraversion, neuroticism, openness, and agreeableness were assessed using the 10-item Midlife Development Inventory on a rating scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (a lot). Ordered logistic regression models were used to examine whether personality traits predicted homebound status in later 3 years with and without adjusting covariates. RESULTS: The sample was on average 77.0 ± 6.70 years old, and 55% were female. The majority were non-Hispanic whites (76%), and received some college or vocational school education or higher (55%). Homebound participants tended to be less educated older females. Three years later, 42 of 1538 baseline-non-homebound participants (3%) became homebound, and 195 participants (13%) became semi-homebound. Among these five personality traits, high conscientiousness (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.73, p < 0.01) was associated with a low likelihood of becoming homebound after adjusting demographic and health-related covariates. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provided a basis for personality assessment to identify and prevent individuals from becoming homebound.

Fear of falling is as important as multiple previous falls in terms of limiting daily activities: a longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: Fear of falling and previous falls are both risk factors that affect daily activities of older adults. However, it remains unclear whether they independently limit daily activities accounting for each other. METHODS: We used the data from Round 1 (Year 1) to Round 5 (Year 5) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. We included a total of 864 community-dwelling participants who provided data on previous falls, fear of falling and limited activities from Year 1 to Year 5 and had no limited daily activities at Year 1 in this study. Previous falls and fear of falling were ascertained by asking participants how many falls they had in the past year and whether they had worried about falling in the last month. Limited daily activities included any difficulties with mobility (e.g., going outside), self-care (e.g., eating), and household activities (e.g., laundering). Generalized estimation equation models were used to examine whether previous falls and fear of falling independently predicted development of limited daily activities adjusting covariates. RESULTS: Participants were mainly between 65 and 79 years old (83 %), male (57 %), and non-Hispanic White (79 %). Among participants who had multiple falls in Year 1, 19.1-31 %, 21.4-52.4 %, and 11.9-35.7 % developed limitations in mobility, self-care, and household activities during Year 2 to Year 5, respectively. Among those who had fear of falling in Year 1, 22.5-41.3 %, 30.0-55.0 %, and 18.8-36.3 % developed limitations in mobility, self-care, and household activities during Year 2 to Year 4, respectively. Fear of falling independently predicted limitations in mobility (Incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 1.79, 95 % CI: 1.44, 2.24), self-care (IRR: 1.25, 95 % CI: 1.08, 1.44) and household activities (IRR: 1.39, 95 % CI: 1.08, 1.78) after adjusting for previous falls and covariates. Multiple previous falls independently predicted limitations in mobility (IRR: 1.72, 1.30, 2.27), self-care (IRR: 1.40, 95 % CI: 1.19, 1.66) and household activities (IRR: 1.36, 95 % CI: 1.01, 1.83) after adjusting fear of falling and covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Fear of falling seems to be as important as multiple previous falls in terms of limiting older adults' daily activities.

Bidirectional relationship between subjective age and frailty: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Subjective age refers to how young or old individuals experience themselves to be and is associated with health status, behavioral, cognitive, and biological processes that influence frailty. However, little research has examined the relationship between subjective age and frailty among older adults. This study examined the bidirectional association between subjective age and frailty among community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: We used data from the 2011 to 2015 waves of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Our sample consists of 2,592 community-dwelling older adults with complete data on main outcome variables. Subjective age was measured by asking participants, "What age do you feel most of the time?" Based on the five phenotypic criteria: exhaustion, unintentional weight loss, low physical activity, slow gait, and weak grip strength, frailty was categorized into robust = 0, pre-frailty = 1 or 2; frailty = 3 or more criteria met. Generalized estimating equation models were used to examine the concurrent and lagged association between subjective age and frailty. RESULTS: Participants were, on average, 75.2 ± 6.8 years old, non-Hispanic whites (76 %), female (58 %). 77 % of the participants felt younger, 18 % felt the same, and 5 % felt older than their chronological age. About 45 %, 46 %, and 9 % of the participants were robust, pre-frailty and frailty in the first wave, respectively. Generalized estimating equations revealed that an "older" subjective age predicted a higher likelihood of pre-frailty and frailty (OR, 95 % CI = 1.93, 1.45-2.56). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that people with older subjective age are more likely to be pre-frail/frail. Subjective age could be used as a quick and economical screening for those who are potentially frailty or at risk for frailty.

Independent and synergistic effects of pain, insomnia, and depression on falls among older adults: a longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the relationship between falls and pain, insomnia and depressive symptoms which are common and risk factors in older adults. We aimed to examine the independent and synergistic effects of these risk factors on future falls among older adults. METHODS: We used data of 2558 community-dwelling older adults from 2011 (Y1) to 2015 (Y5) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS). Pain was determined by whether participants reported bothersome pain in the last month. Insomnia was assessed by two questions about how often the participants had trouble falling asleep and maintaining sleep. Depressive symptoms were assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire-2. Generalized estimation equation (GEE) models were used to examine the independent effects of pain, insomnia and depressive symptoms at prior-wave (period y-1) on falls at current wave (period y) adjusting for covariates (age, sex, education, race/ethnicity, living arrangement, BMI, smoking, vigorous activities, number of chronic illnesses and hospitalization). The significance of the three-way interaction of these factors (pain*insomnia*depression) was tested using the aforementioned GEE models to determine their synergistic effects on falls. RESULTS: Overall, the participants were mainly 65-79 years old (68%), female (57%) and non-Hispanic White (70%). At Y1, 50.0% of the participants reported pain, 22.6% reported insomnia and 9.9% reported depressive symptoms. The incidence of falls from Y2 to Y5 was 22.4, 26.0, 28.3, and 28.9%, respectively. Participants with pain (Odds ratio [OR], 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.36, 1.23-1.50) and depressive symptoms (OR, 95% CI = 1.43, 1.23-1.67) had high rates of falling adjusting for covariates. After further adjustment for insomnia and depressive symptoms, pain independently predicted falls (OR, 95% CI = 1.36, 1.22-1.51). Depressive symptoms also independently predicted falls after further adjusting for pain and insomnia (OR, 95% CI = 1.40, 1.20-1.63). After adjusting for pain and depression, the independent effects of insomnia were not significant. None of the interaction terms of the three risk factors were significant, suggesting an absence of their synergistic effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pain and depressive symptoms independently predict falls, but synergistic effects seem absent. Further research is needed to develop effective strategies for reducing falls in older adults, particularly with pain and depressive symptoms.

Associations between symptoms of pain, insomnia and depression, and frailty in older adults: A cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is prevalent in older adults and has adverse effects on multiple health outcomes. Pain, insomnia, and depressive symptoms are commonly seen and treatable symptoms in older adults and are associated with frailty. However, it is unknown whether these symptoms are independently associated with frailty and how they interact with each other creating a greater impact on frailty than individual symptoms. It is important to understand these associations for nurses to provide high-quality patient-centered care for older adults with frailty. OBJECTIVES: To determine independent associations of pain, insomnia, and depressive symptoms with frailty and examine their synergistic impact on frailty among older adults. DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study. SETTING: Communities in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling older adults from the National Health and Aging Trend Study (N = 7,609), a nationally representative survey of Medicare Beneficiaries in the United States. METHODS: Frailty status was determined by five criteria of the Physical Frailty Phenotype: exhaustion, low physical activity, weakness, slowness, and shrinking. Pain was determined by self-reports of bothersome pain in the last month. Insomnia included self-reports of difficulty initiating sleep and difficulty maintaining sleep. Depressive symptom was assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2. Logistic regression models were used adjusting for sociodemographic, health-related and behavioral covariates. RESULTS: The sample was mainly under 80 years old (72%), female (57%), and non-Hispanic White (81%). Approximately 53% experienced bothersome pain, 11% had difficulty initiating sleep, 6% had difficulty maintaining sleep, and 15% had depressive symptom; 46% were pre-frail and 14% were frail. Independent associations with pre-frailty and frailty were found in pain (odds ratio [OR]: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.60, 2.04), difficulty initiating sleep (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.46) and depressive symptom (OR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.85, 2.84). Interaction terms between pain and depressive symptom (OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.14, 3.07), and between difficulty initiating sleep and depressive symptom (OR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.15, 6.13) were significant, suggesting a synergistic impact on pre-frailty and frailty. CONCLUSIONS: Pain, difficulty initiating sleep, and depressive symptoms are independent risk factors of frailty and may have a synergistic impact on frailty. Interventions should be developed to address these symptoms to reduce the adverse effects of frailty.