Use of rivaroxaban in Germany: a database drug utilization study of a drug started in hospital.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this drug utilization study was to describe the use of rivaroxaban in Germany during a time period in which approval was limited to the prevention of venous thromboembolism following hip or knee replacement. Additionally, we explored the feasibility of reconstructing inpatient drug use of rivaroxaban in a database where with a few exceptions inpatient prescribing information is not available. METHODS: Source of data was one statutory health insurance providing data on about seven million insurants throughout Germany. Analyses were based on a cohort of rivaroxaban users from launch (October 2008) to December 2009 and encompassed potential indications for rivaroxaban use, treatment duration, and co-prescribing of potentially interacting drugs. Start of rivaroxaban treatment was defined by the date of surgery. RESULTS: During the study period, 425 rivaroxaban users were identified contributing 440 treatment periods. For more than 82% of these episodes labelled indications could be determined. Treatment durations exceeded recommendations in 95% of the episodes following knee replacement whereas rivaroxaban use after elective hip surgery was found to be longer than recommended in 56%. Prescribing of potentially interacting medication was rare except for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, no important off-label use of rivaroxaban was identified. Based on several assumptions that have to be considered in the interpretation of the results our study describes a database approach to reconstruct inpatient drug use for a drug started after a coded hospital procedure, when treatment continues after hospital discharge and no change in drug use is expected in the outpatient setting.

Limited evidence on persistence with anticoagulants, and its effect on the risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review of observational studies.

PURPOSE: The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence is high following an initial VTE event, and it persists over time. This recurrence risk decreases rapidly after starting with anticoagulation treatment and reduces by ~80%-90% with prolonged anticoagulation. Nonpersistence with anticoagulants could lead to increased risk of VTE recurrence. This systematic review aimed to estimate persistence at 3, 6, and 12 months with anticoagulants in patients with VTE, and to evaluate the risk of VTE recurrence in nonpersistent patients. METHODS: PubMed and Embase(®) were searched up to May 3, 2014 and the search results updated to May 31, 2015. Studies involving patients with VTE aged ≥18 years, treatment with anticoagulants intended for at least 3 months or more, and reporting data for persistence were included. Proportions were transformed using Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation and pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects approach. RESULTS: In total, 12 observational studies (7/12 conference abstracts) were included in the review. All 12 studies either reported or provided data for persistence. The total number of patients meta-analyzed to estimate persistence at 3, 6, and 12 months was 71,969 patients, 58,940 patients, and 68,235 patients, respectively. The estimated persistence for 3, 6, and 12 months of therapy was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78-87; I (2)=99.3%), 62% (95% CI, 58-66; I (2)=98.1%), and 31% (95% CI, 22-40; I (2)=99.8%), respectively. Only two studies reported the risk of VTE recurrence based on nonpersistence - one at 3 months and the other at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Limited evidence showed that persistence was suboptimal with an estimated 17% patients being nonpersistent with anticoagulants in the crucial first 3 months. Persistence declined over 6 and 12 months. Observational data on persistence with anticoagulation treatment, especially direct oral anticoagulants, in patients with VTE and its effect on risk of VTE recurrence were scarce and further research is required.

Daclizumab induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as an immunosuppression regimen for primary kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have demonstrated the efficacy of interleukin-2-receptor blockers in lowering the incidence of early acute rejection in cyclosporine-treated kidney recipients when compared to patients not induced with an antibody product. The addition of daclizumab to a tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppressive protocol was tested to evaluate whether there might be an additional reduction of the risk of rejection after renal transplantation. METHODS: Since March 1998, we studied the effect of daclizumab in a nonrandomized, prospective study of 233 sequential recipients of first renal transplant. They were retrospective compared with a control group of 225 renal transplant recipients receiving a 10-day course of OKT3 induction, and tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone maintenance. The study group received the same immunosuppressive regimen with the addition of daclizumab at 1 mg/kg for five doses over 10 weeks in the place of OKT3 therapy. There was at least 1HLA DR antigen compatibility match present between all donors and recipients. Patients were followed for 1 year after renal transplantation for the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, patient and graft survival, and adverse events. RESULTS: At 12 months, patient and graft survival for the daclizumab was 98 and 96 vs. 96 and 94% for the OKT3 group, respectively, and were not statistically different. Acute rejection rates (<6 months) were lower in the daclizumab group as compared with the OKT3 group, i.e., 5 (2.1%) vs. 16 (7.1%) (P=0.011) respectively. The incidence of infection requiring hospitalization appeared to be lower with daclizumab (7.3 vs. 16%, P<0.0036) with a similar trend with cyclomegalovirus infection, i.e., 1.6 vs. 4%, respectively (P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of daclizumab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids is safe and effective for kidney transplant recipients in lowering the incidence of early acute rejection and without any increase in morbidity when compared to our previous protocol, which may have an eventual impact in long-term graft survival.

Effect of living-related donor bone marrow infusion on chimerism and in vitro immunoregulatory activity in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: In a previously reported series of donor-specific bone marrow cell (DBMC) infusions in cadaver kidney transplant recipients, there appeared to be an improvement in long-term graft survival (6 years) and fewer chronic rejections, which correlated with increasing DBMC chimerism (approximately 1.4% in the iliac crest bone marrow compartment now at 6 years). Prompted by this, we embarked on a study of DBMC infusion in living-related donor (LRD) kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: Between November 1996 and May 2000, 47 LRD kidney transplant recipients received donor iliac crest marrow (1.8 x 10(8)+/-1.9 x 10(8) cells/kg body weight+/-SD) in a single infusion 4 days postoperatively. Either OKT3 (n=26) or daclizumab (n=21) were used for induction therapy, with maintenance tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone immunosuppression. These recipients were prospectively compared with 39 noninfused LRD kidney transplants (control group), which received equivalent immunosuppression in the same time period. Clinical follow-up ranged from 19.0 months to 61.6 months (mean 33.2 months). Polymerase chain reaction-flow chimerism analysis and in vitro assays of immunoregulatory activity of chimeric cells were performed. RESULTS: The incidence of acute rejection over this period of time was 10.6% and 10.3%, respectively (i.e., did not differ between groups). Immunosuppressive dosages were somewhat (but not statistically) lower over time in the DBMC group. Four-year actuarial patient and graft survival for the DBMC-infused group was 98% and 98%, and 98% and 95% for the control group, respectively ( =NS). DBMC infusion was well tolerated, with no increase in infectious episodes. DBMC chimerism in recipient iliac crest marrow has increased more rapidly than might be predicted from results previously seen in the cadaver group, despite four times fewer DBMC infused. DBMCs and (donor) peripheral blood mononuclear cells purified by immunobeads from recipient blood or bone marrow (recipient-derived donor cells) inhibited mixed leukocyte responses of the recipient to the donor more strongly than freshly obtained peripheral blood cells drawn from the donors or even compared with bone marrow cells aspirated from the donors in a previously reported group of experiments. Additionally, similarly purified recipient-derived recipient cells from the same chimeric recipient more strongly inhibited the same mixed leukocyte response reactions autologously than a large group of nonchimeric (autologous) bone marrow modulating cells in similar reactions. CONCLUSIONS: These observations confirm that an immunoregulatory process appears to have been generated by DBMC infusion, encouraging a further decrease in immunosuppressive dosing using such assays in the future.

Validation of acute liver injury cases in a population-based cohort study of oral antimicrobial users.

We conducted a cohort study of acute, noninfectious liver injury among oral antimicrobial users. Potential cases were identified in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD(SM)) population between July 1, 2001, and March 31, 2009, using ICD-9-CM codes primarily for acute and subacute necrosis of the liver, hepatic coma, and unspecified hepatitis. Liver test results were used to confirm case status according to published criteria. Two physician reviewers experienced in studying acute liver injury (blinded to study drug exposures) evaluated data abstracted from hospital and emergency department records to validate potential cases. Of 715 potential cases having claims associated with any of the primary screening codes, 312 (44%) were valid cases, 108 (15%) were not cases, and 295 (41%) were of uncertain status (records inadequate for validation). Among potential cases with adequate medical records, the PPV for presence of any of the primary codes was 74% (95% CI, 70%-78%). The highest PPV for a single code was for acute and subacute necrosis of the liver (84%; 95% CI, 77%-90%). Evaluation of cases of noninfectious liver injury using hospital and emergency department medical records continues to represent the preferred approach in studies using insurance claims data.

Risk of acute liver injury associated with the use of moxifloxacin and other oral antimicrobials: a retrospective, population-based cohort study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and relative risk of a hospitalization or emergency visit for noninfectious liver injury in users of eight oral antimicrobials-amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, clarithromycin, cefuroxime, doxycycline, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, telithromycin-compared with nonusers of these antimicrobials. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort study with a nested case-control analysis. DATA SOURCE: HealthCore Integrated Research Database. PATIENTS: Adults with continuous health plan enrollment for at least 6 months before study entry who had a new dispensing of a study antimicrobial between July 1, 2001, and March 31, 2009. Cases had diagnoses indicating noninfectious liver injury during follow-up. To control for potentially confounding risk factors, 10 controls at risk for liver injury during follow-up were matched to each case by age, sex, and event date (liver injury date of the case), and analyses were adjusted for medical history, concomitant drugs, and health care service use. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two physician reviewers (blind to exposure) validated the cases. Among 1.3 million antimicrobial users, we identified 607 cases of liver injury, including 82 cases of severe hepatocellular injury and 11 cases of liver failure. Liver injury incidence in nonusers of study antimicrobials was 35/100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 29-42/100,000 person-years). For valid cases, the adjusted relative risk among current users of multiple antimicrobials was 3.2 (95% CI 1.6-6.7). Levofloxacin had the highest relative risk for current single use (3.2, 95% CI 1.8-5.8). Relative risks were also elevated for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (2.5, 95% CI 1.3-5.0), doxycycline (2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.2), moxifloxacin (2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.7), and amoxicillin (2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.7). CONCLUSION: The results support a comparatively high adjusted relative risk of liver injury among patients exposed concurrently to multiple antimicrobials and modest elevations in the risk for several antimicrobials used alone; however, we found little evidence of any strong effect of commonly used antimicrobials on the risk of liver injury.

The use of daclizumab, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in african-american and Hispanic first renal transplant recipients.

Limited data are available on the use of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in conjunction with anti-IL-2 receptor antibody, in groups of kidney transplant recipients considered to be at higher risk. This study compared the incidence of acute rejection between African-American (AA), Hispanic (H), and non-African-American, non-Hispanics (non-AA, non-H) first renal transplant recipients. We studied 233 sequential first renal transplants. Of the 233, 37 recipients (16%) were AA, 85 (36.5%) were H and 111 (47.5%) were non-AA, non-H. All received daclizumab induction therapy (1 mg/kg) on the day of surgery, and every other week for a total of 5 doses, as well as mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and steroids. At 1 year, patient and graft survival were 97% and 95% in AA, 98% and 98% in H, and 96% and 95% in non-AA, non-H, respectively (not statistically different). Biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes were 8.1% in AA, 4.7% in H, and 4.5% in non-AA, non-H (also not statistically different). This immunosuppressive protocol appears to be safe and effective in helping to minimize biopsy-proven acute rejection and optimize renal allograft survival in African-American and Hispanic renal transplant recipients in the first year post transplantation.