Comparison of Levels of Nasal, Salivary, and Plasma Antibody to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 During Natural Infection and After Vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Most studies of immunity to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) measure antibody or cellular responses in blood; however, the virus infects mucosal surfaces in the nose and conjunctivae and infectious virus is rarely if ever present in the blood. METHODS: We used luciferase immunoprecipitation assays to measure SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in the plasma, nose, and saliva of infected persons and vaccine recipients. These assays measure antibody that can precipitate the SAR-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins. RESULTS: Levels of plasma anti-spike antibody declined less rapidly than levels of anti-nucleocapsid antibody in infected persons. SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody levels in the nose declined more rapidly than antibody levels in the blood after vaccination of infected persons. Vaccination of previously infected persons boosted anti-spike antibody in plasma more than in the nose or saliva. Nasal and saliva anti-spike antibody levels were significantly correlated with plasma antibody in infected persons who had not been vaccinated and after vaccination of uninfected persons. CONCLUSIONS: Persistently elevated SARS-CoV-2 antibody in plasma may not indicate persistence of antibody at mucosal sites such as the nose. The strong correlation of SARS-CoV-2 antibody in the nose and saliva with that in the blood suggests that mucosal antibodies are derived primarily from transudation from the blood rather than local production. While SARS-CoV-2 vaccine given peripherally boosted mucosal immune responses in infected persons, the increase in antibody titers was higher in plasma than at mucosal sites. Taken together, these observations indicate the need for development of mucosal vaccines to induce potent immune responses at sites where SARS-CoV-2 infection occurs. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01306084.

Computationally optimized broadly reactive vaccine based upon swine H1N1 influenza hemagglutinin sequences protects against both swine and human isolated viruses.

Swine H1 influenza viruses were stable within pigs for nearly 70 years until in 1998 when a classical swine virus reassorted with avian and human influenza viruses to generate the novel triple reassortant H1N1 strain that eventually led to the 2009 influenza pandemic. Previously, our group demonstrated broad protection against a panel of human H1N1 viruses using HA antigens derived by the COBRA methodology. In this report, the effectiveness of COBRA HA antigens (SW1, SW2, SW3 and SW4), which were designed using only HA sequences from swine H1N1 and H1N2 isolates, were tested in BALB/c mice. The effectiveness of these vaccines were compared to HA sequences designed using both human and swine H1 HA sequences or human only sequences. SW2 and SW4 elicited antibodies that detected the pandemic-like virus, A/California/07/2009 (CA/09), had antibodies with HAI activity against almost all the classical swine influenza viruses isolated from 1973-2015 and all of the Eurasian viruses in our panel. However, sera collected from mice vaccinated with SW2 or SW4 had HAI activity against ~25% of the human seasonal-like influenza viruses isolated from 2009-2015. In contrast, the P1 COBRA HA vaccine (derived from both swine and human HA sequences) elicited antibodies that had HAI activity against both swine and human H1 viruses and protected against CA/09 challenge, but not a human seasonal-like swine H1N2 virus challenge. However, the SW1 vaccine protected against this challenge as well as the homologous vaccine. These results support the idea that a pan-swine-human H1 influenza virus vaccine is possible.