Potassium-lowering effects of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate in the early post-transplant period.

PROBLEM: Hyperkalemia is a serious condition among intra-abdominal transplant recipients, and the safety and efficacy of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) for its management during the early post-transplant period are not well-established. METHODS: Adults who received at least one 10-g dose of SZC within 14 days after an intra-abdominal transplant between January 2020 and July 2022 were included in our study. The primary outcome was the change in potassium (K+) levels following the first SZC dose. Other analyses explored adjunctive potassium-lowering therapies, potential gastrointestinal complications, and patient subgroups based on therapy and transplant type. RESULTS: Among the recipients (n = 46), 11 were kidney recipients, 26 were liver recipients, seven were simultaneous liver/kidney recipients, and two were simultaneous pancreas/kidney recipients. The mean time to first dose post-transplant was 7.6 (±4) days, and the mean change in serum K+ after the initial SZC dose was -.27 mEq (p = .001). No gastrointestinal complications were observed following the SZC dose. The mean increase in serum bicarbonate was .58 mEq (p = .41) following the first dose of SZC. Four kidney recipients required dialysis following the SZC dose. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest investigation on the use of SZC in transplant recipients. A single 10-g dose of SZC reduced serum K+ levels in all subgroups, while the use of adjunctive K+-lowering therapies did not provide additional reduction beyond the effects of SZC. Importantly, no gastrointestinal complications were observed. These findings suggest that SZC may be a safe and promising therapeutic option for hyperkalemia management following solid organ transplantation.

Hypoalbuminemia is a risk factor for invasive fungal infections and poor outcomes in infected kidney transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Invasive fungal infections (IFI), are estimated to occur in 2%-14% of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) in the current era of immune suppression and are associated with high mortality rates. We hypothesized that hypoalbuminemia in KTRs is a risk factor for IFI and would be associated with poor outcomes. METHODS: In this study, using data from a prospective cohort registry, we describe the frequency of IFI due to Blastomycosis, Coccidioidomycosis, Histoplasmosis, Aspergillosis, and Cryptococcus in KTRs with serum albumin levels measured 3-6 months before diagnosis. Controls were selected based on incidence density sampling. KTRs were divided into three groups based on the pre-IFI serum albumin level: normal (≥4 g/dL), mild (3-4 g/dL), or severe (<3 g/dL) hypoalbuminemia. Outcomes of interest were uncensored graft failure after IFI and overall mortality. RESULTS: A total of 113 KTRs with IFI were compared with 348 controls. The incidence rate of IFI among individuals with normal, mild, and severe hypoalbuminemia was 3.6, 8.7, and 29.3 per 100 person-years, respectively. After adjustment for multiple variables, the trend for risk of uncensored graft failure following IFI was greater in KTRS with mild (HR = 2.1; 95% CI, .75-6.1) and severe (HR = 4.47; 95% CI, 1.56-12.8) hypoalbuminemia (P-trend < .001) compared to those with normal serum albumin. Similarly, mortality was higher in severe hypoalbuminemia (HR = 1.9; 95% CI, .67-5.6) compared to normal serum albumin (P-trend < .001). CONCLUSION: Hypoalbuminemia precedes the diagnosis of IFI in KTRs, and is associated with poor outcomes following IFI. Hypoalbuminemia may be a useful predictor of IFI in KTRs and could be incorporated into screening algorithms.

Recipient and kidney graft outcomes of deceased donors with human immunodeficiency virus in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) act afforded transplantation of organs from donors who have HIV. Herein we compared the long-term outcomes of recipients with HIV by donor HIV testing status. METHODS: Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified all primary adult kidney transplant recipients who were HIV-positive between 1/1/16-12/31/21. Recipients were grouped into three cohorts according to the donor HIV status based on antibody (Ab) and nucleic acid testing (NAT): Donor Ab-/NAT- (n = 810), Donor Ab+ /NAT- (n = 98), and Donor Ab+/NAT+ (n = 90). We compared recipient and death-censored graft survival (DCGS) by donor HIV testing status using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression, censored at 3 years posttransplant. Secondary outcomes were delayed graft function (DGF) and the following 1-year outcomes: acute rejection, re-hospitalization, and serum creatinine. RESULTS: In Kaplan-Meier analyses, patient survival and DCGS were similar by donor HIV status (log rank p = .667; log rank p = .388). DGF occurred more frequently in donors with HIV Ab-/NAT- testing compared with Ab+/NAT- or Ab+/NAT+ testing (38.0% vs. 28.6% vs. 26.7%, p = .028). Average dialysis time before transplant was twice as long for recipients who received organs from donors with Ab-/NAT- testing (p < .001). Acute rejection, re-hospitalization and serum creatinine at 12 months did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patient and allograft survival for recipients living with HIV remains comparable irrespective of donor HIV testing status. Utilizing kidneys from deceased donors with HIV Ab+/NAT- or Ab+/NAT+ testing shortens dialysis time prior to transplant.

Delayed graft function: current status and future directions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Delayed graft function is a common early posttransplant event predictive of adverse outcomes including hospital readmission, impaired long-term graft function, and decreased graft and patient survival. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent literature describing delayed graft function in hopes of better understanding and managing this condition. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research efforts have been garnered towards risk factor modification, prevention, and earlier detection of delayed graft function. In this review, we aim to summarize current innovative approaches and future directions. SUMMARY: Delayed graft function portends worse graft and patient outcomes. Continued research to prevent, and detect early perturbations in allograft function, and more optimally manage this disease will hopefully improve graft function, along with graft/patient survival.

Transplant kidney biopsy for proteinuria with stable creatinine: Findings and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known aboutbiopsy findings and outcomes when kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) undergo biopsy for isolated proteinuria with stable serum creatinine (SCr). METHODS: We analyzed all KTRs who underwent biopsy for isolated proteinuria with stable SCr between January 2016 and June 2020. Patients were divided into three groups based on the biopsy findings: Active Rejection (AR), Glomerulonephritis (GN), and Other. RESULTS: A total of 130 KTRs fulfilled our selection criteria; 38 (29%) in the AR group, 26 (20%) in the GN group, and 66 (51%) in the Other group. Most baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. In multivariate analysis, higher HLA mismatch (HR per mismatch: 1.30; 95% CI:1.06-1.59; P = .01) and male gender (HR: .45; 95% CI .23-.89; P = .02) were associated with AR. There was no significant correlation between the degree of proteinuria and rejection (r = .05, P = .58) or GN (r = .07, P = .53). Graft survival was also similar between the groups. Likely due to the early diagnosis without a significant rise in SCr, outcomes were similar among all three groups. CONCLUSION: Routine monitoring for proteinuria followed by a biopsy and appropriate management may help to identify early acute graft injury and prevent graft failure.

Risk factors for progression from low level BK dnaemia to unfavorable outcomes after BK management via immunosuppressive reduction.

BACKGROUNDS: Effective management of BK viremia (BKPyV-DNAemia) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) involves regular monitoring and adjustment of immunosuppression. With this strategy, the majority of patients will clear BK or have ongoing, but non-significant, low-level BKPyV-DNAemia. However, despite adjustments, some will develop more severe sequelae of BK including BKPyV-DNAemia >5 log10 copies/mL and BK nephropathy, and others may develop de novo DSA (dnDSA) or acute rejection (AR). METHODS: This was a single-center study of KTRs transplanted at the University of Wisconsin-Madison between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2017. In this study, we sought to elucidate characteristics associated with the progression of BKPyV-DNAemia to unfavorable outcomes after decreasing immunosuppressive medications for the management of BK viremia as described in consensus guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 224 KTRs fulfilled our selection criteria; 118 (53%) resolved or had persistent low DNAemia, 64 (28%) had severe BK/nephropathy, and 42 (19%) developed dnDSA or AR. In multivariable analysis, female gender (HR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.08-3.90; P = .02); previous rejection (HR: 2.90; 95% CI: 1.04-8.12; P = .04), and early infection (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72-0.90; P < .001) were associated with the development of severe BK/nephropathy. Conversely, non-depleting induction at transplant (HR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.03-4.11; P = .03), HLA mismatches >3 (HR: 2.27; HR: 1.01-5.06; P = .04), and delayed graft function (HR: 4.14; 95% CI: 1.12-15.28; P = .03) were associated with development of dnDSA and/or rejection. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that almost half of KTRs with BKPyV-DNAemia managed by our immunosuppressant adjustment protocol progress unfavorably. Identification of these risk factors could assist the frontline clinician in creating an individualized immunosuppressive modification plan potentially mitigating negative outcomes.

Cytomegalovirus nephritis in kidney transplant recipients: Epidemiology and outcomes of an uncommon diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Data on epidemiology and outcomes of cytomegalovirus (CMV) nephritis in kidney transplant patients are limited due to the rarity of this condition. METHODS: A retrospective review of all kidney transplant recipients (KTR) (n = 6490) and biopsy-proven CMV nephritis between 1/1997 and 12/2020 was performed. RESULTS: The prevalence of CMV nephritis was low: 13/6490 (0.2%). The diagnosis was made at a median of 7.0 months (range 2.6-15.6 months) after transplant. 6 of 13 (46%) patients were CMV (D+/R-). Median CMV DNA load at biopsy was 376,000, IU/mL (range 87,000-6,460,000 IU/mL). Main biopsy features were CMV glomerulitis (n = 7/13, 54%) followed by CMV tubulointerstitial nephritis (6/13; 46%). Mean eGFR at biopsy (22.7 ± 12 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) was significantly decreased compared to baseline eGFR (38.7 ± 18.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 , p = 0.02). The vast majority, 11 of 13 (85%), experienced graft failure including 5 of 13 (38%) death-censored. 5 of 13 (38%) patients were diagnosed with acute rejection: three had concurrent acute rejection, and two had rejection within 3 months of index biopsy, respectively. Patients with tubulointerstitial CMV nephritis were significantly more likely to have rejection at the time of biopsy (50% vs. 0%, p < 0.05) compared to those with glomerular CMV nephritis. There were no significant differences between these groups in terms of eGFR at all time points, death, graft failure, immunosuppression changes or rejection after biopsy. CONCLUSION: CMV nephritis is rare but appears to be associated with poor patient/allograft outcomes. Early identification and timely treatment of CMV infection may prevent end-organ involvement and improve patient and allograft-related outcomes.

Outcomes of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants based on preemptive transplant compared to those who were on dialysis before transplant - a retrospective study.

Among kidney transplant recipients, the duration of pretransplant dialysis is significantly associated with worse post-transplant outcomes. However, data on the outcomes of preemptive simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) are limited. We analyzed primary SPK recipients transplanted between January 2000 and December 2017. Patients were divided into two groups based on pretransplant dialysis history of preemptive versus non-preemptive. Patient and survival of grafts were outcomes of interest. Of the 644 recipients, 174 (27%) were preemptive and 470 (73%) were not. Most of the baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. In the univariable analysis, the non-preemptive transplant was associated with 54% increased risk for kidney death-censored graft failure (DCGF; HR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.01-2.35; P = 0.05). There was a 29% increased risk after adjustment for confounding factors (HR: 1.29; 95% CI: 0.83-2.02; P = 0.26), although this association was not statistically significant. Similarly, there was a 16% increased risk of pancreas DCGF in univariable analysis and 1% after adjustment, which was also not statistically significant. When outcomes were based on the duration of pretransplant dialysis, the duration was not associated with either patient survival or survival of either graft in K-M analysis. In SPK recipients, with pretransplant dialysis history, there was a tendency toward inferior graft survival, mainly for the kidney more than the pancreas.

Outcomes after simultaneous kidney-pancreas versus pancreas after kidney transplantation in the current era.

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) and pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplant are both potential options for diabetic ESRD patients. Historically, PAK pancreas graft outcomes were felt to be inferior to SPK pancreas graft outcomes. Little is known about outcomes in the modern era of transplantation. We analyzed our SPK and PAK recipients transplanted between 01/2000 and 12/2016. There were a total of 635 pancreas and kidney transplant recipients during the study period, 611 SPK and 24 PAK. Twelve of the PAK patients received a living donor kidney. There were no significant differences between the two groups in kidney or pancreas graft rejection at 1 year. Similarly, 1-year graft survival for both organs was not different. At last follow-up, uncensored and death-censored graft survival was not statistically different for kidney or pancreas grafts. In addition, in Cox regression analysis SPK and PAK were associated with similar graft survival. Although the majority of pancreas transplants are in the form of SPK, PAK is an acceptable alternative. Simultaneous pancreas and kidney avoids donor risks associated with live donation, so may be preferable in regions with short wait times, but PAK with a living donor kidney may be the best alternative in regions with long SPK wait times.

Histopathological Features and Role of Allograft Kidney Biopsy Among Recipients With Prolonged Delayed Graft Function: A Review.

Delayed graft function (DGF) is an early posttransplant complication predictive of adverse outcomes. This "acute kidney injury of transplantation" is often defined as allograft dysfunction requiring renal replacement within 7 d posttransplantation. DGF is an important area of study because it is emerging with efforts to expand the donor pool and address the supply-demand gap in kidney transplantation. DGF is often caused by severe kidney injury mechanisms because of multiple donors, recipients, and immunologic factors. The role of kidney biopsy, particularly in prolonged DGF, is an ongoing area of research and inquiry for clinicians and researchers alike to better define, manage, and predict outcomes of this early posttransplant event. This review aims to provide an in-depth, comprehensive summary of the literature to date on the histopathology of DGF and the role of kidney transplant biopsies in prolonged DGF.

Serum uric acid levels in kidney transplant recipients: A cause for concern? A review of recent literature.

The impact of elevated serum uric acid levels i.e., hyperuricemia, on native and transplant chronic kidney disease progression has been debated. This literature review presents an analysis of multiple studies exploring the relationship between serum uric acid levels and kidney transplant outcomes. The review includes a summary of the pathophysiology of hyperuricemia and gout, a review of urate-lowering therapies, and an appraisal of multiple studies examining the association or lack thereof between serum uric acid level and kidney transplant outcomes. Based on these studies, elevated serum uric acid levels may contribute to CKD progression in kidney transplant recipients. In this review, we also summarize current literature to highlight risk factors associated with hyperuricemia as well as the need for further investigation to monitor and manage hyperuricemia in kidney transplant recipients.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use in kidney transplant recipients.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are novel oral hypoglycemic agents garnering much attention for their substantial benefits. These recent data have positioned SGLT2i at the forefront of diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure management. SGLT2i use post-kidney transplant is an emerging area of research. Highlights from this mini review include the following: Empagliflozin is the most prescribed SGLT2i in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), median time from transplant to initiation was 3 years (range: 0.88-9.6 years). Median baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 66.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 (range: 50.4-75.8). Median glycohemoglobin (HgbA1c) at initiation was 7.7% (range: 6.9-9.3). SGLT2i were demonstrated to be effective short-term impacting HgbA1c, eGFR, hemoglobin/hematocrit, serum uric acid, and serum magnesium levels. They are shown to be safe in KTRs with low rates of infections, hypoglycemia, euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis, and stable tacrolimus levels. More data is needed to demonstrate long-term outcomes. SGLT2i appear to be safe, effective medications for select KTRs. Our present literature, though limited, is founded on precedent robust research in CKD patients with diabetes. Concurrent research/utilization of SGLT2i is vital to not only identify long-term patient, graft and cardiovascular outcomes of these agents, but also to augment management in KTRs.

Second Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Dialysis Dependent Recipients by Induction Type in the United States.

BACKGROUND: We examined the association between induction type for a second kidney transplant in dialysis-dependent recipients and the long-term outcomes. METHODS: Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified all second kidney transplant recipients who returned to dialysis before re-transplantation. Exclusion criteria included: missing, unusual, or no-induction regimens, maintenance regimens other than tacrolimus and mycophenolate, and positive crossmatch status. We grouped recipients by induction type into 3 groups: the anti-thymocyte group (N = 9899), the alemtuzumab group (N = 1982), and the interleukin 2 receptor antagonist group (N = 1904). We analyzed recipient and death-censored graft survival (DCGS) using the Kaplan-Meier survival function with follow-up censored at 10 years post-transplant. We used Cox proportional hazard models to examine the association between induction and the outcomes of interest. To account for the center-specific effect, we included the center as a random effect. We adjusted the models for the pertinent recipient and organ variables. RESULTS: In the Kaplan-Meier analyses, induction type did not alter recipient survival (log-rank P = .419) or DCGS (log-rank P = .146). Similarly, in the adjusted models, induction type was not a predictor of recipient or graft survival. Live-donor kidneys were associated with better recipient survival (HR 0.73, 95% CI [0.65, 0.83], P < .001) and graft survival (HR 0.72, 95% CI [0.64, 0.82], P < .001). Publicly insured recipients had worse recipient and allograft outcomes. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of average immunologic-risk dialysis-dependent second kidney transplant recipients, who were discharged on tacrolimus and mycophenolate maintenance, induction type did not influence the long-term outcomes of recipient or graft survival. Live-donor kidneys improved recipient and graft survival.

Kidney disease in non-kidney solid organ transplantation.

Kidney disease after non-kidney solid organ transplantation (NKSOT) is a common post-transplant complication associated with deleterious outcomes. Kidney disease, both acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease (CKD) alike, emanates from multifactorial, summative pre-, peri- and post-transplant events. Several factors leading to kidney disease are shared amongst solid organ transplantation in addition to distinct mechanisms unique to individual transplant types. The aim of this review is to summarize the current literature describing kidney disease in NKSOT. We conducted a narrative review of pertinent studies on the subject, limiting our search to full text studies in the English language. Kidney disease after NKSOT is prevalent, particularly in intestinal and lung transplantation. Management strategies in the peri-operative and post-transplant periods including proteinuria management, calcineurin-inhibitor minimization/ sparing approaches, and nephrology referral can counteract CKD progression and/or aid in subsequent kidney after solid organ transplantation. Kidney disease after NKSOT is an important consideration in organ allocation practices, ethics of transplantation. Kidney disease after SOT is an incipient condition demanding further inquiry. While some truths have been revealed about this chronic disease, as we have aimed to describe in this review, continued multidisciplinary efforts are needed more than ever to combat this threat to patient and allograft survival.

Preemptive Second Kidney Transplant Outcomes by Induction Type in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The role of induction in preemptive second kidney recipients is unclear. We examined the association between induction therapy and the long-term graft and recipient survival in the settings of tacrolimus and mycophenolate maintenance. METHODS: We identified all preemptive second kidney transplant recipients between 2000 and 2020 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We excluded those with missing or mixed induction regimens and positive crossmatch. We grouped recipients by induction type into 3 groups: anti-thymocyte globulin (n = 1442), alemtuzumab (n = 362), and interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA; n = 481). We generated Kaplan-Meier curves of the recipient and death-censored graft survival (DCGS) with follow-up censored at 10 years. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to examine the association between induction and the above outcomes. We adjusted the models for recipient and donor variables. RESULTS: Rates of delayed graft function, rejection, hospitalization, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder at one year were not statistically different. Recipient survival did not vary by induction type in the Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank P = .189) or in the multivariable model. However, DCGS was the lowest in the Alemtuzumab group (log-rank P = .01). In the multivariable models, alemtuzumab was associated with a 57% increased risk of graft loss (1.57, 95% confidence interval (1.08, 2.30), P = .019) compared to anti-thymocyte. Live-donor kidneys were associated with significantly better recipient survival and DCGS. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to anti-thymocyte induction, alemtuzumab, but not IL-2RA, was associated with inferior graft survival in preemptive second transplant recipients discharged on tacrolimus and mycophenolate.

Kidney delayed graft function after combined kidney-solid organ transplantation: A review.

Kidney delayed graft function (K-DGF) is a common post-kidney transplant complication associated with adverse outcomes. With continued advances in solid organ transplantation (SOT), combined kidney-solid organ transplantation (CKSOT) is an ever-growing transplant option for patients with advanced kidney disease in the setting of concurrent solid organ failure. K-DGF in this setting is understudied. In this review, we aimed to abridge the representative literature on K-DGF in CKSOT. K-DGF occurs at different rates across combined and sequential kidney-solid organ transplantation (SKSOT), in simultaneous-pancreas kidney (SPK) transplant (8-23%), simultaneous heart-kidney (SHK) transplant (27-37%), simultaneous-liver kidney (SLiK) transplant (16-49%), and kidney after thoracic (13.6-19.2%) and abdominal (13.6-25%) transplantation. Though many K-DGF risk factors span across various subtypes of combined KSOT, some effect particular transplant types more specifically and may be modifiable to reduce K-DGF incidence. While more studies are needed to prevent and manage K-DGF in combined kidney-solid organ transplantation, we hope our review will provide context of this disease and spur further inquiry.

Post-transplant erythrocytosis after kidney transplantation: A review.

Post-transplant erythrocytosis (PTE) is defined as persistently elevated hemoglobin > 17 g/dL or hematocrit levels > 51% following kidney transplantation, independent of duration. It is a relatively common complication within 8 months to 24 months post-transplantation, occurring in 8%-15% of kidney transplant recipients. Established PTE risk factors include male gender, normal hemoglobin/hematocrit pre-transplant (suggestive of robust native kidney erythropoietin production), renal artery stenosis, patients with a well-functioning graft, and dialysis before transplantation. Many factors play a role in the development of PTE, however, underlying endogenous erythropoietin secretion pre-and post-transplant is significant. Other contributory factors include the renin-angiotensin- aldosterone system, insulin-like growth factors, endogenous androgens, and local renal hypoxia. Most patients with PTE experience mild symptoms like malaise, headache, fatigue, and dizziness. While prior investigations showed an increased risk of thromboembolic events, more recent evidence tells a different story-that PTE perhaps has lessened risk of thromboembolic events or negative graft outcomes than previously thought. In the evaluation of PTE, it is important to exclude other causes of erythrocytosis including malignancy before treatment. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are the mainstays of treatment. Increased ACE-I/ARB use has likely contributed to the falling incidence of erythrocytosis. In this review article, we summarize the current literature in the field of post-transplant erythrocytosis after kidney transplantation.

Treatment of Chronic Active Antibody-mediated Rejection With Pulse Steroids, IVIG, With or Without Rituximab is Associated With Increased Risk of Pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: The risk of infection associated with specific treatments of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) after kidney transplantation remains unknown. METHODS: This was a single-center study of kidney transplant recipients treated with pulse steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) ± rituximab for biopsy-confirmed cAMR. The control group consisted of age- and race-matched patients who underwent donor-specific antibody-based protocol biopsies but had no rejection. We collected data on BK virus (BKV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), urinary tract infection (UTI), and pneumonia postbiopsy. RESULTS: There were 49 patients in each group. In those with cAMR, 21 (43%) were treated with steroids, IVIG, and rituximab; the remaining received steroids and IVIG only. The risk of graft failure was greater in the cAMR group [22 (45%) vs. 3 (6%), P < 0.001]. Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated a significantly greater risk of pneumonia in the cAMR group (P = 0.02). This was confirmed by multivariable Cox regression analyses [Hazard ratio (HR) = 6.04, P = 0.027, 95% CI, 1.22-29.75]. None of the patients with pneumonia were affected by opportunistic pathogens. Additionally, the risk of CMV, UTI, and BKV was not increased. Rituximab was not independently associated with any of the infections studied. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of cAMR, but not rituximab, was associated with a 6-fold increased risk of pneumonia. Additional studies are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis and monitoring strategies, including for hypogammaglobulinemia, to reduce the risk of pneumonia following the treatment of cAMR.