Is the Direct Anterior Approach to THA Cost-effective? A Markov Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of the direct anterior approach, a muscle-sparing technique for THA, has increased over the years; however, this approach is associated with longer procedure times and a more expensive direct cost. Furthermore, studies have shown a higher revision rate in the early stages of the learning curve. Whether the clinical advantages of the direct anterior compared with the posterior approach-such as less soft tissue damage, decreased short-term postoperative pain, a lower dislocation rate, decreased length of stay in the hospital, and higher likelihood of being discharged home-outweigh the higher cost is still debatable. Determining the cost-effectiveness of the approach may inform its utility and justify its use at various stages of the learning curve. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We used a Markov modeling approach to ask: (1) Is the direct anterior approach more likely to be a cost-effective approach than the posterior approach over the long-term for more experienced or higher volume hip surgeons? (2) How many procedures does a surgeon need to perform for the direct anterior approach to be a cost-effective choice? METHODS: A Markov model was created with three health states (well-functioning THA, revision THA, and death) to compare the cost-effectiveness of the direct anterior approach with that of the posterior approach in five scenarios: surgeons who performed one to 15, 16 to 30, 31 to 50, 51 to 100, and more than 100 direct anterior THAs during a 6-year span. Procedure costs (not charges), dislocation costs, and fracture costs were derived from published reports, and model was run using two different cost differentials between the direct anterior and posterior approaches (USD 219 and USD 1800, respectively). The lower cost was calculated as the total cost differential minus pharmaceutical and implant costs to account for differences in implant use and physician preference regarding postoperative pain management. The USD 1800 cost differential incorporated pharmaceutical and implant costs. Probabilities were derived from systematic review of the evidence as well as from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Utilities were estimated from best available literature and disutilities associated with dislocation and fracture were incorporated into the model. Quality of life was expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), which are calculated by multiplying the utility of a health state (ranging from 0 to 1) by the duration of time in that health state. The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, or the change in costs divided by the change in QALYs when the direct anterior approach was used for THA. USD 100,000 per quality-adjusted life years was used as a threshold for willingness to pay. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed for the scenario in which the direct anterior approach is cost-effective to further account for uncertainty in model inputs. RESULTS: At a cost differential of USD 219 (95% CI 175 to 263), the direct anterior approach was associated with lower cost and higher effectiveness compared with the posterior approach for surgeons with an experience level of more than 100 operations during a 6-year span. At a cost differential of USD 1800 (95% CI 1440 to 2160), the direct anterior approach remained a cost-effective strategy for surgeons who performed more than 100 operations. At both cost differentials, the direct anterior approach was not cost-effective for surgeons who performed fewer than 100 operations. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed the model to be the most sensitive to fluctuations in the utility of revision THA, probability of revision after the posterior approach THA, probability of dislocation after the posterior approach THA, fluctuations in the probability of dislocation after direct anterior THA, cost of direct anterior THA, and probability of intraoperative fracture with the direct anterior approach. At the cost differential of USD 219 and for surgeons with a surgical experience level of more than 100 direct anterior operations, the direct anterior approach was still the cost-effective strategy for the entire range of values. CONCLUSION: For high-volume hip surgeons, defined here as surgeons who perform more than 100 procedures during a 6-year span, the direct anterior approach may be a cost-effective strategy within the limitations imposed by our analysis. For lower volume hip surgeons, performing a more familiar approach appears to be more cost-effective.

Proximal humeral fracture-dislocations: which patterns can be reduced in the emergency department?

BACKGROUND: Shoulder fracture-dislocations can represent a challenging management scenario in the emergency department (ED) because of concern for the presence of occult fractures that may displace during a reduction attempt. The alternative, a closed reduction attempt in the operating room, has the benefit of full paralysis but requires additional resource utilization. There is limited guidance in the literature about the risks of an initial reduction attempt in the ED as a function of fracture pattern to help guide physicians with this decision. METHODS: This was a retrospective case review of adult patients with shoulder dislocations and fracture-dislocations seen in the ED at a level 1 trauma center over a 10-year period. Imaging and medical records were reviewed to evaluate whether the reduction attempt was successful, unsuccessful without worsening, or unsuccessful with worsening alignment of any fractures, as well as the ultimate clinical outcome. RESULTS: We identified 165 patients with fracture-dislocations and 484 patients with simple dislocations during the same period. Of the patients with fracture-dislocations, 103 had greater tuberosity fractures, 12 had nondisplaced surgical neck fractures, and 50 had displaced surgical neck fractures. None of the patients with simple dislocations had displacement during an ED reduction attempt, including 100 patients aged >65 years. Of the 103 patients with greater tuberosity fracture-dislocations, only 1 had displacement of a humeral shaft fracture during ED reduction. Displacement occurred in 6 of 8 patients with nondisplaced neck fractures who underwent an initial ED reduction attempt vs. 1 of 4 patients who underwent the initial reduction attempt in the operating room. ED reduction was attempted in 25 of the 50 displaced humeral neck fracture-dislocations and was successful in 10 of these (40%). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with greater tuberosity fracture-dislocations, there is a low rate of displacement with a reduction attempt in the ED, but an ED reduction attempt in nondisplaced neck fractures is not recommended because of the high rate of displacement. For displaced neck fractures, closed reduction can be successful in select patients. Finally, these data confirm prior reports that closed reduction of simple shoulder dislocations in patients aged >65 years is safe in the ED.

A novel treatment for prevention of post-traumatic elbow stiffness using onaBotulinum toxin type A: a prospective placebo controlled randomized trial.

Approximately 30% of all upper extremity fractures are elbow fractures which may result elbow stiffness. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of onaBotulinum Toxin type A injection to prevent post-traumatic pain and elbow-stiffness. All patients were included who presented to a single surgeon with supracondylar/ intraarticular distal humerus fractures, proximal ulna and radius fractures. The study was developed in a randomized placebo controlled study between 2003-2007. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score as well as the arc-of-motion (AOM) were assessed after three, six, twelve-months and final follow up for evaluation. Of the 31-patients included, 15-patients (48.4%) received Botox injections. In all patients no complication was observed when injecting a dosage 100-units for the brachialis and biceps brachii muscles. Furthermore, it was an effective method to prevent post-traumatic elbow stiffness, lasting six- months. Significant differences in DASH, VAS-score and ROM after three-months between the Botox and control group (DASH 21.6±11.0 vs. 55.3±11.0 ; VAS 1.2±5.2 vs. 5.7±21.9 ; ROM 103±7.6 vs. 73±6.3 ; p>0.05) were identified in the prospective group. Botulinum toxin is a safe, reliable and effective treatment to prevent post-traumatic elbow stiffness. Our study demonstrates improved early range-of- motion (p<0.05), better extension after 6 weeks and improved functional outcome including VAS and DASH score (p<0.05).

Creation of an Online Wiki Improves Post-Operative Surgical Protocol Adherence in Arthroplasty Patients.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative care pathways are tools used in high-volume clinical settings to standardize care, reduce variability, and improve outcomes. However, the mechanism by which the information is transmitted to other caregivers is often inconsistent and error-prone. At our institution, we developed an online, user-editable ("wiki") database to communicate post-operative protocols. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the hypothesis that implementation of the wiki would improve protocol adherence and reduce unintentional deviations inpatient care. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent primary lower extremity arthroplasty at our institution during three 6-month time periods including immediately before, 6 months after, and 2 years following introduction of the wiki. Adherence to defined perioperative care pathways (laboratory studies, post-operative imaging, perioperative antibiotics, and inpatient pain medications) was compared between the groups. RESULTS: After wiki implementation, adherence to protocols improved significantly for laboratory orders (P < .0001), imaging (P < .001), pain control regimen (P = .03), and overall protocol adherence (P < .001). Improvements were seen in some areas almost immediately, while others did not show improvements until 2 years after implementation. Costs associated with unnecessary testing were reduced by 82%. CONCLUSION: Development of an online wiki for tracking post-operative protocols improves care pathway adherence and reduces variability in care while lowering costs associated with unnecessary testing, although some benefits may not be immediately realized. Several practical barriers to implementing the wiki are also discussed, along with proposed solutions.

Dedicated Perioperative Hip Fracture Comanagement Programs are Cost-effective in High-volume Centers: An Economic Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic hip fractures are common injuries typically occurring in patients who are older and medically frail. Studies have suggested that creation of a multidisciplinary team including orthopaedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, social workers, and specialized physical therapists, to comanage these patients can decrease complication rates, improve time to surgery, and reduce hospital length of stay; however, they have yet to achieve widespread implementation, partly owing to concerns regarding resource requirements necessary for a comanagement program. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We performed an economic analysis to determine whether implementation of a comanagement model of care for geriatric patients with osteoporotic hip fractures would be a cost-effective intervention at hospitals with moderate volume. We also calculated what annual volume of cases would be needed for a comanagement program to "break even", and finally we evaluated whether universal or risk-stratified comanagement was more cost effective. METHODS: Decision analysis techniques were used to model the effect of implementing a systems-based strategy to improve inpatient perioperative care. Costs were obtained from best-available literature and included salary to support personnel and resources to expedite time to the operating room. The major economic benefit was decreased initial hospital length of stay, which was determined via literature review and meta-analysis, and a health benefit was improvement in perioperative mortality owing to expedited preoperative evaluation based on previously conducted meta-analyses. A break-even analysis was conducted to determine the annual case volume necessary for comanagement to be either (1) cost effective (improve health-related quality of life enough to be worth additional expenses) or (2) result in cost savings (actually result in decreased total expenses). This calculation assumed the scenario in which a hospital could hire only one hospitalist (and therapist and social worker) on a full-time basis. Additionally, we evaluated the scenario where the necessary staff was already employed at the hospital and could be dedicated to a comanagement service on a part-time basis, and explored the effect of triaging only patients considered high risk to a comanagement service versus comanaging all geriatric patients. Finally, probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted on all critical variables, with broad ranges used for values around which there was higher uncertainty. RESULTS: For the base case, universal comanagement was more cost effective than traditional care and risk-stratified comanagement (incremental cost effectiveness ratios of USD 41,100 per quality-adjusted life-year and USD 81,900 per quality-adjusted life-year, respectively). Comanagement was more cost effective than traditional management as long as the case volume was more than 54 patients annually (range, 41-68 patients based on sensitivity analysis) and resulted in cost savings when there were more than 318 patients annually (range, 238-397 patients). In a scenario where staff could be partially dedicated to a comanagement service, universal comanagement was more cost effective than risk-stratified comanagement (incremental cost effectiveness of USD 2300 per quality-adjusted life-year), and both comanagement programs had lower costs and better outcomes compared with traditional management. Sensitivity analysis was conducted and showed that the level of uncertainty in key variables was not high enough to change the core conclusions of the model. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a systems-based comanagement strategy using a dedicated team to improve perioperative medical care and expedite preoperative evaluation is cost effective in hospitals with moderate volume and can result in cost savings at higher-volume centers. The optimum patient population for a comanagement strategy is still being defined. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1, Economic and Decision Analysis.

Revision Arthroscopic Repair Versus Latarjet Procedure in Patients With Recurrent Instability After Initial Repair Attempt: A Cost-Effectiveness Model.

PURPOSE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic revision instability repair and Latarjet procedure in treating patients with recurrent instability after initial arthroscopic instability repair. METHODS: An expected-value decision analysis of revision arthroscopic instability repair compared with Latarjet procedure for recurrent instability followed by failed repair attempt was modeled. Inputs regarding procedure cost, clinical outcomes, and health utilities were derived from the literature. RESULTS: Compared with revision arthroscopic repair, Latarjet was less expensive ($13,672 v $15,287) with improved clinical outcomes (43.78 v 36.76 quality-adjusted life-years). Both arthroscopic repair and Latarjet were cost-effective compared with nonoperative treatment (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of 3,082 and 1,141, respectively). Results from sensitivity analyses indicate that under scenarios of high rates of stability postoperatively, along with improved clinical outcome scores, revision arthroscopic repair becomes increasingly cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Latarjet procedure for failed instability repair is a cost-effective treatment option, with lower costs and improved clinical outcomes compared with revision arthroscopic instability repair. However, surgeons must still incorporate clinical judgment into treatment algorithm formation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, expected value decision analysis.

Cost-Effectiveness of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair for Symptomatic Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

PURPOSE: To compare the cost-effectiveness within the United States health care system of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with symptomatic large and massive rotator cuff tears without cuff-tear arthropathy. METHODS: An expected-value decision analysis was constructed comparing the costs and outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for large and massive rotator cuff tears (and excluding cases of cuff-tear arthropathy). Comprehensive literature search provided input data to extrapolate costs and health utility states for these outcomes. The primary outcome assessed was that of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus rotator cuff repair. RESULTS: For the base case, both arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and reverse total shoulder were superior to nonoperative care, with an ICER of $15,500/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and $37,400/QALY, respectively. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was dominant over primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, with lower costs and slightly improved clinical outcomes. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was the preferred strategy as long as the lifetime progression rate from retear to end-stage cuff-tear arthropathy was less than 89%. However, when the model was modified to account for worse outcomes when reverse shoulder arthroplasty was performed after a failed attempted rotator cuff repair, primary reverse total shoulder had superior outcomes with an ICER of $90,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair-despite high rates of tendon retearing-for patients with large and massive rotator cuff tears may be a more cost-effective initial treatment strategy when compared with primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and when assuming no detrimental impact of previous surgery on outcomes after arthroplasty. Clinical judgment should still be prioritized when formulating treatment plans for these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, economic decision analysis.

What Are the Strength of Recommendations and Methodologic Reporting in Health Economic Studies in Orthopaedic Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Cost-effectiveness research is an increasingly used tool in evaluating treatments in orthopaedic surgery. Without high-quality primary-source data, the results of a cost-effectiveness study are either unreliable or heavily dependent on sensitivity analyses of the findings from the source studies. However, to our knowledge, the strength of recommendations provided by these studies in orthopaedics has not been studied. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) What are the strengths of recommendations in recent orthopaedic cost-effectiveness studies? (2) What are the reasons authors cite for weak recommendations? (3) What are the methodologic reporting practices used by these studies? METHODS: The titles of all articles published in six different orthopaedic journals from January 1, 2004, through April 1, 2014, were scanned for original health economics studies comparing two different types of treatment or intervention. The full texts of included studies were reviewed to determine the strength of recommendations determined subjectively by our study team, with studies providing equivocal conclusions stemming from a lack or uncertainty surrounding key primary data classified as weak and those with definitive conclusions not lacking in high-quality primary data classified as strong. The reasons underlying a weak designation were noted, and methodologic practices reported in each of the studies were examined using a validated instrument. A total of 79 articles met our prespecified inclusion criteria and were evaluated in depth. RESULTS: Of the articles included, 50 (63%) provided strong recommendations, whereas 29 (37%) provided weak recommendations. Of the 29 studies, clinical outcomes data were cited in 26 references as being insufficient to provide definitive conclusions, whereas cost and utility data were cited in 13 and seven articles, respectively. Methodologic reporting practices varied greatly, with mixed adherence to framing, costs, and results reporting. The framing variables included clearly defined intervention, adequate description of a comparator, study perspective clearly stated, and reported discount rate for future costs and quality-adjusted life years. Reporting costs variables included economic data collected alongside a clinical trial or another primary source and clear statement of the year of monetary units. Finally, results reporting included whether a sensitivity analysis was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Given that a considerable portion of orthopaedic cost-effectiveness studies provide weak recommendations and that methodologic reporting practices varied greatly among strong and weak studies, we believe that clinicians should exercise great caution when considering the conclusions of cost-effectiveness studies. Future research could assess the effect of such cost-effectiveness studies in clinical practice, and whether the strength of recommendations of a study's conclusions has any effect on practice patterns. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Given the increasing use of cost-effectiveness studies in orthopaedic surgery, understanding the quality of these studies and the reasons that limit the ability of studies to provide more definitive recommendations is critical. Highlighting the heterogeneity of methodologic reporting practices will aid clinicians in interpreting the conclusions of cost-effectiveness studies and improve future research efforts.

Widespread Implementation of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Instability Maintains Functional Outcomes at Midterm to Long-Term Follow-up While Decreasing Complication Rates: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Our primary purpose was to evaluate whether complications have increased or functional outcomes have changed as medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has been adopted by more surgeons at more institutions over recent years. Our secondary purpose was to further define the complication profile of MPFL reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed on January 12, 2014, using the keywords "medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction," "patellar instability reconstruction," "patellofemoral ligament reconstruction," and "MPFL." Articles meeting our inclusion criteria were reviewed. Outcome measures, functional failures, complications, graft choice, and surgical technique were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-four articles met our exclusion and inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Nineteen articles were "new" additions to the literature, whereas 15 had previously been reported on in prior analyses ("old"). The 19 new articles reported a statistically significant decrease in functional failure rates, from 9.55% in older studies to 4.77% in more recent studies (P < .001). The major complication rate dropped from 2.01% to 0.46% in the newer studies (P = .005), and the minor complication rate decreased from 6.53% to 4.00% (P = .06). Postoperative Kujala scores did not show a statistically significant change between newer and older publications (89.0 [SD, 3.7] and 89.4 [SD, 4.9], respectively; P = .55). Comparing results by fixation type, as well as by graft choice, showed no statistically significant differences in terms of outcomes or complication profile. CONCLUSIONS: With nearly twice the number of medical centers performing reconstruction of the MPFL and outcomes reported on nearly double the number of patients in recent years, functional outcomes remain favorable as complication and failure profiles are improving. Furthermore, despite a wide array of fixation techniques, as well as multiple options for graft constructs, there are no statistically or clinically significant differences in functional outcomes over time. This finding highlights the efficacy and adoptability of MPFL reconstruction for the treatment of recurrent patellar instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of mixed-level studies.

Arthroscopic assessment of medial malleolar reduction.

INTRODUCTION: Ankle fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation are fixed in an effort to reestablish anatomic bony alignment and avoid a malunion, thereby diminishing the risk of post-traumatic arthritis. For a medial malleolar fracture, an articular step-off is likely more related to the risk of post-traumatic arthritis than is a cortical step-off. However, the external cortical alignment is often used to judge the adequacy of reduction, as the articular component of the fracture is not as readily visualized. Arthroscopy has been used in various articular fractures as an aid to diagnosis and treatment. The current study prospectively assessed both the quality of medial malleolar reduction on the articular side using arthroscopy and the adequacy of using cortical cues to guide the articular reduction. METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective diagnostic study. All patients had medial malleolar fractures that required fixation. The outcome variables of interest were extra-articular fracture displacement and articular surface displacement. RESULTS: After reduction and provisional fixation, 10 of the 12 patients had an anatomic reduction based on cortical cues. On arthroscopy 7 of the 12 patients had an anatomic reduction. Four of the patients had a slight gap (<1 mm) at the anterior edge of the fracture. The last patient had an anterior gap just under 2 mm. Two patients had impaction of the medial malleolus that made reduction difficult and was recognized during arthroscopy after obtaining a reduction based on cortical cues. CONCLUSION: The cortical reduction of the medial malleolus often matched up with the articular reduction. However, in some patients, impaction of the medial malleolus made it so that the two did not match up. There are some cases in which extra-articular cues are insufficient to evaluate for intra-articular reduction.

What interventions add value in lateral compression type 1 fragility pelvis fractures? A retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: Fragility fractures are a large source of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Orthopaedic surgeons are regularly the main point of contact in patients with lateral compression type 1 pelvis fractures, despite many of these being treated non-operatively. This study aims to identify risk factors for mortality and elucidate which follow-up visits have the potential to improve care for these patients. Methods and materials: In all, 211 patients have been identified with fragility lateral compression type 1 fractures at a level 1 trauma centre over a 5-year period. For all patients, we recorded patient demographics, imaging data, hospital readmissions, medical complications and death dates if applicable. Results: Of the 211 patients identified, 56.4% had at least one orthopaedic follow-up, of which no patient had a clinically meaningful medical intervention initiated. 30-day readmission rate was 19%, and 1-year mortality was 24%. Male sex, need for an assist device, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index and increased age were found to be statistically associated with increased risk of mortality. Patients who followed up with their primary care physician were found to have a statistically lower risk of mortality. Computed tomography scans were obtained in 70% of patients and never limited patient weight-bearing status or found any additional injury not already identified on the radiograph. Discussion/Conclusions: For patients with lateral compression type 1 type fragility fractures, orthopaedic surgeons did not offer additional clinically meaningful intervention after the time of initial diagnosis in this patient cohort. The rate of clinical follow-up with a primary care physician is relatively low despite high rates of medical comorbidity. Computed tomography scans were utilised frequently but did not change recommendations. The high rate of medical complications and lack of orthopaedic intervention suggest that we should re-evaluate the role of the orthopaedic surgeon versus the primary care physician as the primary point of medical contact for patients with these injuries.

Determination of the Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability of Fusion Assessment in First Tarsometatarsal Joint Arthrodesis Using CT Scan: An Observational Study.

Background: First tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis is a common procedure performed by podiatrists and orthopedic surgeons. There remains debate on how useful CT scans are in assessing fusion status in the post-operative patient. The purpose of our study was to determine the reliability among both orthopedic surgeons and radiologists in reviewing both postoperative radiographs and CT in order to determine if fusion had occurred in patients undergoing 1st tarsometatarsal arthrodesis. A secondary purpose of this study was to determine if CT offered improved inter- and intra-rater reliability when compared to plain radiographs. Methods: Patients who underwent 1st tarsometatarsal arthrodesis were retrospectively reviewed and those who underwent CT post-operatively for persistent pain were identified. Orthopedic surgeons and radiologists then analyzed the radiographs and CT of these patients for union with a threshold for union being set at 50% of the joint being fused. Imaging was then re-evaluated by the same provider 6 months later. Results: 24 patients were identified meeting inclusion criteria. Inter-rater reliability and intra-rater reliability for assessment of 1st tarsometatarsal arthrodesis were better with CT compared to radiographs; however, this association was not deemed reliable. Both imaging modalities were not able to assess union status confidently and reliably across reviewers, although CT scan had better intra-rater reliability. Conclusions: While CT is frequently used to assess fusion in patients who have underwent 1st tarsometatarsal arthrodesis, it was not found to be better than radiographs. Practitioners should reconsider the use CT as the gold standard when assessing fusion in this population.

Effect of capitate morphology on contact biomechanics after proximal row carpectomy.

PURPOSE: Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is used as a treatment for a variety of wrist pathologies to maintain motion and to improve strength and decrease pain. Several studies have looked at how PRC alters wrist characteristics, although they did not provide an explanation for the variability observed in outcomes. Studies have classified the capitate into 3 unique types: round, V-shaped, or flat. We hypothesized that these differences in morphology could affect the contact biomechanics between the radius and the capitate after PRC. METHODS: A total of 14 cadaveric wrists underwent PRC. They were classified by capitate morphology and then loaded to 200 N in a neutral position, flexion, and extension. We measured contact area, contact pressure, and location using pressure-sensitive film in all 3 positions and compared their morphology types. RESULTS: Nine wrists had a round-type capitate, 4 had a V-shaped capitate, and 1 had a flat capitate, which we excluded from statistical analysis. Comparing round and V-shaped types, we found no differences in contact area, pressure, or location in any wrist position For the V-shaped capitates, there was increased contact pressure in flexion and extension compared with the wrist in neutral. Center of pressure translated dorsal and radial in flexion to volar and ulnar in extension for all types. CONCLUSIONS: When we compared V-shaped and round-type capitates, we found no significant differences in contact characteristics of the wrist after PRC. There were some differences in contact pressure for V-shaped capitates in various wrist positions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Differences between round and V-shaped capitates do not appear to affect contact biomechanics after PRC. Thus, these 2 capitate shapes may not necessarily be a factor in the decision-making process to perform PRC.

"Nailable" Does Not Always Mean Reducible in Distal Femur Fractures: Arthroplasty Component and Nail Design Matter.

Distal femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are challenging. These fractures can be fixed with a retrograde intramedullary nail (rIMN), but the design of the femoral component of the TKA influences the starting point for an rIMN. We performed a biomechanical study to evaluate how different TKA components influence the starting point for an rIMN and how that can lead to a deformity in the sagittal plane. We simulated a distal femur fracture with three different arthroplasty components. We used three different implants to simulate fracture reduction and measured the resultant sagittal plane deformity. Low and moderate femoral component ratio (FCR) design components were able to maintain fracture alignment within 5° of anatomic. High FCR component (more posterior starting point) sagittal plane deformities of up to 15° were observed with both the straight and medium Herzog bend nails, which was statistically significant (P<.001). Use of a high Herzog bend nail decreased the deformity by an average of 6°, which was statistically significant (P<.001). There is variability in how the TKA design affects the starting point and thus the sagittal plane alignment after fixation. This study helps quantify the effect of arthroplasty component design on fracture alignment. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(1):35-38.].

Which pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures are high risk for conversion to open reduction?

Supracondylar humerus fractures are common pediatric injuries encountered by orthopedic surgeons. Displaced fractures are treated operatively with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or open reduction of injuries that cannot be adequately closed reduced. The purpose of this study is to identify preoperative injury characteristics associated with open reduction. Retrospective chart review was performed on all AO type 13A (Gartland type) supracondylar humerus fractures in patients 2-13 years old treated surgically at a single level 1 trauma center over 6 years. Preoperative demographics and radiographic parameters were obtained for all patients. Primary outcomes were closed reduction or conversion to open reduction of fractures prior to k-wire fixation. Initial bivariate analysis was done using Chi-square tests. Final multivariate analysis with Bonferonni correction was performed using a backward, stepwise regression model including potential predictor variables identified in the bivariate analysis. A total of 211 patients received surgical treatment and 18 of those patients (8.5%) failed closed reduction and underwent open reduction. Final multivariate analysis demonstrated that only flexion type [relative risk (RR), 10.2] and coronal displacement more than 7 mm (RR, 4.49) were significant preoperative factors for conversion to open reduction. Patients with significant coronal displacement and flexion-type injuries are markers of challenging reduction and are at high risk for conversion to open reduction.

The effects of pain, supination, and grip strength on patient-rated disability after operatively treated distal radius fractures.

PURPOSE: The correlation between physician-observed parameters and patient-rated disability in distal radius fractures is complex and poorly understood. Anecdotal clinical experience suggests that supination is an important factor in the return of functional status after distal radius fracture. To explore this relationship, we conducted a retrospective multivariate linear regression analysis of an existing patient database to evaluate the hypothesis that range of motion and other objective parameters are important determinants of patient-rated disability. METHODS: We analyzed a prospectively gathered registry of patients undergoing operative fixation of distal radius fractures using physical examination parameters measured at each follow-up visit and patient-based outcomes including Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and visual analog scale for pain. We constructed a multivariate linear regression model to evaluate the association of range of motion, grip strength, and visual analog scale score with the DASH score. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 190 patients and 611 total clinic visits. Pain, grip strength, and supination were significantly correlated with DASH scores, controlling for all other factors. These 3 variables were able to predict 56% of the variability of the DASH score. Flexion-extension, radial-ulnar deviation, and pronation had no significant correlation to DASH score. CONCLUSIONS: Pain, strength, and supination appear to be important determinants of patient-rated outcomes after distal radius fracture. Pain and strength continuously improve over time up to 2 years after surgery, whereas supination plateaus more quickly, usually within the first 3 to 6 months. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.

Can Lateral X-Rays Reliably Determine Which Posterior Malleolus Ankle Fractures Need a CT?

BACKGROUND: For rotational ankle fractures with a posterior malleolus fracture (PMF), the decision to further evaluate the ankle injury with computed tomography (CT) is challenging. The objective of this study is to determine how well PMF fracture size on x-rays correlates with size on CT, and how well x-rays can predict which patients receive PMF fixation after CT review. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of adult ankle fractures with PMFs that had preoperative radiographs and CT imaging over a 5-year period. PMF x-ray and CT measurements were recorded, and relationships between x-ray measurements and final PMF fixation plan after CT review were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients were identified with both x-rays and preoperative CT imaging. Pearson's rank correlation demonstrated a strong relation between PMF width percentage measured on x-ray and CT (r = 0.724). Of the 45 patients with a PMF size under 20% on x-ray, only one patient (with an apparent incarcerated fragment) underwent PMF fixation after review of the CT. CONCLUSIONS: PMF width on lateral x-ray correlates well with CT size and is sensitive for predicting the need for dedicated posterior malleolus based on one institutional practice pattern. Below 20% fracture width on lateral x-ray, a dedicated CT rarely leads to a decision to perform PMF fixation. Limiting pre-operative CT to those with PMF width >20% could reduce CT utilization by as much as 45% without negatively affecting patient care. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Diagnostic.

What Is the Rate of Displacement of Occult Posterior Malleolus Fractures in Nailed Tibial Shaft Fractures?

OBJECTIVE: To describe the radiographic consequences of posterior malleolus fractures (PMF) present with tibial shaft fractures fixed with intramedullary nails. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred thirty-three patients with tibial shaft fractures. INTERVENTION: Intramedullary nail fixation and prophylactic articular fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Displacement of PMF with intramedullary nail insertion. RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty-three patients were identified with tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nail fixation at a Level 1 trauma center without a uniform preoperative computed tomography protocol. One hundred thirty-three patients had an identifiable PMF appreciated on preoperative imaging. Of the 600 remaining patients without a known PMF, 29 had PMF identified after nail insertion: 24 patients with nondisplaced fractures that all healed radiographically at final follow-up, 3 patients had fractures <30% of the articular surface displaced 1-2 mm, and 2 patients had fractures >30% of the joint surface that displaced 1-2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of radiographically observable PMF associated with tibial shaft fractures is high, even without a preoperative computed tomography screening protocol in place. In patients without an appreciable PMF on injury films, less than 1% (2/600) had displacement of a large, clinically significant PMF with nail placement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Nonoperative Treatment of Select Lateral Compression Type II Pelvic Ring Injuries (OTA/AO 61B2.2) Results in a Low Rate of Radiographic Displacement.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify radiographic outcomes and to identify predictors of late displacement in the nonoperative treatment of lateral compression type II (LC-2) pelvic ring injuries. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Two Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Thirty eight patients 18 years of age or older with LC-2 pelvic ring injuries were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Nonoperative treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Crescent fracture displacement (CFD) was measured on initial axial computed tomography scan. Change in pelvic ring alignment was measured by the deformity index, simple ratio, and inlet and outlet ratios on successive plain radiographs. RESULTS: Patients in this study had minimally displaced LC-2 pelvic ring injuries, with median initial CFD of 2 mm and median initial deformity index of 2%. No patients had a change of more than or equal to 10 percentage points in deformity index over the treatment period, but small amounts of displacement were seen on the other ratios. No patients initially selected for nonoperative treatment converted to operative treatment. No radiographic predictors of late displacement were identified. Bilateral pubic rami fractures and the presence of a complete sacral fracture ipsilateral to the crescent fracture were not associated with late displacement. CONCLUSIONS: A spectrum of injury severity and stability exists in the LC-2 pattern. Nonoperative treatment of LC-2 injuries with low initial deformity and CFD results in minimal subsequent displacement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

High variability in patient reported outcome utilization following hip fracture: a potential barrier to value-based care.

For patients with hip fractures, outcomes can be measured by giving surveys measuring "patient rated outcome measures" (PROMs), performance based measures (PBMS), and objective medical outcomes (e.g., mortality, living situation, resource utilization). This study reviewed articles on hip fracture published in top academic journals, and found that most studies are not reliably using a single set of outcome measures including PROMs, and no single PROM or outcome battery is being used commonly. PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION: Osteoporotic hip fractures are associated with high levels of morbidity, mortality, and cost, while gains in mortality over the past 30 years have been modest. To improve care beyond simple mortality metrics requires identifying and then consistently measuring outcomes that are meaningful to patients and families. The purpose of this study was to review the top-tier hip fracture literature published in the past 30 years to determine if there are consensus outcome measures being routinely used and if the rate of reporting clinically meaningful patient-rated outcome measures is improving over time. METHODS: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis on outcome measures reported in osteoporotic hip fractures. Articles were included if they had been published over the last 30 years and were from high impact factor journals. Inclusion criteria were elderly hip fractures, therapeutic or prognostic study, unique and identifiable patients, and included follow-up beyond initial hospitalization. We analyzed study type, inclusion criteria, outcomes reported, and journal specialty orientation. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-four articles were included in the final analysis. Sixty-seven percent of the articles were therapeutic studies; 33% were prognostic studies. The average number of patients in each study was 435; the average age was 78 years. The most commonly reported outcome was mortality, and was present in 79% of studies. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in patient-reported outcome measures, with the most popular score (Harris Hip Score) reported only 14% of the time. Only 6% of articles had all components of essential core outcome sets previously defined in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the apparent advances that have been made in our ability to care for hip fractures, the overall rate of reporting outcomes beyond mortality rate remains low. This lack of consensus represents a major barrier to implementation of value-based care in this patient population.